Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Jfk. Bought election. Bay of pigs. Cuban missile crisis. Vietnnam. Classless husband. Another empty suit offering meaningless platitudes like hope. Still, heads above his drunken younger brother teddy, the fredo of the family.
and the rest of those in that clan of rapist, murderers, drug addicts, drug overdoses, drunken car running off bridges drowning women and leaving them in their cars...
all that family has done all their lives is SUCK off taxpayers for their living...And they're hailed as heroes for it
something wrong with our society
Really? You're playing the You-must-hate-children card? What happened? Run out of race cards or did you misplace your you-must-hate-the-elderly cards? Perhaps you have some you-hate-clean-water cards under the sofa cushions that you can play every time your argument is too vacuous to stand on its own. Personally, if I were you I would stick some war-on-women cards up my sleeve just in case you get boxed in by facts and reality.
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
How many children have died of starvation due to Republican cuts? There are tons of resources for everyone to get food.
Jfk. Bought election. Bay of pigs. Cuban missile crisis. Vietnnam. Classless husband. Another empty suit offering meaningless platitudes like hope. Still, heads above his drunken younger brother teddy, the fredo of the family.
and the rest of those in that clan of rapist, murderers, drug addicts, drug overdoses, drunken car running off bridges drowning women and leaving them in their cars...
all that family has done all their lives is SUCK off taxpayers for their living...And they're hailed as heroes for it
something wrong with our society
Well said Stephanie.
And I would add that JFK's Hitler-admiring daddy Joe, when US Ambassador in London in 1940 assured FDR that Britain would surrender to Germany like any day now.
(As the historical knowledge possessed by some of you is - shall we say? - imperfect perhaps I should add that Britain did not surrender in 1940, or at any other time).
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
How many children have died of starvation due to Republican cuts? There are tons of resources for everyone to get food.
I am afraid you have not grasped to Marxist-Leninist concept of 'objective reality'. Don't let your mind be clouded by those silly 'fact' things.
It goes like this. Republicans are evil: check. Evil people starve children: check.
Therefore: Thousands of children have died because of Republican cuts!
It's quite easy. I'm sure you will soon get the hang of it.
Is that what you tell yourself so as not to feel guilty that you begrudge children food?
Really? You're playing the You-must-hate-children card? What happened? Run out of race cards or did you misplace your you-must-hate-the-elderly cards? Perhaps you have some you-hate-clean-water cards under the sofa cushions that you can play every time your argument is too vacuous to stand on its own. Personally, if I were you I would stick some war-on-women cards up my sleeve just in case you get boxed in by facts and reality.
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
Nobody hated jfk....um......he was murdered you fucking hag....someone hated him enough to remove him from the picture. Seriously just die off already you moronic piece of shit. You lying worthless troll.JFK was a liberal. If you hated Teddy's politics, you would have hated Jack and Bobby's too. Ted dedicated his public life to carrying out his two brother's unfinished agenda.
The Great Society was based on our slain President's New Frontier. The following were President Kennedy's agenda and proposals:
Civil Rights Bill
Medicare
War on Poverty
And JFK did not believe in trickle down economics.
JFK, The Demand-Side Tax Cutter
JFK lowered taxes, but supply-siders wrongly claim he's their patron saint.
"The Revenue Act of 1964 was aimed at the demand, rather than the supply, side of the economy," said Arthur Okun, one of Kennedy's economic advisers.
This distinction, taught in Economics 101, seldom makes it into the Washington sound-bite wars. A demand-side cut rests on the Keynesian theory that public consumption spurs economic activity. Government puts money in people's hands, as a temporary measure, so that they'll spend it. A supply-side cut sees business investment as the key to growth. Government gives money to businesses and wealthy individuals to invest, ultimately benefiting all Americans. Back in the early 1960s, tax cutting was as contentious as it is today, but it was liberal demand-siders who were calling for the cuts and generating the controversy.
When Kennedy ran for president in 1960 amid a sluggish economy, he vowed to "get the country moving again." After his election, his advisers, led by chief economist Walter Heller, urged a classically Keynesian solution: running a deficit to stimulate growth. (The $10 billion deficit Heller recommended, bold at the time, seems laughably small by today's standards.) In Keynesian theory, a tax cut aimed at consumers would have a "multiplier" effect, since each dollar that a taxpayer spent would go to another taxpayer, who would in effect spend it againmeaning the deficit would be short-lived.
