Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

[jc456]

house impeachment is an investigation not a trial .....

sooner or later RW dipshits MIGHT figure that out-

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Nope

 

[jc456]

If this SOB in office now is not guilty and deserving of impeachment then no president ever will be You really want a king trump??

Surrrrrrrre

 

[OKTexas]

The little commie from harvard just lied. He said Nixon sent people to do the break in, it's been proven Nixon had no foreknowledge of the break in, he got busted for trying to cover it up. Why do I think he will never face charges for his perjury?

.

 

[The Original Tree]

house impeachment is an investigation not a trial .....

sooner or later RW dipshits MIGHT figure that out-

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Really, why is the intel committee not providing all testimony to the judiciary committee. What is shitt hiding?

.

Why do you think testimony was withheld?

Schitler is hiding something.

Adolph Schiffler won't release his transcripts of his conversations with THE SECRET WHISTLEBLOWER, and neither will he let THE GOP interview his staff, or The FAKE Whistleblower.

What can be the argument against seeing transcripts of YOUR conversations with the person central to the investigation? That is evidence!

Whistleblowers are protected from repercussions, not anonymity. With anonymity, anything can be claimed without proof.

Why couldn't the whistleblower appear to testify and answer questions even with his face concealed and his voice altered in a separate booth to protect his identity?

It's the fact that Schiff pulls this crap, refuses to provide reasonable answers and no one in the media even bothers to ask either like they all have a bolt in their brain that makes this proceeding impossible to take seriously as legitimate.

And THE ACCUSED has a right to cross examine Adverse Witnesses and see ALL EVIDENCE against them.

Again, there is NO DUE PROCESS In this and it is REQUIRED BY LAW. It is an Illegal Witch Trial.

 

[OKTexas]

Also the republicans have to assume what they decide to do will set precedent on what is acceptable by future presidents.

If Republicans just acquit Trump, they'll have to accept that it's okay for a future Democratic president to solicit bribes from foreign governments for personal gain too.

Please provide the quote where Trump asked for anything for himself.

.

 

[The Original Tree]

The little commie from harvard just lied. He said Nixon sent people to do the break in, it's been proven Nixon had no foreknowledge of the break in, he got busted for trying to cover it up. Why do I think he will never face charges for his perjury?

.

Someone should have called her on that. She bold faced lied about that fact. Nixon found out about that stupid stunt after the fact. He even went to his grave saying that.
His issue was that he tried to protect a couple of people he knew after the fact when he should have washed his hands of them.

 

[toobfreak]

The dems have been repeating the same lie all day...that Trump and Russia colluded....its outrageous....

• Last I checked, isn't accusations with no evidence to back it up called DEFAMATION?

• Collusion: wasn't that one of the things Mueller defined as NOT a crime?

 

[Nostra]

The little commie from harvard just lied. He said Nixon sent people to do the break in, it's been proven Nixon had no foreknowledge of the break in, he got busted for trying to cover it up. Why do I think he will never face charges for his perjury?

.

Odd for a "Constitutional Scholar" to be so ignorant of such a huge Constitutionally historic event, huh?

It would seem she is lying............which would be perjury under these circumstances.

 

[Rambunctious]

The dems have been repeating the same lie all day...that Trump and Russia colluded....its outrageous....

• Last I checked, isn't accusations with no evidence to back it up called DEFAMATION?

• Collusion: wasn't that one of the things Mueller defined as NOT a crime?

The House Dems are ABUSING their power....

 

[toobfreak]

The dems have been repeating the same lie all day...that Trump and Russia colluded....its outrageous....

Been repeating ---TRUMP tried to get Ukraine to interfere in our election for the BENEFIT of HIMSELF Now do you understand Rambo?

 

[ElmerMudd]

house impeachment is an investigation not a trial .....

sooner or later RW dipshits MIGHT figure that out-

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Really, why is the intel committee not providing all testimony to the judiciary committee. What is shitt hiding?

.

Why do you think testimony was withheld?

I know for a fact they have not provided the testimony of the ICIG. It was mentioned today.

.

