Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court

The constitutional lawyer, scholar and teacher seems to have a hard time following the document. And these are not split decisions even the rapid liberal don't support his actions. We told you people but did you listen? Hell yeah, everyone knew what he was doing was illegal only the left wing defended it, pitiful

Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court | National Review Online

President Obama’s team suffered their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court in the legal challenge to the so-called recess appointments made when Congress was not actually in recess, a string of defeats that only represents “the tip of the iceberg,” according to Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah).

“Not every case in which the president has exceeded his authority has made it all the way to the Supreme Court,” Lee, a former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito, told National Review Online. “The fact that his track record is as bad as it is in the Supreme Court . . . is yet another indication of the fact that we’ve got a president who is playing fast and loose with the Constitution.”

their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court

maybe a better description of the prezbo

is the unconstitutional scholar
 
I'm thrilled it was unanimous.

The libs will just blame the Republicans for forcing Obama to violate the COTUS

Of course we do. Republicans deliberately creating power vacuums in government forces someone to do something to repair the sabotage. Saying the government does not work is one thing but making sure it does not work is another.
Obama could walk up to you and kick you in the balls -- and you'd thank him for deigning to notice you.

And you'd never wash your balls again because Obama's foot touched them. But then, being an occutard, ball-washing isn't a priority for you.
 
The appointments came during a period when the Senate claimed to be in session, even though it was on a 20-day break in most of its substantive business. The chamber was gaveled in briefly every three days, apparently in an attempt to stymie recess appointments, and a Senate resolution said no business was to be conducted.

However, as Breyer noted in the court’s ruling Thursday, the Senate has sometimes taken formal actions and even passed legislation during such pro forma sessions.

The Supreme Court’s decision Thursday does not upset any current appointments. Obama has not exercised his recess appointment power since he named the three individuals to the labor panel and Richard Cordray to head the newly-created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in 2012.

But the ruling’s impact now and in the near future could be less sweeping than when the current legal fight was set in motion two years ago. That’s because last November, Senate Democrats exercised the so-called nuclear option — doing away with the Republican minority’s power to use the filibuster to block action on most nominees with fewer than 60 votes.


Read more: Supreme Court strikes down Obama recess appointments - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO.com



pure partisan politics, no more, no less. Make of it what you will. Nobody LOST ...


of course simpleton RW's keep score in the won lost column even though they are behind in the WH
0-2 and no hope in sight.
 
The constitutional lawyer, scholar and teacher seems to have a hard time following the document. And these are not split decisions even the rapid liberal don't support his actions. We told you people but did you listen? Hell yeah, everyone knew what he was doing was illegal only the left wing defended it, pitiful

Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court | National Review Online

President Obama’s team suffered their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court in the legal challenge to the so-called recess appointments made when Congress was not actually in recess, a string of defeats that only represents “the tip of the iceberg,” according to Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah).

“Not every case in which the president has exceeded his authority has made it all the way to the Supreme Court,” Lee, a former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito, told National Review Online. “The fact that his track record is as bad as it is in the Supreme Court . . . is yet another indication of the fact that we’ve got a president who is playing fast and loose with the Constitution.”

their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court

maybe a better description of the prezbo

is the unconstitutional scholar

How does all that stack up against ACA?
 
He's a central planner, cut from the same bolt as Wilson, FDR and LBJ. They have no need for the rule of law cuz you see, they know what's best for everyone else. True story.

"By the end of his term, 138 Reagan administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever."
from p. 184,Sleep-Walking Through History: America in the Reagan Years, by Haynes Johnson, (1991, Doubleday)

TRUE STORY

Iran-Contra, Wedtech, HUD,

James Watt, Edwin Meese III, E. Bob Wallach, Lyn Nofziger, Michael Deaver, Casper Weinberger, Raymond Donovan, Elliott Abrams, Robert C. McFarlane, Oliver North, John Poindexter, Richard Secord


MANY MORE


Reagan's was the most corrupt administration in the lifetime of most Americans

And this has what to do with Obama, Wilson, FDR and LBJ being from the same central planner's school of government?

Not a damn thing...but thanks for playing. :cuckoo:

BUT RONNIE WAS A 'CONSTITUTIONALISTS' GUY RIGHT?

No, he was not. He talked a good Constitutional game but in reality, I played politics like the rest of them. One need only look at the gun bans he implemented for evidence of that.
 
Obamacare, itself, is not a tax.

It's merely a package that cleverly conceals a range of taxes that will stagger the economy when they are phased in.

Remember, when you need a pacemaker it will be taxed and Medicaid won't cover the tax part. When you need a wheelchair it will be taxed. When you get lung cancer and need a nebulizer it will be taxed.

Oh, and if your union got you a really good healthcare plan? Yeah. That will be taxed.

But you won't notice. You're too stupid. And Obama, Pelosi and Reid are confident of that. You could prove them wrong but you won't.
 
It's been obvious since Teddie Roosevelt that some federal help was needed for the people. Raygun was a disaster and still is- see hater dupes...
 
Obamacare, itself, is not a tax.

It's merely a package that cleverly conceals a range of taxes that will stagger the economy when they are phased in.

Remember, when you need a pacemaker it will be taxed and Medicaid won't cover the tax part. When you need a wheelchair it will be taxed. When you get lung cancer and need a nebulizer it will be taxed.

Oh, and if your union got you a really good healthcare plan? Yeah. That will be taxed.

But you won't notice. You're too stupid. And Obama, Pelosi and Reid are confident of that. You could prove them wrong but you won't.

