- Sep 13, 2012
- 65,492
- 20,558
it was a crime, cohen plead guilty to them, the judge accepted it being a crime by accepting the guilty plea of cohen.Edwards problem is he used campaign money to make the payoff, which is illegal. If there was a personal benefit, it's not a legitimate campaign expense. Trump gained a personal benefit, so it can't legally be a campaign expense. If it wasn't a legal campaign expense and wasn't paid with campaign money, there is no violation of campaign finance law.
.
Cohen is composing to satisfy the prosecutor. By law if there was a personal benefit to be had in the transaction, it isn't a legal campaign expense. It couldn't be a campaign finance violation unless campaign funds were used.
.
That's bs. If Cohen gets caught lying to get a lighter sentence, it backfires and he gets a LONGER sentence. He has every reason NOT to lie.
I guess some folks can be talked into pleading to just about anything. There can't be a conspiracy related to the NDA's, because Cohen was Trumps attorney and acting on Trumps behalf. Cohen also had a fiduciary responsibility to only act in Trumps best interest, if he allowed Trump to go down the road to criminality, Trump has a cause of action against Cohen in the tens of millions.
.
Yes he can... because the women were paid off using an LLC, and Trump is on tape discussing the payoff doing it. He conspired with Cohen to break campaign finance laws.
Fuck this shit, post the transcripts of the tapes or STFU. Trump got a personal benefit from the NDA's, legally only things that benefit the campaign and nothing else can be financed with campaign funds, there cannot be a dual purpose like a personal or commercial benefit.
.