Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, they'll try, anything before Trump took entered politics is none of their fucking business, they aren't law enforcement. They have the authority of government oversight, nothing more.
.
not if he fucked around with his taxes.... if he committed tax fraud - then donny is in deep doo doo....
Waters wouldn't know one page of a tax return form another, but still, tax enforcement isn't a congressional function either.
.
that is why they would hire experts, silly kitty. & if there were fraud committed - then the appropriate measure can be taken.
I thought that's what the IRS and DOJ are for. They're the only experts that count.
.
congress investigates & gets the IRS involved for their expertise if needed.
You don't seem to understand the purpose of an investigation, they're not supposed to be fishing expeditions. There has to be a reason other than just not liking someone. This bullshit of show me the man and I'll find you a crime is what third world dictators do. Congress has no law enforcement power, and have no authority to investigate anything before Trump entered politics.
.
it isn't required - but highly suspect that trump refused to show his taxes... it could be something as simple as him lying about his income. perhaps the emperor isn't as golden as he says... OR maybe he is, but understated his wealth to avoid them thar taxes... but someone ( cohen ) said under oath that trump did manipulate his finances for both tax & insurance reasons. allen weisellburg - trumps CFO since the days of his daddy has limited immunity & has been cooperating with mueller. anything that cohen testified to, mueller already knows & the house is playing catch up since the took the majority.
Have you ever protested your property tax assessment?
.
i actually have... but i didn't manipulate my house's worth to get a lower bill.
So you told them it's worth exactly what you'd ask for it if you put it on the market? I king of doubt that.
.
uh... they go by the evaluation analysis which is done every 5-10 years & whenever a permit is taken out, they inspect it.
A not insignificant percentage of Americans supported Donald Trump for president but who cares about what they think
Obama wasn't required to show his birth certificate yet conservatives spent 8 years demanding it. When Obama did release both long and short form, conservatives said they were forged.
Gates is getting extended time to testify Think Trumps campaign manager isn't giving all the proof to Mueller ,you're talking about?? Or do you think all these people are just whispering sweet nothings into Muellers ear?Plain to see Texas nobody paid 1000 an hour to help you get into a good school lolNO commentYou have evidence that they pay more than the market rate?What about paying far more than the market rate ??
The attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C., claim that Trump is violating the Constitution's emolument's clauses, which bar the president from receiving "any present, emolument, office or title of any kind whatever from any king, prince, or foreign state" or any state in the U.S. The lawsuit claims that he improperly benefits financially when foreign or state governments patronize the hotel he owns just a few blocks from the White House.
The Trump legal team sought authority from the federal judge in the case, Peter Messitte of Maryland, to appeal the judge's pre-trial decision that the emoluments clauses are intended to protect against any type of potentially improper influence.
EXCLUSIVE: DC AG on court's green light for Trump emoluments lawsuit
JULY 25, 201804:32
Justice Department lawyers argued that the term "emolument" has a very specific meaning — a payment made to a public official in addition to the official salary. Under that reading, financial benefits from an office holder's private business dealings would be exempt.
In his order Friday, Messitte said the government cannot appeal the case piecemeal and must wait for a final ruling after a trial. He also declined to put a hold on the case, which would have blocked the challengers from seeking evidence about his hotel business through the legal process known as discovery.
He ordered lawyers for Maryland and Washington, D.C., to submit a schedule for discovery within 20 days. That order can be appealed.
"This is another major win for us in this historic case," said Karl Racine, Washington's attorney general. "We will soon provide the court a new schedule to begin the process of getting information about how President Trump is profiting from the presidency."
The Justice Department, which is representing Trump, had no comment on Friday's ruling.
you believe the world class liar ?? Did you when Mexico was paying for the wall did you when he was going to show his taxes ??? Paying for personal items from his charitable foundation?? When the f will you ah's grow a brain and admit this pos is a world class scumbag?You have evidence that they pay more than the market rate?
