Obama politicizes Texas shootings

[hazlnut]

The GOP made it political when they sold their soul to the NRA...

 

[Slade3200]

To start we can better regulate these high capacity semi auto's. Make the vetting process much better for people to own those types of weapons. Will criminals still be able to get them? yes of course. Would it help save lives? Very likely. Why should a Yahoo, like this Texas church shooter be able to walk into the local sporting goods store and walk out carrying around a weapon capable of killings dozens of people in the matter of minutes? Do you think the same amount of people would have died if he would have had a pistol or a bolt action riffle or a shotgun?

Great. Give me the specs to manage to. 30? 15? 10?

All semi auto or just the military style? Even 22s? Semi pistols?

Thats all part of the conversation. Do you think it is a good conversation to have. Do you agree with the spirit of my argument or do you believe it is a moot point? I'm happy to engage further into it, just curious about where you stand on it.

Moot

why?

Not mute .....MOOT

(I noticed you tried to fix it)

Yeah, typo, thanks. So to my point... agree or disagree?

 

[HaShev]

The GOP made it political when they sold their soul to the NRA...

So you think the Clintons and the DNC will stop silencing their informants with guns and go back to cutting brakes?
Or do they just want to take guns away from the informants and the involved people, so they can't defend against the cartel?

 

[Rustic]

Come on Barry you controlled both chambers and didn’t do a dang thing
I swear this guy has the IQ of my golf handicap

Obama Uses Texas Church Massacre To Call For Fewer Guns

Barry can fuck off, the Self-righteous piece of shit should just stay at home and shut his fucking mouth

 

[Rustic]

Come on Barry you controlled both chambers and didn’t do a dang thing
I swear this guy has the IQ of my golf handicap

Obama Uses Texas Church Massacre To Call For Fewer Guns

We all politicize it. Every shooting, every time.

Yes. It's true. And, with the increase in shootings over the past 50 years, I think it's a worthy debate. I for one believe in expansion of carry laws by the citizenry vs. the expansion of restricting gun laws. Why? Because those that lean towards more restricting and banning have not figured out how reducing legal rights to guns is going to stop people who are using guns illegally to commit shootings. In areas of this country where some of the most restrictive gun laws are in place (e.g. Chicago), there are are more murders and other crimes with illegal guns.

Whose legal right to a gun is reduced if you require private sellers to do background checks on purchasers?

Those things you speak of are absolutely unnecessary... Mind your own fucking business you fucking PC whore.

 

[iceberg]

we could pass more laws.

i believe Chicago and California have some of the strictest laws on the books. can we start there as to look at what IS NOT working?

It is working well in New York City.

Cities don't have walls, you should understand that. It's easy to get guns in and out.

then how do the laws stop criminals from getting guns?

show me laws that allow good people to keep their guns and bad people to be told NO in a manner they will accept and i'm in. but to date, just bitching and whining about guns.

what would you do?

To start we can better regulate these high capacity semi auto's. Make the vetting process much better for people to own those types of weapons. Will criminals still be able to get them? yes of course. Would it help save lives? Very likely. Why should a Yahoo, like this Texas church shooter be able to walk into the local sporting goods store and walk out carrying around a weapon capable of killings dozens of people in the matter of minutes? Do you think the same amount of people would have died if he would have had a pistol or a bolt action riffle or a shotgun?

Great. Give me the specs to manage to. 30? 15? 10?

All semi auto or just the military style? Even 22s? Semi pistols?

Thats all part of the conversation. Do you think it is a good conversation to have. Do you agree with the spirit of my argument or do you believe it is a moot point? I'm happy to engage further into it, just curious about where you stand on it.

Open to talk.

 

[Slade3200]

Come on Barry you controlled both chambers and didn’t do a dang thing
I swear this guy has the IQ of my golf handicap

Obama Uses Texas Church Massacre To Call For Fewer Guns

Barry can fuck off, the Self-righteous piece of shit should just stay at home and shut his fucking mouth

Perhaps you should take your own advice

 

[Rustic]

Come on Barry you controlled both chambers and didn’t do a dang thing
I swear this guy has the IQ of my golf handicap

Obama Uses Texas Church Massacre To Call For Fewer Guns

Yes what a horrible person, he wants to end all the killing.

