Okay - It is time to predict Uncle Joe's pick

[petro]

Easy.
Whoever CNN and MSPMS tell him to pick.

 

[petro]

I dunno..... whatever goes good with a vegetable.

Obviously, the only qualification will be to "look brown".

He should pick Omar.
Black, female and Muslim.
Three Aces in a hand of Diversity Poker.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Ukraine joe is incompetent, senile, dementia laden, mentally slow, health problems. The communist party behind him will be making that decision.

OMG, this is coming from a Trump supporter.

You know, I wish irony was painful, I really do. Let's break that down:

"Incompetent"- Trump - check (doesn't read, doesn't do intel briefings (first Pres. ever?) and knows little about anything, other than playing the white grievance card to his brain dead supporters.)

"senile" - Trump - check (Dog - TV - Couch - Porn Star - Fox News)

"dementia laden" - Trump - check (This is a man with all the symptoms, including extreme paranoia. Also has trouble with pronouncing many words)

"mentally slow" - Trump - check (self explanatory)

"health problems" - Trump - check (cannot walk down a wide ramp without difficulty, cannot drink a glass of water with only one hand)

"The communist party.." <snip> Trump - check (Putin pulls the strings, Trump does the dancing)

Sadly, you're too stupid to understand any of this, but thinking people are well aware.

You're describing Ukraine joe who has a history of mental and health problems. Unfortunately, you're delusional and can't see the truth..or just keep your head in the sand.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Easy.
Whoever CNN and MSPMS tell him to pick.

Better than letting the anti-choice, anti-gay morons decide.

 

[Missourian]

I'm going with either Val Demmings, Val Demmings or Val Demmings.

In fact, I'm betting on it.

She's perfect - Her questioning in the impeachment trial was brilliant
Her background as police chief of a large US city (Orlando) blows away Rump's "law and order" BS
She assures a win in Florida (even though the latest poll has Joe up by 13)
She'd energize both black voters and females
And as icing on the cake, she would carve up Pence in a debate like soft Brie cheese.

Who's your pick, and why?

I'm going with the 'other Biden'.

I haven't seen them...but Joe Biden told me to vote for them as Joe is running for U.S. Senate.

 

[DrLove]

Ukraine joe is incompetent, senile, dementia laden, mentally slow, health problems. The communist party behind him will be making that decision.

OMG, this is coming from a Trump supporter.

You know, I wish irony was painful, I really do. Let's break that down:

"Incompetent"- Trump - check (doesn't read, doesn't do intel briefings (first Pres. ever?) and knows little about anything, other than playing the white grievance card to his brain dead supporters.)

"senile" - Trump - check (Dog - TV - Couch - Porn Star - Fox News)

"dementia laden" - Trump - check (This is a man with all the symptoms, including extreme paranoia. Also has trouble with pronouncing many words)

"mentally slow" - Trump - check (self explanatory)

"health problems" - Trump - check (cannot walk down a wide ramp without difficulty, cannot drink a glass of water with only one hand)

"The communist party.." <snip> Trump - check (Putin pulls the strings, Trump does the dancing)

Sadly, you're too stupid to understand any of this, but thinking people are well aware.

You're describing Ukraine joe who has a history of mental and health problems. Unfortunately, you're delusional and can't see the truth..or just keep your head in the sand.

Could you link us to Uncle Joe's "history of mental problems"?
Gateway Pundit doesn't count

 

[DrLove]

Obama didn't F things up like this one has. And no, white people can't possibly understand the black experience in this country or in my case, the black, female experience.

There is nothing wrong with political calculations. Never in my lifetime has an election been so important. If a VP helps to win a state, or if they can energize younger, black voters to get out, I am all for it.

Nor can you understand, as in my case, the white female experience - who cares? The important thing as a national leader is to understand the American experience.

Any other choice, such as gender or race based is biased and bigoted. One thing for certain - if bias and bigotry are wrong - they are wrong for any race, gender or creed. There are no free passes based on skin color or religion or gender - to do so is to exemplify bigotry.

Again, I ask - are gender and race chosen at will, or determined at conception?

Gender and race are determined conception, but I fail to see what difference that makes.

I consider myself to be extremely fortunate to have been born male and white to a solidly middle class family as opposed to poor and black in the ghetto.

My odds were easily 10 times the odds of the latter who may be dead or in prison.

Why can't you empathize with that reality, and why are political calculations when it comes to a running mate wrong?

Calling it racism is just dirt dumb.

 

[BS Filter]

I predict Creepy Joe will pick a dumbass low IQ Negro. He has quite a few to chose from.

Our resident racist rears its ugly head. Back to ignore you go Trumpette!

Then the NAACP is racist.

 

[rightwinger]

I would personally like to see Tammy Duckworth

I think Kamala Harris would be too visible and outspoken. I think Demmings might be a good bet

 

[DrLove]

I predict Creepy Joe will pick a dumbass low IQ Negro. He has quite a few to chose from.

Our resident racist rears its ugly head. Back to ignore you go Trumpette!

Then the NAACP is racist.

Whatever blows yer skirt up!

