🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

One Good Reason Al Gore May Not Run.Anguish Of Facing Live Questions Regarding Global Warming.

By 2050 Al Gore will be considered an environmental God - if not before.
 
Why indeed would Americans -- or citizens of anywhere for that matter -- elect somebody who's not even running?

Has some quack doctor told you you have but three months to live?

Or is there some other explanation for your lack of patience.

Google the meaning of this word: "YET"

Everybody knows what "yet" means including, presumably, the OP. And yet (oops) the OP isn't posting in the "yet"; he's posting in the "now".

So there's a very solid, fundamental reason Al Gore may not run, and that is that Al Gore is not running. NOW.
 
Sure,

Gore said polar cap be gone in 5 years
that was in 2007, 2008 and 2009




The lies Democrats have to tell themselves


"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?
 
"One Good Reason Al Gore May Not Run.Anguish Of Facing Live Questions Regarding Global Warming."

Gore isn't running for president because he isn't running for president.

The same reason John McCain isn't running for president.

You'd think this would be a simple concept.

Wonder if Harold Stassen's running...
 
he invented the internet and the religion of Globull Warming. The Goremans!!

goremons_530.jpg
 
Last edited:
Al Gore is not running for President.

The DNC will nominate Hillary Clinton, and it won't matter who her VP nomination is.

Of the choices the GOP has for President, one of them needs to start polling less than 10 points behind Hillary. If they don't, Hillary will win in a Reagan's second term style landslide. Taking all kinds of red states.

Hillary will probably win because American women want to give a woman a try, and no other woman has anything close to her qualifications
 
Will they be asking Gore if the earth is flat also?

How bout

Mr Gore, do you really expect us to believe this gravity stuff?
 
Sure,

Gore said polar cap be gone in 5 years
that was in 2007, 2008 and 2009




The lies Democrats have to tell themselves


"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?


indeed- and Democrats used that anyway to try and fear monger
big policy changes




considering that the ice coverage is actually up 50%
means he was way wrong and way off


but the good news
the science is settled
 
Sure,

Gore said polar cap be gone in 5 years
that was in 2007, 2008 and 2009




The lies Democrats have to tell themselves


"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?


indeed- and Democrats used that anyway to try and fear monger
big policy changes




considering that the ice coverage is actually up 50%
means he was way wrong and way off


but the good news
the science is settled
Democrats?...fear mongering?

How so?

I think that whole "inconvenient truth" thing is last decade's style.
 
Al Gore is not running for President.

The DNC will nominate Hillary Clinton, and it won't matter who her VP nomination is.

Of the choices the GOP has for President, one of them needs to start polling less than 10 points behind Hillary. If they don't, Hillary will win in a Reagan's second term style landslide. Taking all kinds of red states.

Hillary will probably win because American women want to give a woman a try, and no other woman has anything close to her qualifications


First Lady for 8 years, Democratic safe seat handed to her after she carpet bagged her way into NY and
and a failed short time as Secretary of State

The smartest women in America who did not know here husband was cheating on her

sure- real qualified
 
Sure,

Gore said polar cap be gone in 5 years
that was in 2007, 2008 and 2009




The lies Democrats have to tell themselves


"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?


indeed- and Democrats used that anyway to try and fear monger
big policy changes




considering that the ice coverage is actually up 50%
means he was way wrong and way off


but the good news
the science is settled


Flew right over your head?

Lemme spell it out:
You struck the word "may" to make a dishonest point. You even forgot to replace it with another verb.
Busted.
 
Sure,

Gore said polar cap be gone in 5 years
that was in 2007, 2008 and 2009




The lies Democrats have to tell themselves


"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?


indeed- and Democrats used that anyway to try and fear monger
big policy changes




considering that the ice coverage is actually up 50%
means he was way wrong and way off


but the good news
the science is settled


Flew right over your head?

Lemme spell it out:
You struck the word "may" to make a dishonest point. You even forgot to replace it with another verb.
Busted.


the only ones being dishonest here
are Gore, Democrats and the whole environmental wackos

If you want to say Gore was correct because he used the word "may"
considering that the claims went from almost no ice cap
to the reality of an actual 50% increase
His "may" is way off

Really? from none to increase , not even just a little gone



go ahead,, good luck with that


"Gore was right about his predictions because he said 'may' "
 
Sure,

Gore said polar cap be gone in 5 years
that was in 2007, 2008 and 2009




The lies Democrats have to tell themselves


"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?


indeed- and Democrats used that anyway to try and fear monger
big policy changes




considering that the ice coverage is actually up 50%
means he was way wrong and way off


but the good news
the science is settled


Flew right over your head?

