Obama Orders Climate Change Be Considered in Military Planning

[Weatherman2020]

Water is expected to be the thing people fight over rather than oil in the coming years. If republicans were not so strategically stupid they would know this already. As water sources dry up refugees and soldiers will go get some more from their neighbors who will not be inclined to share. The potential for warfare is not insignificant.

Please name one location of possible war due to water. One. Uno. Just one.

Nevada

Nevada is going to go to war? Who's General Reid going to attack? The Mormons of Utah?

Attack? How about defend? There are a bunch of crazies out there that think laws are for the other guy.

So the US military is planning combat with Nevadians?
This is good, please continue.

 

[owebo]

Welcome to the fucking Dark Ages.

The American Rightwing has devolved to the point where they are forbidding our Military Services from integrating climate science into their models.

Droughts, melting ice caps and mega-storms have a huge impact on planetary life and resource competition, but the OP heard on Fox News that we should only consider the Bible when building scientific models.

How the fuck did we get here?

Wait, you didn't mention MMGW....what the fuck?

 

[francoHFW]

July 2016 was world's hottest month since records began, says Nasa ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Aug 16, 2016 - As the string of hottest months continues, 2016 is 'virtually certain' to be the ... the past 14 months have broken the temperature record for each month, ... Hottest ever June marks 14thmonth of record-breaking temperatures.

Brainwashed functional morons everywhere.....

We should have all the hundreds of climate scientists take their private planes to the French Riveria to discuss this again.

Too bad there was no technology available that allowed people to meet remotely....

I'm sure that's a great argument on Fox...I'll bet they took scheduled airlines. Drop in the olympic swimming pool any way you look at it.

 

[Rustic]

July 2016 was world's hottest month since records began, says Nasa ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Aug 16, 2016 - As the string of hottest months continues, 2016 is 'virtually certain' to be the ... the past 14 months have broken the temperature record for each month, ... Hottest ever June marks 14thmonth of record-breaking temperatures.

Brainwashed functional morons everywhere.....

We should have all the hundreds of climate scientists take their private planes to the French Riveria to discuss this again.

Too bad there was no technology available that allowed people to meet remotely....

I'm sure that's a great argument on Fox...I'll bet they took scheduled airlines. Drop in the olympic swimming pool any way you look at it.

Barry would not know his ass from a hole in the ground on anything military...

 

[Weatherman2020]

July 2016 was world's hottest month since records began, says Nasa ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Aug 16, 2016 - As the string of hottest months continues, 2016 is 'virtually certain' to be the ... the past 14 months have broken the temperature record for each month, ... Hottest ever June marks 14thmonth of record-breaking temperatures.

Brainwashed functional morons everywhere.....

We should have all the hundreds of climate scientists take their private planes to the French Riveria to discuss this again.

Too bad there was no technology available that allowed people to meet remotely....

I'm sure that's a great argument on Fox...I'll bet they took scheduled airlines. Drop in the olympic swimming pool any way you look at it.

I think my favorite was last month when DiCaprio flew his private jet 8,000 miles to get an environmental award and then fly home the next day.

 

[Grizz]

Water is expected to be the thing people fight over rather than oil in the coming years. If republicans were not so strategically stupid they would know this already. As water sources dry up refugees and soldiers will go get some more from their neighbors who will not be inclined to share. The potential for warfare is not insignificant.

People like you and the Magic Negro give humanity a bad name.

 

[francoHFW]

95% chance then, now higher after 10 straight months of record temperatures...

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

 

[francoHFW]

July 2016 was world's hottest month since records began, says Nasa ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Aug 16, 2016 - As the string of hottest months continues, 2016 is 'virtually certain' to be the ... the past 14 months have broken the temperature record for each month, ... Hottest ever June marks 14thmonth of record-breaking temperatures.

Brainwashed functional morons everywhere.....

We should have all the hundreds of climate scientists take their private planes to the French Riveria to discuss this again.

Too bad there was no technology available that allowed people to meet remotely....

I'm sure that's a great argument on Fox...I'll bet they took scheduled airlines. Drop in the olympic swimming pool any way you look at it.

I think my favorite was last month when DiCaprio flew his private jet 8,000 miles to get an environmental award and then fly home the next day.

Irrelevant nonsense as always.

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Just unreal. A complete bumbling incompetent buffoon.

 

[owebo]

95% chance then, now higher after 10 straight months of record temperatures...

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

That's fucking hilarious....ipcc mainstream settled science....

 

[Weatherman2020]

July 2016 was world's hottest month since records began, says Nasa ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Aug 16, 2016 - As the string of hottest months continues, 2016 is 'virtually certain' to be the ... the past 14 months have broken the temperature record for each month, ... Hottest ever June marks 14thmonth of record-breaking temperatures.

