Official 2020 November Election Thread.

[conserveguy877]

Still unbelievable how there's still an election count happening 48 hours after the polls closed. The people are waking up to this.

So what are you saying? Peoples' votes shouldn't be counted? You wish to disenfranchise people. Have you ever read Orwell's 1984?

Thanks for the introduction on how Voter Fraud has been caught to steal this election result.

O'Keefe is such an honest guy, I almost believe that.

Deflect.

 

[iceberg]

I don't believe the media is being dishonest. I think the President has done everything possible to undermine the people's faith in our election process, and unfortunately, some believe him.

Like Covid, this election is requiring patience, and some people are not doing well with that at all. Many races are so close! I think both parties, no matter which wins, need to think on the fact that they're not so popular as they wish they were.

He wasn't the one changing the election process at will.

Everyone was dealing with a deadly epidemic and trying to allow people to stay safe. That required a lot of changes for some states. I don't call that "Changing the election process at will."

They can protest safely, they can vote safely.

This is trying to have it both ways.

Mail-in voting was for everyone, not just protesters.

not my point and i believe you know that.

if it was safe to protest in mass groups, then it would be safe to do other activities.

there was zero need to stress out our postal system by introducing an uncontrolled variable unless you were hoping to gain from said variable.

like i said, you can't say it's safe to protest in large groups, but not vote. esp if you also say "follow the science". why did we quit when it came to voting but ok in protesting and riots?

don't pick a side or defend an outcome - just ask yourself, if this was something the OTHER side were trying to do - still defend it?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It has always been an issue. I never liked foreigners coming in here and stirring shit up.

I see you as the foreigner...;o)

My passport says otherwise

 

[ninja007]

LIBS WANT US TO BELIEVE THAT TRUMP WILL LOSE PA after bidens fracking comments in the debate, lol. the trends all over the midwest showed Trump to easily win pa and nc, ga. the sea of RED is all thru there, literally 15 plus states, all red. And those states he won easily in 2016.

 

[Faun]

Still unbelievable how there's still an election count happening 48 hours after the polls closed. The people are waking up to this.

So what are you saying? Peoples' votes shouldn't be counted? You wish to disenfranchise people. Have you ever read Orwell's 1984?

Thanks for the introduction on how Voter Fraud has been caught to steal this election result.

O'Keefe is such an honest guy, I almost believe that.

Deflect.

LOL

Good luck convincing America that O'Keefe can be trusted to tell the truth.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Like the big baby that he is.

He should be pist off with the dems cheating so much-----

 

[Faun]

Like the big baby that he is.

He should be pist off with the dems cheating so much-----

LOL

Your rite, he shood bee pist.

 

[conserveguy877]

Still unbelievable how there's still an election count happening 48 hours after the polls closed. The people are waking up to this.

So what are you saying? Peoples' votes shouldn't be counted? You wish to disenfranchise people. Have you ever read Orwell's 1984?

Thanks for the introduction on how Voter Fraud has been caught to steal this election result.

O'Keefe is such an honest guy, I almost believe that.

Deflect.

LOL

Good luck convincing America that O'Keefe can be trusted to tell the truth.

Enough said you apologist.

 

[Dr Grump]

My passport says otherwise

So does mine. Who decides what a foreigner is? Are there even foreigners in cyberspace? Where is the server for this site hosted? What is the nationality of the person who owns this URL? Do you know?

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[OldLady]

I don't believe the media is being dishonest. I think the President has done everything possible to undermine the people's faith in our election process, and unfortunately, some believe him.

Like Covid, this election is requiring patience, and some people are not doing well with that at all. Many races are so close! I think both parties, no matter which wins, need to think on the fact that they're not so popular as they wish they were.

He wasn't the one changing the election process at will.

Everyone was dealing with a deadly epidemic and trying to allow people to stay safe. That required a lot of changes for some states. I don't call that "Changing the election process at will."

They can protest safely, they can vote safely.

This is trying to have it both ways.

