Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New York Times ,Washington Post, CNN ,MSNBC, ABC, Newsweek, and all the rest of them ....The View, the late shows.... yes it's all a coup against Trump, but don't let this fool you into thinking that they'll support someone like Bernie Sanders or Tulsi Gabbard.Well... the failing NY Slimes is a premier, Platinum card carrying, charter member of the DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING, and they don't try to hide their radical leftist Trump hating bias in the least.Here's what the soulless, complicit pricks at New York Times call it .....a "saga".
Roger Stone Is Found Guilty in Trial That Revived Trump-Russia Saga
That's why no sane person should bother reading any of their garbage.
No, documents show the Bidens were involved in a HUGE money laundering scandal along with the Hildebeasty and the Kerry family in Ukraine....try DuckDuckGo instead of Googly which censors much info, or put it on page 8901!BLACKMAIL....PERSONIFIED!!!!!Well I guess I should make the case for Blackmail. Yep that's what ol'Trumpybear did. He tried to Blackmail that president into publicly announcing that the Ukraine was opening an investingation into the Bidens corruption.
Blackmail I tells ya.
Doesn't matter what you call it. The turd still stinks.
Blackmail is when you have something damaging about a person, and threaten to release that information unless your demands are met. And when did Trump ever ask Zelensky to make anything public?
Many forms of blackmail are considered crimes under state or federal law. Most states treat blackmail as a type of extortion or coercion, which involves threats of violence or other harm in order to compel a person to do something.
Blackmail Law | Justia
What you call it doesn't change what he did or that it was done with corrupt intent.
The VERY DEFINITION...BooBoo is almost as dumb as Creepy Toes!!!
That is a quid pro quo in the nation's interest. Trump should try that once or twice.
But do you need the story again?
Uhmm ok. Back channel. Small steps.See... even YOU can't keep up with your demtard propaganda. Extortion is out already, pard, it's BRIBERY now... I think... at least it was, but I think today it's going to change again to... "HE MADE ME CRY."So Trump has the right to fire an ambassador that won't go along with his extortion scheme. I get it.
Bingo, this is the left trying to spin "Trump is mean" into some kind of impeachable offense.
She's setting the scene for Sondland and Volker to testify about Giuliani's role in setting up the quid. Or maybe it was the quo.
She was fired months before the Ukraine call took place.
She wasn't fired until after Giuliani, Fruman and Parnas set about establishing their back channel. Small steps.
It was wrong, but no one argues he didn't have the right to do it. If it's true she was the target of a smear campaign - and it hasn't been contested, so far - it certainly wasn't right. A diligent President (just kidding) would have checked with the State Dept, which Trump didn't do. OTOH, if his diligence were directed elsewhere, a smear campaign driven by his personal attorney could come in handy.
It wasn't wrong at all President Trump doesn't need to justify her firing to anyone, he's the President.
That's right. He's completely unaccountable. He'd tell you so himself.
President Trump is accountable to the American people who can fire him. He's not accountable to a political appointee he's the boss of.
The American people, in the form of their elected representatives, are discussing whether to fire him now.
Name the impeachable offense. A fired ambassador crying over getting fired is not an impeachable offense. Here I'll just laugh in your face now
He didn't do anything. He asked a favor,
HA HA HA. The House Democrats have A reason for participating in this moronic fraud. They need to insure that they don't lose any VOTES in their next election.Nunes did spew forth his usual collection of lies and conspiracy theory bullshit.
What is your opinion of the Ukrainans being threatened by Biden, and aid being withheld by him and Obama , as it was ?His favor was looking into, getting to the bottom of Crowdstrike, the Server and the Ukraine, and the Bidens. His henchmen made it clear that the aid's release was conditioned on the President of the Ukraine publicly announcing those investigations.
None of those are impeachable, and none of them occurred, except by Biden and Obama.The impeachable offenses are bribery, misuse of an office of trust, and contempt of Congress. You could shoehorn in a couple more, if you wanted to take your time.
He didn't do anything. He asked a favor,
His favor was looking into, getting to the bottom of Crowdstrike, the Server and the Ukraine, and the Bidens. His henchmen made it clear that the aid's release was conditioned on the President of the Ukraine publicly announcing those investigations.
