why?
the oil belongs to Canada. The oil will be traded in the global market. The oil is NOT light sweet crude. The USA gets another pipeline and no useable oil for us.The pipeline will create a few temporary jobs until after its built and those jobs will be union jobs.
Who the hell is crying? ... oh wait, its the Republicans, nevermind.
Somewhere around 35 jobs to be roughly exact, making sure Big Oil's raw product is getting to those refineries so it can be shipped to Asia...
That's why I asked him "are you Exxon?" Who else benefits?
Here's the Market Analysis from the State Department.
http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/205654.pdf
The State Departments market analysis in Keystone XLs final supplemental environmental impact statement states, U.S. product exports are not sensitive to different scenarios of pipeline development. Essentially saying that exports occur (and have occurred for more than 20 years) with or without Keystone XL and the project would not impact those those trends.
Nothing will be any different from how it's been for the last 20 years regarding crude or crude products exports.
Your arguments are false, are not based on facts, and have played themselves out.
I guess you mean GISMYS' argument is false, because that just confirms my point. Again.
And thanks.
![thup :thup: :thup:](/styles/smilies/thup.gif)