 

[BrokeLoser]

I'm going with either Val Demmings, Val Demmings or Val Demmings.

In fact, I'm betting on it.

She's perfect - Her questioning in the impeachment trial was brilliant
Her background as police chief of a large US city (Orlando) blows away Rump's "law and order" BS
She assures a win in Florida (even though the latest poll has Joe up by 13)
She'd energize both black voters and females
And as icing on the cake, she would carve up Pence in a debate like soft Brie cheese.

Who's your pick, and why?

Haha...Val...haha
I’m sure middle America will love her.
Apparently you don’t know what “energized” black voters look like.

 

[TNHarley]

that senile pedo will probably pick himself

 

[Bush92]

Atlanta Mayor Keisha Bottoms

View attachment 367486

Wonder if "Bottoms" likes anal?

 

[bendog]

I'm not sold on any of the minority candidates, though I admire Sen. Duckworth. The biggest "knock" on her may be that she's not the "right" kind of minority.

I'm suspicious of her views on capital, although I suspect she sees it as "a necessary evil," and I'd agree, but Sen Warren is imo the most qualified.

 

[BS Filter]

I predict Creepy Joe will pick a dumbass low IQ Negro. He has quite a few to chose from.

Our resident racist rears its ugly head. Back to ignore you go Trumpette!

Then the NAACP is racist.

Whatever blows yer skirt up!

You're the idiot that says the word "Negro" is racist.

 

[SeaGal]

Gender and race are determined conception, but I fail to see what difference that makes.

I consider myself to be extremely fortunate to have been born male and white to a solidly middle class family as opposed to poor and black in the ghetto.

My odds were easily 10 times the odds of the latter who may be dead or in prison.

Why can't you empathize with that reality, and why are political calculations when it comes to a running mate wrong?

Calling it racism is just dirt dumb.

Empathy is a passive reaction. The ghetto poor need action - and that begins with education - charter, vouchers, virtual. All things the Democrats have fought tooth and nail to avoid, though recently virtual has received a favorable reception.

The rallying cry that is is 'time' for a woman, whether a woman of color or not, is offensive. We were recently told that it was 'time' to elect a black man - how'd that work out for the ghetto?

True, VP's are often chosen for what they can bring (translate votes) to the ticket - regional, age, experience, etc. That doesn't mean that it's good for the country.

Gender and race should not be the determining factor when selecting a leader, (and yes, that's my opinion) - as I've stated repeatedly - those characteristics are not achieved through diligence, hard work or dedication to pubic service. The notion that only a black woman can 'understand' the black woman experience which somehow qualifies her to be the leader of a diverse nation is nonsense.

 

[DrLove]

Gender and race are determined conception, but I fail to see what difference that makes.

I consider myself to be extremely fortunate to have been born male and white to a solidly middle class family as opposed to poor and black in the ghetto.

My odds were easily 10 times the odds of the latter who may be dead or in prison.

Why can't you empathize with that reality, and why are political calculations when it comes to a running mate wrong?

Calling it racism is just dirt dumb.

Empathy is a passive reaction. The ghetto poor need action - and that begins with education - charter, vouchers, virtual. All things the Democrats have fought tooth and nail to avoid, though recently virtual has received a favorable reception.

The rallying cry that is is 'time' for a woman, whether a woman of color or not, is offensive. We were recently told that it was 'time' to elect a black man - how'd that work out for the ghetto?

True, VP's are often chosen for what they can bring (translate votes) to the ticket - regional, age, experience, etc. That doesn't mean that it's good for the country.

Gender and race should not be the determining factor when selecting a leader, (and yes, that's my opinion) - as I've stated repeatedly - those characteristics are not achieved through diligence, hard work or dedication to pubic service. The notion that only a black woman can 'understand' the black woman experience which somehow qualifies her to be the leader of a diverse nation is nonsense.

The black women under consideration are every bit as qualified as any of the white women who were under consideration.
All things being equal, yes - It makes sense to choose the black female at a time when post-George Floyd, 63% of the American people support the BLM movement.

63% support Black Lives Matter as recognition of discrimination jumps: POLL

63% of Americans support the Black Lives Matter movement and a record 69% say Black people, minorities are denied equal treatment in the criminal justice system.

abcnews.go.com

I appreciate your parallel universe view, but not really getting anywhere here. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

 

[BS Filter]

Gender and race are determined conception, but I fail to see what difference that makes.

I consider myself to be extremely fortunate to have been born male and white to a solidly middle class family as opposed to poor and black in the ghetto.

My odds were easily 10 times the odds of the latter who may be dead or in prison.

Why can't you empathize with that reality, and why are political calculations when it comes to a running mate wrong?

Calling it racism is just dirt dumb.

Empathy is a passive reaction. The ghetto poor need action - and that begins with education - charter, vouchers, virtual. All things the Democrats have fought tooth and nail to avoid, though recently virtual has received a favorable reception.

The rallying cry that is is 'time' for a woman, whether a woman of color or not, is offensive. We were recently told that it was 'time' to elect a black man - how'd that work out for the ghetto?

