Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You said, quote: "He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers..."He indicted them with illegally-obtained and inadmissible evidence?He indicted them because he had to have some RUSSIANS! to try and prop up his giant nothingburger,.What do you think he indicted them for then? Jaywalking?
Funny thing is that some of them showed up for their court date, and he and his clown car of "investigators" couldn't backpedal fast enough.
He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers and used the camera on the computers to see the specific people who were doing the crime.
Illegally obtained? It was two countries sharing intel.
Hacking is illegal. Please tell me you know this.
Old Eddie's having a very, very bad day.Bless your heart, Ed. You're one of those never ever tRumpersof any wrong doing? Tell me that when he's found innocent of money laundering paying off women who he's slept with with campaign money, illegal use of charitable monies etc etc etc etcStay tuned for the link as it's just breaking right now.
Now where do the democrats stand?
I'm hoping they are relieved that Trump has been cleared of any wrongdoing.
Coming over the wires right now, there was no collusion or conspiracy, Trump is clean
Link?
If 147 perfect links with perfect articles by perfect people and signed by Jesus were provided, you still wouldn't consider them.
I observe that you have Pogo all figured out.
Stay tuned for the link as it's just breaking right now.
Now where do the democrats stand?
I'm hoping they are relieved that Trump has been cleared of any wrongdoing.
Yeah it’s happening live. Basically a nothing burger. Complete and total vindication.
Until we get to see the report and not just the opinion of somebody as to what I says, we have no clue what is in it.
We the people deserve to see what we paid for.
Legally he cannot release the full report. He has to protect innocents. Just a synopsis
They can redact the names of the innocent. A synopsis is just a person's opinion of what it says.
World wide racists you mean.Coming over the wires right now, there was no collusion or conspiracy, Trump is clean
This is World Wide Rightists Reaction
That mole was Seth Rich who's now unavailable for comment.But Russia DID hack into DNC-Clinton emails BECAUSE IT WAS SO DAMN EASY!
Wikileaks , who revealed the Clinton Emails, said it had nothing to do with Russia. Mr. Assange has hinted that he may have had a mole at the DNC, a whistleblower.
Thank God it's over...now back to much more important things like the NCAA tourney. I was angry when they interrupted my game. Priorities.
It's always funny when people who can't think for themselves try to dictate what other people think.That is quite an insane and unhinged boatload of bizarre bovine excrement! You are over the edge Pal. There is more to social justice than combatting wealth and income disparity although that is part of it. You apparently think that a Plutocracy is good for Democracy. That is insane. Remember the French Revolution? No that is not a threat. It is an attempt to impart some wisdom about history and its tendency to repeat itself when people are too stupid to learn by it. and no fool, I am not a Communist , nor am I promoting a revolution. There is a lot of wiggling room between the libertarian/ laissez faire world that you seek and a dictatorship.And looky there, right on cue -- a promise of death. You bozos just can't help it, can you?Feel free to believe that those of us who want to save the earth and work for social justice are tyrants go right ahead. I live by certain rules and values of civilized society in which we are interdependent . Obviously you prefer social Darwinism, but you might discover that you are not one of the fittest .Oh, I can understand it, all right. Never met a leftist yet who didn't believe he had the moral authority to be a dictator.On what basis do you believe you have authority to dictate to others?
On the basis of being a member of human society who cares about others and the earth. I doubt that you can understand that though
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
― C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)
C.S. Lewis says you can fuck off, we don't need your interference.
"Social justice" is a code word that means "taking from people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't".
I'm sure it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy as a white liberal knowing how superior you are to minorities who need you to do their thinking for them.
But you need to come to terms with your inherent impotence that no little blue pill can cure. There will be no Revolution. You will not be given a seat on the Politburo, especially given your complete unwillingness to do any wet work in your desired Revolution. In the insanely unlikely event there is a Revolution, you will work in a tractor factory 6 days a week, and you'd damn well better make the right noises in the Party meetings or you'll be put in a mass grave alongside those you believe aren't ideologically pure.
Good Gaea's gargantuan gazongas, but Commies are stupid.
So I suggest you sit down and shut up and let the adults handle things. Keep your Commie wet dreams to yourself. Rational people aren't interested.
And now 50% of the country knows what 50% of the country knew two years ago.
Congrats.
I'm certain it's against Russian law to hack their government computers. So why should we object if they hack our computers?You said, quote: "He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers..."He indicted them with illegally-obtained and inadmissible evidence?He indicted them because he had to have some RUSSIANS! to try and prop up his giant nothingburger,.
Funny thing is that some of them showed up for their court date, and he and his clown car of "investigators" couldn't backpedal fast enough.
He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers and used the camera on the computers to see the specific people who were doing the crime.
Illegally obtained? It was two countries sharing intel.
Hacking is illegal. Please tell me you know this.
Hacking the Russian computers is not illegal when they are investigating a crime... and when it comes to intelligence agencies when conducting intelligence gathering and trying to protect their country and pass along information to allies.
One inescapable observation from Mueller report. Putin’s attempts to sow discord in the American public worked beyond his wildest dreams. And two of the three major cable news channels were his useful idiots.
Doug McKelway (@dougmckelway) March 24, 2019
Thank God this two-year long national nightmare is over. Donald Trump is now the President of everyone, right, left, and center.
Are you sure about that Dude. Only in the minds of idiots and the delusional did he win. It is far from over. He has not been exonerated. If there was a winner today, it's the American people and all those who want to restore decency and sanity to government .In case anyone here is keeping score, Trump wins yet again and the lefttards lose yet again. This is a very one sided game indeed. Can it be that Trump alone is smarter than all of the dumb democommies combined? From the looks of their most recent recruits like AOC, apparently so.
Which,of course, you just made up, because now you're whiny.You have consistently posted claims about the law that are obviously false
"...trying to protect their country..."You said, quote: "He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers..."He indicted them with illegally-obtained and inadmissible evidence?He indicted them because he had to have some RUSSIANS! to try and prop up his giant nothingburger,.
Funny thing is that some of them showed up for their court date, and he and his clown car of "investigators" couldn't backpedal fast enough.
He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers and used the camera on the computers to see the specific people who were doing the crime.
Illegally obtained? It was two countries sharing intel.
Hacking is illegal. Please tell me you know this.
Hacking the Russian computers is not illegal when they are investigating a crime... and when it comes to intelligence agencies when conducting intelligence gathering and trying to protect their country and pass along information to allies.
I'm certain it's against Russian law to hack their government computers. So why should we object if they hack our computers?You said, quote: "He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers..."He indicted them with illegally-obtained and inadmissible evidence?He indicted them because the Dutch hacked their computers and used the camera on the computers to see the specific people who were doing the crime.
Illegally obtained? It was two countries sharing intel.
Hacking is illegal. Please tell me you know this.
Hacking the Russian computers is not illegal when they are investigating a crime... and when it comes to intelligence agencies when conducting intelligence gathering and trying to protect their country and pass along information to allies.
