One Good Reason Al Gore May Not Run.Anguish Of Facing Live Questions Regarding Global Warming.

[konradv]

a theory that is non false-able or has a non-refutable proposition-i.e. all weather changes are due to Global Warming. er Climate Change.

Weather changes are due to increased CO2. We know it absorbs energy. What happens to that energy?

 

[Rexx Taylor]

One Good Reason Al Gore May Not Run.Anguish Of Facing Live Questions Regarding Global Warming.

the real reason....


even though the case was dropped, more likely he will always be remembered as

another thing about Al Gore, if he is running, and off to campaign, as soon as he opens his mouth, wouldnt u think that 95% of the audience would just start to walk away,mentally saying, Oh My God, What the hell is wrong with his voice? he sounds like a drunken Richard Simmons.

 

[rightwinger]

The global, hemispheric, and tropical LT anomalies from the 30-year (1981-2010) average for the last 14 months are:

UAH Global Temperature Update for Feb. 2015 0.30 deg. C Roy Spencer PhD


Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Of course, we all realize that reality has a liberal bias.

You dumb fucks really think that your silly flap-yap can change what is really happening out there in the real world?

Yea...but it snowed all winter

How do you explain that?

 

[Old Rocks]

What we have here are a bunch of ignoramouses that think that obese junkies on the am radio, and alcoholic Senators know more about science than do scientists.

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. From all the differant nations and cultures. So what Neuter and the other flap-yaps are claiming is that there is an international conspiracy among 99% of the scientists in the world to mislead the rest of us on the issue of what the human produced GHGs are doing to our world. A conspiracy that crosses national, political, and cultural boundries.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What we have here are a bunch of ignoramouses that think that obese junkies on the am radio, and alcoholic Senators know more about science than do scientists.

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. From all the differant nations and cultures. So what Neuter and the other flap-yaps are claiming is that there is an international conspiracy among 99% of the scientists in the world to mislead the rest of us on the issue of what the human produced GHGs are doing to our world. A conspiracy that crosses national, political, and cultural boundries.

Your scientists keep getting caught fudging data numbers, that tends to make a thinking person skeptical

 

[Old Rocks]

One Good Reason Al Gore May Not Run.Anguish Of Facing Live Questions Regarding Global Warming.

the real reason....


even though the case was dropped, more likely he will always be remembered as

another thing about Al Gore, if he is running, and off to campaign, as soon as he opens his mouth, wouldnt u think that 95% of the audience would just start to walk away,mentally saying, Oh My God, What the hell is wrong with his voice? he sounds like a drunken Richard Simmons.

Really? Judge for yourself.

Al Gore New thinking on the climate crisis Talk Video TED.com

You just branded yourself a liar.

 

[rightwinger]

97% of scientists agree on manmade global warming

But college dropout Rush Limbaugh says otherwise

Guess we gotta go with Rush

 

[SassyIrishLass]

97% of scientists agree on manmade global warming

But college dropout Rush Limbaugh says otherwise

Guess we gotta go with Rush

You're being duped again, fool.

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

 

[Neotrotsky]

even the 97% is falsely contrived

too funny that Democrats still use it

 

[Neotrotsky]

97% of scientists agree on manmade global warming

But college dropout Rush Limbaugh says otherwise

Guess we gotta go with Rush

probably explains (no college) why the Democrats should not have listened to the
""hands up" people since that turned out false

 

[Old Rocks]

What we have here are a bunch of ignoramouses that think that obese junkies on the am radio, and alcoholic Senators know more about science than do scientists.

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. From all the differant nations and cultures. So what Neuter and the other flap-yaps are claiming is that there is an international conspiracy among 99% of the scientists in the world to mislead the rest of us on the issue of what the human produced GHGs are doing to our world. A conspiracy that crosses national, political, and cultural boundries.

Your scientists keep getting caught fudging data numbers, that tends to make a thinking person skeptical

Link? I have watched the the glaciers in three mountain ranges recede since 1965. I have read of the retreat of the glaciers in the other mountain ranges of the world. We read from the researchs of the scientists and pictures from the satellites of the loss of ice from the Greenland and Anarctica Ice Caps, and the loss of sea ice in the Arctic.

The people who have been repeatedly caught in outright lies are people like yourself that are playing politics rather than studying the science.

 

[Neotrotsky]

a theory that is non false-able or has a non-refutable propositr -i.e. all weather changes are due to Global Warming. er Climate Change.

Weather changes are due to increased CO2. We know it absorbs energy. What happens to that energy?

take your pick
global warming or global cooling
or just change of some type

whatever ones promotes the cause
seem to be the best choice

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What we have here are a bunch of ignoramouses that think that obese junkies on the am radio, and alcoholic Senators know more about science than do scientists.

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. From all the differant nations and cultures. So what Neuter and the other flap-yaps are claiming is that there is an international conspiracy among 99% of the scientists in the world to mislead the rest of us on the issue of what the human produced GHGs are doing to our world. A conspiracy that crosses national, political, and cultural boundries.

Your scientists keep getting caught fudging data numbers, that tends to make a thinking person skeptical

Link? I have watched the the glaciers in three mountain ranges recede since 1965. I have read of the retreat of the glaciers in the other mountain ranges of the world. We read from the researchs of the scientists and pictures from the satellites of the loss of ice from the Greenland and Anarctica Ice Caps, and the loss of sea ice in the Arctic.

The people who have been repeatedly caught in outright lies are people like yourself that are playing politics rather than studying the science.

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

 

[rightwinger]

97% of scientists agree on manmade global warming

But college dropout Rush Limbaugh says otherwise

Guess we gotta go with Rush

You're being duped again, fool.

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

Red herring

Move along

 

[SassyIrishLass]

97% of scientists agree on manmade global warming

But college dropout Rush Limbaugh says otherwise

Guess we gotta go with Rush

You're being duped again, fool.

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

Red herring

Move along

Typical dimocrat, duped and then too stupid to admit you've been duped. You're pathetic

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Red herrings seem to be in abundance:

Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions - NaturalNews.com

Global Warming Fabricated by NASA and NOAA - Breitbart

Fakegate The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming - Forbes

The scandal of fiddled global warming data - Telegraph

 

[konradv]

Weather changes are due to increased CO2. We know it absorbs energy. What happens to that energy?

take your pick global warming or global cooling or just change of some type whatever ones promotes the cause
seem to be the best choice

You didn't answer the question. Why?

 

[Old Rocks]

A newspaper article? Lassie, you just branded yourself as one dumb fuck. Here, learn to read real science. An article from 1981 that predicted exactly what we are seeing today;

http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

Summary. The global temperature rose by 0.20C between the middle 1960's and
1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is
consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect due to measured increases of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar
luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend
of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming
should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the
century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980's. Potential effects on
climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North
America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West
Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the
fabled Northwest Passage.

You want to be taken seriously discussing this subject, post peer reviewed articles from real scientists.

 

[Neotrotsky]

97% of scientists agree on manmade global warming

But college dropout Rush Limbaugh says otherwise

Guess we gotta go with Rush

You're being duped again, fool.

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

Red herring

Move along

too funny, your "fact" brought up by you is a red herring

Obviously, your science skill set is as misguided as your logic
since is not a red herring, true and relevant.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Weather changes are due to increased CO2. We know it absorbs energy. What happens to that energy?

take your pick global warming or global cooling or just change of some type whatever ones promotes the cause
seem to be the best choice

You didn't answer the question. Why?

well the Democrats claim to be the party of science

tell us which one is it this week?

cooling or warming

(hint it snowed a lot this winter so don't say no snow like they did a couple of years ago)