Obama Claims He’d Be Treated Better In Europe, Whines About “Names I’m Called” In USA

[Yurt]

what a thin skinned whiner

by all means, stay there obama, you won't be missed much

 

[bodecea]

If the white wingers on this site are any indication, who could even suggest he's incorrect?

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Remember when RWrs didn't cheer the Russians?

 

[Rozman]

Michelle would love Europe...
All that love of fashion...She would thrive there.

 

[jon_berzerk]

This president just can't take any criticism of any kind. He would might earn more respect if he wouldn't be so critical of this nation and its citizens, especially while in other sovereignties. The founders who wrote Article 2 Section 1, the presidential clause wanted a future president to have sole allegiance to the United States. That's why they wanted nothing but a natural born Citizen to be Commander-in-Chief. We all know that Obama was born a dual Citizen and his birth was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948. That act means Obama was born with split allegiances due to his father being a British Subject.




Obama Claims He?d Be Treated Better In Europe, Whines About ?Names I?m Called? In America

that is incredible

--LOL

 

[rdean]

If the white wingers on this site are any indication, who could even suggest he's incorrect?

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Yea. Dissent. But it was about something. Like the Vietnam War or abortion rights, or gay rights or anti Iraq or.........well, you get the picture.

 

[rdean]

It's just a short clip in the link, but it does come off as rather whiny. I would have liked to hear him list some specifics to see if he's implying racist names.

you mean like boi, manchild.....

 

[daveman]

If the white wingers on this site are any indication, who could even suggest he's incorrect?

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Remember when RWrs didn't cheer the Russians?

Remember when the left didn't send arms to terrorists?

 

[Avorysuds]

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Remember when RWrs didn't cheer the Russians?

Remember when the left didn't send arms to terrorists?

owned.

 

[daveman]

If the white wingers on this site are any indication, who could even suggest he's incorrect?

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Yea. Dissent. But it was about something. Like the Vietnam War or abortion rights, or gay rights or anti Iraq or.........well, you get the picture.

Or some bastard Presidenting While Republican.

Let's see -- dissent turned into treason around January of 2009, didn't it?

 

[Katzndogz]

Michelle would love Europe...
All that love of fashion...She would thrive there.

Thrive? They would put her in her fat ass place.

 

[Sherry]

It's just a short clip in the link, but it does come off as rather whiny. I would have liked to hear him list some specifics to see if he's implying racist names.

you mean like boi, manchild.....

Oh come on, you can do better than that...I can always depend on you to take the bait.

 

[J.E.D]

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Remember when RWrs didn't cheer the Russians?

Remember when the left didn't send arms to terrorists?

Remember when Republicans did?

 

[OriginalShroom]

Has any Senators said in a speech that Obama is "Unpatriotic" yet?

Until that happens, Obama has nothing to complain about.

 

[rdean]

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Remember when RWrs didn't cheer the Russians?

Remember when the left didn't send arms to terrorists?

They still don't. Unlike Republicans.

 

[daveman]

Remember when RWrs didn't cheer the Russians?

Remember when the left didn't send arms to terrorists?

They still don't. Unlike Republicans.

As usual, reality says you're wrong.

While the White House was busy drafting proposals to ban assault rifles, the last of the regulations imposed on Saudi travel to the United States after September 11 were being taken apart. While some government officials were busy planning how to disarm Americans, other officials were negotiating the transfer of F-16s and Abrams tanks to Muslim Brotherhood-run Egypt.

Obama is unwilling to trust Americans with an AR-15, but is willing to trust a genocidal terrorist group with Abrams tanks and F-16 jets. The F-16’s M61 Vulcan cannon can fire 6,000 rounds a minute and the 146 lb warhead of its HARM missiles can do a lot more than put a few dents in a brick wall. The Abrams’ 120 mm cannon can penetrate 26 inches of steel armor making it a good deal more formidable than even the wildest fantasies of San Francisco liberals about the capabilities of a so-called “assault rifle.”

While Obama has not been willing to respect the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights, he was willing to arm a terrorist group whose motto is, “The Koran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader, Jihad is our path and death in the name of Allah is our goal.” If a High School student wrote that on his Facebook page, he would be in police custody within the hour, but an international organization and national government that trades in such rhetoric gets devastating firepower from our government… free of charge.

