Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of courseIt means money launderingwho cares if someone makes $$$$$ that way....that means he's smarter than youyet another shady Trump deal that makes you think ..
Trump Sold a $40 Million Estate to a Russian Oligarch for $100 Million—and a Democratic Senator Wants to Know Why
he bought an estate for $41 million then sold it to a Russian oligarch for $95 million only four years later.
the art of the crook, I mean deal.
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Or it means absolutely nothing. Of course you would be disappointed if no crime is actually committed.
Because billionaires are not good with money and are easily taken advantage of
Have you lost your mind? Republicans investigated EVERY little thing Obama and admin did for 8 solid years....There is no coupe
People need to get over Hillary.
Right we need to investigate the other side to death but leave my side alone because there is nothing there.
Love the partisan lack of logic.
While the Republican majority under President Trump, investigates NOTHING, with his near half-hundred of scandals in just the first year... twiddle their fingers....
It's a disgrace, what the R's have done to their obligation of OVER SIGHT over the Executive branch!
We need to follow the moneyyou know you wish you could make that muchIt means money launderingwho cares if someone makes $$$$$ that way....that means he's smarter than youyet another shady Trump deal that makes you think ..
Trump Sold a $40 Million Estate to a Russian Oligarch for $100 Million—and a Democratic Senator Wants to Know Why
he bought an estate for $41 million then sold it to a Russian oligarch for $95 million only four years later.
the art of the crook, I mean deal.
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
it's totally legal
Perfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
We need to follow the moneyyou know you wish you could make that muchIt means money launderingwho cares if someone makes $$$$$ that way....that means he's smarter than youyet another shady Trump deal that makes you think ..
Trump Sold a $40 Million Estate to a Russian Oligarch for $100 Million—and a Democratic Senator Wants to Know Why
he bought an estate for $41 million then sold it to a Russian oligarch for $95 million only four years later.
the art of the crook, I mean deal.
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
it's totally legal
Perfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
I'm sure it is too. After all, it's a witch hunt anyway.
In spite of all the IRS audits wealthy people like Trump undergo, now ten years later, they want to investigate a real estate deal. Hmmmm.
This is looking under rocks hoping to find a gold coin, and this nonsense costs taxpayers money.
Again, HGTV created an entire channel of people doing what Trump did. It goes on all the time. You people on the left have a problem because Trump sold a property to a Russian, but no problem with Steele getting his information that they used for a surveillance warrant from Russian sources.
It's pure hypocrisy.
It is no more a witchhunt than Hillary Clinton's investigations.
There was evidence with Clinton--none with Trump. Apples and oranges.
Hillary should be in prison like any other person who did what she did. But their coupe made sure they covered each others back.
You don't know there is none until the investigation is finished. Apples and apples.
The only difference is: R & D
It's been almost a year and a half. You see with an honest and dignified government, you don't open up an investigation unless you have evidence of wrongdoing. This was opened up with not a shred of evidence. Trump made a joke during the debates. That's about it. The Russians supposedly hacked the DNC server under the Obama administration, and somehow Trump got in the middle of that? The clown who got hacked used P-A-S-S-W-O-R-D as his actual password. I mean come on now.
This was such a coupe that the DNC refused to let the FBI look at their server, and no problem. Hillary erased her emails subpoenaed by the US Congress, no problem. She smashed her cell phones, no problem.
When did Mueller start the investigation? How long were the Clinton investigation?
Which is likely the more complicated and obstructed one?
The overly simplistic and deliberately mangled version you describe is not what they are looking at.
I'm perfectly willing to let it conclude just like all the other investigations.
Thank youOf courseIt means money launderingwho cares if someone makes $$$$$ that way....that means he's smarter than youyet another shady Trump deal that makes you think ..
Trump Sold a $40 Million Estate to a Russian Oligarch for $100 Million—and a Democratic Senator Wants to Know Why
he bought an estate for $41 million then sold it to a Russian oligarch for $95 million only four years later.
the art of the crook, I mean deal.
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Or it means absolutely nothing. Of course you would be disappointed if no crime is actually committed.
Because billionaires are not good with money and are easily taken advantage of
Man do you believe your BS? Billionaire make money mistakes all the time, probably more than you or I do, it’s just they take more risks day in and day out because it is taking those risks that will one day pay off.
It was s business and high risk and reward are a normal routine and mistakes are costly and good decisions are profitable.
We need to follow the moneyyou know you wish you could make that muchIt means money launderingwho cares if someone makes $$$$$ that way....that means he's smarter than you
it's totally legal
Perfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
A property.
Thank youOf courseIt means money launderingwho cares if someone makes $$$$$ that way....that means he's smarter than you
Or it means absolutely nothing. Of course you would be disappointed if no crime is actually committed.
Because billionaires are not good with money and are easily taken advantage of
Man do you believe your BS? Billionaire make money mistakes all the time, probably more than you or I do, it’s just they take more risks day in and day out because it is taking those risks that will one day pay off.
It was s business and high risk and reward are a normal routine and mistakes are costly and good decisions are profitable.
