Pain lingers for lesbian couple denied in Sweet Cakes case

[Katzndogz]

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

Odd. Your brain is hardwired in a weird way. If someone tries to force you to do something against your will, your brain interprets it as you imposing on them if you refuse. That's just not lucid thinking. It's like flinging a feces filled diaper against the wall and blaming the wall for being there.

And open to the public doesn't mean publicly owned. I've shown many people the door, with or without your permission. Sorry.

THEY ARE A RETAIL BAKERY! They get paid to bake, decorate and deliver wedding cakes. They refused to serve a homosexual couple. Did they think they would get Gay all over themselves if they filled that order?

They refused because they found that homosexual couple to be 'icky'. No other reason.

Their immortal souls were not going to be compromised simply for doing what they do as a matter of business each and every day. They employed discrimination. And not because their customers were acting in an unruly way. Not because their customers did not wear shirts and shoes in their shop. they refused because that couple was Lesbian.

What's the rationale here? The bakers don't approve of them? If they were Black or Asian or Islamic or blind or deaf or retarded, could their disapproval hold water? These bakers claim to be Christian. How does their refusal square with the Golden Rule? With 'cast not the first stone' With judge not lest ye be judged'? Since when has dogma been an acceptable form of commerce?

It's like you are totally unaware that the pervs won their case. Now that they won, victory is some what spoiled by the pervs being treated like the pervs they are.

 

[TNHarley]

Just because its law, doesn't mean its right. Why do you support involuntary servitude?

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

 

[Katzndogz]

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

Odd. Your brain is hardwired in a weird way. If someone tries to force you to do something against your will, your brain interprets it as you imposing on them if you refuse. That's just not lucid thinking. It's like flinging a feces filled diaper against the wall and blaming the wall for being there.

And open to the public doesn't mean publicly owned. I've shown many people the door, with or without your permission. Sorry.

THEY ARE A RETAIL BAKERY! They get paid to bake, decorate and deliver wedding cakes. They refused to serve a homosexual couple. Did they think they would get Gay all over themselves if they filled that order?

They refused because they found that homosexual couple to be 'icky'. No other reason.

Their immortal souls were not going to be compromised simply for doing what they do as a matter of business each and every day. They employed discrimination. And not because their customers were acting in an unruly way. Not because their customers did not wear shirts and shoes in their shop. they refused because that couple was Lesbian.

What's the rationale here? The bakers don't approve of them? If they were Black or Asian or Islamic or blind or deaf or retarded, could their disapproval hold water? These bakers claim to be Christian. How does their refusal square with the Golden Rule? With 'cast not the first stone' With judge not lest ye be judged'? Since when has dogma been an acceptable form of commerce?

None of this is true. The lesbos were served every time they went to that bakery. Only when the service they demanded was participation in sinful conduct did the bakers refuse.

 

[Katzndogz]

This is really where we are heading. Prosecute individuals who refuse to BE Gay or lesbian.

 

[Nosmo King]

They're a bakery! They bake wedding cakes! They aren't picking your cotton!

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

Being bigoted and stupid have consequences.

 

[Nosmo King]

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

Odd. Your brain is hardwired in a weird way. If someone tries to force you to do something against your will, your brain interprets it as you imposing on them if you refuse. That's just not lucid thinking. It's like flinging a feces filled diaper against the wall and blaming the wall for being there.

And open to the public doesn't mean publicly owned. I've shown many people the door, with or without your permission. Sorry.

THEY ARE A RETAIL BAKERY! They get paid to bake, decorate and deliver wedding cakes. They refused to serve a homosexual couple. Did they think they would get Gay all over themselves if they filled that order?

They refused because they found that homosexual couple to be 'icky'. No other reason.

Their immortal souls were not going to be compromised simply for doing what they do as a matter of business each and every day. They employed discrimination. And not because their customers were acting in an unruly way. Not because their customers did not wear shirts and shoes in their shop. they refused because that couple was Lesbian.

What's the rationale here? The bakers don't approve of them? If they were Black or Asian or Islamic or blind or deaf or retarded, could their disapproval hold water? These bakers claim to be Christian. How does their refusal square with the Golden Rule? With 'cast not the first stone' With judge not lest ye be judged'? Since when has dogma been an acceptable form of commerce?

None of this is true. The lesbos were served every time they went to that bakery. Only when the service they demanded was participation in sinful conduct did the bakers refuse.

How is baking a wedding cake, something a retail bakery does every day, "participation in sinful conduct"?

 

[Katzndogz]

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

Being bigoted and stupid have consequences.

So does being a perv which is why more than 3 years down the line the pervs are still learning their lesson. Consequences. They got 'em.

