Pelosi to Boehner: Be "fair"

This is the definition of a troll thread.
You are the definition of a troll, but a classic example of a Grubercrat.

You have a new word? You never heard of Gruber before last week. How stupid do you feel?
I have heard of him for years, just like lying ass Pelosi.

One of my nieces worked for him, and another works for that commie Obama nominated as AG.

I have a whole branch of the family that are Grubercrats.

I don't speak to any of the Massholes.

I think I'll pay a little attention to you. You seem like a winner.
 
Yeah read an article like this:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704586504574654362679868966

Gruber was the main architect of Obamacare. He promoted it. He worked on it. He was active in it. For Pelosi to claim she's never heard of him is bizarre and an obvious lie.
Gruber is also of course a stinking crook and hypocrite.

She didn't say that she never heard of him. Did she?
She didnt know who he was.
Nancy Pelosi says she doesn 8217 t know who Jonathan Gruber is. She touted his work in 2009. - The Washington Post
That's like completely impossible.
 
Yeah read an article like this:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704586504574654362679868966

Gruber was the main architect of Obamacare. He promoted it. He worked on it. He was active in it. For Pelosi to claim she's never heard of him is bizarre and an obvious lie.
Gruber is also of course a stinking crook and hypocrite.

She didn't say that she never heard of him. Did she?
She didnt know who he was.
Nancy Pelosi says she doesn 8217 t know who Jonathan Gruber is. She touted his work in 2009. - The Washington Post
That's like completely impossible.

You nutters love semantics. When you prove that she spent some time with the guy..and knew him personally.....you'll be able to see what an honest person does when he is proven wrong. Until then......
 
Yeah read an article like this:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704586504574654362679868966

Gruber was the main architect of Obamacare. He promoted it. He worked on it. He was active in it. For Pelosi to claim she's never heard of him is bizarre and an obvious lie.
Gruber is also of course a stinking crook and hypocrite.

She didn't say that she never heard of him. Did she?
She didnt know who he was.
Nancy Pelosi says she doesn 8217 t know who Jonathan Gruber is. She touted his work in 2009. - The Washington Post
That's like completely impossible.

You nutters love semantics. When you prove that she spent some time with the guy..and knew him personally.....you'll be able to see what an honest person does when he is proven wrong. Until then......
You'er among the least hones tposters on this forum. The proof is right there. She claimed she didnt know who he was. Yet she had worked with him and he was well known for public policy in health care, for Romneycare, and for Obamacare.
So either you believe Nancy was completely out of touch with the political scene as Obamacare was being rolled out, in which case you are ignorant, or you think she is soimehow not lying, in whch case you are stupid.
 
Yeah read an article like this:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704586504574654362679868966

Gruber was the main architect of Obamacare. He promoted it. He worked on it. He was active in it. For Pelosi to claim she's never heard of him is bizarre and an obvious lie.
Gruber is also of course a stinking crook and hypocrite.

She didn't say that she never heard of him. Did she?
She didnt know who he was.
Nancy Pelosi says she doesn 8217 t know who Jonathan Gruber is. She touted his work in 2009. - The Washington Post
That's like completely impossible.

You nutters love semantics. When you prove that she spent some time with the guy..and knew him personally.....you'll be able to see what an honest person does when he is proven wrong. Until then......
Honest? Really? Here you are making excuses for an obvious liar and pretending otherwise.
 
Yeah read an article like this:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704586504574654362679868966

Gruber was the main architect of Obamacare. He promoted it. He worked on it. He was active in it. For Pelosi to claim she's never heard of him is bizarre and an obvious lie.
Gruber is also of course a stinking crook and hypocrite.

She didn't say that she never heard of him. Did she?
She didnt know who he was.
Nancy Pelosi says she doesn 8217 t know who Jonathan Gruber is. She touted his work in 2009. - The Washington Post
That's like completely impossible.