Mail-in voting was for everyone, not just protesters.

not my point and i believe you know that.

if it was safe to protest in mass groups, then it would be safe to do other activities.

there was zero need to stress out our postal system by introducing an uncontrolled variable unless you were hoping to gain from said variable.

like i said, you can't say it's safe to protest in large groups, but not vote. esp if you also say "follow the science". why did we quit when it came to voting but ok in protesting and riots?

don't pick a side or defend an outcome - just ask yourself, if this was something the OTHER side were trying to do - still defend it?

I don't believe the media is being dishonest. I think the President has done everything possible to undermine the people's faith in our election process, and unfortunately, some believe him.

Like Covid, this election is requiring patience, and some people are not doing well with that at all. Many races are so close! I think both parties, no matter which wins, need to think on the fact that they're not so popular as they wish they were.

He wasn't the one changing the election process at will.

Everyone was dealing with a deadly epidemic and trying to allow people to stay safe. That required a lot of changes for some states. I don't call that "Changing the election process at will."

They can protest safely, they can vote safely.

This is trying to have it both ways.

Mail-in voting was for everyone, not just protesters.

not my point and i believe you know that.

if it was safe to protest in mass groups, then it would be safe to do other activities.

there was zero need to stress out our postal system by introducing an uncontrolled variable unless you were hoping to gain from said variable.

like i said, you can't say it's safe to protest in large groups, but not vote. esp if you also say "follow the science". why did we quit when it came to voting but ok in protesting and riots?

don't pick a side or defend an outcome - just ask yourself, if this was something the OTHER side were trying to do - still defend it?

Tbh, you're really pissing me off. This isn't about the fucking protests, ice, or about whether Covid is real. This is about the validity of our election, our votes. I'm not going down any of your damned rabbit holes tonight.

 

[Synthaholic]

Still unbelievable how there's still an election count happening 48 hours after the polls closed. The people are waking up to this.

So what are you saying? Peoples' votes shouldn't be counted? You wish to disenfranchise people. Have you ever read Orwell's 1984?

Thanks for the introduction on how Voter Fraud has been caught to steal this election result.

Yeah, he's credible.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

My passport says otherwise

So does mine. Who decides what a foreigner is? Are there even foreigners in cyberspace? Where is the server for this site hosted? What is the nationality of the person who owns this URL? Do you know?

No. It’s a US Message Board. Enough said.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I don't believe the media is being dishonest. I think the President has done everything possible to undermine the people's faith in our election process, and unfortunately, some believe him.

Like Covid, this election is requiring patience, and some people are not doing well with that at all. Many races are so close! I think both parties, no matter which wins, need to think on the fact that they're not so popular as they wish they were.

He wasn't the one changing the election process at will.

Everyone was dealing with a deadly epidemic and trying to allow people to stay safe. That required a lot of changes for some states. I don't call that "Changing the election process at will."

They can protest safely, they can vote safely.

This is trying to have it both ways.

Mail-in voting was for everyone, not just protesters.

not my point and i believe you know that.

if it was safe to protest in mass groups, then it would be safe to do other activities.

there was zero need to stress out our postal system by introducing an uncontrolled variable unless you were hoping to gain from said variable.

like i said, you can't say it's safe to protest in large groups, but not vote. esp if you also say "follow the science". why did we quit when it came to voting but ok in protesting and riots?

don't pick a side or defend an outcome - just ask yourself, if this was something the OTHER side were trying to do - still defend it?

I don't believe the media is being dishonest. I think the President has done everything possible to undermine the people's faith in our election process, and unfortunately, some believe him.

Like Covid, this election is requiring patience, and some people are not doing well with that at all. Many races are so close! I think both parties, no matter which wins, need to think on the fact that they're not so popular as they wish they were.

He wasn't the one changing the election process at will.

Everyone was dealing with a deadly epidemic and trying to allow people to stay safe. That required a lot of changes for some states. I don't call that "Changing the election process at will."

They can protest safely, they can vote safely.

This is trying to have it both ways.

