TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
- Jun 11, 2015
- 27,362
- 7,871
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nor there is any incentive to do good for the constituents.shit man, flake isn't a lame duck, he's a fking dead duck.yep, he said so on 60 minutes. funny he outed himself on national tv.I will say once again, any GOP that votes no, loses all money for any other election cycle from the GOP!! fk them. these are really nasty people who live in DC. they have no common man sincerity
That's why Flake is such a problem. He's not running for re-election, and he's pretty clearly decided that the lack of any need to get votes has freed him from any obligation to his constituents.
I frankly think, like any other employer, the people of a state should have the option to say, "No thanks, just go now" when an elected official declares he's going to retire at the end of his term. You can't really trust an employee to still be giving you his best effort when keeping his job is no longer a motivation.
What, you mean he didn't throw a screaming fit in front of the world, interspersed with blubbering, "poor me" fake crying and blaming partisan attacks for having to talk about it?Actually, the Dear Leader has copped to downing a whole six pack an hour before class and how it affected his academics. Your Dear Leader also copped to getting into fights and doing more in the way of drugs than just weed.
Thank you for accidentally bringing that important disctinction to the discussion.
If I was a a hardcore leftist senator I would love to have Kav on the campaign trail with my opponent. That would be grounds for impeaching Kav if I am correct. I doubt SC justices are allowed to campaign for either party. Even if that isnt correct I would love to have Kav drive more women into voting for me.I agree he was pathetic but I'd rather not have a liar on the SC that basically threatened the dem senators.
If you were a hardcore leftist senator running for reelection in West Virginia, North Dakota or Indiana, would you rather have Kavanaugh on the campaign trail with your opponent next week instead, reporting back to the electorate and letting them see that he isn't the Heavy Drinking Gang Banger that libs say shouldn't be on the court?
nor there is any incentive to do good for the constituents.shit man, flake isn't a lame duck, he's a fking dead duck.yep, he said so on 60 minutes. funny he outed himself on national tv.That's why Flake is such a problem. He's not running for re-election, and he's pretty clearly decided that the lack of any need to get votes has freed him from any obligation to his constituents.
I frankly think, like any other employer, the people of a state should have the option to say, "No thanks, just go now" when an elected official declares he's going to retire at the end of his term. You can't really trust an employee to still be giving you his best effort when keeping his job is no longer a motivation.
By the same token, he would be a powerful force driving men to the polls on the campaign trail if he is denied on such flimsy grounds. He could be a strong force flipping red state democrat seats.
Thats fine with me. There are more women than men.If I was a a hardcore leftist senator I would love to have Kav on the campaign trail with my opponent. That would be grounds for impeaching Kav if I am correct. I doubt SC justices are allowed to campaign for either party. Even if that isnt correct I would love to have Kav drive more women into voting for me.I agree he was pathetic but I'd rather not have a liar on the SC that basically threatened the dem senators.
If you were a hardcore leftist senator running for reelection in West Virginia, North Dakota or Indiana, would you rather have Kavanaugh on the campaign trail with your opponent next week instead, reporting back to the electorate and letting them see that he isn't the Heavy Drinking Gang Banger that libs say shouldn't be on the court?
By the same token, he would be a powerful force driving men to the polls on the campaign trail if he is denied on such flimsy grounds. He could be a strong force flipping red state democrat seats.
Thats fine with me. There are more women than men.If I was a a hardcore leftist senator I would love to have Kav on the campaign trail with my opponent. That would be grounds for impeaching Kav if I am correct. I doubt SC justices are allowed to campaign for either party. Even if that isnt correct I would love to have Kav drive more women into voting for me.I agree he was pathetic but I'd rather not have a liar on the SC that basically threatened the dem senators.
If you were a hardcore leftist senator running for reelection in West Virginia, North Dakota or Indiana, would you rather have Kavanaugh on the campaign trail with your opponent next week instead, reporting back to the electorate and letting them see that he isn't the Heavy Drinking Gang Banger that libs say shouldn't be on the court?
By the same token, he would be a powerful force driving men to the polls on the campaign trail if he is denied on such flimsy grounds. He could be a strong force flipping red state democrat seats.
They're gonna be sad soon.
well actually it is about keeping government out of churches. but what the fk do you know?Way to utterly misunderstand and misinterpret history in your lame attempt to appropriate it for yourself.
Just keep yammering about how America was built on a dislike of religion. That'll DEFINITELY play well in "flyover country". No, really. You should absolutely run with that.
Congrats on your distortion effort. The idea is to keep religious shit out of government. Thanks for keeping your religious feelings at home![]()
They're gonna be sad soon.
And the government was the church, and the church, the government.The settlers came to America to escape the persecution of the church by the government.
That's adorable and all, but he was attacked mercilessly...and no, he did not throw a manbaby tantrum like your abortion fairy Kavanaugh. Kinda fell on your face, there.I'm sure you Dear violent fighting, stoned, beer guzzling Leader WOULD have cried if and sobbed if he was attacked by 1/2 the Congress, 80% of the media, for 2 weeks during his NOMINATION --- if Hillary had done it to him...
well actually the government was the monarchy and the church the enforcer for them.And the government was the church, and the church, the government.The settlers came to America to escape the persecution of the church by the government.
So no, the other poster was spot on.
Zero, thanks for asking.How many of them are being paid to protest? That pisses me off.
One title of the monarch was, "The Supreme Head of the Church". So the monarchy was, indeed, part of the church. In fact, it ran it.well actually the government was the monarchy and the church the enforcer for them.
the king ruled the church was the law. the Monarch set it up that way.One title of the monarch was, "The Supreme Head of the Church". So the monarchy was, indeed, part of the church. In fact, it ran it.well actually the government was the monarchy and the church the enforcer for them.