Pelosie Admits Dems HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT INVESTIGATIONS!

[jc456]

Pelosie Admits Dems HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT INVESTIGATIONS!

Breaking: Democrat news conference happening now:

Nancy Pelosie was just asked by media what evidence the democrats have to support their 8 investigations. Pelsoie replied "the evidence they have is the evidence they will collect". Say what? In political double speak this means they have NO EVIDENCE but are therefore going to do it anyway, despite being seen as a massive over reach....

Pelosie steps in it again.. Another "we have to pass the bill for you to see what is in it" moment...

Are these people this stupid?

There is no way in hell you were ever a police officer if you don't understand you have to collect evidence to do an investigation.

Now let me say two things, in a real law enforcement investigation you need probable cause and then usually a warrant depending on the situation. In Congress it isn't the same thing, as they are not going after criminal charges.

How do you investigate someone with no evidence that a crime has been committed?

so the next question should have been what are you looking for based on what?

these fks went to college to be this stupid? hahahahahahaha,

 

[Lewdog]

they are not going after criminal charges.

you sure about that?????????

Why else investigate if not to bring criminal charges? They've been trying to convince everyone Trump is a criminal to get him impeached.

Congress can refer people for criminal charges to the DOJ... but the DOJ isn't going to indict a sitting President. Once Trump, if Trump, is impeached it won't be Congress pressing criminal charges, it would be the DOJ or the AGs of the states.

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

 

[Slyhunter]

You investigate anyone enough eventually you'll find a crime he committed. Nobody is perfect. Do nothing Congress.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

they are not going after criminal charges.

you sure about that?????????

Why else investigate if not to bring criminal charges? They've been trying to convince everyone Trump is a criminal to get him impeached.

Congress can refer people for criminal charges to the DOJ... but the DOJ isn't going to indict a sitting President. Once Trump, if Trump, is impeached it won't be Congress pressing criminal charges, it would be the DOJ or the AGs of the states.

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

and neither do YOU......

 

[The Original Tree]

Enough evidence to throw Trump into a frenzy

He actually seems to be ignoring the whole thing, except to make sure his messaging gets out refuting silly claims of people like you.

I don't think it bothers him at all. In fact, I think he thinks its fun.

It's a game to him. Like Marbles or something.

 

[Lewdog]

You obviously have no LEO experience or what is necessary to obtain warrants and subpoenas.. Congress doesn't have to live by evidence rules as Mueller has had to. Mueller found NOTHING using the law, now we have dim wits who have nothing, wanting to go searching for another two years with broad powers and not even reasonable suspicion. This is a FARCE!

Fuck Off dimwit

You must have been the most inept, corrupt law enforcement officer in your town... or you were just one of Sheriff Jimbo-Bob's sister's husbands so he felt bad for you and gave you a job. You make the most ridiculous statements about law enforcement that I've ever seen. Hell, here you are jumping to conclusions about what Mueller's found and his report hasn't even come out.

Congress and Pelosi ABSOLUTELY live by the rule they CANNOT disclose evidence to the public that is still part of Mueller's ongoing investigation.

The only thing Moscow Mueller found was his own hands on Putin's balls giving them a nice tickle.

You don't have to manufacture "process crimes" when you can indict people for Actual Crimes.

Correct: Process crimes that have absolutely NOTHING TO DO with his mandate..

You keep proving you are a liar about being ex-law enforcement. When investigating one crime, if you come across another crime you don't ignore it.

Please continue to embarrass yourself.

LOL

More left wing projection... I retired as a sergeant with 25 years of service.

Right... you don't understand basic laws. You might have retired as a sergeant mall cop, but that is about as close as you ever got. With as often as you lie on here, and can't get facts straight, you probably were even a crooked mall cop.

You don't get all the evidence for a crime upfront before you start an investigation.

If some guy's wife goes missing... who's your first suspect that you question and check for evidence?

 

[Lewdog]

they are not going after criminal charges.

you sure about that?????????

Why else investigate if not to bring criminal charges? They've been trying to convince everyone Trump is a criminal to get him impeached.

Congress can refer people for criminal charges to the DOJ... but the DOJ isn't going to indict a sitting President. Once Trump, if Trump, is impeached it won't be Congress pressing criminal charges, it would be the DOJ or the AGs of the states.

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

and neither do YOU......

