Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Contrary to popular propaganda, this is not a Hamas gig. Hamas does not want a confrontation with Israel.RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
We've seen this tactic before. It is a variation of the Human Shield technique.
First you establish a barrier of civilian, humanitarian, educational (emphasizing youth activities), cultural exhibits, etc, etc, etc...) between Israeli forces and HAMAS (Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters)... Once well established and peacefully planted, then HAMAS begins a provocation that will necessitate (even demand) an Israeli response; placing this HAMAS established picture of tranquillity in harms way --- mortal danger.
You don't think HAMAS is such a benevolent leadership, that they won't make self-improvement projects in the city, but for some reason, they will establish a Large-scale refugee style camp (literally) right on the border?
The surprise (of an attack) is in not knowing → what is about to happen! It is one of the things that make trusting people vulnerable to a faint. In many successful mystery stories, the culprit is the one least expected.
(COMMENT)Organizer of the Great March of Return says protests in Gaza ‘must go on’
The next phase of the Great March of Return must see an escalation in artistic, cultural and social actions. Instead of direct confrontation with occupation soldiers, the struggle should take the form of art exhibits, dance and theatre; children planting trees; university professors holding free classes in tents at the base camps; girls in our national dress; people painting, school and family trips; playgrounds and children’s games; novelists and writers sharing our story with the world; musicians bringing our music to the world –all of this taking place in the return camps.
Organizer of the Great March of Return says protests in Gaza ‘must go on’
The HAMAS plan is that when the conditions are right, → HAMAS resources will create such a provocation that Israel will be forced to respond, and the response will result in some major catastrophe → causing a mass casualty event in the process. The HAMAS gamble is that the world will not recognize it is an orchestrated event by HAMAS to initiate global condemnation of Israel; believing that the Israelis are heartless and cruel with no moral value on life.
Most Respectfully,
R
Israel will have no legitimate excuse to shoot anybody.Instead of direct confrontation with occupation soldiers, the struggle should take the form of art exhibits, dance and theatre; children planting trees; university professors holding free classes in tents at the base camps; girls in our national dress; people painting, school and family trips; playgrounds and children’s games; novelists and writers sharing our story with the world; musicians bringing our music to the world –all of this taking place in the return camps.
Liar.Contrary to popular propaganda, this is not a Hamas gig. Hamas does not want a confrontation with Israel.RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
We've seen this tactic before. It is a variation of the Human Shield technique.
First you establish a barrier of civilian, humanitarian, educational (emphasizing youth activities), cultural exhibits, etc, etc, etc...) between Israeli forces and HAMAS (Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters)... Once well established and peacefully planted, then HAMAS begins a provocation that will necessitate (even demand) an Israeli response; placing this HAMAS established picture of tranquillity in harms way --- mortal danger.
You don't think HAMAS is such a benevolent leadership, that they won't make self-improvement projects in the city, but for some reason, they will establish a Large-scale refugee style camp (literally) right on the border?
The surprise (of an attack) is in not knowing → what is about to happen! It is one of the things that make trusting people vulnerable to a faint. In many successful mystery stories, the culprit is the one least expected.
(COMMENT)Organizer of the Great March of Return says protests in Gaza ‘must go on’
The next phase of the Great March of Return must see an escalation in artistic, cultural and social actions. Instead of direct confrontation with occupation soldiers, the struggle should take the form of art exhibits, dance and theatre; children planting trees; university professors holding free classes in tents at the base camps; girls in our national dress; people painting, school and family trips; playgrounds and children’s games; novelists and writers sharing our story with the world; musicians bringing our music to the world –all of this taking place in the return camps.
Organizer of the Great March of Return says protests in Gaza ‘must go on’
The HAMAS plan is that when the conditions are right, → HAMAS resources will create such a provocation that Israel will be forced to respond, and the response will result in some major catastrophe → causing a mass casualty event in the process. The HAMAS gamble is that the world will not recognize it is an orchestrated event by HAMAS to initiate global condemnation of Israel; believing that the Israelis are heartless and cruel with no moral value on life.
Most Respectfully,
R
The idea is to change the face of the protests. No tires, no rocks, no kites. Just family picnics with planned activities.
Israel will have no legitimate excuse to shoot anybody.Instead of direct confrontation with occupation soldiers, the struggle should take the form of art exhibits, dance and theatre; children planting trees; university professors holding free classes in tents at the base camps; girls in our national dress; people painting, school and family trips; playgrounds and children’s games; novelists and writers sharing our story with the world; musicians bringing our music to the world –all of this taking place in the return camps.
The idea is to change the face of the protests. No tires, no rocks, no kites. Just family picnics with planned activities.
And so Israel won't shoot anybody. If Gaza had just done that in the FIRST place 161 would still be alive.Israel will have no legitimate excuse to shoot anybody.