HA HA HA. The House Democrats have A reason for participating in this moronic fraud. They need to insure that they don't lose any VOTES in their next election.Nunes did spew forth his usual collection of lies and conspiracy theory bullshit.
What's yours ?
Both transcripts plus the Ukraine president and foreign minister prove none of that happened.It wasn't wrong at all President Trump doesn't need to justify her firing to anyone, he's the President.
That's right. He's completely unaccountable. He'd tell you so himself.
President Trump is accountable to the American people who can fire him. He's not accountable to a political appointee he's the boss of.
The American people, in the form of their elected representatives, are discussing whether to fire him now.
Name the impeachable offense. A fired ambassador crying over getting fired is not an impeachable offense. Here I'll just laugh in your face now
It's not the firing of an Ambassador, although that's a lovely strawman.
The impeachable offenses are bribery, misuse of an office of trust, and contempt of Congress. You could shoehorn in a couple more, if you wanted to take your time.
Where the fuck have you been????He didn't do anything. He asked a favor,
His favor was looking into, getting to the bottom of Crowdstrike, the Server and the Ukraine, and the Bidens. His henchmen made it clear that the aid's release was conditioned on the President of the Ukraine publicly announcing those investigations.
And I suppose you have a link to your claim?
BLACKMAIL....PERSONIFIED!!!!!Don't forget they threw in EXTORTION between quid pro quo and bribery.
These bat shit crazy, lunatic demtrash change the game faster than we can keep up with.
I think today they're hoping the bitch cries. That ought to do it... the president made me cry because he fired me... WHAAAAAA, WHAAA. I'm SURE they'll be able to impeach the president on... HE MADE ME CRY.
Well I guess I should make the case for Blackmail. Yep that's what ol'Trumpybear did. He tried to Blackmail that president into publicly announcing that the Ukraine was opening an investingation into the Bidens corruption.
Blackmail I tells ya.
Doesn't matter what you call it. The turd still stinks.
Blackmail is when you have something damaging about a person, and threaten to release that information unless your demands are met. And when did Trump ever ask Zelensky to make anything public?
Many forms of blackmail are considered crimes under state or federal law. Most states treat blackmail as a type of extortion or coercion, which involves threats of violence or other harm in order to compel a person to do something.
Blackmail Law | Justia
What you call it doesn't change what he did or that it was done with corrupt intent.
The VERY DEFINITION...BooBoo is almost as dumb as Creepy Toes!!!
Yes you could say we blackmail countries with aid into following policies favorable to US interest. No president has as of yet been successful in blackmailing a country into harming the domestic opposition, although one did get close, but that effort has apparently failed.
Then propose jail time for Obama, Hillary, Quid Pro Joe, Comey, Brennan, and other criminal creeps.Mine is that I think we need enforce the law. You evidently think otherwise.
What is your opinion of the Ukrainans being threatened by Biden, and aid being withheld by him and Obama , as it was ?His favor was looking into, getting to the bottom of Crowdstrike, the Server and the Ukraine, and the Bidens. His henchmen made it clear that the aid's release was conditioned on the President of the Ukraine publicly announcing those investigations.
Trump never has mentioned the Bidens in any correspondence. What's wrong with looking into Crowdstrike?He didn't do anything. He asked a favor,
His favor was looking into, getting to the bottom of Crowdstrike, the Server and the Ukraine, and the Bidens. His henchmen made it clear that the aid's release was conditioned on the President of the Ukraine publicly announcing those investigations.
Please, its being spun now, and has been spun before in the liberal media that it was wrong for Trump to fire her. Obama called the top general in Afghanistan into the oval office and fired him in a heated discussion. I don't recall anyone on the left crying about that.
It was wrong, but no one argues he didn't have the right to do it. If it's true she was the target of a smear campaign - and it hasn't been contested, so far - it certainly wasn't right. A diligent President (just kidding) would have checked with the State Dept, which Trump didn't do. OTOH, if his diligence were directed elsewhere, a smear campaign driven by his personal attorney could come in handy.
It wasn't wrong at all President Trump doesn't need to justify her firing to anyone, he's the President.
That's right. He's completely unaccountable. He'd tell you so himself.
President Trump is accountable to the American people who can fire him. He's not accountable to a political appointee he's the boss of.
The American people, in the form of their elected representatives, are discussing whether to fire him now.
