- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,659
- 53,566
- 3,605
Dumb thread.
It has very little knowledge about Political Legitimacy, or Electoral Boycotting.
It has become very clear to intelligent members, those who are non-partisan, independents, and moderates, that the Deep State and corruption in our process has made voting largely meaningless, except to lend an air of credibility to the crimes of the oligarchy.
We have some systemic problems in this nation we need to face up to before the rest of the planet take our elections and the legitimacy of our representative republic seriously again.
Using ad hominem to shame folks to give legitimacy to the Deep State is juvenile at best.
Election boycott - Wikipedia
Legitimacy (political) - Wikipedia
Penguin p-p-p-picks up more votes than the Lib Dems
I thought this was a good answer, and it is personal for everyone. I guess it really depends upon a critical mass. At what point has the ruling oligarchy and Deep State lost the faith of the nation, and thus, legitimacy?
Role of election boycotts in a democracy —
". . .Summary of the individual responses received:
Election boycotts have no place in a functioning democracy; participation being at the heart of the democratic process. However, boycotts could have a role to play in a democracy that is not functioning as it should be and where fair competition is impossible. The problem lies in determining at what point conditions for a fair election are being violated to such an extent that a boycott is justifiable. Even if justifiable it should be considered as a last resort. In most cases opposition parties have concluded that participation in the electoral process – even if it is unequal – is more beneficial than boycotting it. Choosing to be outside the electoral process is a highly risky political tactic and can come with high costs. Both the degree of sympathy and interest in any boycott by the wider electorate is a crucial factor in determining the impact of any boycott. Their impacts are often minimal and can be managed by the incumbent government unless the boycott is accompanied by other measures which hinder ability to govern or there is a minimum voter participation required. Boycotts therefore often impact upon legitimacy but not the final result. There is also a very real danger that resorting to a boycott can have a long-term and damaging effect on the democratic process.
There is a danger that street protests (as a means to bring about a change in government) are resorted to too easily and become less then exceptional events, thereby undermining the constitutional process.. . "
Most intelligent folks know that, unless you subscribe to a DNC or GOP world view, the elections are a sham.
How Presidential Debates Work
How Presidential Debates Work
League Refuses to "Help Perpetrate a Fraud" | League of Women Voters
Elections Corruption
You've Got to Stop Voting - by Mark E. Smith
You've Got to Stop Voting - by Mark E. Smith | FUBAR AND GRILL
U.S. Political Parties and the Deep State - LA Progressive
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/02_election_boycotts_frankel.pdf
I am willing to bet, those same folks that vociferously state, you have to vote, would also say that Venezuela's election that overwhelming re-elected Nicolás Maduro, was not "legitimate."![71 :71: :71:](/styles/smilies/new/71.gif)
What a bunch of crap.
![1peleas :1peleas: :1peleas:](/styles/smilies/new/1peleas.gif)
It has very little knowledge about Political Legitimacy, or Electoral Boycotting.
It has become very clear to intelligent members, those who are non-partisan, independents, and moderates, that the Deep State and corruption in our process has made voting largely meaningless, except to lend an air of credibility to the crimes of the oligarchy.
We have some systemic problems in this nation we need to face up to before the rest of the planet take our elections and the legitimacy of our representative republic seriously again.
Using ad hominem to shame folks to give legitimacy to the Deep State is juvenile at best.
Election boycott - Wikipedia
Legitimacy (political) - Wikipedia
Penguin p-p-p-picks up more votes than the Lib Dems
I thought this was a good answer, and it is personal for everyone. I guess it really depends upon a critical mass. At what point has the ruling oligarchy and Deep State lost the faith of the nation, and thus, legitimacy?
Role of election boycotts in a democracy —
". . .Summary of the individual responses received:
Election boycotts have no place in a functioning democracy; participation being at the heart of the democratic process. However, boycotts could have a role to play in a democracy that is not functioning as it should be and where fair competition is impossible. The problem lies in determining at what point conditions for a fair election are being violated to such an extent that a boycott is justifiable. Even if justifiable it should be considered as a last resort. In most cases opposition parties have concluded that participation in the electoral process – even if it is unequal – is more beneficial than boycotting it. Choosing to be outside the electoral process is a highly risky political tactic and can come with high costs. Both the degree of sympathy and interest in any boycott by the wider electorate is a crucial factor in determining the impact of any boycott. Their impacts are often minimal and can be managed by the incumbent government unless the boycott is accompanied by other measures which hinder ability to govern or there is a minimum voter participation required. Boycotts therefore often impact upon legitimacy but not the final result. There is also a very real danger that resorting to a boycott can have a long-term and damaging effect on the democratic process.
There is a danger that street protests (as a means to bring about a change in government) are resorted to too easily and become less then exceptional events, thereby undermining the constitutional process.. . "
Most intelligent folks know that, unless you subscribe to a DNC or GOP world view, the elections are a sham.
How Presidential Debates Work
How Presidential Debates Work
League Refuses to "Help Perpetrate a Fraud" | League of Women Voters
Elections Corruption
You've Got to Stop Voting - by Mark E. Smith
You've Got to Stop Voting - by Mark E. Smith | FUBAR AND GRILL
U.S. Political Parties and the Deep State - LA Progressive
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/02_election_boycotts_frankel.pdf
I am willing to bet, those same folks that vociferously state, you have to vote, would also say that Venezuela's election that overwhelming re-elected Nicolás Maduro, was not "legitimate."
![71 :71: :71:](/styles/smilies/new/71.gif)
What a bunch of crap.
![1peleas :1peleas: :1peleas:](/styles/smilies/new/1peleas.gif)