Lemme spell it out:
You struck the word "may" to make a dishonest point. You even forgot to replace it with another verb.
Busted.


the only ones being dishonest here
are Gore, Democrats and the whole environmental wackos

If you want to say Gore was correct because he used the word "may"

go ahead,, good luck with that


Anything with may in it is correct.
But removing it in an attempt to change someone's words into something he didn't say -- is dishonest.
Good luck with that. Especially now that you've shown a precedent.
 
Al Gore is not running for President.

The DNC will nominate Hillary Clinton, and it won't matter who her VP nomination is.

Of the choices the GOP has for President, one of them needs to start polling less than 10 points behind Hillary. If they don't, Hillary will win in a Reagan's second term style landslide. Taking all kinds of red states.

Hillary will probably win because American women want to give a woman a try, and no other woman has anything close to her qualifications


First Lady for 8 years, Democratic safe seat handed to her after she carpet bagged her way into NY and
and a failed short time as Secretary of State

The smartest women in America who did not know here husband was cheating on her

sure- real qualified
That's how righty media people view her.

90% of Americans, who are busy adult low information voters will pull the lever for different reasons.

Hillary is familiar
Hillary was once in the white house, and we saw her on the news with all those foreign leaders
Hillary is a woman
The Repoublicans are the same old white guys
I don't even know who the Republican nominee is
 
Sure,

Gore said polar cap be gone in 5 years
that was in 2007, 2008 and 2009




The lies Democrats have to tell themselves


"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?


indeed- and Democrats used that anyway to try and fear monger
big policy changes




considering that the ice coverage is actually up 50%
means he was way wrong and way off


but the good news
the science is settled


Flew right over your head?

Lemme spell it out:
You struck the word "may" to make a dishonest point. You even forgot to replace it with another verb.
Busted.


the only ones being dishonest here
are Gore, Democrats and the whole environmental wackos

If you want to say Gore was correct because he used the word "may"

go ahead,, good luck with that


Anything with may in it is correct.
But removing it in an attempt to change someone's words into something he didn't say -- is dishonest.
Good luck with that. Especially now that you've shown a precedent.


please

Gore and the Democrats got caught fear mongering
and now you want to act indignant
because he said "may"

Since I didn't use it , it somehow changed what Gore really meant
or what he wanted the impact to be ?

Now who is being disingenuous ?


Really, if the predictions were that questionable
why even make them


No doubt any Republican at the time said
"well Gore only said may.."

The Democrats would have jumped all over them
as denying science, etc
 
Last edited:
May I recommend the sacrament of Confession. With luck you'll draw a priest who's had a similar experience.

Thank you for that suggestion. I know I can rely upon your apparently many intimate experiences with clergy.
 
Last edited:
"Said the polar cap be gone"?
Give yourself a hernia striking the word "may"?

indeed- and Democrats used that anyway to try and fear monger
big policy changes




considering that the ice coverage is actually up 50%
means he was way wrong and way off


but the good news
the science is settled

Flew right over your head?

Lemme spell it out:
You struck the word "may" to make a dishonest point. You even forgot to replace it with another verb.
Busted.

the only ones being dishonest here
are Gore, Democrats and the whole environmental wackos

If you want to say Gore was correct because he used the word "may"

go ahead,, good luck with that

Anything with may in it is correct.
But removing it in an attempt to change someone's words into something he didn't say -- is dishonest.
Good luck with that. Especially now that you've shown a precedent.

please

Gore and the Democrats got caught fear mongering
and now you want to act indignant
because he said "may"

Since I didn't use it , it somehow changed what Gore really meant
or what he wanted the impact to be ?

Now who is being disingenuous ?


Really, if the predictions were that questionable
why even make them


::flail::flail::

Busted means busted. Just as one equals one and "Gore not running" equals "Gore not running".
Not rocket surgery.
 
True
I am guilty for pointing out the false fear mongering of Al Gore


"rocket science"
you guy should really stay away from anything to do with science

we saw how the last predictions worked out


No matter how Clinton-like you want to parse the words
no one, except Democrats, is trying to argue that Gore was
correct in his predictions because he used the word may

Truthfully, you are first idiot that I have actually seen
that tried to argue it- that Gore was correct in his predictions

I'm sure you won't' be the last
 

Forum List

Back
Top