It doesn't matter, Trump is already on record stating that he will give any profits to the U.S. Treasury. Just as other former presidents did. But the lying lowlife scumbag left persist because they are assholes.
Great deflection! If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. LMAO
.
It's plain to see you'll swallow anything put in your mouth. Anything can be alleged, proof is another matter. So far you've proved nothing.
.
not if he fucked around with his taxes.... if he committed tax fraud - then donny is in deep doo doo....
Waters wouldn't know one page of a tax return form another, but still, tax enforcement isn't a congressional function either.
.
that is why they would hire experts, silly kitty. & if there were fraud committed - then the appropriate measure can be taken.
I thought that's what the IRS and DOJ are for. They're the only experts that count.
.
congress investigates & gets the IRS involved for their expertise if needed.
You still don't get it, it's not congresses job to investigate individuals, they are there to provide oversight of government operations. You little bitches are crying about government over reach, it doesn't get worse than that.
.
Gates is getting extended time to testify Think Trumps campaign manager isn't giving all the proof to Mueller ,you're talking about?? Or do you think all these people are just whispering sweet nothings into Muellers ear?Plain to see Texas nobody paid 1000 an hour to help you get into a good school lolNO commentYou have evidence that they pay more than the market rate?
The attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C., claim that Trump is violating the Constitution's emolument's clauses, which bar the president from receiving "any present, emolument, office or title of any kind whatever from any king, prince, or foreign state" or any state in the U.S. The lawsuit claims that he improperly benefits financially when foreign or state governments patronize the hotel he owns just a few blocks from the White House.
The Trump legal team sought authority from the federal judge in the case, Peter Messitte of Maryland, to appeal the judge's pre-trial decision that the emoluments clauses are intended to protect against any type of potentially improper influence.
EXCLUSIVE: DC AG on court's green light for Trump emoluments lawsuit
JULY 25, 201804:32
Justice Department lawyers argued that the term "emolument" has a very specific meaning — a payment made to a public official in addition to the official salary. Under that reading, financial benefits from an office holder's private business dealings would be exempt.
In his order Friday, Messitte said the government cannot appeal the case piecemeal and must wait for a final ruling after a trial. He also declined to put a hold on the case, which would have blocked the challengers from seeking evidence about his hotel business through the legal process known as discovery.
He ordered lawyers for Maryland and Washington, D.C., to submit a schedule for discovery within 20 days. That order can be appealed.
"This is another major win for us in this historic case," said Karl Racine, Washington's attorney general. "We will soon provide the court a new schedule to begin the process of getting information about how President Trump is profiting from the presidency."
The Justice Department, which is representing Trump, had no comment on Friday's ruling.
you believe the world class liar ?? Did you when Mexico was paying for the wall did you when he was going to show his taxes ??? Paying for personal items from his charitable foundation?? When the f will you ah's grow a brain and admit this pos is a world class scumbag?It doesn't matter, Trump is already on record stating that he will give any profits to the U.S. Treasury. Just as other former presidents did. But the lying lowlife scumbag left persist because they are assholes.
Great deflection! If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. LMAO
.
It's plain to see you'll swallow anything put in your mouth. Anything can be alleged, proof is another matter. So far you've proved nothing.
.
it isn't required - but highly suspect that trump refused to show his taxes... it could be something as simple as him lying about his income. perhaps the emperor isn't as golden as he says... OR maybe he is, but understated his wealth to avoid them thar taxes... but someone ( cohen ) said under oath that trump did manipulate his finances for both tax & insurance reasons. allen weisellburg - trumps CFO since the days of his daddy has limited immunity & has been cooperating with mueller. anything that cohen testified to, mueller already knows & the house is playing catch up since the took the majority.
Have you ever protested your property tax assessment?
.
i actually have... but i didn't manipulate my house's worth to get a lower bill.
So you told them it's worth exactly what you'd ask for it if you put it on the market? I king of doubt that.
