- Thread starter
- #181
However a Congressmen who is looking after more than just one person is less corrupt.
this is patently false
like everything else, it depends
an example - the people of Atlanta & the people of South Alabama have been in a dispute over water rights for decades
Atlanta is a big city & utilizes a lot of resources
Atlanta also produces a tremendous amount of waste; so much that the Chattahoochee river is just about disgusting anywhere south of Atlanta
the waste has also just about destroyed marine life where the river lets out into the Gulf of Mexico & has seriously hurt the economy of fishermen in South Alabama
the politicians in Atlanta represent FAR more people than the politicians in South Alabama
is it corrupt to destroy nature?
do the millions of people in Atlanta have a right to fully utilize the river that is the lifeblood of the city?
are the pols that represent MORE people less corrupt when they continue to allow the river to be polluted to the point that those south of them cannot enjoy its benefits?
the world is not absolute & statements like the one you just made can almost always be disproven
because there are always at least 3 sides to every story