Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 123,611
- 78,783
- 2,635
It was a benefit to his campaign. It was for the purpose of influencing the election.Post the transcripts? Go listen to them. Stormy Daniels was paid through Cohen's LLC which he clear as day says on the tape with Trump he was creating JUST to make the payments.
And Cohen used his own funds to fund the NDA, doesn't matter if he did it through the LLC or not, it was a short term loan to Trump personally and not to his campaign. The NDA served a dual purpose and couldn't have been a legal campaign expense under any circumstances.
.
Trump and Guiliani has said Trump paid Cohen back. Have you been under a huge rock?
That's why I said it was a short term personal loan to Trump, not to his campaign. Are you having problems reading simple english tonight?
.
It was not reported and was for the purpose of benefiting his campaign.
That's appears to be the position of knuckledraggers with TDS. The law says, if there was a personal benefit, it can't be a legitimate campaign expense. Deal with it.
.