.
uh... they go by the evaluation analysis which is done every 5-10 years & whenever a permit is taken out, they inspect it.
If you protested. you didn't agree with their analysis, you claimed the property was less than they said it was. RIGHT? What makes you think Trump didn't do the same?
.
you can start with this, although there are more counts than what is listed per offense:
Impeachable Offenses - Need to Impeach
you're welcome.
you can start with this, although there are more counts than what is listed per offense:
Impeachable Offenses - Need to Impeach
you're welcome.
From a blind site. No identification whatsoever and no supporting facts.
Waters wouldn't know one page of a tax return form another, but still, tax enforcement isn't a congressional function either.
.
that is why they would hire experts, silly kitty. & if there were fraud committed - then the appropriate measure can be taken.
I thought that's what the IRS and DOJ are for. They're the only experts that count.
.
congress investigates & gets the IRS involved for their expertise if needed.
You still don't get it, it's not congresses job to investigate individuals, they are there to provide oversight of government operations. You little bitches are crying about government over reach, it doesn't get worse than that.
.
oh you desperate little feline.... congress' job is oversight of government operations.... & that includes for a sitting president to operate the government legally.... starting with his own background being crime free. to do that properly they get the experts to investigate where they haven't the experience in the area they wanna check & balance.
it isn't required - but highly suspect that trump refused to show his taxes... it could be something as simple as him lying about his income. perhaps the emperor isn't as golden as he says... OR maybe he is, but understated his wealth to avoid them thar taxes... but someone ( cohen ) said under oath that trump did manipulate his finances for both tax & insurance reasons. allen weisellburg - trumps CFO since the days of his daddy has limited immunity & has been cooperating with mueller. anything that cohen testified to, mueller already knows & the house is playing catch up since the took the majority.
that is why they would hire experts, silly kitty. & if there were fraud committed - then the appropriate measure can be taken.
I thought that's what the IRS and DOJ are for. They're the only experts that count.
.
congress investigates & gets the IRS involved for their expertise if needed.
You still don't get it, it's not congresses job to investigate individuals, they are there to provide oversight of government operations. You little bitches are crying about government over reach, it doesn't get worse than that.
.
oh you desperate little feline.... congress' job is oversight of government operations.... & that includes for a sitting president to operate the government legally.... starting with his own background being crime free. to do that properly they get the experts to investigate where they haven't the experience in the area they wanna check & balance.
Wrong, it the voters job to vet a president, congress has no authority over what he did before he entered politics. Their job is to write laws, not enforce them. BTW there is nothing in the Constitution that says a person must be crime free to run for president, so even that wouldn't justify congresses over reach. They are limited to looking only at things AFTER he took office.
.
it isn't required - but highly suspect that trump refused to show his taxes... it could be something as simple as him lying about his income. perhaps the emperor isn't as golden as he says... OR maybe he is, but understated his wealth to avoid them thar taxes... but someone ( cohen ) said under oath that trump did manipulate his finances for both tax & insurance reasons. allen weisellburg - trumps CFO since the days of his daddy has limited immunity & has been cooperating with mueller. anything that cohen testified to, mueller already knows & the house is playing catch up since the took the majority.
How would releasing his (Donald Trump's) income taxes show anything about his net worth? None of mine ever showed my net worth. Why would his?
How is manipulating his finances for both tax & insurance reasons illegal? I would meet toward the end of the calendar year with my CPA. We would discuss what I needed to do during the last months of the year if I needed to buy something or sell something. We also discussed what I needed to do during the coming year. Was that illegal? I was audited a number of times and the IRS never thought I did anything wrong.
Now many thousand pages do you think would make up the Trump tax returns? The Trump empire controls hundreds of businesses. How many pages per company?
Regardless of what would be in the Trump tax returns, Progressives hair would be on fire about what was on line 57 of page 7,518. LOCK HIM UP, LOCK HIM UP!
he's profiting off his presidency. hence the emoluments lawsuit. god you are such a mook.
