brummelben
Gold Member
- Sep 29, 2016
- 6,514
- 650
- 200
- Banned
- #161
You had your wish before the ACA, private insurers set the rules. Do you remember lifetime caps, or pre existing conditions, or 40% of every dollar written off to overhead. To the private insurers its profits over people and will always be so long as the profit motive is there.I'm all for SMART regulation, not MORE regulation.I agree with you about the employer programs, and i'm not happy with the current ACA, It needs serious reform. I don't think healthcare should be completely private as they have proven to be reckless in the tremendous power they hold over the health and care for our citizens. It is on of the richest industries in the world. They are able to do this because of the great capitalistic society we have created. I do not think it unreasonable for there to be regulations and standards for these companies to follow that will benefit our citizens... esp for the less fortunate.Isn't that how it was before Obamacare?The operative words in your post are "health care related tax burden".I've lived in a country with a REAL government insurance program. I'm sure you've been asked to research them before. The fact is that a FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE person who wants to reduce his own health care related tax burden would be insane to oppose single payer universal health care. The only reasons one opposes that is an UNWARRANTED fear of government and a fear that someone who earns less $$ might get the same health care that they get.
Car insurance? Please.
You are so entitlement minded, you have no concept of what fiscal conservatism is. Not a clue.
There should be NO "health care related tax burden" to pay for the healthcare of healthy Americans!
I'm all for supporting those with catastrophic illnesses or injuries, and I'm all for supporting our elders.
Everyone else should be paying their own freight. Period. They should be picking up the phone and calling any insurance company they wish, and buying whatever health insurance coverage they wish.
Just like they do with auto, life, and home insurance.
They need to be freed from the hostage-taking entitlement heads like yourself.
Nope. It was NOT that way before ObamaCare. The American people have been held hostage by their employers in a take-it-or-leave-it condition for decades. They are forced into that condition by the US government meddling in the private markets.
Were you happy with that system?
I was not happy with the status quo. Hell no. That's exactly why I am equally angry at the Republicans for doing NOTHING about it.
Auto, life, and home insurance have not been skyrocketing. In fact, while cars have been getting more and more expensive, auto insurance has been going down.
So the problem isn't insurance companies. It's the vast meddling in health markets by the government which is the cause. We know this because that is the only insurance market where the government is a big player.
Not just a big player. The biggest player.
And it gets to write all the rules for its competitors. How's that working out?
It would be as if GEICO was allowed to write the rules Allstate and Progressive and State Farm and all the rest had to follow.
We need LESS government in healthcare. Not more.
Here's the thing. The more you centralize power, the easier you make it to capture. And yet the Left continues to make it easier and easier for others to capture control over every aspect of our lives. To hold us hostage. They have been doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.
The government does a fine job with insurance, far better than private companies- just look to Medicare as an example