Synthaholic
Diamond Member
unless they are being used on americans, why is it our duty to stop them? If the "entire world" wants Assad punished, then why aren't the blue hatted UN troops doing it?
It is not our role to get in the middle of every civil war in the world. But if you think it is, why didn't we stop the slaughter in Sudan and Congo?
If this is the right wing logic, then why all the obsession with Iran's nuclear program? It hasn't been used on Americans.
Iran has repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons on American interests, which makes them getting nuclear weapons a legitimate concern. Syria, on the other hand, has had chemical weapons for years, and never used them against us.
Link? And I will keep pressing you for one, so don't run away.
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Yet, for some reason, you think attacking Syria because someone allegedly used chemical weapons a legitimate exercise of American power.
There is no "allegedly". Syria and Russia have both admitted that chemical weapons have been used in Syria.