Have you ever protested your property tax assessment?
.
i actually have... but i didn't manipulate my house's worth to get a lower bill.
So you told them it's worth exactly what you'd ask for it if you put it on the market? I king of doubt that.
.
uh... they go by the evaluation analysis which is done every 5-10 years & whenever a permit is taken out, they inspect it.
If you protested. you didn't agree with their analysis, you claimed the property was less than they said it was. RIGHT? What makes you think Trump didn't do the same?
.
i didn't cook books to reflect what i wanted to portray.... i didn't lie what i spent on upgrades or whatever to get a better insurance rate or to use the tax deductions ..
he's profiting off his presidency. hence the emoluments lawsuit. god you are such a mook.
Please show us specifically where he is profiting.
i actually have... but i didn't manipulate my house's worth to get a lower bill.
So you told them it's worth exactly what you'd ask for it if you put it on the market? I king of doubt that.
.
uh... they go by the evaluation analysis which is done every 5-10 years & whenever a permit is taken out, they inspect it.
If you protested. you didn't agree with their analysis, you claimed the property was less than they said it was. RIGHT? What makes you think Trump didn't do the same?
.
i didn't cook books to reflect what i wanted to portray.... i didn't lie what i spent on upgrades or whatever to get a better insurance rate or to use the tax deductions ..
You can't prove Trump did either? Remember, valuations are opinions.
.
Once more Trump has filthy hands , money laundering and dirty money are his majors , he minors in emoluments You think all those testifying before Mueller and his group of experts are whistling Dixie in his ear?Gates is getting extended time to testify Think Trumps campaign manager isn't giving all the proof to Mueller ,you're talking about?? Or do you think all these people are just whispering sweet nothings into Muellers ear?Plain to see Texas nobody paid 1000 an hour to help you get into a good school lolNO comment
The attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C., claim that Trump is violating the Constitution's emolument's clauses, which bar the president from receiving "any present, emolument, office or title of any kind whatever from any king, prince, or foreign state" or any state in the U.S. The lawsuit claims that he improperly benefits financially when foreign or state governments patronize the hotel he owns just a few blocks from the White House.
The Trump legal team sought authority from the federal judge in the case, Peter Messitte of Maryland, to appeal the judge's pre-trial decision that the emoluments clauses are intended to protect against any type of potentially improper influence.
EXCLUSIVE: DC AG on court's green light for Trump emoluments lawsuit
JULY 25, 201804:32
Justice Department lawyers argued that the term "emolument" has a very specific meaning — a payment made to a public official in addition to the official salary. Under that reading, financial benefits from an office holder's private business dealings would be exempt.
In his order Friday, Messitte said the government cannot appeal the case piecemeal and must wait for a final ruling after a trial. He also declined to put a hold on the case, which would have blocked the challengers from seeking evidence about his hotel business through the legal process known as discovery.
He ordered lawyers for Maryland and Washington, D.C., to submit a schedule for discovery within 20 days. That order can be appealed.
"This is another major win for us in this historic case," said Karl Racine, Washington's attorney general. "We will soon provide the court a new schedule to begin the process of getting information about how President Trump is profiting from the presidency."
The Justice Department, which is representing Trump, had no comment on Friday's ruling.
you believe the world class liar ?? Did you when Mexico was paying for the wall did you when he was going to show his taxes ??? Paying for personal items from his charitable foundation?? When the f will you ah's grow a brain and admit this pos is a world class scumbag?
Great deflection! If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. LMAO
.
It's plain to see you'll swallow anything put in your mouth. Anything can be alleged, proof is another matter. So far you've proved nothing.
.
Manafort was the campaign manager for a short time, but what would that have to do with emoluments? You seem to have a hard time picking a subject and sticking with it, are you senile or just a bad case of ADD?
.
