Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
H. Clinton was too easy on them by calling SOME of them Deplorables.And folks on the right actually applaud his efforts.Bye, Project Veritas.
James O' Keefe has to be one of the scummiest of human being that the right wing has ever produced and the moron actually find funding for his crap.
Of course I do. Try reading their article on this story. They explain how they figured out she was a fraud.LOLYou mean the do a search on Facebook?Nope, O’Keefe just proved they’re not. He proved they vet their stories.That’s it? Just 20?
Shit, that’s just a few days work for trump.
Analysis | President Trump has made 1,628 false or misleading claims over 298 days
Find another 1600 Obama lies just to catch up to trump. Oh, and by the time you do, you’ll have to catch up to trump again, who’s averaging more than 5 lies a day.
The Washington Post - fake news.
Yeah, they're crack reporters!
They researched her entire story, numbnuts. Called supposed employers, references, looked into her claims. Determined she was full of shit and exposed her and was able to connect her with O’Keefe.
It’s called, “vetting,” and all O’Keefe exposed was the Washington Post vets their articles.
You have no idea what they did.
Who do you think you're fooling?
You have no idea what they did.
Who do you think you're fooling?
This is the Coup de grace of Moore's chances. It is proof that the Post's original reporting was accurate and backed up. The post didn't bite at the story that was just bait, they actually checked it out. And it was bogus.
If the Post stories that started this thing were the nonsense that Moore said it was. A 15 year old who had her abortion paid for by Moore? They should have jumped with both feet. Instead they checked it and proved all their stories.
(this does not validate Alred's lies. It was not part of Post's reporting. That is a tissue of lies from beginning to end)
Somehow you believe that proves something.You have no idea what they did.
Who do you think you're fooling?
Dude - they were stone cold BUSTED. We know EXACTLY what they did.
To discredit REAL victims of child molestation......and yes.....that's just how sick and deplorable the RW has now become.Why would a "conservative group" want to do a fake story with the Washington Post against Roy Moore?
Of course I do. Try reading their article on this story. They explain how they figured out she was a fraud.LOLYou mean the do a search on Facebook?Nope, O’Keefe just proved they’re not. He proved they vet their stories.The Washington Post - fake news.
Yeah, they're crack reporters!
They researched her entire story, numbnuts. Called supposed employers, references, looked into her claims. Determined she was full of shit and exposed her and was able to connect her with O’Keefe.
It’s called, “vetting,” and all O’Keefe exposed was the Washington Post vets their articles.
You have no idea what they did.
Who do you think you're fooling?
The Washington post feels like they were setup?A woman approached The Post with dramatic — and false — tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.
A woman who falsely claimed to The Washington Post that Roy Moore, the Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Alabama, impregnated her as a teenager appears to work with an organization that uses deceptive tactics to secretly record conversations in an effort to embarrass its targets.
In a series of interviews over two weeks, the woman shared a dramatic story about an alleged sexual relationship with Moore in 1992 that led to an abortion when she was 15. During the interviews, she repeatedly pressed Post reporters to give their opinions on the effects that her claims could have on Moore’s candidacy if she went public.
The Post did not publish an article based on her unsubstantiated account. When Post reporters confronted her with inconsistencies in her story and an Internet posting that raised doubts about her motivations, she insisted that she was not working with any organization that targets journalists.
But on Monday morning, Post reporters saw her walking into the New York offices of Project Veritas, an organization that targets the mainstream news media and left-leaning groups. The organization sets up undercover “stings” that involve using false cover stories and covert video recordings meant to expose what the group says is media bias.
James O’Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas who was convicted of a misdemeanor in 2010 for using a fake identity to enter a federal building during a previous sting, declined to answer questions about the woman outside the Project Veritas office, a storefront in Mamaroneck, N.Y., on Monday morning shortly after the woman walked inside.
A woman approached The Post with dramatic — and false — tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.
O'Keefe again, was approached to comment on the woman, why she was trying set up the WashPo with a fake story and what she was doing in his office. His answer, "no reply"!
What a surprise! O'Keefe wanted to do a "fake news" sting. But in the end, it appears it's O'Keefe who got stung, trying to produce a "fake news" story.
Oh, the irony!!!
Speaking of stupid & incredibly pathetic, check this out....Never ceases to amaze me how stupid conservatives are. It’s like they’re a subspecies if humans.So the psychos on the right thought if they got someone to lie about having had sex with roy Moore when she was 15 and got the Washington post to print it that they'd be able to discredit both roy moose's victims and the WaPo.
seems that didn't work so well...
A conservative activist group tried to target Washington Post reporters, planting a source with a false allegation against Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore.
But instead of publishing the story of “Jaime Phillips,” who claimed Moore impregnated her at 15 and helped her get an abortion, the Post exposed the plot and foiled the operation to dupe its journalists.
After the Post first published allegations on November 9 that Moore pursued relationships with teenagers and sexually assaulted a 14-year-old, the newspaper has been dogged by easily disprovable allegations that sources were biased, paid, or both.
A conservative group tried to plant a fake Roy Moore allegation in the Washington Post. It failed.
project veritas?
Hey, moron, stop trolling to redirect the original topic......
My post is as on topic as the one I quoted dummy lol
Now call her out before someone else notices your hypocrisy
Nope....but it IS interesting that you are so supportive of Moore and O'Keefe trying to discredit child molestation victims that you would try to contribute to deflection.
