Obama Gives USSC The Middle Finger: 'Most Illegals Will Still Not Be Deported!'

yeah, that makes sense, so they walk a few miles wait till dark and sneak back in..

That's only if Hillary is elected and the border is kept wide open and unsecured....
really? if dump got elected and congress actually said yes to wall money ,assuming deportation would begin almost immediately and realizing a wall of the scale dump wants would take decades to complete if at all .
how many of the deportees do you think would sneak back in before the wall was finished?
500,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
???


I hate to be the one to break it to you Sonny, but the "wall" was approved years ago and the money allocated. The problem? Bush did nothing and Ovama did nothing.

It's sort like the 680 billion "stimulus" program. The money was allocated by the Congress and *poof* it just disappeared.

Remember your illustrious leader's laughing and saying "I guess shovel ready wasn't as shovel ready as we thought"

I do believe that out of the billion or two that was set aside for the border - 20 miles of fence was put up near San Diego. Not a bad return on our investment, wouldn't you agree?

20 miles of fence for a billion dollars?
 
yeah, that makes sense, so they walk a few miles wait till dark and sneak back in..

That's only if Hillary is elected and the border is kept wide open and unsecured....
really? if dump got elected and congress actually said yes to wall money ,assuming deportation would begin almost immediately and realizing a wall of the scale dump wants would take decades to complete if at all .
how many of the deportees do you think would sneak back in before the wall was finished?
500,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
???


I hate to be the one to break it to you Sonny, but the "wall" was approved years ago and the money allocated. The problem? Bush did nothing and Ovama did nothing.

It's sort like the 680 billion "stimulus" program. The money was allocated by the Congress and *poof* it just disappeared.

Remember your illustrious leader's laughing and saying "I guess shovel ready wasn't as shovel ready as we thought"

I do believe that out of the billion or two that was set aside for the border - 20 miles of fence was put up near San Diego. Not a bad return on our investment, wouldn't you agree?

20 miles of fence for a billion dollars?
any links to back up that bullshit ?
none of what you just posted is bad news as it's a deflection of my question..
fail.
 
Last edited:
The Secure Fence Act of 2006’s goal is to help secure America’s borders to decrease illegal entry, drug trafficking, and security threats by building 700 miles (1,100 km) of physical barriers along the Mexico-United States border. Additionally, the law authorizes more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting as well as authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the use of advanced technology like cameras, satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles to reinforce infrastructure at the border.[1] Congress approved $1.2 billion in a separate homeland security spending bill to bankroll the fence, though critics say this is $4.8 billion less than what’s likely needed to get it built.[citation needed]

Proponents of the bill believe that it will diminish vehicle transport of illegal immigrants, encouraging those who want to enter the country to pursue legal channels or cover potentially hundreds of miles on foot and overcome a difficult obstacle. This should decrease the number of apprehensions of illegal immigrants, by physically reducing their numbers. It could also diminish the illegal drug trade pouring into the US from Mexico as well as provide additional protection from terrorist entry into the country.[2]

Opponents of the bill argue that it is not an effective strategy to curb illegal immigration because the fence is not a continuous barrier and can be climbed over or dug under in some areas. They also argue that it could harm US-Mexico relations, disrupt the environment and natural migration of wildlife, as well as increase the danger and risk of illegal immigrants attempting to cross the border. Further, opponents argue that because of the increased risk of crossing the border, illegal immigrants who previously pursued seasonal work and then returned home may have to bring their families and live permanently in the country.[2]

Since construction of the wall began “apprehensions, a rough proxy for measuring illegal crossings, were down 18% at the southern border in 2008 and Border Patrol attributes some of that to the fence.[citation needed] But a report in May 2009 by the Congressional Research Service found "strong indication" that illegal crossers had simply found new routes.” [3]

On January 23, 2008 the 110th Congress introduced Reinstatement of the Secure Fence Act of 2008 (H.R. 5124). This bill called for Homeland Security to construct an additional 700 miles of two layered, 14 foot high fencing along the southwest border.[4] The bill died in committee and was never voted upon.[4]

By April 2009 Homeland Security had erected about 613 miles of new pedestrian fencing and vehicle barriers along the southwest border from California to Texas.[5]