I get it now......Trump was overpaid $30 million by mistake
No need to investigate
We need to follow the moneyyou know you wish you could make that muchIt means money laundering
it's totally legal
Perfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
A property.
Selling real estate is an easy way to launder money
Just declare the laundered money as profit
We need to follow the moneyyou know you wish you could make that muchIt means money laundering
it's totally legal
Perfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
A property.
Selling real estate is an easy way to launder money
Just declare the laundered money as profit
We need to follow the moneyyou know you wish you could make that much
it's totally legal
Perfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
A property.
Selling real estate is an easy way to launder money
Just declare the laundered money as profit
So why would Trump need to launder anything? You think he doesn't have enough money where he needs to stoop to illegal activities?
The problem with Trump is you on the left wish he was as stupid as you'd like him to be.
Now if you'd like, give me the percentage of profit Trump made, and I'll go to the HGTV web site and show you dozens and dozens of videos where regular ordinary people did the exact same; some who made a larger percentage of profit than Trump did on that deal.
There is no coupe
People need to get over Hillary.
Right we need to investigate the other side to death but leave my side alone because there is nothing there.
Love the partisan lack of logic.
You have investigated Clinton to death. She is probably the most investigated political figure to date.
But how dare they investigate Trump.
Thing is - Hillary's out. She's neither an elected official nor a viable candidate. What she IS however, is a convenient squirrel for the Trumpsters.
How about we put the same energy into investigating Trump that we did in Hillary?
I haven’t investigated anyone, and I’m on record from day one to investigate Trump, so spare me you BS! That is the issue, one side wants the other side investigated over and over and over again and if they don’t find anything, the other side won’t be happy. It’s all silly politics, go ahead investigate Clinton and Trump all you want, I really don’t care, hell we are wasting money on other stupid partisan BS so it’s fine by me. You guys have at it and investigate Trump, investigate Clinton and when wrong doing is found you can be giddy and happy because America will suffer but hell, it’s all about shaming the other side, fuck America!
Of course it doesn'tWe need to follow the moneyyou know you wish you could make that much
it's totally legal
Perfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
A property.
Selling real estate is an easy way to launder money
Just declare the laundered money as profit
Lots of way to launder money, just because it is real estate doesn’t mean money was laundered, just a lot of wishful partisans hoping Trump laundered money because it is your party over the country.
We’re now learning there was never an honest/unbiased investigation into Hillary. The obama cronies made sure that wouldn’t happen.There is no coupe
People need to get over Hillary.
Right we need to investigate the other side to death but leave my side alone because there is nothing there.
Love the partisan lack of logic.
You have investigated Clinton to death. She is probably the most investigated political figure to date.
But how dare they investigate Trump.
Thing is - Hillary's out. She's neither an elected official nor a viable candidate. What she IS however, is a convenient squirrel for the Trumpsters.
How about we put the same energy into investigating Trump that we did in Hillary?
That’s a problem we all should be concerned about. Wouldn’t you agree?
It is no more a witchhunt than Hillary Clinton's investigations.
There was evidence with Clinton--none with Trump. Apples and oranges.
Hillary should be in prison like any other person who did what she did. But their coupe made sure they covered each others back.
You don't know there is none until the investigation is finished. Apples and apples.
The only difference is: R & D
It's been almost a year and a half. You see with an honest and dignified government, you don't open up an investigation unless you have evidence of wrongdoing. This was opened up with not a shred of evidence. Trump made a joke during the debates. That's about it. The Russians supposedly hacked the DNC server under the Obama administration, and somehow Trump got in the middle of that? The clown who got hacked used P-A-S-S-W-O-R-D as his actual password. I mean come on now.
This was such a coupe that the DNC refused to let the FBI look at their server, and no problem. Hillary erased her emails subpoenaed by the US Congress, no problem. She smashed her cell phones, no problem.
When did Mueller start the investigation? How long were the Clinton investigation?
Which is likely the more complicated and obstructed one?
The overly simplistic and deliberately mangled version you describe is not what they are looking at.
I'm perfectly willing to let it conclude just like all the other investigations.
I can tell you what started the Hillary investigation. Can you tell me the evidence they had to start the Trump investigation?
We need to follow the moneyPerfectly legal but it pisses them off that someone makes a great deal.
Trump walked off with an additional $30 million
What was his Russian friend provided in return?
A property.
Selling real estate is an easy way to launder money
Just declare the laundered money as profit
So why would Trump need to launder anything? You think he doesn't have enough money where he needs to stoop to illegal activities?
The problem with Trump is you on the left wish he was as stupid as you'd like him to be.
Now if you'd like, give me the percentage of profit Trump made, and I'll go to the HGTV web site and show you dozens and dozens of videos where regular ordinary people did the exact same; some who made a larger percentage of profit than Trump did on that deal.
He launders money for the profit. Nobody else was loaning him money at the time. Do some favors for some Russian billionaires and you can finance the Trump empire
There was evidence with Clinton--none with Trump. Apples and oranges.
Hillary should be in prison like any other person who did what she did. But their coupe made sure they covered each others back.
