Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,568
- 5,051
- 265
I did not.You did. You revealed your limited understanding of free black thought.
There is no BLACK thought and only a racist would say that there it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did not.You did. You revealed your limited understanding of free black thought.
We're not. It's true that Hispanics as a group vote in majority for the Democratic party it is also true that they, along with mixed race individuals, are the fastest growing demographic in America. And it's also true that white population numbers are declining. If you're going to find new conservatives you are going to have to look to more and more minority communities. That's just your demographic reality.What you just described are historically commiecrat constituencies. Sounds like it's the the commies who are losing. My life isn't changing a bit, well except for the negative effects of commie policies.
I did not.
There is no BLACK thought and only a racist would say that there it
We're not. It's true that Hispanics as a group vote in majority for the Democratic party it is also true that they, along with mixed race individuals, are the fastest growing demographic in America. And it's also true that white population numbers are declining. If you're going to find new conservatives you are going to have to look to more and more minority communities. That's just your demographic reality.
And it's hilarious to me that racist cuck whites are in a lose lose situation and don't seem to realize it. Can't stop their demographic decline without political power. Can't maintain their political power without replenishing their older whiter voting base with a younger generation that is increasingly less white. Politically speaking they are fucked. They won't find any solutions to demographic replacement through politics and they don't have the balls for the other thing so no matter what they lose. That's pretty much a certainty at this point.And?
.
Anything else, racist?I love it as well. Especially how white wing warriors only feel empowered when hiding behind black avatars. It's just goes to show that even if conservatism wins, white people still lose.
I'm not a racist, I'm a bigot. I'm bigoted against racist whites. What's wrong with that?Anything else, racist?
absolutely epic thread. I can't even read the racist response from the idiot leftists and the thread is still GOLDEN.
And it's hilarious to me that racist cuck whites are in a lose lose situation and don't seem to realize it. Can't stop their demographic decline without political power. Can't maintain their political power without replenishing their older whiter voting base with a younger generation that is increasingly less white. Politically speaking they are fucked. They won't find any solutions to demographic replacement through politics and they don't have the balls for the other thing so no matter what they lose. That's pretty much a certainty at this point.
You aren't. It's you who can't seem to grasp facts. There isn't a single minority demographic that you aren't in at least a 20pt deficit with when it comes to votes, and if you weren't winning a majority of non college educated whites you'd be losing with white voters too. In fact you haven't won the popular vote since 2004. If you don't win it next election your party will have gone 2 decades without winning with a majority of American voters.Child, you really are delusional. You seem to be the only one hung up on race. We are winning hearts and minds and you just can't seem to grasp why. LMAO
You aren't. It's you who can't seem to grasp facts. There isn't a single minority demographic that you aren't in at least a 20pt deficit with when it comes to votes, and if you weren't winning a majority of non college educated whites you'd be losing with white voters too. In fact you haven't won the popular vote since 2004. If you don't win it next election your party will have gone 2 decades without winning with a majority of American voters.
The popular vote is the relevant measurement by which we gauge which candidates received more votes from actual people you moron.When are you poor things going to realize, when it comes to presidential elections, the popular vote is as irrelevant as the skies being partly cloudy on election day. And even the college educated are starting to get a clue what commiecrat policies can do to their lifestyle. What did James Carvel say, "It's the economy stupid.".
.
Good for you.Sounds like pure loon babble to me.
The popular vote is the relevant measurement by which we gauge which candidates received more votes from actual people you moron.
In what way is the popular vote irrelevant to the argument over which party receives more support? Can you explain that in a manner that doesn't make you look incredibly stupid?Well you got one thing right, that is funny. And irrelevant.
In what way is the popular vote irrelevant to the argument over which party receives more support? Can you explain that in a manner that doesn't make you look incredibly stupid?
You might win more House or Senate seats but that still doesn't mean you'll get more support from voters than Democrats. For example there are less populated states who combined, receive fewer votes than someone running for the Senate in California or New York but those States combined will get more Senate seats that California since each State only gets two no matter how many people vote for them. It doesn't matter how you slice it, our support comes from people and Republican power is maintained by mechanisms. The electoral college, the rules of the Senate. Not from popular majority support from actual living breathing people.Yeah, we'll see in a month which party receives the most support, won't we?
You might win more House or Senate seats but that still doesn't mean you'll get more support from voters than Democrats. For example there are less populated states who combined, receive fewer votes than someone running for the Senate in California or New York but those States combined will get more Senate seats that California since each State only gets two no matter how many people vote for them. It doesn't matter how you slice it, our support comes from people and Republican power is maintained by mechanisms. The electoral college, the rules of the Senate. Not from popular majority support from actual living breathing people.