Since all of the testimony is damning for Trump why do you think Schiff would withhold it.........assuming you are right. It's may be because the part of the testimony is classified.
In any event, the argument that Schiff acted unfairly went out the window when the public testimony began and when he released the transcripts of the closed door testimony. Anything else?

How about you post a link to the ICIG testimony if you think shitt released it all. Perhaps shitt is withholding that testimony because the ICIG had no authority to receive or act on the so called WB complaint in the first place.

.

Let the main dogs come forward and testify; Trump, Pompeo, Giuliani, Bolton, Mulvaney.
If they are not allowed to testify, it is the equivalent of pleading the 5th and they are guilty.

Shut up and help all push to get those involved, under oath, tell the world what happened and why.

 

[JGalt]

The little commie from harvard just lied. He said Nixon sent people to do the break in, it's been proven Nixon had no foreknowledge of the break in, he got busted for trying to cover it up. Why do I think he will never face charges for his perjury?

.

Odd for a "Constitutional Scholar" to be so ignorant of such a huge Constitutionally historic event, huh?

It would seem she is lying............which would be perjury under these circumstances.

Well hey, Obama was a "constitutional scholar" too, ya know.

 

[berg80]

The facts behind Trump’s bogus accusations about Biden and Ukraine
The facts behind Trump’s bogus accusations about Biden and Ukraine
......................................................................................................
A quick guide to Trump’s false claims about Ukraine and the Bidens
Trump has falsely claimed that Biden in 2015 pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin, the top Ukrainian prosecutor, because he was investigating Ukraine’s largest private gas company, Burisma, which had added Biden’s son, Hunter, to its board in 2014.

There are two big problems with this claim: One, Shokin was not investigating Burisma or Hunter Biden, and two, Shokin’s ouster was considered a diplomatic victory.

Biden was among the many Western officials who pressed for the removal of Shokin because he actually was not investigating the corruption endemic to the country. Indeed, he was not investigating Burisma at the time. In September 2015, then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt publicly criticized Shokin’s office for thwarting a British money-laundering probe into Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ide-trumps-false-claims-about-ukraine-bidens/
.......................................................................................................................
It is incredibly frustrating to see the board littered with one falsehood after another with respect to every facet of this scandal. Shokin was not investigating Burisma or Hunter Biden!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TRUMP'S GOAL OF CREATING A FALSE NARRATIVE IS BEING ACHIEVED EVERY TIME YOU FOLKS REPEAT ONE OF HIS LIES.

He is following Putin's disinformation playbook. For every fact there is a Repub talking point claiming there are no facts. OR LYING ABOUT THE FACTS IN EVIDENCE.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Really, why is the intel committee not providing all testimony to the judiciary committee. What is shitt hiding?

.

Why do you think testimony was withheld?

I know for a fact they have not provided the testimony of the ICIG. It was mentioned today.

.

Wonder when the First bit of Evidence will be presented. This looks like a Dry discussion on PBS about the definition of "IS" for several hours.

You mean besides the overwhelming evidence of Trump's guilt contained in the House report?

There is No Evidence. Can you show me First Hand Evidence of a Crime?

Every single witness in Adolph Schiffler's Hoax Hearing said that they had No Knowledge of any Crimes and No Evidence. Today when the Fake Witnesses were asked if there was any evidence of an Impeachable Offense to raise their hands, not one did.

Now, don't you have some Putin Pudding to serve to your dead Daddy Al Baghdadi?

Have Trump testify, he is the one that can tell the whole story.

 

[Nostra]

Rep Demings (D): "President Trump has tried to OBSORB himself of criminal doings".

Huh?

 

[JGalt]

Really, why is the intel committee not providing all testimony to the judiciary committee. What is shitt hiding?

.

Why do you think testimony was withheld?

I know for a fact they have not provided the testimony of the ICIG. It was mentioned today.

.

Since all of the testimony is damning for Trump why do you think Schiff would withhold it.........assuming you are right. It's may be because the part of the testimony is classified.
In any event, the argument that Schiff acted unfairly went out the window when the public testimony began and when he released the transcripts of the closed door testimony. Anything else?