Brainwashed functional morons everywhere.....

We should have all the hundreds of climate scientists take their private planes to the French Riveria to discuss this again.

Too bad there was no technology available that allowed people to meet remotely....

I'm sure that's a great argument on Fox...I'll bet they took scheduled airlines. Drop in the olympic swimming pool any way you look at it.

I think my favorite was last month when DiCaprio flew his private jet 8,000 miles to get an environmental award and then fly home the next day.

Irrelevant nonsense as always.

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

Sorry, I cant find one person who acts like climate change is a crisis.
Maybe you can call Al Gore in one of his 12,000 sq ft mansions to see if he knows of anyone acting like its a crisis.

 

[Weatherman2020]

95% chance then, now higher after 10 straight months of record temperatures...

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

How many private jets flew in for the 2014 meeting? Do you know?

 

[Kondor3]

I'm so old I remember when the goal of the military was to destroy the enemy.

Obama orders climate change be considered in military planning

I wouldn't worry too much.

Stupid orders from a Lame Duck will be ignored in the field.

They'll quibble for six months on the design of the forms, another six months on the composition of the review board, another six months on the reporting mechanics, another six months on the field mechanisms, another six months on the data aggregation and outputs, another six months on... this and that and this and that and...

Before you know it, it will be 2020; meanwhile, DoD will throw an occasional Total Bullshit summary at the Executive Branch, to keep 'em quiet, and... business as usual.

 

[francoHFW]

95% chance then, now higher after 10 straight months of record temperatures...

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

How many private jets flew in for the 2014 meeting? Do you know?

And I don't care. Irrelevant nonsense for ignorant chumps of the greedy idiot billionaire GOP, Big Oil, etc. Absolutely mindless.

 

[owebo]

95% chance then, now higher after 10 straight months of record temperatures...

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

How many private jets flew in for the 2014 meeting? Do you know?

And I don't care. Irrelevant nonsense for ignorant chumps of the greedy idiot billionaire GOP, Big Oil, etc. Absolutely mindless.

Speaking of mindless....

 

[Little-Acorn]

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

 

[Weatherman2020]

95% chance then, now higher after 10 straight months of record temperatures...

The Economist explains: Why scientists are (almost) certain that ...
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/.../economist-explains
The Economist
Nov 2, 2014 - ON NOVEMBER 2ND the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which represents mainstream scientific opinion, said that it was ...

How many private jets flew in for the 2014 meeting? Do you know?

And I don't care. Irrelevant nonsense for ignorant chumps of the greedy idiot billionaire GOP, Big Oil, etc. Absolutely mindless.

You don't care that everyone screaming it's a crisis never act like its a crisis?

Good trained sheeple.

 

[francoHFW]

I'm so old I remember when the goal of the military was to destroy the enemy.

Obama orders climate change be considered in military planning

I wouldn't worry too much.

Stupid orders from a Lame Duck will be ignored in the field.

They'll quibble for six months on the design of the forms, another six months on the composition of the review board, another six months on the reporting mechanics, another six months on the field mechanisms, another six months on the data aggregation and outputs, another six months on... this and that and this and that and...

Before you know it, it will be 2020; meanwhile, DoD will throw an occasional Total Bullshit summary at the Executive Branch, to keep 'em quiet, and... business as usual.

They have plans for every contingency. Why not global warming, which ONLY the GOP and the dupes in the entire world deny? Ay caramba...

 

[Weatherman2020]

I'm so old I remember when the goal of the military was to destroy the enemy.

Obama orders climate change be considered in military planning

I wouldn't worry too much.

Stupid orders from a Lame Duck will be ignored in the field.

They'll quibble for six months on the design of the forms, another six months on the composition of the review board, another six months on the reporting mechanics, another six months on the field mechanisms, another six months on the data aggregation and outputs, another six months on... this and that and this and that and...

Before you know it, it will be 2020; meanwhile, DoD will throw an occasional Total Bullshit summary at the Executive Branch, to keep 'em quiet, and... business as usual.

You know Hillary will double the stupidity.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I'm so old I remember when the goal of the military was to destroy the enemy.

Obama orders climate change be considered in military planning

I wouldn't worry too much.

Stupid orders from a Lame Duck will be ignored in the field.

They'll quibble for six months on the design of the forms, another six months on the composition of the review board, another six months on the reporting mechanics, another six months on the field mechanisms, another six months on the data aggregation and outputs, another six months on... this and that and this and that and...

Before you know it, it will be 2020; meanwhile, DoD will throw an occasional Total Bullshit summary at the Executive Branch, to keep 'em quiet, and... business as usual.

They have plans for every contingency. Why not global warming, which ONLY the GOP and the dupes in the entire world deny? Ay caramba...

When will this global warming flood our Navy ports?