Pain lingers for lesbian couple denied in Sweet Cakes case

[Jarlaxle]

Who appointed you the national Pope?

The lesbians won their case. Now they are complaining because they are getting just what they dished out.

They came as paying customers. Customers expecting the same high level of service provided to all other customers. What precisely did they " dish out"?

They instigated a terrorist campaign against this bakery. Perverts threatened the bakers, their vendors and even their customers. What these pervs are getting is mild.

Terrorist campaign? You made the claim, prove it.

The bakery closed because of threats.

Intolerance Burns Out Oregon Bakers

TODD'S AMERICAN DISPATCH: Christian bakery closes after LGBT threats, protests | Fox News

They were boycotted.

And if you depose threats so vehemently, why do you celebrate the threats received by those two women?

Because she is a psychopath.

 

[Nosmo King]

So.... what? Some things have changed, and other things haven't.

In 1791 they had said "all men are created equal" and yet had slavery, are you suggesting we go back to slavery?

Forcing private businesses to patronize those they don't want to is slavery.

Thus spake the pro Jim Crow advocate.

He is right though. Unless you have some delusional statist outlook

Are businesses licensed? Are they to follow the law? Is creating a second class American citizen because a business finds them unworthy of commerce the way you want to see our society devolve?

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

 

[martybegan]

Forcing private businesses to patronize those they don't want to is slavery.

Thus spake the pro Jim Crow advocate.

He is right though. Unless you have some delusional statist outlook

Are businesses licensed? Are they to follow the law? Is creating a second class American citizen because a business finds them unworthy of commerce the way you want to see our society devolve?

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

So instead we make the owners second class citizens?

 

[JOSweetHeart]

^^^ They asked for a gay wedding cake when they knew very well that it wasn't on the menu.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

And how, precisely does a Gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

 

[TNHarley]

Forcing private businesses to patronize those they don't want to is slavery.

Thus spake the pro Jim Crow advocate.

He is right though. Unless you have some delusional statist outlook

Are businesses licensed? Are they to follow the law? Is creating a second class American citizen because a business finds them unworthy of commerce the way you want to see our society devolve?

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

 

[TNHarley]

Jim Crow laws were not right either. But you statists love to suck the govts cock.. I don't get it..
Most of our problems are created by them...

 

[Nosmo King]

^^^ They asked for a gay wedding cake when they knew very well that it wasn't on the menu.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

And how, precisely does a Gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

 

[Nosmo King]

Thus spake the pro Jim Crow advocate.

He is right though. Unless you have some delusional statist outlook

Are businesses licensed? Are they to follow the law? Is creating a second class American citizen because a business finds them unworthy of commerce the way you want to see our society devolve?

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

 

[martybegan]

^^^ They asked for a gay wedding cake when they knew very well that it wasn't on the menu.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

And how, precisely does a Gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to
their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

So if he didn't bake the cake, their wedding would have been cancelled?

 

[boedicca]

^^^ They asked for a gay wedding cake when they knew very well that it wasn't on the menu.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

And how, precisely does a Gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

How Tolerant (not) of you Progs. Someone believes differently than you do, so his life must be destroyed. Well, you unleashed the whirlwind, so don't complain when the same standards are applied to you.

 

[boedicca]

He is right though. Unless you have some delusional statist outlook

Are businesses licensed? Are they to follow the law? Is creating a second class American citizen because a business finds them unworthy of commerce the way you want to see our society devolve?

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

Some slaves worked in houses cooking; they were still slaves, bub.

 

[Iceweasel]

^^^ They asked for a gay wedding cake when they knew very well that it wasn't on the menu.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

And how, precisely does a Gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

Odd. Your brain is hardwired in a weird way. If someone tries to force you to do something against your will, your brain interprets it as you imposing on them if you refuse. That's just not lucid thinking. It's like flinging a feces filled diaper against the wall and blaming the wall for being there.

And open to the public doesn't mean publicly owned. I've shown many people the door, with or without your permission. Sorry.

 

[TNHarley]

He is right though. Unless you have some delusional statist outlook

Are businesses licensed? Are they to follow the law? Is creating a second class American citizen because a business finds them unworthy of commerce the way you want to see our society devolve?

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

 

[Preacher]

Dykes get what they deserve

You now need to have a neutral third party examine your computer for evidence of pornography featuring lesbians.

My computer is at lenovos shop being fixed I'm on my phone lol

 

[JoeB131]

They did so once they realized the couple was going after them.

Well, it was a stupid thing to do.

The smart thing was to get a lawyer and have him fight it out. Legally, of course, they didn't have aleg to stand on, but once they did what they did, the Human Rights Commission had no choice but to inflict a heavy fine.

 

[JoeB131]

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

Isn't that like saying that Rosa Parks should have sat her ass at the back of the bus?

 

[Nosmo King]

Are businesses licensed? Are they to follow the law? Is creating a second class American citizen because a business finds them unworthy of commerce the way you want to see our society devolve?

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

 

[TNHarley]

What does a license have to do with anything? That doesn't mean the state owns the business. Unworthy? You apparently need to put words into people's mouths, that's the sign of a weak argument. You don't create second class citizens by turning down work, that's just bizarre!

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

 

[Nosmo King]

And how, precisely does a Gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

Odd. Your brain is hardwired in a weird way. If someone tries to force you to do something against your will, your brain interprets it as you imposing on them if you refuse. That's just not lucid thinking. It's like flinging a feces filled diaper against the wall and blaming the wall for being there.

And open to the public doesn't mean publicly owned. I've shown many people the door, with or without your permission. Sorry.

THEY ARE A RETAIL BAKERY! They get paid to bake, decorate and deliver wedding cakes. They refused to serve a homosexual couple. Did they think they would get Gay all over themselves if they filled that order?

They refused because they found that homosexual couple to be 'icky'. No other reason.

Their immortal souls were not going to be compromised simply for doing what they do as a matter of business each and every day. They employed discrimination. And not because their customers were acting in an unruly way. Not because their customers did not wear shirts and shoes in their shop. they refused because that couple was Lesbian.

What's the rationale here? The bakers don't approve of them? If they were Black or Asian or Islamic or blind or deaf or retarded, could their disapproval hold water? These bakers claim to be Christian. How does their refusal square with the Golden Rule? With 'cast not the first stone' With judge not lest ye be judged'? Since when has dogma been an acceptable form of commerce?

 

[Nosmo King]

A license means a business will follow the laws of the land.

A business that discriminates not only is breaking the law, but finding a customer unworthy due to some immutable factor. That's not fair. A business does not have the right to summarily dismiss paying customers if that customer is behaving properly.

Such discrimination makes that customer a second class citizen.

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?