- Thread starter
- #561
Each state has their own electoral rules, but they have to follow the constitution. Something that keeps going over your head.
OK but why hasn't any of the judges that have dropped this case before used that as a reason? I mean if they would have used that as a reason it would have ended the birth certificate issue all together.
Are you fucking serious? The denial of the motion to quash was the first legal victory Taitz has had. This hearing was the exception and not the rule...
Please keep on track you are just the least little bit showing the twist out stance.
Why hasn't one judge used the full faith and credit clause as a reason to dismiss the case? Not one has. If one judge would have used the full faith and credit clause as a reason this issue would have been dead long ago. Maybe because it has no standing? The judge is doing his job by allowing citizens to present their case, something no other judges have done. As I have stated I will accept the decision made by the Georgia Secretary of state and this issue will been done and over for me, my question to you is will you accept it?
Last edited: