Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats two cool points this week for good jokes.Not now but you can bet they are going to talk about how ugly she is.It looks like Kavanaugh is up next.Thats the next progression. She handed the repubs a bag of explosives so now they are deconstruction mode. They have to find something to break her down.Why the fuck is her looks continually pointed out?
That is more than pointless.
The GOP won't take any shots at the lady-professor.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beer holder.
Ginsberg is pissed about this crap.How many Democratic SC appointments have gone though this much acrimony and outright hatred?
The writing was on the wall with Garland, he wasn't going to get the votes.Kavenaugh will receive an up or down vote-So now you jump from the process of background checks to, "the Democrats use this as a political weapon". Probably... It says nothing about the truth of the claims more about how unethical politics is. Something that Republicans have done on more then a few occasions.So if I investigate somebody 100 times but afterwards stuff comes out that I missed does that mean I don't have a right to investigate those things? The only thing I've seen the left, or anybody do is ask for an investigation. Show me one who is even suggesting prosecuting Kavanaugh?They already did one. Six of them. They wouldn't turn up anything more on this, because as we have seen, there is ZERO documentation of what happened that night.
The Committee has sent questions to anyone they can reach who was involved, that is the same thing the FBI would do, it would just take them longer.
A background check is a very specific thing. They just gather INFORMATION, they don't use it to build a case, which is basically what the left is calling for here.
They had months and months to investigate this. Feinstein had the information TWO MONTHS before the official hearings were held.
So we should keep trying people until we find the guilty? How Fascist of you.
Actually trying to prosecute him would be better because you would be held to a far higher standard of evidence, and any judge would throw out the charges in a heartbeat.
They are asking for "An investigation" as cover to vote no and use Ford's accusation as a shield, at least the Dems from Red States are.
-As to how unfair it is. The picking of a SCOTUS nominee IS a political process not a judicial one. I find it the height of irony that a Republican asks for a nomination process were there is no political gamesmanship and the standard of the nominee in question should be no higher then whether or not he has committed sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. Garland wasn't even allowed a meeting let alone a hearing when he was put forward. Kavanaugh had no compunction trying to get Clinton impeached for lying about a blowjob between CONSENTING ADULTS. Here's a tip. When asking for not just fair but unreasonable fair behavior. Which, not holding a higher standard that there is doubt that he committed a crime is. It's probably a good idea to have a proven track record of fairness yourself. Otherwise what is it but blatant, self-serving hypocrisy?
I have always been of the opinion that this is nothing more than a political weapon. And the Garland thing has nothing to do with this. He was denied hearings, his whole life wasn't turned upside down in an attempt to ruin him. He wasn't accused of unprovable acts done 30+ years ago.
How many Democratic SC appointments have gone though this much acrimony and outright hatred?
Everything else in your response is bullshit fluff.
How about we ruin your life with accusations with this level of evidence?
Something Garland never received
Oh yes...the harlot defenseTypical of the way conservatives attack femalesYou sound jealous. Typical whorish catty behavior.
Gawd she is hideous....inside and out.
I think she may have been the aggressor, Lets see, All girls school, Sophomore Trying to fit in, tried to get the Prize Virgin From the all boys Jesuit School got turned down or rejected /drunk and ended up somewhere she can't remember I know it happens doesn't mean he did it
You think he poked it in before she could fight her way free?How do you know she escaped Predator Brett?She managed to escape Predator Brett, remember?How do you know she was raped?As an experiment, go get raped and see if you return cheery and optimistic.
I wish I had memory loss concerning her looks.Not now but you can bet they are going to talk about how ugly she is.It looks like Kavanaugh is up next.Thats the next progression. She handed the repubs a bag of explosives so now they are deconstruction mode. They have to find something to break her down.Why the fuck is her looks continually pointed out?
That is more than pointless.
The GOP won't take any shots at the lady-professor.
I too think the lady-professor is pretty. I have no problem with her looks.Not now but you can bet they are going to talk about how ugly she is.It looks like Kavanaugh is up next.Thats the next progression. She handed the repubs a bag of explosives so now they are deconstruction mode. They have to find something to break her down.Why the fuck is her looks continually pointed out?
That is more than pointless.
The GOP won't take any shots at the lady-professor.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beer holder.
Yep, even she knows what's going on here.Ginsberg is pissed about this crap.How many Democratic SC appointments have gone though this much acrimony and outright hatred?
I suspect Trump thinks this is all a victimless crime, yes.I cant see Drumpf being a cuck. He is an apex sexual predator.Where did I say only? I said repub men seem to have a problem with being sexual predators. The leader of the repubs likes grabbing pussies.I'll take my chances with a female. Repub men seem to have a problem with being sexual predators.
You really think it’s only Republican men?
Kinda sounds cuckolded?
However the political implications for November will cause Trump and the GOP to rethink Kavanaugh very quickly.
I am waiting with 'baited breath to hear what Kavanaugh will say during his grilling by the DEMs next.
RWer is not very bright.Yeah, they kinda did......she is fuzzy on all details except for one, she is crystal clear that it was Kav.She didn’t breakRepublicans needed to break her story and establish that she was not credibleLindsey Graham just gave a remarkable interview in the hallway. way to go Lindsey!!!
Lindsey Graham was hysterical and childish, Dr. Ford was emotional, mature and rational.
They failed
Ford established that herserlf
She calmly laid out her story and Republicans failed to break it
She didn't mention Kav's name to the 2012 therapy session.
Her witnesses couldn't collaborate her story.
There are major holes in her testimony
I too think the lady-professor is pretty. I have no problem with her looks.Not now but you can bet they are going to talk about how ugly she is.It looks like Kavanaugh is up next.Thats the next progression. She handed the repubs a bag of explosives so now they are deconstruction mode. They have to find something to break her down.Why the fuck is her looks continually pointed out?
That is more than pointless.
The GOP won't take any shots at the lady-professor.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beer holder.
She is a credible witness. Her testimony seems factual.
Kavanaugh is between a rock and a hard place now.
Kavenaugh will receive an up or down vote-So now you jump from the process of background checks to, "the Democrats use this as a political weapon". Probably... It says nothing about the truth of the claims more about how unethical politics is. Something that Republicans have done on more then a few occasions.So if I investigate somebody 100 times but afterwards stuff comes out that I missed does that mean I don't have a right to investigate those things? The only thing I've seen the left, or anybody do is ask for an investigation. Show me one who is even suggesting prosecuting Kavanaugh?They already did one. Six of them. They wouldn't turn up anything more on this, because as we have seen, there is ZERO documentation of what happened that night.
The Committee has sent questions to anyone they can reach who was involved, that is the same thing the FBI would do, it would just take them longer.
A background check is a very specific thing. They just gather INFORMATION, they don't use it to build a case, which is basically what the left is calling for here.
They had months and months to investigate this. Feinstein had the information TWO MONTHS before the official hearings were held.
So we should keep trying people until we find the guilty? How Fascist of you.
Actually trying to prosecute him would be better because you would be held to a far higher standard of evidence, and any judge would throw out the charges in a heartbeat.
They are asking for "An investigation" as cover to vote no and use Ford's accusation as a shield, at least the Dems from Red States are.
-As to how unfair it is. The picking of a SCOTUS nominee IS a political process not a judicial one. I find it the height of irony that a Republican asks for a nomination process were there is no political gamesmanship and the standard of the nominee in question should be no higher then whether or not he has committed sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. Garland wasn't even allowed a meeting let alone a hearing when he was put forward. Kavanaugh had no compunction trying to get Clinton impeached for lying about a blowjob between CONSENTING ADULTS. Here's a tip. When asking for not just fair but unreasonable fair behavior. Which, not holding a higher standard that there is doubt that he committed a crime is. It's probably a good idea to have a proven track record of fairness yourself. Otherwise what is it but blatant, self-serving hypocrisy?
I have always been of the opinion that this is nothing more than a political weapon. And the Garland thing has nothing to do with this. He was denied hearings, his whole life wasn't turned upside down in an attempt to ruin him. He wasn't accused of unprovable acts done 30+ years ago.
How many Democratic SC appointments have gone though this much acrimony and outright hatred?
Everything else in your response is bullshit fluff.
How about we ruin your life with accusations with this level of evidence?
Something Garland never received
I hear what your saying, but, just the incident that happened is enough to screw things up for her.....doesn't have to be noticed by people.Sorry but I know women that have been through the same thing and it indeed fucks up their lives.K so let's really break this down.
When she was 15, someone pushed her into a room, groped her over her clothes, laughed with her friend about it, briefly covered her mouth and....that was it. She escaped and that was the end of that.
Not good. Very bad. Unfortunate. If true, the guy's a cad.
But this woman, a wife and mother with two sons, two master's degrees, a PhD and etc is so traumatized by this almost 40 years later she "can't fly"? (but can). She needs two doors on the first floor? (But not until 2012).
That's just not right. I don't think it jives. I think she DID recover from this, and maybe trouble in her marriage brought it up again, fine. But to NOW cast this as if it "broke her". Nope. And don't a single man here fall for it, either.