Mail-in voting was for everyone, not just protesters.

not my point and i believe you know that.

if it was safe to protest in mass groups, then it would be safe to do other activities.

there was zero need to stress out our postal system by introducing an uncontrolled variable unless you were hoping to gain from said variable.

like i said, you can't say it's safe to protest in large groups, but not vote. esp if you also say "follow the science". why did we quit when it came to voting but ok in protesting and riots?

don't pick a side or defend an outcome - just ask yourself, if this was something the OTHER side were trying to do - still defend it?

Tbh, you're really pissing me off. This isn't about the fucking protests, ice, or about whether Covid is real. This is about the validity of our election, our votes. I'm not going down any of your damned rabbit holes tonight.

This is an election thread.

 

[the other mike]

Bullshit headline;

MSN

www.msn.com

Mitt Romney and 2 others.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Someone needs to take Trump's phone away. He's making a complete jackass of himself. More so than usual.

They're going to have to drag him out of the white house kicking and screaming.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Someone needs to take Trump's phone away. He's making a complete jackass of himself. More so than usual.

They're going to have to drag him out of the white house kicking and screaming.

Only if he loses.

This is what we voted for in 2016. I like it.

Go fuck yourself.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Bullshit headline;

MSN

www.msn.com

Mitt Romney and 2 others.

Mitt Romney can kiss my ass.

 

[XponentialChaos]

 

[iceberg]

I don't believe the media is being dishonest. I think the President has done everything possible to undermine the people's faith in our election process, and unfortunately, some believe him.

Like Covid, this election is requiring patience, and some people are not doing well with that at all. Many races are so close! I think both parties, no matter which wins, need to think on the fact that they're not so popular as they wish they were.

He wasn't the one changing the election process at will.

Everyone was dealing with a deadly epidemic and trying to allow people to stay safe. That required a lot of changes for some states. I don't call that "Changing the election process at will."

They can protest safely, they can vote safely.

This is trying to have it both ways.

Mail-in voting was for everyone, not just protesters.

not my point and i believe you know that.

if it was safe to protest in mass groups, then it would be safe to do other activities.

there was zero need to stress out our postal system by introducing an uncontrolled variable unless you were hoping to gain from said variable.

like i said, you can't say it's safe to protest in large groups, but not vote. esp if you also say "follow the science". why did we quit when it came to voting but ok in protesting and riots?

don't pick a side or defend an outcome - just ask yourself, if this was something the OTHER side were trying to do - still defend it?

I don't believe the media is being dishonest. I think the President has done everything possible to undermine the people's faith in our election process, and unfortunately, some believe him.

Like Covid, this election is requiring patience, and some people are not doing well with that at all. Many races are so close! I think both parties, no matter which wins, need to think on the fact that they're not so popular as they wish they were.

He wasn't the one changing the election process at will.

Everyone was dealing with a deadly epidemic and trying to allow people to stay safe. That required a lot of changes for some states. I don't call that "Changing the election process at will."

They can protest safely, they can vote safely.

This is trying to have it both ways.

Mail-in voting was for everyone, not just protesters.

not my point and i believe you know that.

if it was safe to protest in mass groups, then it would be safe to do other activities.

there was zero need to stress out our postal system by introducing an uncontrolled variable unless you were hoping to gain from said variable.

like i said, you can't say it's safe to protest in large groups, but not vote. esp if you also say "follow the science". why did we quit when it came to voting but ok in protesting and riots?

don't pick a side or defend an outcome - just ask yourself, if this was something the OTHER side were trying to do - still defend it?

Tbh, you're really pissing me off. This isn't about the fucking protests, ice, or about whether Covid is real. This is about the validity of our election, our votes. I'm not going down any of your damned rabbit holes tonight.

No rabbit hole.

mail in voting was because it wasn't safe to go out in crowds. yet they said protesting in crowds is fine.

That simply makes zero logical sense to me. only emotional.

if there is an acceptable risk in crowds for events, what makes one safe and one not when the voting can be controlled, distanced, and sanitized as needed.

I'm only asking why one is safe uncontrolled and the other is not safe, but controlled.

You can get mad but in my experience that is done when you havw no answer and hate the question.