Bullshit. Had he pulled off this stunt, the right would be using her fake news as evidence all the other women were lying too.He did fail, but you were wrong in your conclusions. He was all about exposing Wapo not discrediting women who claim abuse, like the Clinton's did in the 90s with the help of Wapo and most in the MSM.LOLOLNo...he was trying to discredit Wapo.The guy gets caught trying to invent fake news in order to discredit women who claim Moore sexually assaulted them when they were teenagers. That’s good enough reason not to like him. That you do despite that is a reflection on you.I really like O'Keefe. Why don't you?
He failed miserably.
Not only did he expose himself as fake news — he proved the Washington Post vets their articles. I don’t believe the stories told by Moore’s accusers, but O’Keefe just raised their credibility.
Don't you find that appalling?
He just bolstered their case.
Somehow you believe that proves something.
Moron ....This is the Coup de grace of Moore's chances. It is proof that the Post's original reporting was accurate and backed up. The post didn't bite at the story that was just bait, they actually checked it out. And it was bogus.
If the Post stories that started this thing were the nonsense that Moore said it was. A 15 year old who had her abortion paid for by Moore? They should have jumped with both feet. Instead they checked it and proved all their stories.
(this does not validate Alred's lies. It was not part of Post's reporting. That is a tissue of lies from beginning to end)
It proves nothing of the sort. When someone tries to con a con artist, the fact that they weren't fooled doesn't proved they aren't con artists. The Post reporters didn't bite because she looked suspecious from the start. She never even lived in Gadsen. That would be enough right there to arouse suspicion.
Speaking of stupid & incredibly pathetic, check this out....Never ceases to amaze me how stupid conservatives are. It’s like they’re a subspecies if humans.
Hey, moron, stop trolling to redirect the original topic......
My post is as on topic as the one I quoted dummy lol
Now call her out before someone else notices your hypocrisy
Nope....but it IS interesting that you are so supportive of Moore and O'Keefe trying to discredit child molestation victims that you would try to contribute to deflection.
If this story is accurate they were trying to discredit a news source not a potential victim.
Try using your brain with your partisan node turned off.
As to Moore I have no clue what the facts are. Neither do any of you.
Speaking of stupid & incredibly pathetic, check this out....
Hey, moron, stop trolling to redirect the original topic......
My post is as on topic as the one I quoted dummy lol
Now call her out before someone else notices your hypocrisy
Nope....but it IS interesting that you are so supportive of Moore and O'Keefe trying to discredit child molestation victims that you would try to contribute to deflection.
If this story is accurate they were trying to discredit a news source not a potential victim.
Try using your brain with your partisan node turned off.
As to Moore I have no clue what the facts are. Neither do any of you.
nope! the ultimate goal was to discredit the Moore accusers by claiming the Washington post did not vet their accusers well, and all the accusers are liars, just like she was, with the WPost...
You're lying about reading their article, otherwise you would have known that was not the entirety of their research. They also called the references she gave, none of which panned out. They also found a gofundme page of hers, exposing her as a partisan conservative.Of course I do. Try reading their article on this story. They explain how they figured out she was a fraud.LOLYou mean the do a search on Facebook?Nope, O’Keefe just proved they’re not. He proved they vet their stories.
Yeah, they're crack reporters!
They researched her entire story, numbnuts. Called supposed employers, references, looked into her claims. Determined she was full of shit and exposed her and was able to connect her with O’Keefe.
It’s called, “vetting,” and all O’Keefe exposed was the Washington Post vets their articles.
You have no idea what they did.
Who do you think you're fooling?
I've read it, turd. They searched social media.
That may indeed been part of his plan but I don't believe that was his only goal. That certainly wasn't his goal when he tried to expose ACORN. That wasn't his goal when he tried to expose Planned Parenthood. That wasn't his intent when he tried to expose NPR or when he tried to expose Senator Landrieu.Bullshit. Had he pulled off this stunt, the right would be using her fake news as evidence all the other women were lying too.He did fail, but you were wrong in your conclusions. He was all about exposing Wapo not discrediting women who claim abuse, like the Clinton's did in the 90s with the help of Wapo and most in the MSM.LOLOLNo...he was trying to discredit Wapo.The guy gets caught trying to invent fake news in order to discredit women who claim Moore sexually assaulted them when they were teenagers. That’s good enough reason not to like him. That you do despite that is a reflection on you.
He failed miserably.
Not only did he expose himself as fake news — he proved the Washington Post vets their articles. I don’t believe the stories told by Moore’s accusers, but O’Keefe just raised their credibility.
Don't you find that appalling?
He just bolstered their case.
You are likely correct, but that still does not change your erroneous thinking about O'Keefe's motives. His goal was to discredit the liberal media.
True enough...and I am glad he exposed the heinous nature of those organizations. Are you?That may indeed been part of his plan but I don't believe that was his only goal. That certainly wasn't his goal when he tried to expose ACORN. That wasn't his goal when he tried to expose Planned Parenthood. That wasn't his intent when he tried to expose NPR or when he tried to expose Senator Landrieu.Bullshit. Had he pulled off this stunt, the right would be using her fake news as evidence all the other women were lying too.He did fail, but you were wrong in your conclusions. He was all about exposing Wapo not discrediting women who claim abuse, like the Clinton's did in the 90s with the help of Wapo and most in the MSM.LOLOLNo...he was trying to discredit Wapo.
He failed miserably.
Not only did he expose himself as fake news — he proved the Washington Post vets their articles. I don’t believe the stories told by Moore’s accusers, but O’Keefe just raised their credibility.
Don't you find that appalling?
He just bolstered their case.
You are likely correct, but that still does not change your erroneous thinking about O'Keefe's motives. His goal was to discredit the liberal media.
Somehow you believe that proves something.
Yeah - it proves that WaPo VETS their stories and that O'Keefe is a dweeb that nobody is buying anymore.
Massive backfire