At first Kennedy balked at Heller's Keynesianism. He even proposed a balanced budget in his first State of the Union address. But Heller and his team won over the president. By mid-1962 Kennedy had seen the Keynesian light, and in January 1963 he declared that "the enactment this year of tax reduction and tax reform overshadows all other domestic issues in this Congress."
The plan Kennedy's team drafted had many elements, including the closing of loopholes (the "tax reform" Kennedy spoke of).Ultimately, in the form that Lyndon Johnson signed into law, it reduced tax withholding rates, initiated a new standard deduction, and boosted the top deduction for child care expenses, among other provisions. It did lower the top tax bracket significantly, although from a vastly higher starting point than anything we've seen in recent years: 91 percent on marginal income greater than $400,000. And he cut it only to 70 percent, hardly the mark of a future Club for Growth member.
If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.
President John F. Kennedy
Nobody hated JfK......
and I've been helping the poor for 45 years of my working life
so you all can take this how only you liberals are the saints for the poor
JfK wasn't any more special than any other President..He just wasn't the RADICAL that you liberals support and are today
I find the liberal ideology to be PHONY and just downright sick and evil
they can support abortion, then carry on about wanting to even the playing field, they care more for people...blah blah blah is all I hear
And you are a talking point bot. You dont think for yourself period. Nothing about you I cant find someplace else, said by someone smarter.
You are not even a fart in history.
Sweet Nothings Plasma..
Maher doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground... Kennedy would be today's right of center moderate within the democrat party- hell. he'd probably have switched parties JUST LIKE Reagan did with the quip " I didn't leave the democrat part- the democrat party left me".
I find the liberal ideology to be PHONY and just downright sick and evil
they can support abortion, then carry on about wanting to even the playing field, they care more for people...blah blah blah is all I hear
And you are a talking point bot. You dont think for yourself period. Nothing about you I cant find someplace else, said by someone smarter.
You are not even a fart in history.
How many children have died of starvation due to Republican cuts? There are tons of resources for everyone to get food.
I am afraid you have not grasped to Marxist-Leninist concept of 'objective reality'. Don't let your mind be clouded by those silly 'fact' things.
It goes like this. Republicans are evil: check. Evil people starve children: check.
Therefore: Thousands of children have died because of Republican cuts!
It's quite easy. I'm sure you will soon get the hang of it.
You know, old Harry S. Truman had you right wing cocksuckers nailed 65 years ago. And that was when Republicans were more centrist.
"Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools. They approve of social security benefits-so much so that they took them away from almost a million people. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them. They believe in international trade--so much so that they crippled our reciprocal trade program, and killed our International Wheat Agreement. They favor the admission of displaced persons--but only within shameful racial and religious limitations.They consider electrical power a great blessing--but only when the private power companies get their rake-off. They say TVA is wonderful--but we ought never to try it again. They condemn "cruelly high prices"--but fight to the death every effort to bring them down. They think American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people. And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it."
President Harry S. Truman - October 13, 1948
Really? You're playing the You-must-hate-children card? What happened? Run out of race cards or did you misplace your you-must-hate-the-elderly cards? Perhaps you have some you-hate-clean-water cards under the sofa cushions that you can play every time your argument is too vacuous to stand on its own. Personally, if I were you I would stick some war-on-women cards up my sleeve just in case you get boxed in by facts and reality.
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
Where did Democrats get this feeling that it's up to Government to provide by stealing from those who take responsibility for their lives. Sure Democrats win elections and they get the chickenshit entitlement votes but people should Man-up or Lady-up to responsibility,
Some people do deserve or have earned the right to help so they can get back on track and they should be helped but making a life of dependance is no better than freeloading and civil slavery to the government.
Well..just sayin...
I am afraid you have not grasped to Marxist-Leninist concept of 'objective reality'. Don't let your mind be clouded by those silly 'fact' things.
It goes like this. Republicans are evil: check. Evil people starve children: check.
Therefore: Thousands of children have died because of Republican cuts!
It's quite easy. I'm sure you will soon get the hang of it.
You know, old Harry S. Truman had you right wing cocksuckers nailed 65 years ago. And that was when Republicans were more centrist.
"Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools. They approve of social security benefits-so much so that they took them away from almost a million people. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them. They believe in international trade--so much so that they crippled our reciprocal trade program, and killed our International Wheat Agreement. They favor the admission of displaced persons--but only within shameful racial and religious limitations.They consider electrical power a great blessing--but only when the private power companies get their rake-off. They say TVA is wonderful--but we ought never to try it again. They condemn "cruelly high prices"--but fight to the death every effort to bring them down. They think American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people. And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it."