You nutters love semantics. When you prove that she spent some time with the guy..and knew him personally.....you'll be able to see what an honest person does when he is proven wrong. Until then......
Honest? Really? Here you are making excuses for an obvious liar and pretending otherwise.
As I wrote,no one could defend Pelosi here. SHe obviously lied, and not the first time.
 
Yeah read an article like this:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704586504574654362679868966

Gruber was the main architect of Obamacare. He promoted it. He worked on it. He was active in it. For Pelosi to claim she's never heard of him is bizarre and an obvious lie.
Gruber is also of course a stinking crook and hypocrite.

She didn't say that she never heard of him. Did she?
She didnt know who he was.
Nancy Pelosi says she doesn 8217 t know who Jonathan Gruber is. She touted his work in 2009. - The Washington Post
That's like completely impossible.

You nutters love semantics. When you prove that she spent some time with the guy..and knew him personally.....you'll be able to see what an honest person does when he is proven wrong. Until then......
Honest? Really? Here you are making excuses for an obvious liar and pretending otherwise.

I'm not making excuses for anyone. Try harder.
 
Proof should be easy then. Prove that she knew the guy personally. Simple.
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?
 
Proof should be easy then. Prove that she knew the guy personally. Simple.
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?

I'm telling you that what she said could mean that she didn't know him personally......even if she did know of him. Her words can be read both ways. Semantics.

If you can prove that she worked closely with him...knew him personally...then we can say she lied. If not...we can't. It's really not that complicated.
 
WOW. Doubt she followed her own appeal when she was the majority leader.

Pelosi. What a flamming idiot.

Wow...you didn't read her actual words. Here try it again:

“Specifically, we are asking that the minority party receive a similar number of committee slots….as we provided to the Republican minority in the 111th Congress.”

She's asking for the same number of seats for Democrats that SHE provided Republicans.
Elections have consequences and you lost.

And yet when Republicans lost, Pelosi was much more gracious. Imagine that.

You mean like....

We had to pass it to see what was in it....kinda like a stool sample.

Or "You can keep your insurance".

I'd like to be fair to her on those accounts.
 
Proof should be easy then. Prove that she knew the guy personally. Simple.
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?

I'm telling you that what she said could mean that she didn't know him personally......even if she did know of him. Her words can be read both ways. Semantics.

If you can prove that she worked closely with him...knew him personally...then we can say she lied. If not...we can't. It's really not that complicated.
Bullshit.
SHe said she didnt know him. Maybe she meant she didnt know him in the Biblical sense. Maybe she meant she didnt truly know him. Maybe...bullshit.
She claimed something that wasnt true. And not the first time.
 
Yeah, republicans needs to change rules, park any democrat bill on the leaders desk, rush bills through without any democrat voting. You know the way democrats treated the republicans.

Look up the Hastert rule that the House has been under since the Boehner took over. Nancy Pelosi is asking for the same number of seats for Democrats that she gave Republicans.
As far as I'm concerned, they can sit in the back of the bus and shut up.

So, there's your "bipartisanship". Pelosi never had a Hastert rule and gave Republicans committee seats, but Dems can just STFU now that Republicans are in charge.

Oh, but it's the President that needs to compromise. :rolleyes:

Dem's can take their request for compromise and shove it, you can't compromise with LIARS!
 
Proof should be easy then. Prove that she knew the guy personally. Simple.
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?

I'm telling you that what she said could mean that she didn't know him personally......even if she did know of him. Her words can be read both ways. Semantics.

If you can prove that she worked closely with him...knew him personally...then we can say she lied. If not...we can't. It's really not that complicated.
Bullshit.
SHe said she didnt know him. Maybe she meant she didnt know him in the Biblical sense. Maybe she meant she didnt truly know him. Maybe...bullshit.
She claimed something that wasnt true. And not the first time.