And I'm not the one saying there is NOTHING. I take it you've never taken a logic class?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Pelosie Admits Dems HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT INVESTIGATIONS!

Breaking: Democrat news conference happening now:

Nancy Pelosie was just asked by media what evidence the democrats have to support their 8 investigations. Pelsoie replied "the evidence they have is the evidence they will collect". Say what? In political double speak this means they have NO EVIDENCE but are therefore going to do it anyway, despite being seen as a massive over reach....

Pelosie steps in it again.. Another "we have to pass the bill for you to see what is in it" moment...

Are these people this stupid?

What Nancy is saying is that there are no legitimate reasons for the investigations in the House. Everything they claim to be investigating has already been investigated by Mueller and it is clear he found nothing. The investigations are a set up for impeachment timed for the spring or summer of 2020 as a part of the Democrats' campaign. The Democratic Party is now fully engage in defending anti semitism and promoting fake investigations.

 

[Billy_Bob]

You must have been the most inept, corrupt law enforcement officer in your town... or you were just one of Sheriff Jimbo-Bob's sister's husbands so he felt bad for you and gave you a job. You make the most ridiculous statements about law enforcement that I've ever seen. Hell, here you are jumping to conclusions about what Mueller's found and his report hasn't even come out.

Congress and Pelosi ABSOLUTELY live by the rule they CANNOT disclose evidence to the public that is still part of Mueller's ongoing investigation.

The only thing Moscow Mueller found was his own hands on Putin's balls giving them a nice tickle.

You don't have to manufacture "process crimes" when you can indict people for Actual Crimes.

Correct: Process crimes that have absolutely NOTHING TO DO with his mandate..

You keep proving you are a liar about being ex-law enforcement. When investigating one crime, if you come across another crime you don't ignore it.

Please continue to embarrass yourself.

LOL

More left wing projection... I retired as a sergeant with 25 years of service.

Right... you don't understand basic laws. You might have retired as a sergeant mall cop, but that is about as close as you ever got. With as often as you lie on here, and can't get facts straight, you probably were even a crooked mall cop.

You don't get all the evidence for a crime upfront before you start an investigation.

If some guy's wife goes missing... who's your first suspect that you question and check for evidence?

Your an idiot..

Mueller already asked those questions... Now its a how much fake shit can we create... Get a life..

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

There is no way in hell you were ever a police officer if you don't understand you have to collect evidence to do an investigation.

Now let me say two things, in a real law enforcement investigation you need probable cause and then usually a warrant depending on the situation. In Congress it isn't the same thing, as they are not going after criminal charges.

You obviously have no LEO experience or what is necessary to obtain warrants and subpoenas.. Congress doesn't have to live by evidence rules as Mueller has had to. Mueller found NOTHING using the law, now we have dim wits who have nothing, wanting to go searching for another two years with broad powers and not even reasonable suspicion. This is a FARCE!

Fuck Off dimwit

You must have been the most inept, corrupt law enforcement officer in your town... or you were just one of Sheriff Jimbo-Bob's sister's husbands so he felt bad for you and gave you a job. You make the most ridiculous statements about law enforcement that I've ever seen. Hell, here you are jumping to conclusions about what Mueller's found and his report hasn't even come out.

Congress and Pelosi ABSOLUTELY live by the rule they CANNOT disclose evidence to the public that is still part of Mueller's ongoing investigation.

The only thing Moscow Mueller found was his own hands on Putin's balls giving them a nice tickle.

You don't have to manufacture "process crimes" when you can indict people for Actual Crimes.

Correct: Process crimes that have absolutely NOTHING TO DO with his mandate..

The first indication that Mad Moscow Mueller's Ship was Sunk before it was even launched was The Firing of half of his staff that are now under Criminal Investigation.

The 2nd Indication of Mad Moscow Mueller's impending doom, was the fact he had to Indict 13 Imaginary Russians, yet despited the fact we have an Extradition agreement, he refused to Extradite anyone.

The 3rd Indication of Moscow Mueller's Ship was heading for the Rocks, was the fact that he refused to interview Assange despite the fact we have an extradition treaty with Ecuador.

The 4th Indication that this was a witch hunt was The FBI pretending it lost 50,000 texts from the entire FBI to Obstruct an Investigation in to Page and Strozk and McCabe, who are now going to be criminally indicted once The IG found them 24 hours later.