You don't know there is none until the investigation is finished. Apples and apples.
The only difference is: R & D
It's been almost a year and a half. You see with an honest and dignified government, you don't open up an investigation unless you have evidence of wrongdoing. This was opened up with not a shred of evidence. Trump made a joke during the debates. That's about it. The Russians supposedly hacked the DNC server under the Obama administration, and somehow Trump got in the middle of that? The clown who got hacked used P-A-S-S-W-O-R-D as his actual password. I mean come on now.
This was such a coupe that the DNC refused to let the FBI look at their server, and no problem. Hillary erased her emails subpoenaed by the US Congress, no problem. She smashed her cell phones, no problem.
When did Mueller start the investigation? How long were the Clinton investigation?
Which is likely the more complicated and obstructed one?
The overly simplistic and deliberately mangled version you describe is not what they are looking at.
I'm perfectly willing to let it conclude just like all the other investigations.
I can tell you what started the Hillary investigation. Can you tell me the evidence they had to start the Trump investigation?
You mean evidence of Russian hacking and meddling? Plenty.
You don't know there is none until the investigation is finished. Apples and apples.
The only difference is: R & D
It's been almost a year and a half. You see with an honest and dignified government, you don't open up an investigation unless you have evidence of wrongdoing. This was opened up with not a shred of evidence. Trump made a joke during the debates. That's about it. The Russians supposedly hacked the DNC server under the Obama administration, and somehow Trump got in the middle of that? The clown who got hacked used P-A-S-S-W-O-R-D as his actual password. I mean come on now.
This was such a coupe that the DNC refused to let the FBI look at their server, and no problem. Hillary erased her emails subpoenaed by the US Congress, no problem. She smashed her cell phones, no problem.
When did Mueller start the investigation? How long were the Clinton investigation?
Which is likely the more complicated and obstructed one?
The overly simplistic and deliberately mangled version you describe is not what they are looking at.
I'm perfectly willing to let it conclude just like all the other investigations.
I can tell you what started the Hillary investigation. Can you tell me the evidence they had to start the Trump investigation?
You mean evidence of Russian hacking and meddling? Plenty.
No, Trumps possible involvement with Russia's hacking. Even a hint of evidence.
It's been almost a year and a half. You see with an honest and dignified government, you don't open up an investigation unless you have evidence of wrongdoing. This was opened up with not a shred of evidence. Trump made a joke during the debates. That's about it. The Russians supposedly hacked the DNC server under the Obama administration, and somehow Trump got in the middle of that? The clown who got hacked used P-A-S-S-W-O-R-D as his actual password. I mean come on now.
This was such a coupe that the DNC refused to let the FBI look at their server, and no problem. Hillary erased her emails subpoenaed by the US Congress, no problem. She smashed her cell phones, no problem.
When did Mueller start the investigation? How long were the Clinton investigation?
Which is likely the more complicated and obstructed one?
The overly simplistic and deliberately mangled version you describe is not what they are looking at.
I'm perfectly willing to let it conclude just like all the other investigations.
I can tell you what started the Hillary investigation. Can you tell me the evidence they had to start the Trump investigation?
You mean evidence of Russian hacking and meddling? Plenty.
No, Trumps possible involvement with Russia's hacking. Even a hint of evidence.
That is what is not known yet. And we aren't privvy to most of what evidence there is. What is known is Trump campaign associates had meetings that they lied about with Russian officials on subjects that they also subsequently lied about. Hell Trump even joked about it on the campaign trail. Things like that don't LOOK good in an investigation. I'm fine with letting the investigation play out just like the Clinton ones. Why aren't you?
Good grief, that wasn't a coupe. Clinton investigations were opened up with VERY little evidence to begin with and the Benghazi one was purely partisan and went on 17 months.
There is no coupe
People need to get over Hillary.
Right we need to investigate the other side to death but leave my side alone because there is nothing there.
Love the partisan lack of logic.
You have investigated Clinton to death. She is probably the most investigated political figure to date.
But how dare they investigate Trump.
Thing is - Hillary's out. She's neither an elected official nor a viable candidate. What she IS however, is a convenient squirrel for the Trumpsters.
How about we put the same energy into investigating Trump that we did in Hillary?
I haven’t investigated anyone, and I’m on record from day one to investigate Trump, so spare me you BS! That is the issue, one side wants the other side investigated over and over and over again and if they don’t find anything, the other side won’t be happy. It’s all silly politics, go ahead investigate Clinton and Trump all you want, I really don’t care, hell we are wasting money on other stupid partisan BS so it’s fine by me. You guys have at it and investigate Trump, investigate Clinton and when wrong doing is found you can be giddy and happy because America will suffer but hell, it’s all about shaming the other side, fuck America!
If there is something to investigate then it should be. The Clinton email thing deserved an investigation I had no problem with that. I also take the Russian attempts to meddle in our elections very very seriously and I think that that investigation is extremely important for the integrity of future elections. It should not be partisan. Whether or not Trump colluded is somewhat of a sideshow to the bigger picture that no one is willing to acknowledge.