Precautions under the law governing the conduct of hostilities - Jean-Franc¸ois Que´guiner. Legal Adviser in the Legal Division of the ICRC said:However, it remains legally accepted that, in the harsh reality of war, civilian persons and objects may be incidentally affected by an attack directed at a legitimate military objective. Euphemistically referred to as ‘‘collateral casualties’’ or ‘‘collateral damage’’,(4) civilians may be victims of mistaken target identification or of unintended but inevitable side effects of an attack on a legitimate target in their vicinity. According to the principle of proportionality, these collateral casualties and damages are lawful under treaty and customary law only if they are not excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.(5)
------------------------------------
Footnotes
4 ‘‘Collateral casualties’’ and ‘‘collateral damage’’ are defined in Rule 13(c) of the San Remo Manual onPrecautions to be taken by the party subject to an attack
International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea as ‘‘the loss of life of, or injury to, civilians or other
protected persons, and damage to or the destruction of the natural environment or objects that are not in
themselves military objectives’’.
5 Codified in Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I, the principle of proportionality encompasses more
than the duty to take precautions in attack. It is, however, relevant in this context, as illustrated by
Article 57(2)(a)(iii). Since the difficulties in applying this principle are discussed at length in a separate
contribution to this volume (see Enzo Cannizzaro, ‘‘Contextualising proportionality: ius ad bellum and
ius in bello in the Lebanese war’’, pp. 779–792), a detailed analysis of this precautionary measure will not
be made here.
Any party subject to an attack is prohibited from abusing the obligations of the
attacker by trying to shield military objectives and operations. Although
‘‘technically’’ it could be contested that such prohibition belongs to precautions
(it is entailed in Article 51(7) Additional Protocol I and not in the provisions
dealing with precautions) – it remains logical to envisage its content in this context
since it is one of the main obligations addressed to the defender in order to protect
the civilian population. In addition to this absolute prohibition of human shield,
feasible precautions against the effect of attacks are enshrined in Article 58.
The absolute prohibition of human shield
The prohibition of the use of the civilian population, individual civilians orWhile the prohibition of using human shields can be traced back to ancient
civilian objects to render a point or an area immune from military operations
times,(61) the treaty codification of this rule did not make its appearance until much
later. Admittedly, Article 19 of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949 requires
belligerents to evacuate prisoners of war as soon as possible after their capture to
camps situated in an area far enough from the combat zone for them to be out of
danger from hostilities.(62) Article 23 of the same instrument is even more explicit,
stipulating that prisoners of war may not be sent to, or detained in, areas in which
they may be exposed to fire from the combat zone. Nor, a fortiori, may they be
used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations. Along the
same lines, Article 28 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 provides that the
presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas
immune from military operations. However, the scope of each of these very
important provisions is necessarily limited in view of the two instruments’ respective
fields of application. It was only with the adoption of Article 51(7) of Additional
Protocol I that the ban on using human shields was finally extended to protect the
entire civilian population, and all individual civilians, in the following terms:
The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civiliansThis provision is skilfully worded. It goes to the heart of the prohibition
shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military
operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks
or to shield, favour or impede military operations. The Parties to the conflict
shall not direct the movement of the civilian population or individual civilians
in order to attempt to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield
military operations.(63)
by covering both the forcible movement of civilians to shield military objectives
from attack as well as more ‘‘subtle’’ practices. For instance, Article 51(7) clearly
contemplates the scenario of moving civilians to a military site, but it also
envisages the possibility of deliberately placing a military objective in the middle
of, or close to, a civilian area, for example by positioning a piece of artillery in a
school yard or a residential area. Depending on the circumstances, the latter
scenario may also amount to a violation of the obligation – examined later in this
paper – to refrain from placing military objectives in or near densely populated
areas. This violation will be aggravated by the intention of using the civilian
population as a shield. Article 51(7) also prohibits moving a civilian population or
individual civilians in an attempt to shield military operations. In short, this
provision has extended the personal scope of the prohibition to benefit all
civilians, and has broadened the material scope of the prohibition to cover a
maximum of situations.(64) The wide support for this rule, particularly in
diplomatic practice, suggests – with little risk of contradiction – that the
prohibition enjoys customary status in both international and non-international
armed conflicts.(65)
------------------------------------
Footnotes
61 The first modern attempts to establish international criminal liability did set out to criminalize such
practices. The prohibition on using human shields is mentioned in the 29 March 1919 report drafted by
the Commission that was responsible, inter alia, for identifying violations committed by the forces of the
German Empire and its allies (Miguel A. Marin, ‘‘The evolution and present status of the laws of war’’,
RCADI (1957-II), p. 678).
62 The obligation to evacuate knows one exception, when the prisoner concerned cannot be moved, due to,
for example, the seriousness of his wounds. It should be noted that the protection afforded to prisoners
of war also covers the period of time between capture and evacuation. During this interval, they must
not be unnecessarily exposed to danger.