How about you post a link to the ICIG testimony if you think shitt released it all. Perhaps shitt is withholding that testimony because the ICIG had no authority to receive or act on the so called WB complaint in the first place.

.

Let the main dogs come forward and testify; Trump, Pompeo, Giuliani, Bolton, Mulvaney.
If they are not allowed to testify, it is the equivalent of pleading the 5th and they are guilty.

Shut up and help all push to get those involved, under oath, tell the world what happened and why.

Pleading the 5th Amendment doesn't mean you're guilty of anything.

What the hell is wrong with you people, anyway?

 

[Nostra]

The little commie from harvard just lied. He said Nixon sent people to do the break in, it's been proven Nixon had no foreknowledge of the break in, he got busted for trying to cover it up. Why do I think he will never face charges for his perjury?

.

Odd for a "Constitutional Scholar" to be so ignorant of such a huge Constitutionally historic event, huh?

It would seem she is lying............which would be perjury under these circumstances.

Well hey, Obama was a "constitutional scholar" too, ya know.

And the Supreme Court ruled he violated the Constitution numerous times.

 

[JGalt]

The facts behind Trump’s bogus accusations about Biden and Ukraine
The facts behind Trump’s bogus accusations about Biden and Ukraine
......................................................................................................
A quick guide to Trump’s false claims about Ukraine and the Bidens
Trump has falsely claimed that Biden in 2015 pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin, the top Ukrainian prosecutor, because he was investigating Ukraine’s largest private gas company, Burisma, which had added Biden’s son, Hunter, to its board in 2014.

There are two big problems with this claim: One, Shokin was not investigating Burisma or Hunter Biden, and two, Shokin’s ouster was considered a diplomatic victory.

Biden was among the many Western officials who pressed for the removal of Shokin because he actually was not investigating the corruption endemic to the country. Indeed, he was not investigating Burisma at the time. In September 2015, then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt publicly criticized Shokin’s office for thwarting a British money-laundering probe into Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ide-trumps-false-claims-about-ukraine-bidens/
.......................................................................................................................
It is incredibly frustrating to see the board littered with one falsehood after another with respect to every facet of this scandal. Shokin was not investigating Burisma or Hunter Biden!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TRUMP'S GOAL OF CREATING A FALSE NARRATIVE IS BEING ACHIEVED EVERY TIME YOU FOLKS REPEAT ONE OF HIS LIES.

He is following Putin's disinformation playbook. For every fact there is a Repub talking point claiming there are no facts. OR LYING ABOUT THE FACTS IN EVIDENCE.

Dude, if you're going to give some long, wordy, fallacious testimony, maybe you should call Nadler and ask him to use you for a witness, mmmkay?

 

[toobfreak]

Really, why is the intel committee not providing all testimony to the judiciary committee. What is shitt hiding?

.

Why do you think testimony was withheld?

Schitler is hiding something.

Adolph Schiffler won't release his transcripts of his conversations with THE SECRET WHISTLEBLOWER, and neither will he let THE GOP interview his staff, or The FAKE Whistleblower.

What can be the argument against seeing transcripts of YOUR conversations with the person central to the investigation? That is evidence!

Whistleblowers are protected from repercussions, not anonymity. With anonymity, anything can be claimed without proof.

Why couldn't the whistleblower appear to testify and answer questions even with his face concealed and his voice altered in a separate booth to protect his identity?

It's the fact that Schiff pulls this crap, refuses to provide reasonable answers and no one in the media even bothers to ask either like they all have a bolt in their brain that makes this proceeding impossible to take seriously as legitimate.

And THE ACCUSED has a right to cross examine Adverse Witnesses and see ALL EVIDENCE against them.

Again, there is NO DUE PROCESS In this and it is REQUIRED BY LAW. It is an Illegal Witch Trial.

B-But . . . . this is just an INVESTIGATION, except it is full of accusations and premature conclusions pumped out 24/7 to the media and public all day long as FACT! That makes Trump the MOST GUILTY person in the history of jurisprudence never to actually be CHARGED much less CONVICTED of anything!

 

[BluesLegend]

Goddamn how low can Dem's stoop attacking a 13 year old kid WTF??