The 5th Indication that Mueller was going to have to scuttle his own ship was the fact that 24 former FBI and DOJ High Echelon Leaders were fired, forced to resign and half of them are now under Criminal Investigation.

And Last but not least The 6th indication That Mad Moscow Mueller's Investigation more resembles a Mash up of The Titanic, and Hindenberg is the fact, that The Democrats no longer talk about Russian Collusion and have returned to hating Jared Kushner because he is a Jew, and wanting Trump's Tax Returns again. And Mueller refuses to investigate the sourcing and financing of The Dossier or how it was used to file False Affidavits in a FISA Court.

Dem response......Nuh Uh!!!!

 

[The Original Tree]

You obviously have no LEO experience or what is necessary to obtain warrants and subpoenas.. Congress doesn't have to live by evidence rules as Mueller has had to. Mueller found NOTHING using the law, now we have dim wits who have nothing, wanting to go searching for another two years with broad powers and not even reasonable suspicion. This is a FARCE!

Fuck Off dimwit

You must have been the most inept, corrupt law enforcement officer in your town... or you were just one of Sheriff Jimbo-Bob's sister's husbands so he felt bad for you and gave you a job. You make the most ridiculous statements about law enforcement that I've ever seen. Hell, here you are jumping to conclusions about what Mueller's found and his report hasn't even come out.

Congress and Pelosi ABSOLUTELY live by the rule they CANNOT disclose evidence to the public that is still part of Mueller's ongoing investigation.

The only thing Moscow Mueller found was his own hands on Putin's balls giving them a nice tickle.

You don't have to manufacture "process crimes" when you can indict people for Actual Crimes.

Correct: Process crimes that have absolutely NOTHING TO DO with his mandate..

You keep proving you are a liar about being ex-law enforcement. When investigating one crime, if you come across another crime you don't ignore it.

Please continue to embarrass yourself.

What crime?

The Crime of Walking Around While Being White.

Or maybe it is The Crime of Walking Around While Being Orange

Or Maybe it is The Crime of Walking Around While Being Conservative.

But it's Probably The Crime of Walking Around While Being President and SHE AIN'T!

 

[JustAnotherNut]

you sure about that?????????

Why else investigate if not to bring criminal charges? They've been trying to convince everyone Trump is a criminal to get him impeached.

Congress can refer people for criminal charges to the DOJ... but the DOJ isn't going to indict a sitting President. Once Trump, if Trump, is impeached it won't be Congress pressing criminal charges, it would be the DOJ or the AGs of the states.

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

and neither do YOU......

And I'm not the one saying there is NOTHING. I take it you've never taken a logic class?

so what evidence ya got Trump broke any laws?

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

they are not going after criminal charges.

you sure about that?????????

Why else investigate if not to bring criminal charges? They've been trying to convince everyone Trump is a criminal to get him impeached.

Congress can refer people for criminal charges to the DOJ... but the DOJ isn't going to indict a sitting President. Once Trump, if Trump, is impeached it won't be Congress pressing criminal charges, it would be the DOJ or the AGs of the states.

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

They have nothing, otherwise they would have "leaked" it by now.

 

[Lewdog]

The only thing Moscow Mueller found was his own hands on Putin's balls giving them a nice tickle.

You don't have to manufacture "process crimes" when you can indict people for Actual Crimes.

Correct: Process crimes that have absolutely NOTHING TO DO with his mandate..

You keep proving you are a liar about being ex-law enforcement. When investigating one crime, if you come across another crime you don't ignore it.

Please continue to embarrass yourself.

LOL

More left wing projection... I retired as a sergeant with 25 years of service.

Right... you don't understand basic laws. You might have retired as a sergeant mall cop, but that is about as close as you ever got. With as often as you lie on here, and can't get facts straight, you probably were even a crooked mall cop.

You don't get all the evidence for a crime upfront before you start an investigation.

If some guy's wife goes missing... who's your first suspect that you question and check for evidence?

Your and idiot..

Mueller already asked those questions... Now its a how much fake shit can we create... Get a life..

Oh you know all the questions Mueller has asked? You know the answers? Do share... let me guess, because of your great career you have an inside person in Mueller's team that has been telling you everything about the investigation!

Quit lying to people on here and be truthful. You are just some full of shit poster who has tried to create some kind of persona to give yourself some imaginary credibility. Sadly, people that have even basic knowledge of law enforcement know better, and people like myself that have a good enough memory of all the bullshit lies you've told over the last couple of years can call you out on it.