 

[TNHarley]

You cant pick and choose dude. That's fucking inconsistent and terribly partisan. But, what is else is to be expected? You gotta tow the line, right?

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

Being bigoted and stupid have consequences.

Yeah, to a conformist.
"be like me or be punished. But im the tolerant one!!!"
LMAO idiot

 

[Katzndogz]

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

Odd. Your brain is hardwired in a weird way. If someone tries to force you to do something against your will, your brain interprets it as you imposing on them if you refuse. That's just not lucid thinking. It's like flinging a feces filled diaper against the wall and blaming the wall for being there.

And open to the public doesn't mean publicly owned. I've shown many people the door, with or without your permission. Sorry.

THEY ARE A RETAIL BAKERY! They get paid to bake, decorate and deliver wedding cakes. They refused to serve a homosexual couple. Did they think they would get Gay all over themselves if they filled that order?

They refused because they found that homosexual couple to be 'icky'. No other reason.

Their immortal souls were not going to be compromised simply for doing what they do as a matter of business each and every day. They employed discrimination. And not because their customers were acting in an unruly way. Not because their customers did not wear shirts and shoes in their shop. they refused because that couple was Lesbian.

What's the rationale here? The bakers don't approve of them? If they were Black or Asian or Islamic or blind or deaf or retarded, could their disapproval hold water? These bakers claim to be Christian. How does their refusal square with the Golden Rule? With 'cast not the first stone' With judge not lest ye be judged'? Since when has dogma been an acceptable form of commerce?

None of this is true. The lesbos were served every time they went to that bakery. Only when the service they demanded was participation in sinful conduct did the bakers refuse.

How is baking a wedding cake, something a retail bakery does every day, "participation in sinful conduct"?

The pervs won that case. It's now 3 and a half years and counting of getting their pervy asses kicked.

 

[Nosmo King]

The point is they are a bakery. They chose that trade. They are not oppressed into involuntary servitude. They GET PAID to bake cakes!

How on God's green earth can that be involuntary servitude?

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

Being bigoted and stupid have consequences.

Yeah, to a conformist.
"be like me or be punished. But im the tolerant one!!!"
LMAO idiot

bigot

 

[TNHarley]

are you retarded? How is getting forced to give your private property to someone you don't want to, NOT?

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

Being bigoted and stupid have consequences.

Yeah, to a conformist.
"be like me or be punished. But im the tolerant one!!!"
LMAO idiot

bigot

How am I a bigot?
Besides, you support fucking slavery, dumbfuck. Get a new spin.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

^^^ They asked for a gay wedding cake when they knew very well that it wasn't on the menu.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

And how, precisely does a Gay wedding cake differ from a straight wedding cake?

The way that the couple wants it to look is what makes it differ from the other.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Do you suppose that the bakery had a portfolio of cakes they routinely make?

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

That bakery is open to the public. Those two women ARE the public.

And that baker stuck HIS nose into someone else's business. He thought he had to provide his approval to their nuptials. A boycott ensued. So his business, metaphorically, went up in smoke.

The place being open to the public does not mean that anyone can come in there and do whatever the heck they want to because they do not own the place. If a disturbance of any form is caused, the people in charge of the place have every right to not only refuse service to whoever is causing the disturbance but to throw out whoever is causing the disturbance.

Because I've never been to the place, I can't say. I do know that because the couple decided to disrupt the business in the way that it has been disrupted, what is being done to the couple in return shouldn't be all that much of a shock to them. Maybe if they had just gone where they were more welcome, they wouldn't have to be looking over their shoulders for the remainder of their lives.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. You know what they always say. If you stick your nose into other people's business the wrong way, don't be surprised if your own picture eventually goes up in smoke.

Isn't that like saying that Rosa Parks should have sat her ass at the back of the bus?

To me, the back of the bus is better than not being on it at all.

God bless you two always!!!

Holly

 

[bodecea]

Can we have a collective "AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!"

In all seriousness, I am absolutely against anyone harassing these women, but they are the ones who went after the Klein's.

The hate keeps coming: Pain lingers for lesbian couple denied in Sweet Cakes case

It's just a cake, Laurel Bowman-Cryer used to tell her wife, Rachel. But three and a half years have passed, and the hate mail keeps coming.

Back in 2013, the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa made headlines when they refused to make the lesbians' wedding cake. A state official, in a move that's redefined his political career, eventually ordered the bakers to pay $135,000.

The Bowman-Cryers have received thousands of Facebook messages, each one calling them fat or evil, the dumb lesbians who ruined those Christian bakers' lives.

As they waited for their daughter's school bus this May, Rachel's cell phone dinged with a new missive.

