Obama Blames Intel? How Come That Wasn't Okay For Bush????

teapartysamurai

Gold Member
Mar 27, 2010
20,056
2,562
290
When all the Intel from British to the CIA insisted that Hussein had WMD that wasn't okay for Bush. Noooooooooo Bush LIED. It wasn't bad intel, it was just that Bush made them all uniformly say Hussein had WMD.

Remember when Obama and the liberals said intel wasn't an excuse for Bush???? I sure do!!!!

BUT NOW! As usual, IT'S ONLY OKAY TO DO IT WHEN YOU ARE LIBERAL!

So, now Obama is blaming bad intel, and watch all the same liberals who said Bush lied, give Obama a free pass.

THAT'S RIGHT LIBERALS! EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU THAT SAID BUSH LIED HAS NOW BECOME A HYPOCRITE IF YOU BUY OBAMA'S EXCUSE???

I expect you to go silent. But I would love you guys trying to twist yourselves into pretzels trying to explain to us how "Bush lied" but Obama just had "bad intel."

BWAHAHAHAHAH! FREAKING HYPOCRITES!

Obama Called ISIS 'JV' But Blames Intel Community for Underestimating Them ...
President Obama acknowledged Sunday that U.S. intelligence officials "underestimated" the threat posed by the Islamic State and overestimated the Iraqi army’s capacity to defeat the militant group.

The president said in an wide-ranging interview on CBS' “60 Minutes” that the Islamic State militants went "underground" after being squashed in Iraq and regrouped under the cover of the Syrian civil war.

"During the chaos of the Syrian civil war, where essentially you have huge swaths of the country that are completely ungoverned, they were able to reconstitute themselves and take advantage of that chaos," Obama said.

The president said his director of national intelligence, James Clapper, has acknowledged that the U.S. "underestimated what had been taking place in Syria.” He also said it was "absolutely true" that the U.S. overestimated the ability and will of the Iraqi army.

However, Obama also acknowledged that the U.S. is dealing with a conundrum in Syria, as the U.S.-led military campaign against the Islamic State is helping Syrian President Bashar Assad, whom the U.N. has accused of war crimes.

"I recognize the contradiction in a contradictory land and a contradictory circumstance," Obama said. "We are not going to stabilize Syria under the rule of Assad," whose government has committed "terrible atrocities."

Obama Called ISIS JV But Blames Intel Community for Underestimating Them ... - Fox Nation

Nope, nope, nope. If we go by the same standard, Obama had to have LIED about the ISIS threat, he couldn't have had bad intel.

You can't have it both ways, libs!

Cue the crickets as a black hole of silence envelops this story.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
When all the Intel from British to the CIA insisted that Hussein had WMD that wasn't okay for Bush. Noooooooooo Bush LIED. It wasn't bad intel, it was just that Bush made them all uniformly say Hussein had WMD.

Remember when Obama and the liberals said intel wasn't an excuse for Bush???? I sure do!!!!

BUT NOW! As usual, IT'S ONLY OKAY TO DO IT WHEN YOU ARE LIBERAL!

So, now Obama is blaming bad intel, and watch all the same liberals who said Bush lied, give Obama a free pass.

THAT'S RIGHT LIBERALS! EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU THAT SAID BUSH LIED HAS NOW BECOME A HYPOCRITE IF YOU BUY OBAMA'S EXCUSE???

I expect you to go silent. But I would love you guys trying to twist yourselves into pretzels trying to explain to us how "Bush lied" but Obama just had "bad intel."

BWAHAHAHAHAH! FREAKING HYPOCRITES!

Obama Called ISIS 'JV' But Blames Intel Community for Underestimating Them ...
President Obama acknowledged Sunday that U.S. intelligence officials "underestimated" the threat posed by the Islamic State and overestimated the Iraqi army’s capacity to defeat the militant group.

The president said in an wide-ranging interview on CBS' “60 Minutes” that the Islamic State militants went "underground" after being squashed in Iraq and regrouped under the cover of the Syrian civil war.

"During the chaos of the Syrian civil war, where essentially you have huge swaths of the country that are completely ungoverned, they were able to reconstitute themselves and take advantage of that chaos," Obama said.

The president said his director of national intelligence, James Clapper, has acknowledged that the U.S. "underestimated what had been taking place in Syria.” He also said it was "absolutely true" that the U.S. overestimated the ability and will of the Iraqi army.

However, Obama also acknowledged that the U.S. is dealing with a conundrum in Syria, as the U.S.-led military campaign against the Islamic State is helping Syrian President Bashar Assad, whom the U.N. has accused of war crimes.

"I recognize the contradiction in a contradictory land and a contradictory circumstance," Obama said. "We are not going to stabilize Syria under the rule of Assad," whose government has committed "terrible atrocities."

Obama Called ISIS JV But Blames Intel Community for Underestimating Them ... - Fox Nation

Nope, nope, nope. If we go by the same standard, Obama had to have LIED about the ISIS threat, he couldn't have had bad intel.

You can't have it both ways, libs!

