Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no legal requirement for two states.Has nothing to do with the conquest of territory.The conquest of territory by force is illegal.
You bumped your head too hard on the prayer mat, right?
There’s an inherent right to resist Islamic terrorism. Resistance will continue.
Answer my question old man
Do you want one state or two. Simple question. Answer it.
Has nothing to do with the conquest of territory.The conquest of territory by force is illegal.Enforce international law.For all your anti Israel bitching. What is your solution?
Be more specific. Do you want a one state solution? Yes or no. International law is what the US says it is.
You bumped your head too hard on the prayer mat, right?
There’s an inherent right to resist Islamic terrorism. Resistance will continue.
RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)The two state "solution" has been on the table since 1937. Eighty years later we still don't have it. It must not be a good idea.There is no legal requirement for two states.
Do you want one state or two. Simple question. Answer it.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
You have not answered mine.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)The two state "solution" has been on the table since 1937. Eighty years later we still don't have it. It must not be a good idea.Do you want one state or two. Simple question. Answer it.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
You still have not answered the question. WOW!!!
Victors tell history. I have told you this 1000x. You obviously cannot read. You're also a coward.
That's right, the UN cannot make law.Has nothing to do with the conquest of territory.The conquest of territory by force is illegal.Enforce international law.
Be more specific. Do you want a one state solution? Yes or no. International law is what the US says it is.
You bumped your head too hard on the prayer mat, right?
There’s an inherent right to resist Islamic terrorism. Resistance will continue.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)The two state "solution" has been on the table since 1937. Eighty years later we still don't have it. It must not be a good idea.Do you want one state or two. Simple question. Answer it.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
The U. N, did not have the authority? Then they have no right to make Laws ( International Law) or try to enforce them. Keep posting
RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
This is an interesting quest...
(COMMENT)The UN had the authority to divide a country?
Link?
It seems that on agreement of the UN General Assembly, under Chapter XII, UN Charter.
The Answer is YES to the question of authority, having been handed down (all rights and title whatsoever) from Artilce16 of the Treaty of Lausanne.
UN Charter - Chapter XII said:Article 77
1 The trusteeship system shall apply to such territories in the following categories as may be placed thereunder by means of trusteeship agreements:
a. territories now held under mandate;
b. territories which may be detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War; and
c. territories voluntarily placed under the system by states responsible for their administration.
2 It will be a matter for subsequent agreement as to which territories in the foregoing categories will be brought under the trusteeship system and upon what terms.
Article 78
The trusteeship system shall not apply to territories which have become Members of the United Nations, relationship among which shall be based on respect for the principle of sovereign equality.
Jordan is an Article 78 former Mandate Territory, independent Kingdom 1946, and UN Member.
Israel became an Article 78 former Mandate Territory, 1948, independent state and UN Member.
I do not believe that the US foresaw the fiasco that the territories that were non-self-governing territories.
The West Bank and the Gaza Strip are Article 77a, former Mandate Territories, 1948. However, these entities are not members of the UN. As of 2005, the Gaza Strip became self-governing (such as that mess of criminals are) when the Israelis unilaterially withdrew.
Most Respectfully,
R
I believe you are incorrect. The League of Nations had no territory. The Mandate had no territory. The UN had no territory. You cannot give away all or part of a territory that is not yours.The Answer is YES to the question of authority, having been handed down (all rights and title whatsoever) from Artilce16 of the Treaty of Lausanne.
I believe you are incorrect. The League of Nations had no territory. The Mandate had no territory. The UN had no territory. You cannot give away all or part of a territory that is not yours.
That's right, the UN cannot make law.Has nothing to do with the conquest of territory.The conquest of territory by force is illegal.Be more specific. Do you want a one state solution? Yes or no. International law is what the US says it is.
You bumped your head too hard on the prayer mat, right?
There’s an inherent right to resist Islamic terrorism. Resistance will continue.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)The two state "solution" has been on the table since 1937. Eighty years later we still don't have it. It must not be a good idea.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
The U. N, did not have the authority? Then they have no right to make Laws ( International Law) or try to enforce them. Keep posting
That's right, the UN cannot make law.Has nothing to do with the conquest of territory.The conquest of territory by force is illegal.
You bumped your head too hard on the prayer mat, right?
There’s an inherent right to resist Islamic terrorism. Resistance will continue.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
The U. N, did not have the authority? Then they have no right to make Laws ( International Law) or try to enforce them. Keep posting
Good! Then we can stop reading your posts about “ International Law” and Israel’s abiding by them.
Wait.... If there is no such thing as “ International Law” then you should be condemning the PLO’s position that the Israelis have no rights to the Western Wall ! Just proves what a Hypocrite you are
I didn't say that.If there is no such thing as “ International Law”
RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
This is an interesting quest...
(COMMENT)The UN had the authority to divide a country?
Link?
It seems that on agreement of the UN General Assembly, under Chapter XII, UN Charter.
The Answer is YES to the question of authority, having been handed down (all rights and title whatsoever) from Artilce16 of the Treaty of Lausanne.