You start these absolutely ridiculous threads in politics as an attention whore just to start a circle jerk of Trump supporters to come and make comments to give each other rep. It just clutters up the Politics thread.

And so that my post isn't just deleted for being off-topic...

Even if Pelosi knew something from the Mueller investigation she wouldn't be allowed to say it. It's still part of the investigation until the report is released.

 

[Lewdog]

Congress can refer people for criminal charges to the DOJ... but the DOJ isn't going to indict a sitting President. Once Trump, if Trump, is impeached it won't be Congress pressing criminal charges, it would be the DOJ or the AGs of the states.

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

and neither do YOU......

And I'm not the one saying there is NOTHING. I take it you've never taken a logic class?

so what evidence ya got Trump broke any laws?

Strawman. I just told you I didn't make that statement. YOU are the one that said they had "none." Yet when I pressed you saying you didn't know that, your response was to admit you didn't but then say I didn't know either. I never said I did. So now you've moved on to circular logic.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"We found nothing after 2 year of Mueller including shredding Trumps attorney client privilege, therefore we need to investigate further" - the Socialist democrat Party motto 2019

 

[Billy_Bob]

Correct: Process crimes that have absolutely NOTHING TO DO with his mandate..

You keep proving you are a liar about being ex-law enforcement. When investigating one crime, if you come across another crime you don't ignore it.

Please continue to embarrass yourself.

LOL

More left wing projection... I retired as a sergeant with 25 years of service.

Right... you don't understand basic laws. You might have retired as a sergeant mall cop, but that is about as close as you ever got. With as often as you lie on here, and can't get facts straight, you probably were even a crooked mall cop.

You don't get all the evidence for a crime upfront before you start an investigation.

If some guy's wife goes missing... who's your first suspect that you question and check for evidence?

Your and idiot..

Mueller already asked those questions... Now its a how much fake shit can we create... Get a life..

Oh you know all the questions Mueller has asked? You know the answers? Do share... let me guess, because of your great career you have an inside person in Mueller's team that has been telling you everything about the investigation!

Quit lying to people on here and be truthful. You are just some full of shit poster who has tried to create some kind of persona to give yourself some imaginary credibility. Sadly, people that have even basic knowledge of law enforcement know better, and people like myself that have a good enough memory of all the bullshit lies you've told over the last couple of years can call you out on it.

You start these absolutely ridiculous threads in politics as an attention whore just to start a circle jerk of Trump supporters to come and make comments to give each other rep. It just clutters up the Politics thread.

And so that my post isn't just deleted for being off-topic...

Even if Pelosi knew something from the Mueller investigation she wouldn't be allowed to say it. It's still part of the investigation until the report is released.

Wiseman is a pro at creating false crimes. Ask the 40 ENRON people he jailed under false crimes, which SCOTUS threw out, that's how good he is. If they found anything it would be out already.

 

[jc456]

I would keep that tape and run that during his campaign over and over and fking over again. let's show the country over and over how fked up the left truly are. their own words speak volumes.

 

[The Original Tree]

Congress can refer people for criminal charges to the DOJ... but the DOJ isn't going to indict a sitting President. Once Trump, if Trump, is impeached it won't be Congress pressing criminal charges, it would be the DOJ or the AGs of the states.

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

and neither do YOU......

And I'm not the one saying there is NOTHING. I take it you've never taken a logic class?

so what evidence ya got Trump broke any laws?

US CODE: 1776, Section 07-04-76

ORANGE MAN BAD!

 

[JustAnotherNut]

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing

You don't know what they have...

and neither do YOU......

And I'm not the one saying there is NOTHING. I take it you've never taken a logic class?

so what evidence ya got Trump broke any laws?

Strawman. I just told you I didn't make that statement. YOU are the one that said they had "none." Yet when I pressed you saying you didn't know that, your response was to admit you didn't but then say I didn't know either. I never said I did. So now you've moved on to circular logic.

This is what I said...…….

and yet someone would have to have something substantial to impeach...…..yet so far, nothing


I'm still asking you and waiting for an answer......what evidence?


When you don't answer a question and keep twisting the content......well that must be Demoncrat logic and makes you the Strawman, amirite?


Let's keep it on topic for the sake of the thread, huh?