Lol,
Can you be any more gullible you stupid motherfucker?

 

[Rustic]

Come on Barry you controlled both chambers and didn’t do a dang thing
I swear this guy has the IQ of my golf handicap

Obama Uses Texas Church Massacre To Call For Fewer Guns

Daily Caller. Your cult loves that non news site.
We need more semiautomatic weapons so we can have MORE mass killings.
Let’s shoot for one per week. That will make you idiots cream in your pants.

Ar15’s are sporting rifles, nothing more nothing less. Dip shit

 

[Rustic]

We all politicize it. Every shooting, every time.

Yes. It's true. And, with the increase in shootings over the past 50 years, I think it's a worthy debate. I for one believe in expansion of carry laws by the citizenry vs. the expansion of restricting gun laws. Why? Because those that lean towards more restricting and banning have not figured out how reducing legal rights to guns is going to stop people who are using guns illegally to commit shootings. In areas of this country where some of the most restrictive gun laws are in place (e.g. Chicago), there are are more murders and other crimes with illegal guns.

we could pass more laws.

i believe Chicago and California have some of the strictest laws on the books. can we start there as to look at what IS NOT working?

It is working well in New York City.

Cities don't have walls, you should understand that. It's easy to get guns in and out.

then how do the laws stop criminals from getting guns?

show me laws that allow good people to keep their guns and bad people to be told NO in a manner they will accept and i'm in. but to date, just bitching and whining about guns.

what would you do?

To start we can better regulate these high capacity semi auto's. Make the vetting process much better for people to own those types of weapons. Will criminals still be able to get them? yes of course. Would it help save lives? Very likely. Why should a Yahoo, like this Texas church shooter be able to walk into the local sporting goods store and walk out carrying around a weapon capable of killings dozens of people in the matter of minutes? Do you think the same amount of people would have died if he would have had a pistol or a bolt action riffle or a shotgun?

You here of a semi-auto pistol? Shit for brains
Lol

 

[Rustic]

Come on Barry you controlled both chambers and didn’t do a dang thing
I swear this guy has the IQ of my golf handicap

Obama Uses Texas Church Massacre To Call For Fewer Guns

Barry can fuck off, the Self-righteous piece of shit should just stay at home and shut his fucking mouth

Perhaps you should take your own advice

It’s none of his fucking business, barry should just shut his fucking face and hang out with his butt buddy Branson…

 

[Slade3200]

It is working well in New York City.

Cities don't have walls, you should understand that. It's easy to get guns in and out.

then how do the laws stop criminals from getting guns?

show me laws that allow good people to keep their guns and bad people to be told NO in a manner they will accept and i'm in. but to date, just bitching and whining about guns.

what would you do?

To start we can better regulate these high capacity semi auto's. Make the vetting process much better for people to own those types of weapons. Will criminals still be able to get them? yes of course. Would it help save lives? Very likely. Why should a Yahoo, like this Texas church shooter be able to walk into the local sporting goods store and walk out carrying around a weapon capable of killings dozens of people in the matter of minutes? Do you think the same amount of people would have died if he would have had a pistol or a bolt action riffle or a shotgun?

Great. Give me the specs to manage to. 30? 15? 10?

All semi auto or just the military style? Even 22s? Semi pistols?

Thats all part of the conversation. Do you think it is a good conversation to have. Do you agree with the spirit of my argument or do you believe it is a moot point? I'm happy to engage further into it, just curious about where you stand on it.

Open to talk.

Ha, you always are... so let’s start simple, do you think it’s appropriate to regulate the level of firepower contained in the weapons that are sold to our public?

 

[Rustic]

We all politicize it. Every shooting, every time.

Yes. It's true. And, with the increase in shootings over the past 50 years, I think it's a worthy debate. I for one believe in expansion of carry laws by the citizenry vs. the expansion of restricting gun laws. Why? Because those that lean towards more restricting and banning have not figured out how reducing legal rights to guns is going to stop people who are using guns illegally to commit shootings. In areas of this country where some of the most restrictive gun laws are in place (e.g. Chicago), there are are more murders and other crimes with illegal guns.

we could pass more laws.

i believe Chicago and California have some of the strictest laws on the books. can we start there as to look at what IS NOT working?

