Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
This is much ado about nothing...except for one other thing for the homosexuals to whine about
Well, thankfully I'm not a homosexual. However, a physician who refuses to treat an innocent baby because of the sexual proclivities of the parents is unethical at least.
What part of she referred didn't you grasp? It's my understanding the Dr she referred to was even in the same building. This is just another BS story to further the oh woe is us homosexual agenda....and you bought into it hook line and sinker
That certainly does not make HER any more ethical as a doctor who took a Hippocratic oath. You want to doctors to be able to discriminate against babies?
Once again she referred the couple and the child, there was no life threatening thing going on. Stop with the hyperbole
That doesn't make it any less ethical. To refuse treatment to a child because the parents are lesbians is WRONG. The child is completely innocent.
She didn't DENY TREATMENT. She REFERRED the child.
I was recent referred to an ophthalmologist by my local clinic. Was that them *denying* to treat me?
Later, the ER referred me to OHSU..and *forced* me to travel by ambulance to that place. So were they *refusing* to treat me, too?
Yes, in your world.
So I should sue them because they refused to treat my eye ailment.
This is much ado about nothing...except for one other thing for the homosexuals to whine about
Well, thankfully I'm not a homosexual. However, a physician who refuses to treat an innocent baby because of the sexual proclivities of the parents is unethical at least.
Referred.
Didn't *refuse to treat*.
Referred to a more appropriate health care professional.
Says you. According to her own letter, however, it sounds a lot like she is discriminating against the baby based upon the parents being lesbians.
I understand English, so no, the letter doesn't sound anything like that, at all.
Aside from the doc praying over it you mean.No one has yet proven that declining this patient had anything to do with the sexual orientation of the parents.
She's a pediatrician bitch face.She probably had to treat somebody the lezbos attacked in a fit of rage, and was scared to be alone with them.
Well, thankfully I'm not a homosexual. However, a physician who refuses to treat an innocent baby because of the sexual proclivities of the parents is unethical at least.
What part of she referred didn't you grasp? It's my understanding the Dr she referred to was even in the same building. This is just another BS story to further the oh woe is us homosexual agenda....and you bought into it hook line and sinker
That certainly does not make HER any more ethical as a doctor who took a Hippocratic oath. You want to doctors to be able to discriminate against babies?
Once again she referred the couple and the child, there was no life threatening thing going on. Stop with the hyperbole
That doesn't make it any less ethical. To refuse treatment to a child because the parents are lesbians is WRONG. The child is completely innocent.
Again, it's funny when leftist retards try to understand the ethics of the elite educated....
She is ETHICALLY BOUND to refer patients if she thinks she cannot provide them with the best care available to them.
She referred them because she doubted her ability to treat them adequately. Most likely because she'd had to deal with the lezbos in her parking lot or something, and didn't trust them.
I find homosexual behavior to be amoral...but it just ain't right to refuse to care for a BABY because the parents make poor choices. This is morally and ethically wrong. This is not Christian. This is a perversion of the Word.
This is much ado about nothing...except for one other thing for the homosexuals to whine about
Well, thankfully I'm not a homosexual. However, a physician who refuses to treat an innocent baby because of the sexual proclivities of the parents is unethical at least.
Referred.
Didn't *refuse to treat*.
Referred to a more appropriate health care professional.
Says you. According to her own letter, however, it sounds a lot like she is discriminating against the baby based upon the parents being lesbians.
I understand English, so no, the letter doesn't sound anything like that, at all.
She wrote a letter apologizing to the parents.
I am Christian...I believe when my Savior returns, he will be among the sinners, not the preachers. So who am I to judge or shun anyone?I find homosexual behavior to be amoral...but it just ain't right to refuse to care for a BABY because the parents make poor choices. This is morally and ethically wrong. This is not Christian. This is a perversion of the Word.
Is anal play with your husband immoral? How about oral?
Some christians if they knew would think some of the things you do are immoral. If not how boring.
What part of she referred didn't you grasp? It's my understanding the Dr she referred to was even in the same building. This is just another BS story to further the oh woe is us homosexual agenda....and you bought into it hook line and sinker
That certainly does not make HER any more ethical as a doctor who took a Hippocratic oath. You want to doctors to be able to discriminate against babies?
Once again she referred the couple and the child, there was no life threatening thing going on. Stop with the hyperbole
That doesn't make it any less ethical. To refuse treatment to a child because the parents are lesbians is WRONG. The child is completely innocent.
Again, it's funny when leftist retards try to understand the ethics of the elite educated....
She is ETHICALLY BOUND to refer patients if she thinks she cannot provide them with the best care available to them.
She referred them because she doubted her ability to treat them adequately. Most likely because she'd had to deal with the lezbos in her parking lot or something, and didn't trust them.
True, but she really probably shouldn't be a doctor then. We all know you are an angry and hateful old woman, but the baby didn't do anything. The baby is innocent and deserves treatment.
She's a pediatrician bitch face.She probably had to treat somebody the lezbos attacked in a fit of rage, and was scared to be alone with them.
Nazis would have let the baby die because of her parents. Just like you would.That certainly does not make HER any more ethical as a doctor who took a Hippocratic oath. You want to doctors to be able to discriminate against babies?
