Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no question that marriage is beyond the scope of the responsibility of the federal government. All marriage, not just gay marriage. As it stands, 30 States ban gay marriage (N. Carolina just overwhelmingly passed a law against it, wrongly in My opinion) and they have that right. This is a States Rights issue.No, they are not. I demand that I be allowed to kill college professors who hand out less than A grades. If I get a big enough political following, do you think it is right that we should be allowed to kill someone, simply because we now have political power?
Do you even know what rights are?
No one has a right to be married, and the Presidents statements on this is another clear example of why he is unfit to be President of the United States.
If he is for gay marriage, great. But if he is for gay marriage because he was pressured into it, how can anyone expect him to stand his ground with the other nations of this world? To be President, you have to believe your views of the world are right and correct and not allow people to push you off your beliefs.
:0)
Who would be stupid enough to try to get college proffesors (Professors) killed because they hand out bad grades? Went right over your head, did it?
There is an element of intellectualism that is assumed in my statement .. but if you need a graphic depiction instead .. Civil Rights only came when African-Americans were in a position to demand them. Any questions? An element of intellectualism? Are you serious? You cannot even define what a right is, let along attempt to equate your position with intellectual reasoning. When Civil rights came about, African-Americans were still not in a position to demand anything. Perhaps you should bone up on your history a bit more. Without the support of others who WERE in positions of power, the civil rights would have taken much longer than it did. However, the point is this. Simply having numbers does not give anyone the right to demand anything.
Women's rights only came when women were in a position to demand them. Again, incorrect.
Worker's rights, the right's of the disabled, gay rights .. any right achieved in this country came through demand. Again, incorrect.
If you take a look at the wall, you'll find handwriting there. :0) Yes, there is. however, it does not say what you think it does.
There is no question, no doubt that gays will be able to marry in this country and it won't matter what people who don't like it think about it.
The handwriting is on the wall. :0)
However, just because there is a large enough following for a thing, does not mean that the Constitution and other laws of this nation should just be ignored or abandoned. We are a nation of laws. Not demands.
My sister is gay, so yes. This is personal.
Where was your sorry lard ass when the democrats were picking on Cheney for having a gay daughter? hus asswipe?
When did she come out?
When did I arrive here?
Basic math is not your friend, I see.
I wasn't even politically active until 2007.
And I have ALWAYS been a supporter of GLAAD.
Where was your sorry lard ass when the democrats were picking on Cheney for having a gay daughter? hus asswipe?
When did she come out?
When did I arrive here?
Basic math is not your friend, I see.
I wasn't even politically active until 2007.
And I have ALWAYS been a supporter of GLAAD.
Don't worry, it's a typical novice mistake to pick the wrong team until you get a little more experience under your belt.
Riiiiight! That's why he approved of torture.Bush was a man of conviction.
Obama has done whatever is politically expedient his entire life.
Good greif, water boarding is not torture in the pre-911 meaing of the word.[/quote
Tell that to the Japanese commanders imprisoned or EXECUTED by us after WWII for waterboarding our people....AKA torturing our people.
But leave it to the libtards to make something that harms no one long term, takes no limbs, leaves no physical scars, to be torture.
Hell, if they were more objective they would list Biden's speeches as torture under the Geneva Convention as well.
So....has Hannity does his waterboarding for charity yet? Like he promised?
When did she come out?
When did I arrive here?
Basic math is not your friend, I see.
I wasn't even politically active until 2007.
And I have ALWAYS been a supporter of GLAAD.
Don't worry, it's a typical novice mistake to pick the wrong team until you get a little more experience under your belt.
Tell me about it. I voted for Bush twice.
I'm betting that there were at least 30 states that banned marriage between black and white PEOPLE .. and therein lies your problem. They are PEOPLE .. and they have every right to that which is granted to PEOPLE.
Don't worry, it's a typical novice mistake to pick the wrong team until you get a little more experience under your belt.
Tell me about it. I voted for Bush twice.
Let us know when you finally finish maturing and have dropped the other half of the ruling party.
Immie
No, Blacks.
The fundies have their own worries, faced with voting for a cultist.
Blacks view Obama as black. Even though he isn't.
Of couse he's black.
Is Lenny Kravitz black?
Of course he is.
Are these guys black?
Of course they are.
We aren't that confused.
When did she come out?
When did I arrive here?
Basic math is not your friend, I see.
I wasn't even politically active until 2007.
And I have ALWAYS been a supporter of GLAAD.
Don't worry, it's a typical novice mistake to pick the wrong team until you get a little more experience under your belt.
Tell me about it. I voted for Bush twice.
Herein lays your problem. No one has a right to be married. No one. Not gays, not heterosexuals. There is a reason I asked if you knew what a right is.There is no question that marriage is beyond the scope of the responsibility of the federal government. All marriage, not just gay marriage. As it stands, 30 States ban gay marriage (N. Carolina just overwhelmingly passed a law against it, wrongly in My opinion) and they have that right. This is a States Rights issue.:0)
Who would be stupid enough to try to get college proffesors (Professors) killed because they hand out bad grades? Went right over your head, did it?