True, VP's are often chosen for what they can bring (translate votes) to the ticket - regional, age, experience, etc. That doesn't mean that it's good for the country.

Gender and race should not be the determining factor when selecting a leader, (and yes, that's my opinion) - as I've stated repeatedly - those characteristics are not achieved through diligence, hard work or dedication to pubic service. The notion that only a black woman can 'understand' the black woman experience which somehow qualifies her to be the leader of a diverse nation is nonsense.

The black women under consideration are every bit as qualified as any of the white women who were under consideration.
All things being equal, yes - It makes sense to choose the black female at a time when post-George Floyd, 63% of the American people support the BLM movement.

63% support Black Lives Matter as recognition of discrimination jumps: POLL

63% of Americans support the Black Lives Matter movement and a record 69% say Black people, minorities are denied equal treatment in the criminal justice system.

abcnews.go.com

I appreciate your parallel universe view, but not really getting anywhere here. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

You believe polls? Lol, that's funny.

 

[DrLove]

Gender and race are determined conception, but I fail to see what difference that makes.

I consider myself to be extremely fortunate to have been born male and white to a solidly middle class family as opposed to poor and black in the ghetto.

My odds were easily 10 times the odds of the latter who may be dead or in prison.

Why can't you empathize with that reality, and why are political calculations when it comes to a running mate wrong?

Calling it racism is just dirt dumb.

Empathy is a passive reaction. The ghetto poor need action - and that begins with education - charter, vouchers, virtual. All things the Democrats have fought tooth and nail to avoid, though recently virtual has received a favorable reception.

The rallying cry that is is 'time' for a woman, whether a woman of color or not, is offensive. We were recently told that it was 'time' to elect a black man - how'd that work out for the ghetto?

True, VP's are often chosen for what they can bring (translate votes) to the ticket - regional, age, experience, etc. That doesn't mean that it's good for the country.

Gender and race should not be the determining factor when selecting a leader, (and yes, that's my opinion) - as I've stated repeatedly - those characteristics are not achieved through diligence, hard work or dedication to pubic service. The notion that only a black woman can 'understand' the black woman experience which somehow qualifies her to be the leader of a diverse nation is nonsense.

The black women under consideration are every bit as qualified as any of the white women who were under consideration.
All things being equal, yes - It makes sense to choose the black female at a time when post-George Floyd, 63% of the American people support the BLM movement.

63% support Black Lives Matter as recognition of discrimination jumps: POLL

63% of Americans support the Black Lives Matter movement and a record 69% say Black people, minorities are denied equal treatment in the criminal justice system.

abcnews.go.com

I appreciate your parallel universe view, but not really getting anywhere here. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

You believe polls? Lol, that's funny.

You and your fellow Trumptards believe polls to when they tell you things you want to hear.
You know, like Rasmussen's claim that 48% of blacks approve of Donald Trump?

 

[bendog]

Gender and race are determined conception, but I fail to see what difference that makes.

I consider myself to be extremely fortunate to have been born male and white to a solidly middle class family as opposed to poor and black in the ghetto.

My odds were easily 10 times the odds of the latter who may be dead or in prison.

Why can't you empathize with that reality, and why are political calculations when it comes to a running mate wrong?

Calling it racism is just dirt dumb.

Empathy is a passive reaction. The ghetto poor need action - and that begins with education - charter, vouchers, virtual. All things the Democrats have fought tooth and nail to avoid, though recently virtual has received a favorable reception.

The rallying cry that is is 'time' for a woman, whether a woman of color or not, is offensive. We were recently told that it was 'time' to elect a black man - how'd that work out for the ghetto?

True, VP's are often chosen for what they can bring (translate votes) to the ticket - regional, age, experience, etc. That doesn't mean that it's good for the country.

Gender and race should not be the determining factor when selecting a leader, (and yes, that's my opinion) - as I've stated repeatedly - those characteristics are not achieved through diligence, hard work or dedication to pubic service. The notion that only a black woman can 'understand' the black woman experience which somehow qualifies her to be the leader of a diverse nation is nonsense.

The black women under consideration are every bit as qualified as any of the white women who were under consideration.
All things being equal, yes - It makes sense to choose the black female at a time when post-George Floyd, 63% of the American people support the BLM movement.

63% support Black Lives Matter as recognition of discrimination jumps: POLL

63% of Americans support the Black Lives Matter movement and a record 69% say Black people, minorities are denied equal treatment in the criminal justice system.

abcnews.go.com

I appreciate your parallel universe view, but not really getting anywhere here. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Gender is an issue. Trump is admittedly at least formerly a practitioner of sexual assault. Hillary at best enabled Slick to sexually harass employees. The Trump Fake News Machine is doing it's best to paint Biden as Slick.

I'm wary of the dems focusing social justice and police discrimination just upon blacks. There's no doubt the criminal justice system treats blacks in ways whites wouldn't be. But with Trump even latinos here legally fear ICE raids that at a minimum could cost their jobs simply for being arrested without committing any crime. Trump labeled illegal immigrants as racists and murderers. The dems could go overboard, and they can't win NC or Ariz or Fla without latinos and hispanics