In May 2010, Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) unsuccessfully reintroduced his “Finish the Fence” amendment for the second time, which would require Homeland Security to construct an additional 353 miles (568 km) of fencing along the US-Mexico border.[6]

The Republican Party's 2012 platform highlighted the fact that the rest of the double fencing was never built and stated that "The double-layered fencing on the border that was enacted by Congress in 2006, but never completed, must finally be built."[7] The Washington Office on Latin America, claims on its Border Fact Check site that the extremely high cost of complying with the Secure Fence Act's mandate-estimated at US$4.1 billion, or more than the Border Patrol’s entire annual budget of US$3.55 billion- was the main reason that it was not fulfilled.[8] In short, Congress failed to continue to fund the project past the initial $1.2 billion procured, in order to finish building the fence.

Secure Fence Act of 2006 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so GW signing the bill was nothing?
 
yeah, that makes sense, so they walk a few miles wait till dark and sneak back in..

That's only if Hillary is elected and the border is kept wide open and unsecured....
really? if dump got elected and congress actually said yes to wall money ,assuming deportation would begin almost immediately and realizing a wall of the scale dump wants would take decades to complete if at all .
how many of the deportees do you think would sneak back in before the wall was finished?
500,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
???


I hate to be the one to break it to you Sonny, but the "wall" was approved years ago and the money allocated. The problem? Bush did nothing and Ovama did nothing.

It's sort like the 680 billion "stimulus" program. The money was allocated by the Congress and *poof* it just disappeared.

Remember your illustrious leader's laughing and saying "I guess shovel ready wasn't as shovel ready as we thought"

I do believe that out of the billion or two that was set aside for the border - 20 miles of fence was put up near San Diego. Not a bad return on our investment, wouldn't you agree?

20 miles of fence for a billion dollars?
any links to back up that bullshit ?
none of what you just posted is bad news as it's is a deflection of my question..
fail.
"That same year, Customs and Border Protection set aside $58 million to build a 3.5 mile stretch of fence along "difficult terrain" in San Diego, according to the GAO, an investigative arm of Congress."

Price tag for 700 miles of border fencing: high and hard to pin down

Only the corrupt, fiscally irresponsible US government could come up with a 'reported' price tag of an 'average of $1 MILLION dollars a mile (In 2008) for FENCING.

$58 million divided by 4 = $14+ Million per mile....
 
yeah, that makes sense, so they walk a few miles wait till dark and sneak back in..

That's only if Hillary is elected and the border is kept wide open and unsecured....
really? if dump got elected and congress actually said yes to wall money ,assuming deportation would begin almost immediately and realizing a wall of the scale dump wants would take decades to complete if at all .
how many of the deportees do you think would sneak back in before the wall was finished?
500,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
???


I hate to be the one to break it to you Sonny, but the "wall" was approved years ago and the money allocated. The problem? Bush did nothing and Ovama did nothing.

It's sort like the 680 billion "stimulus" program. The money was allocated by the Congress and *poof* it just disappeared.

Remember your illustrious leader's laughing and saying "I guess shovel ready wasn't as shovel ready as we thought"

I do believe that out of the billion or two that was set aside for the border - 20 miles of fence was put up near San Diego. Not a bad return on our investment, wouldn't you agree?

20 miles of fence for a billion dollars?
any links to back up that bullshit ?
none of what you just posted is bad news as it's is a deflection of my question..
fail.
"That same year, Customs and Border Protection set aside $58 million to build a 3.5 mile stretch of fence along "difficult terrain" in San Diego, according to the GAO, an investigative arm of Congress."

Price tag for 700 miles of border fencing: high and hard to pin down

Only the corrupt, fiscally irresponsible US government could come up with a 'reported' price tag of an 'average of $1 MILLION dollars a mile (In 2008) for FENCING.

$58 million divided by 4 = $14+ Million per mile....
another major deflection and more proof why the wall will never be completed and deportation on an industrial scale will fail.
 

upload_2016-6-23_14-54-58.png
 
another major deflection and more proof why the wall will never be completed and deportation on an industrial scale will fail.
What 'deflection'? YOU ASKED FOR THE LINK....YOUR POST #42!