Cue the crickets as a black hole of silence envelops this story.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Here are democrat quotes regarding all the BAD INTEL our agencies gave Clinton/ Bush ....
many quotes before Bush was president!!!

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.
 
Lol, I can't wait to hear the excuses. Come on liberals, don't let me down.

They are googling furiously as we speak, trying to come up with a good excuse!

:lol:
Or scrambling for the new talking points. I also heard liberals are claiming the economy is booming, and it's YOUR FAULT if you don't see it.

Yeah, that's a laugh as well.

BTW, that means Obama has gone to the "Malaise" excuse that Carter went to. Anyone remember that? That's when Carter blamed US for why his economy wasn't working.

:lol:
 
So, "Intel" overestimated the Iraqis ability to handle the problem they underestimated?

Iow...Obama thought they could handle the JV terror squad that never existed?

Or...um....Bush lied!

And I'm still waiting for one liberal to get his foot wet by trying to tell us how this isn't BIG hypocrisy on their part?

:D
 
Come on libs
Rdean
Fakey Jakey
Luddy
Franco HW
Right Winger
Sallow
Jillian
Esmerelda
How come it's ok for Obama to have bad intel but not Bush?
 
The intel community is mostly a bunch of Bush appointees who worship Dick Cheney.:lalala:

Yup, the ones who survived the Prexy W/VP Cheney intel purges. Cheney stove piped the raw intel to his office, had his own team of word processors who massaged & cherry-picked the data until they came up with what they wanted - mostly PNAC's excuse to implement their plan for the Middle East - which W actually tried to do. Remember ANC's Chalabi? Where is he now? Remember Snowball - who gave us all the intel on mobile chem/bioweapons factories/labs? The cruise missiles of death, fitted with dispersal system for chem/bioweapons? The special steel (or was it aluminum?) tubes, useful only for nukes reactors &/or chem/bioweapons fabrication? Where is Chalabi now (other than top of the list of some CIA death list?) Wasn't he accused of leaking to Iran that we'd cracked Iranian diplomatic codes? (& what crazy trusted Chalabi with anything near real-time intel info?)

Yah, Chalabi got to sit in the place of honor for one of W's State of the Union rants, as I recall. Cheney's office browbeat the CIA, DCI Tenet was useful because 1. he was a holdover from Prexy Clinton & 2. he wasn't career CIA, he was just another effing placeholder. As such, it was easy to pin him, & then let him off the hook, give him his pension & some medal or other. He went like a good soldier, & kept his mouth shut.

But W wanted to be a war-time prexy. He got his little War of the Flowers, & we've distorted our political policy, foreign policy, military, poured men, money, material & political goodwill down that rat hole for years, just so's da man could strut his stuff. V. steep butcher's bill on his caved in little chest.

Oh, yah, & CIA has never recovered from the shellacking it took under W. From first among theoretical equals in the intel community, it's now an also-ran. The action now is at NSA, satellites, military intel (the heads of national intel are now all active-duty or @ least retired generals & admirals - isn't life grand? Wasn't CIA set up to get a strategic view - non-military - of our foreign adversaries & allies? Ah, well, tap one line & you get tagged with the rep forever ...) - anywhere but CIA, which is now related to Loser status. Next up, they'll have to wear a hologram L on their forehead.
 
The intel community is mostly a bunch of Bush appointees who worship Dick Cheney.:lalala:

Yup, the ones who survived the Prexy W/VP Cheney intel purges. Cheney stove piped the raw intel to his office, had his own team of word processors who massaged & cherry-picked the data until they came up with what they wanted - mostly PNAC's excuse to implement their plan for the Middle East - which W actually tried to do. Remember ANC's Chalabi? Where is he now? Remember Snowball - who gave us all the intel on mobile chem/bioweapons factories/labs? The cruise missiles of death, fitted with dispersal system for chem/bioweapons? The special steel (or was it aluminum?) tubes, useful only for nukes reactors &/or chem/bioweapons fabrication? Where is Chalabi now (other than top of the list of some CIA death list?) Wasn't he accused of leaking to Iran that we'd cracked Iranian diplomatic codes? (& what crazy trusted Chalabi with anything near real-time intel info?)

Yah, Chalabi got to sit in the place of honor for one of W's State of the Union rants, as I recall. Cheney's office browbeat the CIA, DCI Tenet was useful because 1. he was a holdover from Prexy Clinton & 2. he wasn't career CIA, he was just another effing placeholder. As such, it was easy to pin him, & then let him off the hook, give him his pension & some medal or other. He went like a good soldier, & kept his mouth shut.

But W wanted to be a war-time prexy. He got his little War of the Flowers, & we've distorted our political policy, foreign policy, military, poured men, money, material & political goodwill down that rat hole for years, just so's da man could strut his stuff. V. steep butcher's bill on his caved in little chest.


Um, you are leaving something out?

WHAT'S OBAMA'S EXCUSE????????????

Did Cheney make the intel go bad for Obama???????????

You libs are going to have to let the Bush/Cheney Derangement Syndrome go for a moment and consider that!

:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top