Brainwashed RW idiocy, dingbat. Change the channel.:cuckoo:
 
The constitutional lawyer, scholar and teacher seems to have a hard time following the document. And these are not split decisions even the rapid liberal don't support his actions. We told you people but did you listen? Hell yeah, everyone knew what he was doing was illegal only the left wing defended it, pitiful

Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court | National Review Online

President Obama’s team suffered their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court in the legal challenge to the so-called recess appointments made when Congress was not actually in recess, a string of defeats that only represents “the tip of the iceberg,” according to Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah).

“Not every case in which the president has exceeded his authority has made it all the way to the Supreme Court,” Lee, a former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito, told National Review Online. “The fact that his track record is as bad as it is in the Supreme Court . . . is yet another indication of the fact that we’ve got a president who is playing fast and loose with the Constitution.”

their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court

maybe a better description of the prezbo

is the unconstitutional scholar

How does all that stack up against ACA?


Perfectly. Everything he touches turns to FRAUD.
 
The constitutional lawyer, scholar and teacher seems to have a hard time following the document. And these are not split decisions even the rapid liberal don't support his actions. We told you people but did you listen? Hell yeah, everyone knew what he was doing was illegal only the left wing defended it, pitiful

Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court | National Review Online

President Obama’s team suffered their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court in the legal challenge to the so-called recess appointments made when Congress was not actually in recess, a string of defeats that only represents “the tip of the iceberg,” according to Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah).

“Not every case in which the president has exceeded his authority has made it all the way to the Supreme Court,” Lee, a former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito, told National Review Online. “The fact that his track record is as bad as it is in the Supreme Court . . . is yet another indication of the fact that we’ve got a president who is playing fast and loose with the Constitution.”

No surprise. This is why Bush had to win 2000 and 2004. They needed to put cronies Alito and Roberts on the bench so that corporations matter more than voters. Of course a Democratic president is getting shot down left and right by those Citizens United SCOTUS'
 
Obamacare, itself, is not a tax.

It's merely a package that cleverly conceals a range of taxes that will stagger the economy when they are phased in.

Remember, when you need a pacemaker it will be taxed and Medicaid won't cover the tax part. When you need a wheelchair it will be taxed. When you get lung cancer and need a nebulizer it will be taxed.

Oh, and if your union got you a really good healthcare plan? Yeah. That will be taxed.

But you won't notice. You're too stupid. And Obama, Pelosi and Reid are confident of that. You could prove them wrong but you won't.

Brainwashed RW idiocy, dingbat. Change the channel.:cuckoo:
^Liberal Intellectual Elite
 
Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court

All of which, collectively, pales before ACA.

Obamacare is a tax. Obama told the American people he wasn't going to raise their taxes. Obama lies and you defend it. Y'all can't see how corrupt you are.

The hell it is, hater dupe. The PENALTY for not signing up is a tax, duh:cuckoo:

Ooooo..."hater, dupe".... Harvard?


Obama never told us there was a penalty and a tax for not signing up. The fact is you're a useful idiot who will eat anything as long as Obama is serving it. You're the problem. Ignorant tool.
 
The constitutional lawyer, scholar and teacher seems to have a hard time following the document. And these are not split decisions even the rapid liberal don't support his actions. We told you people but did you listen? Hell yeah, everyone knew what he was doing was illegal only the left wing defended it, pitiful

Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court | National Review Online

President Obama’s team suffered their twelfth unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court in the legal challenge to the so-called recess appointments made when Congress was not actually in recess, a string of defeats that only represents “the tip of the iceberg,” according to Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah).

“Not every case in which the president has exceeded his authority has made it all the way to the Supreme Court,” Lee, a former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito, told National Review Online. “The fact that his track record is as bad as it is in the Supreme Court . . . is yet another indication of the fact that we’ve got a president who is playing fast and loose with the Constitution.”

No surprise. This is why Bush had to win 2000 and 2004. They needed to put cronies Alito and Roberts on the bench so that corporations matter more than voters. Of course a Democratic president is getting shot down left and right by those Citizens United SCOTUS'

I actually agree with this one, expansion of executive power is never the answer to anything over the long term, we cannot rebuild the government around what is probably a passing phase in American politics.
 
Obamacare, itself, is not a tax.

It's merely a package that cleverly conceals a range of taxes that will stagger the economy when they are phased in.

Remember, when you need a pacemaker it will be taxed and Medicaid won't cover the tax part. When you need a wheelchair it will be taxed. When you get lung cancer and need a nebulizer it will be taxed.

Oh, and if your union got you a really good healthcare plan? Yeah. That will be taxed.

But you won't notice. You're too stupid. And Obama, Pelosi and Reid are confident of that. You could prove them wrong but you won't.

Brainwashed RW idiocy, dingbat. Change the channel.:cuckoo:

Make an intelligent reply or get the hell out of here and put your ignorant butt in a classroom.
 
Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court

All of which, collectively, pales before ACA.

Obamacare is a tax. Obama told the American people he wasn't going to raise their taxes. Obama lies and you defend it. Y'all can't see how corrupt you are.

The hell it is, hater dupe. The PENALTY for not signing up is a tax, duh:cuckoo:

That's Ok guys, the next president (a Republican) will take the Executive Orders Obama used to extend the sign up dates for the ACA, write it VERBATIM and change the date to 2050. Of course nobody on the left will complain, because the next President will use the same order.

He will then issue another Executive Order telling the IRS there will be NO tax for not signing up, and tell them not to collect any more taxes concerning the ACA.

Obama established the precedent and the next President will only follow it.

No problem, right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top