Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So I'm full of shit asking a person who talks this bull shit about defending rights, If they would also defend someones right if that person wanted to have sex with an animal?No what you're doing is hitting the civil right flavor of the month. You're on the gay band wagon because it's the in thing to do. You aren't for protecting anyone's rights if your were you would also defend the abnormal right of someone who wants to have sex with animals. I for defending rights but not those of abnormal people.
You are absolutely, totally full of shit.
Obama wants the gay peoples votes, this is why he has supported gay marriage. Its all about what obama wants and needs. Don't be fooled by this con artist......get smart. If people can't see through this muslim by now, i don't know when they ever will. Everything he does is for his own gains, not yours or anyone else's. I can read him like a book!!!!!!!!
So I'm full of shit asking a person who talks this bull shit about defending rights, If they would also defend someones right if that person wanted to have sex with an animal?No what you're doing is hitting the civil right flavor of the month. You're on the gay band wagon because it's the in thing to do. You aren't for protecting anyone's rights if your were you would also defend the abnormal right of someone who wants to have sex with animals. I for defending rights but not those of abnormal people.
You are absolutely, totally full of shit.
There are people who go to jail because their rights are not protected because they had sex with an animal
So I'm full of shit asking a person who talks this bull shit about defending rights, If they would also defend someones right if that person wanted to have sex with an animal?You are absolutely, totally full of shit.
There are people who go to jail because their rights are not protected because they had sex with an animal
You know what you just said and you sure as hell didn't "ask" anything.
But that's cool. I hope more wingnuts publicly channel Rick Santorum.
There is little or no logical basis to ban gay marriage other than religious beliefs unless you consider just plain fear and hatred of gays as a reason. With the growth of population, we certainly don't need more people. We're wrecking the environment with the ones we have and billions more are forecast. Probably the strongest reason would be changes in traditions and commonly accepted gender roles. However, that is hardly a reason to deny millions of people the right to marry the person they love.It raises an interesting question. Why is it that people in favor of gay marriage cannot seem to discuss the issue without referencing religion?
There is little or no logical basis to ban gay marriage other than religious beliefs unless you consider just plain fear and hatred of gays as a reason. With the growth of population, we certainly don't need more people. We're wrecking the environment with the ones we have and billions more are forecast. Probably the strongest reason would be changes in traditions and commonly accepted gender roles. However, that is hardly a reason to deny millions of people the right to marry the person they love.It raises an interesting question. Why is it that people in favor of gay marriage cannot seem to discuss the issue without referencing religion?
Before we deny a person the freedom of choice, we should ask ourselves, what damage would be done to society if we allowed that freedom.
So I'm full of shit asking a person who talks this bull shit about defending rights, If they would also defend someones right if that person wanted to have sex with an animal?You are absolutely, totally full of shit.
There are people who go to jail because their rights are not protected because they had sex with an animal
You know what you just said and you sure as hell didn't "ask" anything.
But that's cool. I hope more wingnuts publicly channel Rick Santorum.
Once the Nazis took power in 1933, the Nazis intensified persecution of German male homosexuals. Persecution ranged from the dissolution of homosexual organizations to internment in concentration camps. In spite of their efforts to eliminate homosexuality, it thrived in Nazi Germany. Hitler filled many key positions with known or suspected homosexualsThere is little or no logical basis to ban gay marriage other than religious beliefs unless you consider just plain fear and hatred of gays as a reason. With the growth of population, we certainly don't need more people. We're wrecking the environment with the ones we have and billions more are forecast. Probably the strongest reason would be changes in traditions and commonly accepted gender roles. However, that is hardly a reason to deny millions of people the right to marry the person they love.It raises an interesting question. Why is it that people in favor of gay marriage cannot seem to discuss the issue without referencing religion?
Before we deny a person the freedom of choice, we should ask ourselves, what damage would be done to society if we allowed that freedom.
And the forerunner of the "gay marriage bans":
At the annual party rally held in Nuremberg in 1935, the Nazis announced new laws which institutionalized many of the racial theories prevalent in Nazi ideology. The laws excluded German Jews from Reich citizenship and prohibited them from marrying or having sexual relations with persons of "German or related blood."
There is little or no logical basis to ban gay marriage other than religious beliefs unless you consider just plain fear and hatred of gays as a reason.It raises an interesting question. Why is it that people in favor of gay marriage cannot seem to discuss the issue without referencing religion?
With the growth of population, we certainly don't need more people. We're wrecking the environment with the ones we have and billions more are forecast. .
Once the Nazis took power in 1933, the Nazis intensified persecution of German male homosexuals. Persecution ranged from the dissolution of homosexual organizations to internment in concentration camps. In spite of their efforts to eliminate homosexuality, it thrived in Nazi Germany. Hitler filled many key positions with known or suspected homosexualsThere is little or no logical basis to ban gay marriage other than religious beliefs unless you consider just plain fear and hatred of gays as a reason. With the growth of population, we certainly don't need more people. We're wrecking the environment with the ones we have and billions more are forecast. Probably the strongest reason would be changes in traditions and commonly accepted gender roles. However, that is hardly a reason to deny millions of people the right to marry the person they love.
Before we deny a person the freedom of choice, we should ask ourselves, what damage would be done to society if we allowed that freedom.
And the forerunner of the "gay marriage bans":
At the annual party rally held in Nuremberg in 1935, the Nazis announced new laws which institutionalized many of the racial theories prevalent in Nazi ideology. The laws excluded German Jews from Reich citizenship and prohibited them from marrying or having sexual relations with persons of "German or related blood."