Once again she referred the couple and the child, there was no life threatening thing going on. Stop with the hyperbole
That doesn't make it any less ethical. To refuse treatment to a child because the parents are lesbians is WRONG. The child is completely innocent.
Again, it's funny when leftist retards try to understand the ethics of the elite educated....
She is ETHICALLY BOUND to refer patients if she thinks she cannot provide them with the best care available to them.
She referred them because she doubted her ability to treat them adequately. Most likely because she'd had to deal with the lezbos in her parking lot or something, and didn't trust them.
True, but she really probably shouldn't be a doctor then. We all know you are an angry and hateful old woman, but the baby didn't do anything. The baby is innocent and deserves treatment.
Doctors are taught to recognize when to refer patients, in the best interests of the patients. That's what she did.
Leftist retards think that people should be forced to serve others, regardless of whether they think they can do it properly or not.
Fascism. Nazis forced jewish doctors to do their bidding, too. It's all the same.
That certainly does not make HER any more ethical as a doctor who took a Hippocratic oath. You want to doctors to be able to discriminate against babies?
Once again she referred the couple and the child, there was no life threatening thing going on. Stop with the hyperbole
That doesn't make it any less ethical. To refuse treatment to a child because the parents are lesbians is WRONG. The child is completely innocent.
Again, it's funny when leftist retards try to understand the ethics of the elite educated....
She is ETHICALLY BOUND to refer patients if she thinks she cannot provide them with the best care available to them.
She referred them because she doubted her ability to treat them adequately. Most likely because she'd had to deal with the lezbos in her parking lot or something, and didn't trust them.
True, but she really probably shouldn't be a doctor then. We all know you are an angry and hateful old woman, but the baby didn't do anything. The baby is innocent and deserves treatment.
Doctors are taught to recognize when to refer patients, in the best interests of the patients. That's what she did.
Leftist retards think that people should be forced to serve others, regardless of whether they think they can do it properly or not.
Fascism. Nazis forced jewish doctors to do their bidding, too. It's all the same.
Well, thankfully I'm not a homosexual. However, a physician who refuses to treat an innocent baby because of the sexual proclivities of the parents is unethical at least.
What part of she referred didn't you grasp? It's my understanding the Dr she referred to was even in the same building. This is just another BS story to further the oh woe is us homosexual agenda....and you bought into it hook line and sinker
That certainly does not make HER any more ethical as a doctor who took a Hippocratic oath. You want to doctors to be able to discriminate against babies?
Once again she referred the couple and the child, there was no life threatening thing going on. Stop with the hyperbole
That doesn't make it any less ethical. To refuse treatment to a child because the parents are lesbians is WRONG. The child is completely innocent.
Again, it's funny when leftist retards try to understand the ethics of the elite educated....
She is ETHICALLY BOUND to refer patients if she thinks she cannot provide them with the best care available to them.
She referred them because she doubted her ability to treat them adequately. Most likely because she'd had to deal with the lezbos in her parking lot or something, and didn't trust them.
I am Christian...I believe when my Savior returns, he will be among the sinners, not the preachers. So who am I to judge or shun anyone?I find homosexual behavior to be amoral...but it just ain't right to refuse to care for a BABY because the parents make poor choices. This is morally and ethically wrong. This is not Christian. This is a perversion of the Word.
Is anal play with your husband immoral? How about oral?
Some christians if they knew would think some of the things you do are immoral. If not how boring.
Read the docs letter. She says it herself.The doc "prayed" over it. That tells me she refused to care for the baby because she is a nosey bitch about what two grown adults decide to do in the bedroom. Again, does she pray for anal sex couples, threesome couples, bondage couples, wiccan couples, etc?
Where'd you get that?
From Youtube? A video posted by someone with a username of "Pranks"????
What part of she referred didn't you grasp? It's my understanding the Dr she referred to was even in the same building. This is just another BS story to further the oh woe is us homosexual agenda....and you bought into it hook line and sinker
That certainly does not make HER any more ethical as a doctor who took a Hippocratic oath. You want to doctors to be able to discriminate against babies?
Once again she referred the couple and the child, there was no life threatening thing going on. Stop with the hyperbole
That doesn't make it any less ethical. To refuse treatment to a child because the parents are lesbians is WRONG. The child is completely innocent.
Again, it's funny when leftist retards try to understand the ethics of the elite educated....
She is ETHICALLY BOUND to refer patients if she thinks she cannot provide them with the best care available to them.
She referred them because she doubted her ability to treat them adequately. Most likely because she'd had to deal with the lezbos in her parking lot or something, and didn't trust them.
Okay, well let's pretend and say that she did deny treatment to the baby based upon the parents' sexual orientations. Do you agree with that concept, that doctors should be able to discriminate based upon a patient's or a patient's parents' sexual orientations?
If I were a Gino I'd only accept hot women and when I was done with looking at them I'd refer them to a new doctor who could use the client.What's next? A pediatrician that "refers" (denies) treatment to a downs syndrome baby because the parents chose to keep it instead of aborting it?
It kills me to agree with you!What's next? A pediatrician that "refers" (denies) treatment to a downs syndrome baby because the parents chose to keep it instead of aborting it?