1st you don't see one link, bitch about it, admit that I did provide one, and then blame me for YOU not seeing it, 2ndly - THEN you ask for a link and bitch when it's given to you! What the hell is your problem with 'links' today?!

:lmao:
 
another major deflection and more proof why the wall will never be completed and deportation on an industrial scale will fail.
What 'deflection'? YOU ASKED FOR THE LINK....YOUR POST #42!

1st you don't see one link, bitch about it, admit that I did provide one, and then blame me for YOU not seeing it, 2ndly - THEN you ask for a link and bitch when it's given to you! What the hell is your problem with 'links' today?!

:lmao:
another major deflection
the link in that post was easy and it helped prove my point .
now you're in the first stage of batshit!
I'm loving' it.
that post was deflection it did not answer the illegals sneaking back in just as the Obama shipping them in fantasy did not.
 
That "actual" fence indeed might not be terribly effective against Mexicans and assorted other foreign illegals.

But powerful as Hell, those bright lights, in keeping "American" liberals from crossing into Mexico for some cheap crack. Why it's almost like the absolutely terrifying "light of day".
 
another major deflection and more proof why the wall will never be completed and deportation on an industrial scale will fail.
What 'deflection'? YOU ASKED FOR THE LINK....YOUR POST #42!

1st you don't see one link, bitch about it, admit that I did provide one, and then blame me for YOU not seeing it, 2ndly - THEN you ask for a link and bitch when it's given to you! What the hell is your problem with 'links' today?!

:lmao:
another major deflection
the link in that post was easy and it helped prove my point .
now you're in the first stage of batshit!
I'm loving' it.
that post was deflection it did not answer the illegals sneaking back in just as the Obama shipping them in fantasy did not.

AGAIN, What 'deflection'? YOU ASKED FOR THE LINK....YOUR POST #42!

1st you don't see one link, bitch about it, admit that I did provide one, and then blame me for YOU not seeing it, 2ndly - THEN you ask for a link and bitch when it's given to you! What the hell is your problem with 'links' today?!

It's right there for everyone to see, despite what you claim otherwise. Again, you continue to try to convince people that what they see is not real. I again, on another issue, will ignore and laugh at your ass.
:lmao:
 
That "actual" fence indeed might not be terribly effective against Mexicans and assorted other foreign illegals.

But powerful as Hell, those bright lights, in keeping "American" liberals from crossing into Mexico for some cheap crack. Why it's almost like the absolutely terrifying "light of day".
nah, crack heads don't care... besides they score theirs from the tunnel rats,
 
another major deflection and more proof why the wall will never be completed and deportation on an industrial scale will fail.
What 'deflection'? YOU ASKED FOR THE LINK....YOUR POST #42!

1st you don't see one link, bitch about it, admit that I did provide one, and then blame me for YOU not seeing it, 2ndly - THEN you ask for a link and bitch when it's given to you! What the hell is your problem with 'links' today?!

:lmao:
another major deflection
the link in that post was easy and it helped prove my point .
now you're in the first stage of batshit!
I'm loving' it.
that post was deflection it did not answer the illegals sneaking back in just as the Obama shipping them in fantasy did not.

AGAIN, What 'deflection'? YOU ASKED FOR THE LINK....YOUR POST #42!

1st you don't see one link, bitch about it, admit that I did provide one, and then blame me for YOU not seeing it, 2ndly - THEN you ask for a link and bitch when it's given to you! What the hell is your problem with 'links' today?!

It's right there for everyone to see, despite what you claim otherwise. Again, you continue to try to convince people that what they see is not real. I again, on another issue, will ignore and laugh at your ass.
:lmao:
posts #39 and 44 are deflections
why they are deflections has jack shit to do with links .
if you insist on pitching a fit over another issue be my guest..
it's not me who cares about being laughed at ,,,,
 
Many of those here didn't 'sneak' in - Obama brought them in...then shipped and dumped them out all over the US without telling local / state reps they were coming.

Many of those here didn't 'sneak' in - Obama brought them in...then shipped and dumped them out all over the US without telling local / state reps they were coming.

You are stupid!
 

Forum List

Back
Top