You are talking about the whacko woman who told the Catholic church they have only been against abortion during the last 50 years. When the Catholic church informed Pelosi they have been against abortion for the last 1,800 years Pelosi told the church they were mistaken, its only been 50 years. This is the genius who bashed oil and coal but praised natural gas as a renewable energy resource like solar and wind. There's not much between her ears, like many libs.
 
Proof should be easy then. Prove that she knew the guy personally. Simple.
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?

I'm telling you that what she said could mean that she didn't know him personally......even if she did know of him. Her words can be read both ways. Semantics.

If you can prove that she worked closely with him...knew him personally...then we can say she lied. If not...we can't. It's really not that complicated.
Bullshit.
SHe said she didnt know him. Maybe she meant she didnt know him in the Biblical sense. Maybe she meant she didnt truly know him. Maybe...bullshit.
She claimed something that wasnt true. And not the first time.

You are talking about the whacko woman who told the Catholic church they have only been against abortion during the last 50 years. When the Catholic church informed Pelosi they have been against abortion for the last 1,800 years Pelosi told the church they were mistaken, its only been 50 years. This is the genius who bashed oil and coal but praised natural gas as a renewable energy resource like solar and wind. There's not much between her ears, like many libs.
She's a psychopath.
 
Proof should be easy then. Prove that she knew the guy personally. Simple.
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?

I'm telling you that what she said could mean that she didn't know him personally......even if she did know of him. Her words can be read both ways. Semantics.

If you can prove that she worked closely with him...knew him personally...then we can say she lied. If not...we can't. It's really not that complicated.
Bullshit.
SHe said she didnt know him. Maybe she meant she didnt know him in the Biblical sense. Maybe she meant she didnt truly know him. Maybe...bullshit.
She claimed something that wasnt true. And not the first time.

You are talking about the whacko woman who told the Catholic church they have only been against abortion during the last 50 years. When the Catholic church informed Pelosi they have been against abortion for the last 1,800 years Pelosi told the church they were mistaken, its only been 50 years. This is the genius who bashed oil and coal but praised natural gas as a renewable energy resource like solar and wind. There's not much between her ears, like many libs.
She's a psychopath.

Does she still think the CIA is out to make her look bad? Seriously why do libs elect these people to such high positions, its rather disturbing to think she's the best they have.
 
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?

I'm telling you that what she said could mean that she didn't know him personally......even if she did know of him. Her words can be read both ways. Semantics.

If you can prove that she worked closely with him...knew him personally...then we can say she lied. If not...we can't. It's really not that complicated.
Bullshit.
SHe said she didnt know him. Maybe she meant she didnt know him in the Biblical sense. Maybe she meant she didnt truly know him. Maybe...bullshit.
She claimed something that wasnt true. And not the first time.

You are talking about the whacko woman who told the Catholic church they have only been against abortion during the last 50 years. When the Catholic church informed Pelosi they have been against abortion for the last 1,800 years Pelosi told the church they were mistaken, its only been 50 years. This is the genius who bashed oil and coal but praised natural gas as a renewable energy resource like solar and wind. There's not much between her ears, like many libs.
She's a psychopath.

Does she still think the CIA is out to make her look bad? Seriously why do libs elect these people to such high positions, its rather disturbing to think she's the best they have.
California has a history of electing batshit women to office. Feinstein. Call Me Senator Boxer. This dingbat.
 
Proof should be easy then. Prove that she knew the guy personally. Simple.
Moving the goalposts? SHe said she didnt know who he was. We proved she obviously knew who he was because she quoted him back in 2009. Ergo she lied.
What about that are you not getting?

I'm telling you that what she said could mean that she didn't know him personally......even if she did know of him. Her words can be read both ways. Semantics.

If you can prove that she worked closely with him...knew him personally...then we can say she lied. If not...we can't. It's really not that complicated.
Do you realize how stupid you look defending these people? If you support obama care he is calling you stupid, and you believing Pelosi 's lied proves it. After this last election liberals have proven without a doubt, y'all are mentally unstable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top