But her life was not effed up. She went on to school and multiple advanced degrees. Not only a successful life, but an exemplary career by all standards. She seems to be REALLY dwelling on something that happened a really long time ago, was very short, and did not rise to actual rape or even close.
My point is that something probably happened, but, not with Kav.
I'm sure those close to you feel the same about you.I wish I had memory loss concerning her looks.Not now but you can bet they are going to talk about how ugly she is.It looks like Kavanaugh is up next.Thats the next progression. She handed the repubs a bag of explosives so now they are deconstruction mode. They have to find something to break her down.Why the fuck is her looks continually pointed out?
That is more than pointless.
The GOP won't take any shots at the lady-professor.
I suspect Trump thinks this is all a victimless crime, yes.I cant see Drumpf being a cuck. He is an apex sexual predator.Where did I say only? I said repub men seem to have a problem with being sexual predators. The leader of the repubs likes grabbing pussies.You really think it’s only Republican men?
Kinda sounds cuckolded?
However the political implications for November will cause Trump and the GOP to rethink Kavanaugh very quickly.
I am waiting with 'baited breath to hear what Kavanaugh will say during his grilling by the DEMs next.
If your trolling for a cuck, I think asslips is a perfect choice. Go for it
Then they should have had to put their vote on the record and be accountable for itThe writing was on the wall with Garland, he wasn't going to get the votes.Kavenaugh will receive an up or down vote-So now you jump from the process of background checks to, "the Democrats use this as a political weapon". Probably... It says nothing about the truth of the claims more about how unethical politics is. Something that Republicans have done on more then a few occasions.So if I investigate somebody 100 times but afterwards stuff comes out that I missed does that mean I don't have a right to investigate those things? The only thing I've seen the left, or anybody do is ask for an investigation. Show me one who is even suggesting prosecuting Kavanaugh?
They had months and months to investigate this. Feinstein had the information TWO MONTHS before the official hearings were held.
So we should keep trying people until we find the guilty? How Fascist of you.
Actually trying to prosecute him would be better because you would be held to a far higher standard of evidence, and any judge would throw out the charges in a heartbeat.
They are asking for "An investigation" as cover to vote no and use Ford's accusation as a shield, at least the Dems from Red States are.
-As to how unfair it is. The picking of a SCOTUS nominee IS a political process not a judicial one. I find it the height of irony that a Republican asks for a nomination process were there is no political gamesmanship and the standard of the nominee in question should be no higher then whether or not he has committed sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. Garland wasn't even allowed a meeting let alone a hearing when he was put forward. Kavanaugh had no compunction trying to get Clinton impeached for lying about a blowjob between CONSENTING ADULTS. Here's a tip. When asking for not just fair but unreasonable fair behavior. Which, not holding a higher standard that there is doubt that he committed a crime is. It's probably a good idea to have a proven track record of fairness yourself. Otherwise what is it but blatant, self-serving hypocrisy?
I have always been of the opinion that this is nothing more than a political weapon. And the Garland thing has nothing to do with this. He was denied hearings, his whole life wasn't turned upside down in an attempt to ruin him. He wasn't accused of unprovable acts done 30+ years ago.
How many Democratic SC appointments have gone though this much acrimony and outright hatred?
Everything else in your response is bullshit fluff.
How about we ruin your life with accusations with this level of evidence?
Something Garland never received
How many times did Reid shelve Bills because there wasn't the votes. No difference
Ginsberg is pissed about this crap.How many Democratic SC appointments have gone though this much acrimony and outright hatred?
I suspect Trump thinks this is all a victimless crime, yes.I cant see Drumpf being a cuck. He is an apex sexual predator.Where did I say only? I said repub men seem to have a problem with being sexual predators. The leader of the repubs likes grabbing pussies.I'll take my chances with a female. Repub men seem to have a problem with being sexual predators.
You really think it’s only Republican men?
Kinda sounds cuckolded?
However the political implications for November will cause Trump and the GOP to rethink Kavanaugh very quickly.
I am waiting with 'baited breath to hear what Kavanaugh will say during his grilling by the DEMs next.
I’m rather cute...and obviously funny as all heck.I'm sure those close to you feel the same about you.I wish I had memory loss concerning her looks.Not now but you can bet they are going to talk about how ugly she is.It looks like Kavanaugh is up next.Thats the next progression. She handed the repubs a bag of explosives so now they are deconstruction mode. They have to find something to break her down.Why the fuck is her looks continually pointed out?
That is more than pointless.
The GOP won't take any shots at the lady-professor.