"I am buying up my ammo right now you filthy, ugly, disgusting, fat, stupid, cruel, anti-Christian piece of liberal scum," she read aloud. "I am getting ready for the war so I hope you have a good hiding place, you sick, disgusting, miserable, piece of degenerate lesbian scum."

The Bowman-Cryers say they never wanted the money, which remains locked in a government account. They say they never wanted a war.

For three and a half years, they have hidden, believing in time their names would disappear from the headlines. They didn't answer the phone. They declined hundreds of interviews, quit their jobs and stopped leaving the house.

Their silence has not protected them. As the Bowman-Cryers retreated, the fury over their case grew louder.

The bakers, Aaron and Melissa Klein, appealed their fines and hired former President George H.W. Bush's White House lawyer. They toured the country with presidential candidate Ted Cruz as the face of a new fight for business owners' religious freedom.

The legalization of same-sex marriage isn't the end of the story, the Kleins told crowds from Iowa to Washington, D.C. The government, they said, wants to force Christian business owners to help gay people marry. The solution, the Kleins warned receptive lawmakers, would be legislation protecting religious liberty. Arkansas, North Carolina and Mississippi have approved bills since then, curtailing the civil rights gay people fought to win.

The hate keeps coming: Pain lingers for lesbian couple denied in Sweet Cakes case

The RW hates the law.

 

[bodecea]

So...tell me, all of you complaining about this issue.....what are YOU actively doing to eliminate PA laws? Are you making sure that PA laws are repealed so that businesses can reject customers for anything....including religion? (which is currently protected)

Or are you just whining?

 

[bodecea]

And the bakers' beliefs include things like "don't cross over the road and ignore those who you might not like", oh, they were quickly forgotten, weren't they?

The Bakers didn't go anywhere. They were in their own shop.

I didn't say anything about going anywhere. However they're Christians, and part of Christian belief is not to turn away from those you don't like. ISN'T IT?

No part of Christian belief requires Christians to commit sin.

What sin would be committed by making a cake for gay people exactly?

Direct participation in the wedding which is a sinful act. Now we know that the government will force Christians to sin and punish them when they refuse. That part is over. The complaint the lesbians have now is a general disapproval of their perversion.

If gays and lesbians could make their unhappiness known, which they did. Sweet Cakes was happily put out of business. Then anyone else could also make their unhappiness known. This couple is getting exactly what they deserve.

Baking a cake for a wedding reception is "direct participation in the wedding"? Since when?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Now when it comes to businesses, they've signed up to an agreement which means they need to act better than an individual needs to do. Businesses are not FREE to do as they wish, they're businesses. Individuals can make choices. If you don't want to serve gay people then you are FREE not to work in the line of business. It's their choice.

It's not the same thing. There is no gay version of Jim Crow when all businesses and services were denied to blacks. Forcing a business to go out of business because of deeply held religious beliefs is an unreasonable demand when they can go next door and get the same service they seek. Such a social upheaval demanded by libturd wing nuts to conform without debate is unreasonable. You're going to get blowback.

Public accommodation laws are antiquated and rightly should be removed from the law books. Everybody is equal; nobody is really discriminated against anymore.

 

[Nosmo King]

They were going to...get ready for it...GET PAID TO PERFORM SERVICES THEY PERFORM EVERY DAY!

How is that tantamount to giving away their private property?

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

Being bigoted and stupid have consequences.

Yeah, to a conformist.
"be like me or be punished. But im the tolerant one!!!"
LMAO idiot

bigot

How am I a bigot?
Besides, you support fucking slavery, dumbfuck. Get a new spin.

Explain how these bakers were "enslaved".

 

[Katzndogz]

This is not an issue of public accommodation. There is no instance of anyone going to the bakery when it was open to the public and been denied service. They were accommodated each and every time. What the complaint is about is an off site personal service requiring the appearance and participation of the baker.

 

[Katzndogz]

Why cant you understand they didn't want to? I think its stupid, but people should be free to be stupid. And bigoted if they wish. Conformity is never the answer.

Being bigoted and stupid have consequences.

Yeah, to a conformist.
"be like me or be punished. But im the tolerant one!!!"
LMAO idiot

bigot

How am I a bigot?
Besides, you support fucking slavery, dumbfuck. Get a new spin.

Explain how these bakers were "enslaved".

They were required to labor against their will. The court agreed. For purposes of gays and lesbians, slavery is acceptable.

Not everyone feels that way. Since the award of slavery, the pervs have been paying over and over. Now they don't like it.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

I think we can see how far society still has to travel.

If you are in the cake business then you sell cakes to the public. Not just to those whose sex lives pass your bigoted standards.

Being repulsed by gay sex is not bigoted anymore than gay men wanting to vomit at the thought of having sex with a woman.

You are the face of bigotry, Tommy