Obama will not negotiate the budget

It's going to take a lot more than one compromise for Republicans to undo five years of damage.

So what's your source? Everybody constantly bitching about lame stream media, so when people bring links from outside the box, you bitch about that, too? Is there anything you don't bitch about?
 
The proper response from the Senate is to change what they disagree with and send it back to the House for Compromise committee. The Senate has refused to do their job for 5 years now. The Democrats are the problem.

The senate has tried numerous times and the house just cans it.

We have a democratic senate and a democratic president, the GOP needs to get their heads out of their asses and stop acting like babies.

You are either amazingly stupid or a liar.... The Senate has NOT sent the bills to committee to discuss and change, the Senate has NOT sent the changed bills back to the House and formed a Compromise committee. Reid has simply trashed the bills.

I am willing to accept that you are just to stupid to know the facts, but I strongly suspect you are simply lying.
There's nothing amazing about him at all Sarge, he's just a stupid liar, and racist asshole.
 
Never mind his party never passed a budget as long as they had power. Now the Nitwit In Chief is taking up his dictator's hat and telling them he wants it how he wants it. Someone needs to inform Mr Constitutional law Professor that the Founders put in checks and balances for a reason.

But since he won't negotiate it gives carte blanche to the House to craft a real budget, including defunding that piece of crap Obamacare.
Obama says he will not negotiate with Congress on debt ceiling - Yahoo Finance

what budget

there is no budget

cranking up the printing presses does not constitute a budget
 
the Stuttering Clusterfuck will negotiate with Syria, Iran and Russia but not with Republicans.

Yup, that's dimocraps for you.
 
Obama's idea of compromise: It's my way or nothing!

Well no.

The terroristic and treasonous Tea party coalition wants to break the law.

President Obama's finally saying no.

You can't break the law.

And you can't constantly use the Constitution like toilet paper, which the Tea party traitors always do.
 
Obama couldn't pass a budget with a veto proof majority what makes anyone think his can pass one today
 
It's going to take a lot more than one compromise for Republicans to undo five years of damage.

So what's your source? Everybody constantly bitching about lame stream media, so when people bring links from outside the box, you bitch about that, too? Is there anything you don't bitch about?

The Budget when the President is a Republican.
War when the President is a Republican.
Treason when the President is a Republican.
Rights when the President is a Republican.


Well anything, when the President is a Republican.

:eusa_shifty:
 
the Stuttering Clusterfuck will negotiate with Syria, Iran and Russia but not with Republicans.

Yup, that's dimocraps for you.

The legitimacy of US debt is a non negotiable aspect of the Constitution. Obama cannot negotiate on the debt ceiling however he has been more than willing to negotiate the terms of the budget with Republicans on numerous occasions including this one.
 
the Stuttering Clusterfuck will negotiate with Syria, Iran and Russia but not with Republicans.

Yup, that's dimocraps for you.

The legitimacy of US debt is a non negotiable aspect of the Constitution. Obama cannot negotiate on the debt ceiling however he has been more than willing to negotiate the terms of the budget with Republicans on numerous occasions including this one.

There is more than enough money to pay the interest on the debt. It is the other programs that are the issue. And no, Obama is not willing to negotiate on those.
 
Never mind his party never passed a budget as long as they had power. Now the Nitwit In Chief is taking up his dictator's hat and telling them he wants it how he wants it. Someone needs to inform Mr Constitutional law Professor that the Founders put in checks and balances for a reason.

But since he won't negotiate it gives carte blanche to the House to craft a real budget, including defunding that piece of crap Obamacare.
Obama says he will not negotiate with Congress on debt ceiling - Yahoo Finance

Good for the President. Shades of 1996. Worked real good for you goofballs then too, right?
 
Never mind his party never passed a budget as long as they had power. Now the Nitwit In Chief is taking up his dictator's hat and telling them he wants it how he wants it. Someone needs to inform Mr Constitutional law Professor that the Founders put in checks and balances for a reason.

But since he won't negotiate it gives carte blanche to the House to craft a real budget, including defunding that piece of crap Obamacare.
Obama says he will not negotiate with Congress on debt ceiling - Yahoo Finance

Good for the President. Shades of 1996. Worked real good for you goofballs then too, right?

Keep telling yourself that, Sparky.
 
the Stuttering Clusterfuck will negotiate with Syria, Iran and Russia but not with Republicans.

Yup, that's dimocraps for you.

The legitimacy of US debt is a non negotiable aspect of the Constitution. Obama cannot negotiate on the debt ceiling however he has been more than willing to negotiate the terms of the budget with Republicans on numerous occasions including this one.

There is more than enough money to pay the interest on the debt. It is the other programs that are the issue. And no, Obama is not willing to negotiate on those.

Spending bills already passed by congress (including continuing resolutions) exceed the current debt limit so the House cannot violate the Constitution by refusing to raise the debt limit. That is non-negotiable because neither side has the power to override the Constitution.
 
The legitimacy of US debt is a non negotiable aspect of the Constitution. Obama cannot negotiate on the debt ceiling however he has been more than willing to negotiate the terms of the budget with Republicans on numerous occasions including this one.

There is more than enough money to pay the interest on the debt. It is the other programs that are the issue. And no, Obama is not willing to negotiate on those.

Spending bills already passed by congress (including continuing resolutions) exceed the current debt limit so the House cannot violate the Constitution by refusing to raise the debt limit. That is non-negotiable because neither side has the power to override the Constitution.

Huh? You're saying Congress has no authority to reduce spending?
 
There is more than enough money to pay the interest on the debt. It is the other programs that are the issue. And no, Obama is not willing to negotiate on those.

Spending bills already passed by congress (including continuing resolutions) exceed the current debt limit so the House cannot violate the Constitution by refusing to raise the debt limit. That is non-negotiable because neither side has the power to override the Constitution.

Huh? You're saying Congress has no authority to reduce spending?

Not at all. I am saying that the Constitution requires the extension of the debt ceiling because of Section 4 of the 14th Amendment.
 
Spending bills already passed by congress (including continuing resolutions) exceed the current debt limit so the House cannot violate the Constitution by refusing to raise the debt limit. That is non-negotiable because neither side has the power to override the Constitution.

Huh? You're saying Congress has no authority to reduce spending?

Not at all. I am saying that the Constitution requires the extension of the debt ceiling because of Section 4 of the 14th Amendment.

No it doesn't.

You get that from CPUSA?

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/25/us/politics/25legal.html?_r=0

“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payments of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion,” the critical sentence says, “shall not be questioned.”

The Supreme Court has said in passing that those words have outlived the historical moment that gave rise to them.

“While this provision was undoubtedly inspired by the desire to put beyond question the obligations of the government issued during the Civil War,” Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for the court in 1935, “its language indicates a broader connotation.”

Idiot
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top