Robert_Stephens
Rookie
- Banned
- #361
Bump for independent logics explanatory post.defense should be.more evolving technology,then peoples lives to eliminate threats.precise,efficient,no nation building.
Ok, that was a sound post. Let me ask you: it is rare a conservative would be against NASA and space and the technologies that spin off it and so on. Ok, then, what is your thinking on Obama and this new agey socialist giveaway silliness in sums far far beyond NASA's budget but billions of dollars more.
Balance it, if you would.
Robert
Interesting. Robert you ignore my direct answer to your challenge and now go with a strawman.
Tell you what. I answered you directly. No strawmen, no dodge, no changing the subject or deflecting. Let's see if a Conservative like you will do the same.
Why is it that Conservatives constantly exclaim "It's not covered in the Constitution!" or "Private inudstry should do it! They always do it better and more efficiently!" about any government program until it's one Obama cuts some funding from?
If you were an Independent, don't you think this would seem pretty hypocritical?
Forgive me if I missed something. Please, post it again to me please and I was probably over typed out by answering questions like: "so, you admit you are a NASA Artist but are a warlord from Oxnard", or some such silliness.
Sorry, please post again asa I do not dodge anything, save for a bullet.
Thank you in advance, sorry about that.
Robert