Abuse Marines...check.
![]()
![]()
No rain in one of the photos...
Here is the better one.
![9h14zl.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi65.tinypic.com%2F9h14zl.jpg&hash=7ee6e8fe246c3a7946cc93a032bfc91d)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Abuse Marines...check.
![]()
![]()
How was it well spent? What did taxpayers get out of it?Ted Cruz cost taxpayers $23 Billion when he shut down the government.Obama cost taxpayers Taxpayers more than $2.2 billion for his failed green energy plan
-Geaux
When do we get that money back?
Money well spent. Shutting down the government is why Cruz gets my vote
-Geaux
Facts are facts. They received numerous warnings, all ignored.That's just one of them. Those memos go back to early Spring. So many warnings from so many directions, blissfully ignored by people asleep at the wheel.I think we should pull out and wait for them to pull off another 9-11 attack.
Or at least not ignore the memos from the bad guys announcing their impending attack. That would be good.
Are you referring to he one that said we are going to hijack some airliners and fly them into the World Trade Center on 9/11?
That makes you ignorant and not worthy of debating.
And I repeat: it's irrelevant.There have been no SCOTUS decisions upholding the use of Executive Orders?You have no point, as usual.Yes. Executive Orders are fully Constitutional.
Has a nice ring to it!
There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
Plenty of things are constitutional without ever being mentioned in the Constitution. Like abortion!
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.There have been no SCOTUS decisions upholding the use of Executive Orders?You have no point, as usual.Yes. Executive Orders are fully Constitutional.
Has a nice ring to it!
There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
Plenty of things are constitutional without ever being mentioned in the Constitution. Like abortion!
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
And I repeat: it's irrelevant.There have been no SCOTUS decisions upholding the use of Executive Orders?You have no point, as usual.There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
Plenty of things are constitutional without ever being mentioned in the Constitution. Like abortion!
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.There have been no SCOTUS decisions upholding the use of Executive Orders?You have no point, as usual.There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
Plenty of things are constitutional without ever being mentioned in the Constitution. Like abortion!
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
Facts are facts. They received numerous warnings, all ignored.That's just one of them. Those memos go back to early Spring. So many warnings from so many directions, blissfully ignored by people asleep at the wheel.I think we should pull out and wait for them to pull off another 9-11 attack.
Or at least not ignore the memos from the bad guys announcing their impending attack. That would be good.
Are you referring to he one that said we are going to hijack some airliners and fly them into the World Trade Center on 9/11?
That makes you ignorant and not worthy of debating.
You've yet to show me a SCOTUS decision re: executive orders.And I repeat: it's irrelevant.There have been no SCOTUS decisions upholding the use of Executive Orders?You have no point, as usual.
Plenty of things are constitutional without ever being mentioned in the Constitution. Like abortion!
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.There have been no SCOTUS decisions upholding the use of Executive Orders?You have no point, as usual.
Plenty of things are constitutional without ever being mentioned in the Constitution. Like abortion!
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
For the brain impaired, I will repeat. There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders.
And you think this statement you made is accurate and relevant?
"Yes. Executive Orders are fully Constitutional."
Seriously? Again? Do you wingnuts all have memory loss?Facts are facts. They received numerous warnings, all ignored.That's just one of them. Those memos go back to early Spring. So many warnings from so many directions, blissfully ignored by people asleep at the wheel.Or at least not ignore the memos from the bad guys announcing their impending attack. That would be good.
Are you referring to he one that said we are going to hijack some airliners and fly them into the World Trade Center on 9/11?
That makes you ignorant and not worthy of debating.
Links to those facts please.
^ that MissourianCaused dumb rubes like Missourian to shit their pants and, sadly, to think ISIS is taking over the world even though they're getting beaten by stupid armies like the Syrian government's army and only control a bunch of sand in the middle of nowhere.Lost Iraq, Libya and Syria to ISIS, Check.
Thats been updated hack boi
Did she buy her gun from a gun show, illegally, with no background check and no registration?