It is working well in New York City.

Cities don't have walls, you should understand that. It's easy to get guns in and out.

then how do the laws stop criminals from getting guns?

show me laws that allow good people to keep their guns and bad people to be told NO in a manner they will accept and i'm in. but to date, just bitching and whining about guns.

what would you do?

Look at machine gun laws. They are heavily regulated and seldom used in crime. This is what happens when a mass shooter tries to get them:
Milwaukee man accused of plotting machine gun attack at Masonic center still in jail

We need to do the same for all guns for mass killing. We should have kept the bans on high capacity magazines and assault weapons.

You have no idea of the difference between a sporting rifle and a military grade rifle. So shut your fucking face you stupid ass motherfucker…

 

[Rustic]

When is it not political?

You can't bring it up after repeated massacres. If you bring it up a month later, Republicans have already forgotten.

When is the correct time for Republicans to talk gun legislation?

We are still waiting for Sandy Hook

You need to mind your own business, you know nothing of the issue. Dumbass

 

[Rustic]

Come on Barry you controlled both chambers and didn’t do a dang thing
I swear this guy has the IQ of my golf handicap

Obama Uses Texas Church Massacre To Call For Fewer Guns

SFTU -

"fewer guns" is not political -- unless you're an NRA bitch boy.

We ALL agree that fewer killing weapons would be a good thing.

Buy more guns and ammo... It reduces violent crime. Fact

 

[EvilCat Breath]

obama should be debarked.

 

[Rustic]

The GOP made it political when they sold their soul to the NRA...

Lol
Who gives a fucking shit what a politically correct whore like yourself thinks.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Then, we can all live like Mad Max on the highways. Wouldn't that be fun?

Freaking AWESOME!

it would be the end of the snowflakes

 

[Slade3200]

Yes. It's true. And, with the increase in shootings over the past 50 years, I think it's a worthy debate. I for one believe in expansion of carry laws by the citizenry vs. the expansion of restricting gun laws. Why? Because those that lean towards more restricting and banning have not figured out how reducing legal rights to guns is going to stop people who are using guns illegally to commit shootings. In areas of this country where some of the most restrictive gun laws are in place (e.g. Chicago), there are are more murders and other crimes with illegal guns.

we could pass more laws.

i believe Chicago and California have some of the strictest laws on the books. can we start there as to look at what IS NOT working?

It is working well in New York City.

Cities don't have walls, you should understand that. It's easy to get guns in and out.

then how do the laws stop criminals from getting guns?

show me laws that allow good people to keep their guns and bad people to be told NO in a manner they will accept and i'm in. but to date, just bitching and whining about guns.

what would you do?

To start we can better regulate these high capacity semi auto's. Make the vetting process much better for people to own those types of weapons. Will criminals still be able to get them? yes of course. Would it help save lives? Very likely. Why should a Yahoo, like this Texas church shooter be able to walk into the local sporting goods store and walk out carrying around a weapon capable of killings dozens of people in the matter of minutes? Do you think the same amount of people would have died if he would have had a pistol or a bolt action riffle or a shotgun?

You here of a semi-auto pistol? Shit for brains
Lol

Sure, why?

 

[Rustic]

we could pass more laws.

i believe Chicago and California have some of the strictest laws on the books. can we start there as to look at what IS NOT working?

It is working well in New York City.

Cities don't have walls, you should understand that. It's easy to get guns in and out.

then how do the laws stop criminals from getting guns?

show me laws that allow good people to keep their guns and bad people to be told NO in a manner they will accept and i'm in. but to date, just bitching and whining about guns.

what would you do?

To start we can better regulate these high capacity semi auto's. Make the vetting process much better for people to own those types of weapons. Will criminals still be able to get them? yes of course. Would it help save lives? Very likely. Why should a Yahoo, like this Texas church shooter be able to walk into the local sporting goods store and walk out carrying around a weapon capable of killings dozens of people in the matter of minutes? Do you think the same amount of people would have died if he would have had a pistol or a bolt action riffle or a shotgun?

You here of a semi-auto pistol? Shit for brains
Lol

Sure, why?

It’s obvious you have no understanding of the issue then