Once the Nazis took power in 1933, the Nazis intensified persecution of German male homosexuals. Persecution ranged from the dissolution of homosexual organizations to internment in concentration camps. In spite of their efforts to eliminate homosexuality, it thrived in Nazi Germany. Hitler filled many key positions with known or suspected homosexualsThere is little or no logical basis to ban gay marriage other than religious beliefs unless you consider just plain fear and hatred of gays as a reason. With the growth of population, we certainly don't need more people. We're wrecking the environment with the ones we have and billions more are forecast. Probably the strongest reason would be changes in traditions and commonly accepted gender roles. However, that is hardly a reason to deny millions of people the right to marry the person they love.
Before we deny a person the freedom of choice, we should ask ourselves, what damage would be done to society if we allowed that freedom.
And the forerunner of the "gay marriage bans":
At the annual party rally held in Nuremberg in 1935, the Nazis announced new laws which institutionalized many of the racial theories prevalent in Nazi ideology. The laws excluded German Jews from Reich citizenship and prohibited them from marrying or having sexual relations with persons of "German or related blood."
There is little or no logical basis to ban gay marriage other than religious beliefs unless you consider just plain fear and hatred of gays as a reason.It raises an interesting question. Why is it that people in favor of gay marriage cannot seem to discuss the issue without referencing religion?
Or you just consider it disgusting, filthy and harmful to the general welfare due to demographic loss.
With the growth of population, we certainly don't need more people. We're wrecking the environment with the ones we have and billions more are forecast. .
That is the biggest bunch of disproven horseshit.
How can you still buy in to that Malthusian tripe?
So I'm full of shit asking a person who talks this bull shit about defending rights, If they would also defend someones right if that person wanted to have sex with an animal?
There are people who go to jail because their rights are not protected because they had sex with an animal
You know what you just said and you sure as hell didn't "ask" anything.
But that's cool. I hope more wingnuts publicly channel Rick Santorum.
Way to spin out of that one did you hurt your back?
Why aren't people defending other rights to do anything they want to do?
Could it be that things like gay marriage is not acceptable to the majority of people? After all gay life style is not the norm it never as been if it was why aren't humans asexual?
No what you're doing is hitting the civil right flavor of the month. You're on the gay band wagon because it's the in thing to do. You aren't for protecting anyone's rights if your were you would also defend the abnormal right of someone who wants to have sex with animals. I for defending rights but not those of abnormal people.
You know what you just said and you sure as hell didn't "ask" anything.
But that's cool. I hope more wingnuts publicly channel Rick Santorum.
Way to spin out of that one did you hurt your back?
Why aren't people defending other rights to do anything they want to do?
Could it be that things like gay marriage is not acceptable to the majority of people? After all gay life style is not the norm it never as been if it was why aren't humans asexual?
What was I spinning out of? You're the one who said you were "asking" when you were clearly implying something. Let's roll the tape:
No what you're doing is hitting the civil right flavor of the month. You're on the gay band wagon because it's the in thing to do. You aren't for protecting anyone's rights if your were you would also defend the abnormal right of someone who wants to have sex with animals. I for defending rights but not those of abnormal people.
That's the old Rick Santorum man-on-dog argument and it's a bullshit strawman. I think you're smart enough to know that's what you were doing, too.
As for the rest of your post, I don't give a shit. I'm not gonna stump for legalizing gay marriage, but I don't think it's bad, either. What I'm really enjoying about this, though, is watching rightwingnuts publicly trip all over themselves trying not to sound like bigoted assholes while they're sounding just like bigoted assholes.
Once the Nazis took power in 1933, the Nazis intensified persecution of German male homosexuals. Persecution ranged from the dissolution of homosexual organizations to internment in concentration camps. In spite of their efforts to eliminate homosexuality, it thrived in Nazi Germany. Hitler filled many key positions with known or suspected homosexualsAnd the forerunner of the "gay marriage bans":
At the annual party rally held in Nuremberg in 1935, the Nazis announced new laws which institutionalized many of the racial theories prevalent in Nazi ideology. The laws excluded German Jews from Reich citizenship and prohibited them from marrying or having sexual relations with persons of "German or related blood."
Yes, but the Nuremberg laws forbade Aryan/Jewish relations as "unnatural", one of same arguments used by those against human rights for gay Americans.
Obama tells Robin Roberts of ABC.
Who cares of what Obama approves? Who appointed him God?
It's not just that....We've finally cut to the nut of the matter here...Maybe those fucked up laws need to be fixed, instead of adding more fucked up laws.when you inherit from your spouse, you are exempt from estate taxes. that can't be fixed by contract.
when you are married and get divorced after 10 or more years, you are entitled to 1/2 of your spouse's social security benefits. that cannot be fixed by contract.
that's just off the top of my head.
but more importantly separate but equal is not equal.
In the end, it's not about rights but privileges and benefits extended by third parties.
It's the star-belly Sneeches come to life.
Changing your opinion has everything to do with intelligence.I think he changed his mind. You know people do that, particular those with any intelligence.
First of all, I said nothing about a flip-flop, so back off on that insinuation.
It has nothing to do with intelligence unless you are talking about the intelligence of people that can see through the pandering for votes.
He's pandering, that was my point also.Changing your opinion has everything to do with intelligence.First of all, I said nothing about a flip-flop, so back off on that insinuation.
It has nothing to do with intelligence unless you are talking about the intelligence of people that can see through the pandering for votes.
Question is, did he really change his mind or is he only pandering to the base.
I don't think he changed his mind. I pointed out a youtube video earlier where he stated that he believed marriage was between a man and a woman but that he felt that a homosexual couple should be allowed marry.
He hasn't changed his mind at all. In fact, the quote that started this OP doesn't really state anything different than what he stated in the past. I'd say, he's pandering.
Immie