President Harry S. Truman - October 13, 1948
You know what's REALLY funny, Bfgrn? That you probably think that 'ole Harry "The Buck Stops Here" Truman would find Barack Obama admirable. Truman was a man who put that sign on his desk in the Oval Office because he was willing to take the heat for doing the right thing even when it was politically unpopular. Barack Obama's sign would read "The Buck Stops THERE!!!"
Harry was straight up Kansas honest...Barry is straight up Chicago dishonest.
Really? You're playing the You-must-hate-children card? What happened? Run out of race cards or did you misplace your you-must-hate-the-elderly cards? Perhaps you have some you-hate-clean-water cards under the sofa cushions that you can play every time your argument is too vacuous to stand on its own. Personally, if I were you I would stick some war-on-women cards up my sleeve just in case you get boxed in by facts and reality.
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
How many children have died of starvation due to Republican cuts? There are tons of resources for everyone to get food.
And you are a talking point bot. You dont think for yourself period. Nothing about you I cant find someplace else, said by someone smarter.
You are not even a fart in history.
Sweet Nothings Plasma..
Oh good cancer lump decided to chime in and show how stupid he is.
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
Where did Democrats get this feeling that it's up to Government to provide by stealing from those who take responsibility for their lives. Sure Democrats win elections and they get the chickenshit entitlement votes but people should Man-up or Lady-up to responsibility,
Some people do deserve or have earned the right to help so they can get back on track and they should be helped but making a life of dependance is no better than freeloading and civil slavery to the government.
Well..just sayin...
Basically what you are protecting are those that steal from us all. Most of the rich, didn't "earn" their riches. They inherited it. They used guile and ruthlessness to con it out of people. Taxes do many things and some of those things are to add parity to an unfair system.
Otherwise there is a more "righteous" way to "redistribute" wealth. And it starts with guillotines.
...moving on..
Where did Democrats get this feeling that it's up to Government to provide by stealing from those who take responsibility for their lives. Sure Democrats win elections and they get the chickenshit entitlement votes but people should Man-up or Lady-up to responsibility,
Some people do deserve or have earned the right to help so they can get back on track and they should be helped but making a life of dependance is no better than freeloading and civil slavery to the government.
Well..just sayin...
Basically what you are protecting are those that steal from us all. Most of the rich, didn't "earn" their riches. They inherited it. They used guile and ruthlessness to con it out of people. Taxes do many things and some of those things are to add parity to an unfair system.
Otherwise there is a more "righteous" way to "redistribute" wealth. And it starts with guillotines.
You are such an idiot..
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
Where did Democrats get this feeling that it's up to Government to provide by stealing from those who take responsibility for their lives. Sure Democrats win elections and they get the chickenshit entitlement votes but people should Man-up or Lady-up to responsibility,
Some people do deserve or have earned the right to help so they can get back on track and they should be helped but making a life of dependance is no better than freeloading and civil slavery to the government.
Well..just sayin...
Basically what you are protecting are those that steal from us all. Most of the rich, didn't "earn" their riches. They inherited it. They used guile and ruthlessness to con it out of people. Taxes do many things and some of those things are to add parity to an unfair system.
Otherwise there is a more "righteous" way to "redistribute" wealth. And it starts with guillotines.
Really? You're trying to tell me there is some other excuse other than not giving a damn, to cut programs that provide food for children? And, it's not my fault that the Republican party wants to hurt seniors, minorities, women and children, so, if you don't want those cards thrown at you, don't support such nonsense.
How many children have died of starvation due to Republican cuts? There are tons of resources for everyone to get food.
Yes there is...We fell on hard time's just recently and I looked up charities that give out food
tons of them out there...But the liberal ideology, if it's not from the government it isn't WORTHY and that make people not caring
Basically what you are protecting are those that steal from us all. Most of the rich, didn't "earn" their riches. They inherited it. They used guile and ruthlessness to con it out of people. Taxes do many things and some of those things are to add parity to an unfair system.
Otherwise there is a more "righteous" way to "redistribute" wealth. And it starts with guillotines.
You are such an idiot..
And you are a poopy pants Diaper head.
Wait a minute!
Ted Nugent are you Lumpy 1??????