UN Charter - Chapter XII said:Article 77
1 The trusteeship system shall apply to such territories in the following categories as may be placed thereunder by means of trusteeship agreements:
a. territories now held under mandate;
b. territories which may be detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War; and
c. territories voluntarily placed under the system by states responsible for their administration.
2 It will be a matter for subsequent agreement as to which territories in the foregoing categories will be brought under the trusteeship system and upon what terms.
Article 78
The trusteeship system shall not apply to territories which have become Members of the United Nations, relationship among which shall be based on respect for the principle of sovereign equality.
Jordan is an Article 78 former Mandate Territory, independent Kingdom 1946, and UN Member.
Israel became an Article 78 former Mandate Territory, 1948, independent state and UN Member.
I do not believe that the US foresaw the fiasco that the territories that were non-self-governing territories.
The West Bank and the Gaza Strip are Article 77a, former Mandate Territories, 1948. However, these entities are not members of the UN. As of 2005, the Gaza Strip became self-governing (such as that mess of criminals are) when the Israelis unilaterially withdrew.
Most Respectfully,
RI believe you are incorrect. The League of Nations had no territory. The Mandate had no territory. The UN had no territory. You cannot give away all or part of a territory that is not yours.The Answer is YES to the question of authority, having been handed down (all rights and title whatsoever) from Artilce16 of the Treaty of Lausanne.
You have not answered mine.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)The two state "solution" has been on the table since 1937. Eighty years later we still don't have it. It must not be a good idea.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
You still have not answered the question. WOW!!!
Victors tell history. I have told you this 1000x. You obviously cannot read. You're also a coward.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
That's right, the UN cannot make law.Has nothing to do with the conquest of territory.You bumped your head too hard on the prayer mat, right?
There’s an inherent right to resist Islamic terrorism. Resistance will continue.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
The U. N, did not have the authority? Then they have no right to make Laws ( International Law) or try to enforce them. Keep posting
Good! Then we can stop reading your posts about “ International Law” and Israel’s abiding by them.
Wait.... If there is no such thing as “ International Law” then you should be condemning the PLO’s position that the Israelis have no rights to the Western Wall ! Just proves what a Hypocrite you areI didn't say that.If there is no such thing as “ International Law”
The territories went directly to the successor states. There was no middle man.I believe you are incorrect. The League of Nations had no territory. The Mandate had no territory. The UN had no territory. You cannot give away all or part of a territory that is not yours.
Turkey held the territory. Turkey unconditionally ceded the territory. That would make the territory terra nullius (territory under no sovereignty).
Very few Palestinians are saying that anymore.You have not answered mine.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
You still have not answered the question. WOW!!!
Victors tell history. I have told you this 1000x. You obviously cannot read. You're also a coward.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
The problem of Palestinians whining about not having a country of their own.
Very few Palestinians are saying that anymore.You have not answered mine.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
You still have not answered the question. WOW!!!
Victors tell history. I have told you this 1000x. You obviously cannot read. You're also a coward.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
The problem of Palestinians whining about not having a country of their own.
The territories went directly to the successor states. There was no middle man.
Very few Palestinians are saying that anymore.You have not answered mine.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
You still have not answered the question. WOW!!!
Victors tell history. I have told you this 1000x. You obviously cannot read. You're also a coward.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
The problem of Palestinians whining about not having a country of their own.
Very few Palestinians are saying that anymore.
Very few Palestinians are saying that anymore.You have not answered mine.The UN had the authority to divide a country?
Link?
You still have not answered the question. WOW!!!
Victors tell history. I have told you this 1000x. You obviously cannot read. You're also a coward.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
The problem of Palestinians whining about not having a country of their own.
So I answered you now Answer me. Man up.
You have not answered mine.RE: Palestine Today
※→ AzogtheDefiler, P F Tinmore, et al,
By the admission of may Arab Palestinians like our friend "P F Tinmore," the two-state recommendation is either unreliable as a viable solution that will stand on its merits --- or --- unacceptable because the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
This leads us only to the conclusion that the Arab Palestinians would rather NOT have an economically sound and progressive nation in a peaceful environment if they have to live in peace with Jewish neighbors.
(COMMENT)Are you going to answer me or not?
A) One State
B) Two State
What do you want?!?!?!?!?!?
The idea of an Arab Palestinian Acceptable → "One State Solution" is based on the premise that the merger would ultimately result in an Arab Palestinian majority having control of the IDF and → that could then legally dismantle the Jewish National Home in favor of an Arab State. This would first start with the Arab Palestinian Refugees placing such a financial and social welfare burden on the Israeli economy as to collapse the most successful state in the entire region; leaving an empty husk in place of was once the 18th most human developed nation in the world. (Death by a thousand cuts.)
Most Respectfully,
RThe UN had the authority to divide a country?the "Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them."
Link?
You still have not answered the question. WOW!!!
Victors tell history. I have told you this 1000x. You obviously cannot read. You're also a coward.
BTW, what problem is the two state solution trying to resolve?
The problem of Palestinians whining about not having a country of their own.