63 Additional Protocol II contains no similar provision; Article 5(2) only mentions that places of
internment and detention must not be located close to the combat zone.
64 As quite aptly noted in the manual Fight it Right, above note 33, p. 58, para. 1003.2, this prohibition on
using human shields must nevertheless be interpreted in the context of a given military operation. For
example, a defending commander may not be deemed to be using civilians as human shields when the
area being defended is a town or residential area that is under siege and allows little opportunity for
persons to move.
65 A very large number of military manuals contain provisions similar to that of Additional Protocol I; see
Henckaerts and Doswald-Beck, above note 8, Vol. II (Practice), Part 2, pp. 2285–302. In addition, the
Rome Statute includes the use of human shields in its list of war crimes set out in Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).
(COMMENT)Israel will have no legitimate excuse to shoot anybody.
Contrary to popular propaganda, this is not a Hamas gig. Hamas does not want a confrontation with Israel.
The idea is to change the face of the protests. No tires, no rocks, no kites. Just family picnics with planned activities.
but Hamas apparently has plans for . Lots of good, wholesome Death Cult activities are planned so be sure to bring weapons, ammunition and a couple of gallons of gasoline in plastic containers. Oh yeah, and condoms. Don’t forget condoms. Wholesome kid activities will include kite flying and incendiary bomb making.
Stupid post of the day! (so far)Contrary to popular propaganda, this is not a Hamas gig. Hamas does not want a confrontation with Israel.
The idea is to change the face of the protests. No tires, no rocks, no kites. Just family picnics with planned activities.
Hamas family picnics
Well, there you have it folks. The Hamas politburo mouthpiece has issued his fatwa.
This is not a Hamas gig
Family picnics on the Esplanade
Do it for.....the children, man.
Stupid post of the day! (so far)Contrary to popular propaganda, this is not a Hamas gig. Hamas does not want a confrontation with Israel.
The idea is to change the face of the protests. No tires, no rocks, no kites. Just family picnics with planned activities.
Hamas family picnics
Well, there you have it folks. The Hamas politburo mouthpiece has issued his fatwa.
This is not a Hamas gig
Family picnics on the Esplanade
Do it for.....the children, man.
You just make shit up and post it.
Great March of Return organizers: Israeli claims that Hamas is behind protests are liesLMAO! Great idea. Hamas "family picnics" with weapons & children as human shields.
He says the same thing year after year after year.(Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Netanyahu: Israel Dealt Palestinian Terror Groups ‘Severest Blow’ in Years
Netanyahu: Israel Dealt Palestinian Terror Groups ‘Severest Blow’ in Years
May 31, 2018
“When they test us, they pay immediately. And if they continue testing us, they will pay dearly,” Netanyahu said of Israel’s retaliatory strikes against the Palestinian terror organizations
Great March of Return organizers: Israeli claims that Hamas is behind protests are liesLMAO! Great idea. Hamas "family picnics" with weapons & children as human shields.
He says the same thing year after year after year.(Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Netanyahu: Israel Dealt Palestinian Terror Groups ‘Severest Blow’ in Years
Netanyahu: Israel Dealt Palestinian Terror Groups ‘Severest Blow’ in Years
May 31, 2018
“When they test us, they pay immediately. And if they continue testing us, they will pay dearly,” Netanyahu said of Israel’s retaliatory strikes against the Palestinian terror organizations
Hamas is still there.
What a loser.
Are you trying to out stupid your previous post?Great March of Return organizers: Israeli claims that Hamas is behind protests are liesLMAO! Great idea. Hamas "family picnics" with weapons & children as human shields.
Your promotion of silly conspiracy theories is a hoot.
"Peaceful Islamic terrorist demonstrations"
Tinmore will be performing here all week, folks. Be sure to tip your waitresses.
Are you trying to out stupid your previous post?Great March of Return organizers: Israeli claims that Hamas is behind protests are liesLMAO! Great idea. Hamas "family picnics" with weapons & children as human shields.
Your promotion of silly conspiracy theories is a hoot.
"Peaceful Islamic terrorist demonstrations"
Tinmore will be performing here all week, folks. Be sure to tip your waitresses.
There was no substance to duck.Are you trying to out stupid your previous post?Great March of Return organizers: Israeli claims that Hamas is behind protests are liesLMAO! Great idea. Hamas "family picnics" with weapons & children as human shields.
Your promotion of silly conspiracy theories is a hoot.
"Peaceful Islamic terrorist demonstrations"
Tinmore will be performing here all week, folks. Be sure to tip your waitresses.
Nice duck.
There was no substance to duck.Are you trying to out stupid your previous post?Great March of Return organizers: Israeli claims that Hamas is behind protests are liesLMAO! Great idea. Hamas "family picnics" with weapons & children as human shields.
Your promotion of silly conspiracy theories is a hoot.
"Peaceful Islamic terrorist demonstrations"
Tinmore will be performing here all week, folks. Be sure to tip your waitresses.
Nice duck.
