Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My pick, at this point, would be Rand Paul but since the electoral process has been compromised it probably won't matter WHO gets the nomination.
The fight continues, Perry criticizes Rand Paul on immigration:
Perry: Paul ?isolationist policies? are ?curiously blind,? ?wrong? ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Perry used the term isolationist, and it fits.
If you don;t know by now that there is a liberal bias in our media you in fact might be an isolationist.
Perry has three things going for him.
(1) He has created the best one-party system in a state since Huey Long in LA.
(2) He has the petroleum industry in his pocket.
(3) He has the 35% social conservative in Texas voting for him every time.
When he runs for the presidency again, not of that will protect him in next presidential primary season. His candidacy will destruct early, like it did last time.
Rand Paul has a warped philosophy, created by an atheist female that advocated promiscuity, abortion, selfishness, and greed.
While I dislike the anti-altruist stance of Ayn Rand, I must ask what you find so morally objectionable about hyr advocacy for promiscuity and abortion, as well as what exactly you identify as being Rand Paul's "warped philosophy".
CNN is a bullshit commie organization.
They're trying to wage a war inside the republicrat establishment.
Notice how there's NEVER a conflict among democrooks. No "mavericks", no "moderates", no "reaching across the isle".
It's because those of us on "the right" aren't robots. We have critical thinking skills, morality and ethics. We don't follow cults of personality. We're individuals and proud of it.
Rand Paul makes good arguments for staying out of foreign conflicts. Rick Perry makes good points about American interests and military power stabilizing global conflicts so that they don't blow up into something worse.
Democrooks do what they want when they have power, regardless of the consequences which are always worse than the problem. They manipulate the story and the bed wetters go along. When shit goes wrong they blame their enemies, that is Americans.
So as far as I'm concerned I'm more interested in who wins the debate in the arena of ideas between Paul/Perry than I am the script Al-CNN is ready to regurgitate.
Bullshit, prove it.
If you don;t know by now that there is a liberal bias in our media you in fact might be an isolationist.
lol... You come off as a nutty CTer.
CTer? I looked it up, no, I reject most conspiracy theories. I do not like Ayn rand, though Rand Paul was NOT named for her, he has quoted her as a source of his political positions. I think Rand Paul is genuine in his beliefs, but disagree with them; of the two, I find Paul more likely to be sincere.
Well you don't even know what a fuckin isolationist is so why would I care who you feel is more sincere?
Let me break it down for you, like baby talk.... Isolationist would have to close off most or all trade. OPS right there you're awkwardly ignorant understanding of the word fails!
In fact, you might be a isolationist of you cause war with many countries. This cuts off contact by way of trade, communication, immigration, tourism and so on.
Or wait, do you disagree still???
Isolationism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There are various types, of course, always have been. Early 20th century on, defined by NATIONS that refuse to understand foreign conflicts can impact their well being, a classic on the subject is "While England Slept" by Winston Churchill.Didn't know about that stunt. The immigration thing is the problem I have with libertarians, I think they're a bit naive on that issue. Having said that, I'd still rather have Paul than another RINO, even if they could win. I don't think there is a perfect candidate but compared to Obama, ANY of them would be preferable, except maybe that fat blowhard pile of shit Christie.My pick, at this point, would be Rand Paul but since the electoral process has been compromised it probably won't matter WHO gets the nomination.
Rand is no Ron.. he's not impressing me much with his flip flopping on immigration. He did a rally with none other than that Obama creep in Chicago.. trying to remember his name.. dark hair, hitler mustache.. It was all about open borders.. He caught a lot of shit about it on his facebook page..
Edit to add: David Axelrod
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
.. You have no voice in Conservatism what so ever.
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
.. You have no voice in Conservatism what so ever.
You far righties are not conservatives and you have no real voice at all in the 2016 selection. Paul, Bush, Christie will be your ultimate choice. No Perry, no Santorum, no far right reactionary weirdoes need apply.
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
.. You have no voice in Conservatism what so ever.
Better than a communist Kenyan... You have no voice in Conservatism what so ever.
You far righties are not conservatives and you have no real voice at all in the 2016 selection. Paul, Bush, Christie will be your ultimate choice. No Perry, no Santorum, no far right reactionary weirdoes need apply.
No idiot canadian either. Ted Cruz...teaper canadian.
Better than a communist Kenyan.You far righties are not conservatives and you have no real voice at all in the 2016 selection. Paul, Bush, Christie will be your ultimate choice. No Perry, no Santorum, no far right reactionary weirdoes need apply.
No idiot canadian either. Ted Cruz...teaper canadian.