In addition to giving the Hezbollah-run government of Lebanon two hundred M113 Armored Personnel Carriers, Obama deliberately turned a blind eye while Al Qaeda and other Islamist rebel groups in Libya received arms shipments from Qatar. Those weapons included a good deal more firepower than anything you can buy at Wal-Mart and later made their way to Mali and Syria. More weapons made their way into the hands of Hamas terrorists in Gaza. Whether any of these weapons were used in the assault on the Benghazi mission is unknown, but entirely possible.​

 

[daveman]

Remember when RWrs didn't cheer the Russians?

Remember when the left didn't send arms to terrorists?

Remember when Republicans did?

Ahhh. So THAT makes it okay for liberals to do it.

Oh, wait -- no, it doesn't.

 

[Moonglow]

If the white wingers on this site are any indication, who could even suggest he's incorrect?

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Revolutionary War.

 

[rdean]

Remember when the left didn't send arms to terrorists?

They still don't. Unlike Republicans.

As usual, reality says you're wrong.

While the White House was busy drafting proposals to ban assault rifles, the last of the regulations imposed on Saudi travel to the United States after September 11 were being taken apart. While some government officials were busy planning how to disarm Americans, other officials were negotiating the transfer of F-16s and Abrams tanks to Muslim Brotherhood-run Egypt.

Obama is unwilling to trust Americans with an AR-15, but is willing to trust a genocidal terrorist group with Abrams tanks and F-16 jets. The F-16’s M61 Vulcan cannon can fire 6,000 rounds a minute and the 146 lb warhead of its HARM missiles can do a lot more than put a few dents in a brick wall. The Abrams’ 120 mm cannon can penetrate 26 inches of steel armor making it a good deal more formidable than even the wildest fantasies of San Francisco liberals about the capabilities of a so-called “assault rifle.”

While Obama has not been willing to respect the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights, he was willing to arm a terrorist group whose motto is, “The Koran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader, Jihad is our path and death in the name of Allah is our goal.” If a High School student wrote that on his Facebook page, he would be in police custody within the hour, but an international organization and national government that trades in such rhetoric gets devastating firepower from our government… free of charge.

In addition to giving the Hezbollah-run government of Lebanon two hundred M113 Armored Personnel Carriers, Obama deliberately turned a blind eye while Al Qaeda and other Islamist rebel groups in Libya received arms shipments from Qatar. Those weapons included a good deal more firepower than anything you can buy at Wal-Mart and later made their way to Mali and Syria. More weapons made their way into the hands of Hamas terrorists in Gaza. Whether any of these weapons were used in the assault on the Benghazi mission is unknown, but entirely possible.​

David Horowitz - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

David Horowitz? Really?

 

[daveman]

If the white wingers on this site are any indication, who could even suggest he's incorrect?

Remember when dissent was patriotic?

Revolutionary War.

Bush Administration. The left constantly reminded us that dissent was patriotic.

Now, it's damn near treason.

You'll take the left's double standards when you pry them from their cold, dead, Cheetos-stained hands.

 

[daveman]

They still don't. Unlike Republicans.

As usual, reality says you're wrong.

While the White House was busy drafting proposals to ban assault rifles, the last of the regulations imposed on Saudi travel to the United States after September 11 were being taken apart. While some government officials were busy planning how to disarm Americans, other officials were negotiating the transfer of F-16s and Abrams tanks to Muslim Brotherhood-run Egypt.

Obama is unwilling to trust Americans with an AR-15, but is willing to trust a genocidal terrorist group with Abrams tanks and F-16 jets. The F-16’s M61 Vulcan cannon can fire 6,000 rounds a minute and the 146 lb warhead of its HARM missiles can do a lot more than put a few dents in a brick wall. The Abrams’ 120 mm cannon can penetrate 26 inches of steel armor making it a good deal more formidable than even the wildest fantasies of San Francisco liberals about the capabilities of a so-called “assault rifle.”

While Obama has not been willing to respect the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights, he was willing to arm a terrorist group whose motto is, “The Koran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader, Jihad is our path and death in the name of Allah is our goal.” If a High School student wrote that on his Facebook page, he would be in police custody within the hour, but an international organization and national government that trades in such rhetoric gets devastating firepower from our government… free of charge.

In addition to giving the Hezbollah-run government of Lebanon two hundred M113 Armored Personnel Carriers, Obama deliberately turned a blind eye while Al Qaeda and other Islamist rebel groups in Libya received arms shipments from Qatar. Those weapons included a good deal more firepower than anything you can buy at Wal-Mart and later made their way to Mali and Syria. More weapons made their way into the hands of Hamas terrorists in Gaza. Whether any of these weapons were used in the assault on the Benghazi mission is unknown, but entirely possible.​

David Horowitz - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

David Horowitz? Really?

I accept your admission that you are unable to refute his points.