FA_Q2
Gold Member
- Dec 12, 2009
- 25,421
- 6,779
Of course.The last time they wrote virus relief legislation it included funding for abortions, the war on Cow FARTS, & to bail out failed den governors..."Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday that he and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will soon unveil a coronavirus relief package that he described as “Rooseveltian” in its scope and size.
“We need big, bold action," Schumer said in an MSNBC interview with Stephanie Ruhle, adding that he and Pelosi "are working very closely together on putting together a very strong plan, which you will hear shortly.”
“We need Franklin Rooseveltian-type action and we hope to take that in the House and Senate in a very big and bold way,” he added.
Schumer said the better course of action is to follow in the footsteps of former President Franklin Roosevelt, who oversaw the largest expansion of the federal government and is credited by many historians with helping to end the Great Depression."
As the Democratic party motto says, 'Never let a crisis go to waste'.....
![]()
Schumer, Pelosi set to unveil ‘Rooseveltian’ relief package
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday that he and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will soon unveil a coronavirus relief package that he described as “Rooseveltian” in i…thehill.com
Those steps make a lot of sense. What do you have against police, firefighters and teachers? The fact is that both red and blue states are facing huge budget shortfalls as there is no way you can plan for this. However I am not sure how you would determine who is a essential employee. Direct payments may be the better solution.
The entire point of relief funding is to consolidate political power and advance your agenda in a package that no one will question.
It is one of the core problems with our modern government.