P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 79,082
- 4,385
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #7,741
![41068550_2179503178787048_6808210556495855616_o.jpg](https://scontent.fdtw1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/41068550_2179503178787048_6808210556495855616_o.jpg?_nc_cat=102&_nc_ht=scontent.fdtw1-1.fna&oh=0c529177cffe71319a63421305c3e19d&oe=5CC704F0)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How lucky for you that the retrograde Islamist society teaches youngsters from the earliest age to hate themselves and hate Jews.
Just incredible that you support that kind of child abuse.
Re-framing the Narrative for Palestinian Rights and Justice
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Just the Introduction to this video was enough to make me gag. Seventy years since the dispossession (Nakba) and violation of their rights. But it would be hard to believe that it could be anything but biased against the Israelis with guest speakers Nadia Hijab (Co-founder of Nadia Hijab is co-founder and board president of Al-Shabaka and biased Human Rights journalist), Zena Agha (a Palestinian-Iraqi writer and poet from London) and Yara Hawari (a British Palestinian anti-Israeli activist), representing the Palestinian Policy Network (PPN) at the Palestinian Center.
You have to love it. Right at the start, they indicate that what defines Palestine and the Palestinian People has been steadily circumscribed. (Portions of the Arab Palestinians people have differing views on the matter.)
They believe that the majority of the Palestinian People (which they cannot agree on exactly what that means)
Re-framing the Narrative for Palestinian Rights and Justice
(COMMENT)
They are recommending views on how to re-frame (change the narrative). But what I found interesting is that they open by saying that from 1948 to 1966, the Palestinians were under Military Rule (by Arab League countries of Jordan and Egypt).
All in all, I found it to be a complete waste of time.
Just My Critique.
Most Respectfully,
R
That is not what she said. The Palestinians who remained in Israel lived under Israeli military rule from 1948 to 1966.But what I found interesting is that they open by saying that from 1948 to 1966, the Palestinians were under Military Rule (by Arab League countries of Jordan and Egypt).
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Just the Introduction to this video was enough to make me gag. Seventy years since the dispossession (Nakba) and violation of their rights. But it would be hard to believe that it could be anything but biased against the Israelis with guest speakers Nadia Hijab (Co-founder of Nadia Hijab is co-founder and board president of Al-Shabaka and biased Human Rights journalist), Zena Agha (a Palestinian-Iraqi writer and poet from London) and Yara Hawari (a British Palestinian anti-Israeli activist), representing the Palestinian Policy Network (PPN) at the Palestinian Center.
You have to love it. Right at the start, they indicate that what defines Palestine and the Palestinian People has been steadily circumscribed. (Portions of the Arab Palestinians people have differing views on the matter.)
They believe that the majority of the Palestinian People (which they cannot agree on exactly what that means)
Re-framing the Narrative for Palestinian Rights and Justice
(COMMENT)
They are recommending views on how to re-frame (change the narrative). But what I found interesting is that they open by saying that from 1948 to 1966, the Palestinians were under Military Rule (by Arab League countries of Jordan and Egypt).
All in all, I found it to be a complete waste of time.
Just My Critique.
Most Respectfully,
R
It was not to change the narrative as much as it was to set a focus. Ethnic cleansing, settler colonialism, and apartheid are all valid arguments. However, apartheid is illegal by statute and would be more fruitful to pursue.They are recommending views on how to re-frame (change the narrative).
(COMMENT)That is not what she said. The Palestinians who remained in Israel lived under Israeli military rule from 1948 to 1966.
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
OH, that is so strange.
(COMMENT)That is not what she said. The Palestinians who remained in Israel lived under Israeli military rule from 1948 to 1966.
I could have sworn that the West Bank was under Joran and the Gaza Strip was under the Egyptian Military Governor. None of Israel (former territory under the Mandate minus the West Bank and Gaza Stript) was under Military Rule. (1948-1966)
NONE of the Arabs Palestinians lining in Israel form 1948 to the Present were under military rule. Israel has had a continuous civil authority since the day it declared independence. (At least that is how I understand it. Do you know something different?)
Most Respectfully,
R
Citizen Strangers Minority Rights in the State of IsraelNONE of the Arabs Palestinians lining in Israel form 1948 to the Present were under military rule.
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
OH, that is so strange.
(COMMENT)That is not what she said. The Palestinians who remained in Israel lived under Israeli military rule from 1948 to 1966.
I could have sworn that the West Bank was under Joran and the Gaza Strip was under the Egyptian Military Governor. None of Israel (former territory under the Mandate minus the West Bank and Gaza Stript) was under Military Rule. (1948-1966)
NONE of the Arabs Palestinians lining in Israel form 1948 to the Present were under military rule. Israel has had a continuous civil authority since the day it declared independence. (At least that is how I understand it. Do you know something different?)
Most Respectfully,
RCitizen Strangers Minority Rights in the State of IsraelNONE of the Arabs Palestinians lining in Israel form 1948 to the Present were under military rule.
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Just the Introduction to this video was enough to make me gag. Seventy years since the dispossession (Nakba) and violation of their rights. But it would be hard to believe that it could be anything but biased against the Israelis with guest speakers Nadia Hijab (Co-founder of Nadia Hijab is co-founder and board president of Al-Shabaka and biased Human Rights journalist), Zena Agha (a Palestinian-Iraqi writer and poet from London) and Yara Hawari (a British Palestinian anti-Israeli activist), representing the Palestinian Policy Network (PPN) at the Palestinian Center.
You have to love it. Right at the start, they indicate that what defines Palestine and the Palestinian People has been steadily circumscribed. (Portions of the Arab Palestinians people have differing views on the matter.)
They believe that the majority of the Palestinian People (which they cannot agree on exactly what that means)
Re-framing the Narrative for Palestinian Rights and Justice
(COMMENT)
They are recommending views on how to re-frame (change the narrative). But what I found interesting is that they open by saying that from 1948 to 1966, the Palestinians were under Military Rule (by Arab League countries of Jordan and Egypt).
All in all, I found it to be a complete waste of time.
Just My Critique.
Most Respectfully,
R
It was not to change the narrative as much as it was to set a focus. Ethnic cleansing, settler colonialism, and apartheid are all valid arguments. However, apartheid is illegal by statute and would be more fruitful to pursue.They are recommending views on how to re-frame (change the narrative).