There is an element of intellectualism that is assumed in my statement .. but if you need a graphic depiction instead .. Civil Rights only came when African-Americans were in a position to demand them. Any questions? An element of intellectualism? Are you serious? You cannot even define what a right is, let along attempt to equate your position with intellectual reasoning. When Civil rights came about, African-Americans were still not in a position to demand anything. Perhaps you should bone up on your history a bit more. Without the support of others who WERE in positions of power, the civil rights would have taken much longer than it did. However, the point is this. Simply having numbers does not give anyone the right to demand anything.
Women's rights only came when women were in a position to demand them. Again, incorrect.
Worker's rights, the right's of the disabled, gay rights .. any right achieved in this country came through demand. Again, incorrect.
If you take a look at the wall, you'll find handwriting there. :0) Yes, there is. however, it does not say what you think it does.
There is no question, no doubt that gays will be able to marry in this country and it won't matter what people who don't like it think about it.
The handwriting is on the wall. :0)
However, just because there is a large enough following for a thing, does not mean that the Constitution and other laws of this nation should just be ignored or abandoned. We are a nation of laws. Not demands.
The Constitution doesn't even mention marriage.
I'm betting that there were at least 30 states that banned marriage between black and white PEOPLE .. and therein lies your problem. They are PEOPLE .. and they have every right to that which is granted to PEOPLE.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Tell me about it. I voted for Bush twice.
Let us know when you finally finish maturing and have dropped the other half of the ruling party.
Immie
Given the representation at this form? Never happen. Never, ever.
The left is so amusing. Romney is unelectable because he has "flip flopped" when he changed a couple positions. Obama is sophisticated because he allows his views to evolve depending on what happens.
Blacks view Obama as black. Even though he isn't.
Of couse he's black.
Is Lenny Kravitz black?
Of course he is.
Are these guys black?
Of course they are.
We aren't that confused.
From the liberal Time magazine. Will Black Voters Punish Obama For His Support of Gay Rights? | TIME Ideas | TIME.com
Herein lays your problem. No one has a right to be married. No one. Not gays, not heterosexuals. There is a reason I asked if you knew what a right is.There is no question that marriage is beyond the scope of the responsibility of the federal government. All marriage, not just gay marriage. As it stands, 30 States ban gay marriage (N. Carolina just overwhelmingly passed a law against it, wrongly in My opinion) and they have that right. This is a States Rights issue.
However, just because there is a large enough following for a thing, does not mean that the Constitution and other laws of this nation should just be ignored or abandoned. We are a nation of laws. Not demands.
The Constitution doesn't even mention marriage.
I'm betting that there were at least 30 states that banned marriage between black and white PEOPLE .. and therein lies your problem. They are PEOPLE .. and they have every right to that which is granted to PEOPLE.
Rights cannot be qualified or licensed or modified by Government(s). In fact, rights are beyond the reach of government. That is what IS in the Constitution.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Since the power of marriage has never been delegated to the Unite States, they have no business forcing people to accept any marriage.
I'm a big believer in law. Current marriage laws are pretty much just a contract that has legal bindings and privileges. There is no reason that this country cannot move all marriage issues into contract law.
Then, if someone wants to be married, they can get a preacher to marry them. But that will have no recognition in law.
But then, I never needed the government to tell Me who I was married to.
Let us know when you finally finish maturing and have dropped the other half of the ruling party.
Immie
Given the representation at this form? Never happen. Never, ever.
What is that supposed to mean? You enjoy being a part of the intolerant left? I thought you had more respect for yourself than that!
Immie
What actions can he take under the Constitution?Now all we have to do is see if his actions back his words.
And as we've seen with Obama, you never know if that's the case.
I've asked this at least twice, but no one has answered.
Maybe you will step up?
Given the representation at this form? Never happen. Never, ever.
What is that supposed to mean? You enjoy being a part of the intolerant left? I thought you had more respect for yourself than that!
Immie
It means that from the minute I landed here and Gramps gave me my first neg rep, I have never been treated so disrespectfully on the internet by a group of people who self-label as Republicans.
I know first-hand how they treat people. It's not how I treat people, nor is it how I wish to be treated so no. I'll stick with myself and my belief system.
Everything that any citizen can legally do.Herein lays your problem. No one has a right to be married. No one. Not gays, not heterosexuals. There is a reason I asked if you knew what a right is.The Constitution doesn't even mention marriage.
I'm betting that there were at least 30 states that banned marriage between black and white PEOPLE .. and therein lies your problem. They are PEOPLE .. and they have every right to that which is granted to PEOPLE.
Rights cannot be qualified or licensed or modified by Government(s). In fact, rights are beyond the reach of government. That is what IS in the Constitution.
Since the power of marriage has never been delegated to the Unite States, they have no business forcing people to accept any marriage.The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
I'm a big believer in law. Current marriage laws are pretty much just a contract that has legal bindings and privileges. There is no reason that this country cannot move all marriage issues into contract law.
Then, if someone wants to be married, they can get a preacher to marry them. But that will have no recognition in law.
But then, I never needed the government to tell Me who I was married to.
So, tell us. What have YOU done to get government out of marriage?
