Not really.Better than a communist Kenyan.No idiot canadian either. Ted Cruz...teaper canadian.
debateble
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really.Better than a communist Kenyan.No idiot canadian either. Ted Cruz...teaper canadian.
debateble
The fight continues, Perry criticizes Rand Paul on immigration:
Perry: Paul ?isolationist policies? are ?curiously blind,? ?wrong? ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Perry used the term isolationist, and it fits.
You left out the one who scares you the most, Ben Carson.The fight continues, Perry criticizes Rand Paul on immigration:
Perry: Paul ?isolationist policies? are ?curiously blind,? ?wrong? ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Perry used the term isolationist, and it fits.
All we need now is for Ted Cruz, Allen West, and Marco Rubio to enter the fray and we have a quorum
You left out the one who scares you the most, Ben Carson.The fight continues, Perry criticizes Rand Paul on immigration:
Perry: Paul ?isolationist policies? are ?curiously blind,? ?wrong? ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Perry used the term isolationist, and it fits.
All we need now is for Ted Cruz, Allen West, and Marco Rubio to enter the fray and we have a quorum
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
You must not be an American then.Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
Correct.
Americans reject extremism both left and right.
Perry clearly does not understand the difference between non-interventionism and isolationism.
Paul has a real chance in 2016 to beat the democratic candidate for the presidency.
Perry would not get 40% of the vote in my opinion.
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
Either one of them would be infinitely better than the communist we have now.
Rick is kinda dumb for dumb though.... Don't get me wrong, Obama is a very intelligent sounding moron as long as he's reading a script. But Risk, I dono....
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
Um, isn't that what you said about Romney?
Frankly, I have no love for the far right, but the last two guys who lost were exactly the kind of "moderate" the MSM says that they want, and they lost anyway.
Honestly, the GOP would be better off if they ran someone from the far right, have that person lose decisively, and then they can't use the excuse they are using now that "McCain/Romney/Christie wasn't a real conservative", which is exactly what they are going to say.
Here's where I think Perry might succeed where Romney failed miserably. He wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He was born on a poor farm, worked his way through college, served in the Air Force and earned everything he has.
Also, hate to say it, Karl Rove was right on one point. Elections are won by that 10% in the middle who vote for the guy they'd like to have a beer with. Perry does better in the "Beer Primary" than Hillary or Christie.
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
Um, isn't that what you said about Romney?
Frankly, I have no love for the far right, but the last two guys who lost were exactly the kind of "moderate" the MSM says that they want, and they lost anyway.
Honestly, the GOP would be better off if they ran someone from the far right, have that person lose decisively, and then they can't use the excuse they are using now that "McCain/Romney/Christie wasn't a real conservative", which is exactly what they are going to say.
Here's where I think Perry might succeed where Romney failed miserably. He wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He was born on a poor farm, worked his way through college, served in the Air Force and earned everything he has.
Also, hate to say it, Karl Rove was right on one point. Elections are won by that 10% in the middle who vote for the guy they'd like to have a beer with. Perry does better in the "Beer Primary" than Hillary or Christie.
CNN is a bullshit commie organization.
They're trying to wage a war inside the republicrat establishment.
Notice how there's NEVER a conflict among democrooks. No "mavericks", no "moderates", no "reaching across the isle".
It's because those of us on "the right" aren't robots. We have critical thinking skills, morality and ethics. We don't follow cults of personality. We're individuals and proud of it.
Rand Paul makes good arguments for staying out of foreign conflicts. Rick Perry makes good points about American interests and military power stabilizing global conflicts so that they don't blow up into something worse.
Democrooks do what they want when they have power, regardless of the consequences which are always worse than the problem. They manipulate the story and the bed wetters go along. When shit goes wrong they blame their enemies, that is Americans.
So as far as I'm concerned I'm more interested in who wins the debate in the arena of ideas between Paul/Perry than I am the script Al-CNN is ready to regurgitate.
Bullshit, prove it.
BTW you have a talking head who's goal is to be on par with Bill or Beck as your avatar. She is not a journalist, she is not honest, she is "opinionated news." Basically she tries top tell you what to think and how to feel about a story she wants to talk about. You can't call her on her bullshit because it's not news, it's not fact.... it's opinion.
CNN is a bullshit commie organization.
They're trying to wage a war inside the republicrat establishment.
Notice how there's NEVER a conflict among democrooks. No "mavericks", no "moderates", no "reaching across the isle".
It's because those of us on "the right" aren't robots. We have critical thinking skills, morality and ethics. We don't follow cults of personality. We're individuals and proud of it.
Rand Paul makes good arguments for staying out of foreign conflicts. Rick Perry makes good points about American interests and military power stabilizing global conflicts so that they don't blow up into something worse.
Democrooks do what they want when they have power, regardless of the consequences which are always worse than the problem. They manipulate the story and the bed wetters go along. When shit goes wrong they blame their enemies, that is Americans.
So as far as I'm concerned I'm more interested in who wins the debate in the arena of ideas between Paul/Perry than I am the script Al-CNN is ready to regurgitate.
Bullshit, prove it.
If you don;t know by now that there is a liberal bias in our media you in fact might be an isolationist.
Christie is preferable to all of them, with the exception of Huntsman.
Once again, no far right candidate can win.
Um, isn't that what you said about Romney?
Frankly, I have no love for the far right, but the last two guys who lost were exactly the kind of "moderate" the MSM says that they want, and they lost anyway.
Honestly, the GOP would be better off if they ran someone from the far right, have that person lose decisively, and then they can't use the excuse they are using now that "McCain/Romney/Christie wasn't a real conservative", which is exactly what they are going to say.
Here's where I think Perry might succeed where Romney failed miserably. He wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He was born on a poor farm, worked his way through college, served in the Air Force and earned everything he has.
Also, hate to say it, Karl Rove was right on one point. Elections are won by that 10% in the middle who vote for the guy they'd like to have a beer with. Perry does better in the "Beer Primary" than Hillary or Christie.
Yeah, but I think we learned our lesson with the last "dumb cowboy". Rick Perry makes George Bush look like a rocket surgeon.
[
Joe, you know when you mention Mormon your eyes cross, you can't raise your arm, your writing slurs, and your tongue sticks to the inside of your mouth: all signs of political stroke.
We both agree that a far right loon cannot win.
You are wrong about a Bush, a Paul, or a Huntsman.
[
Obama scores low in that category, some of those in the middle want substance over soundbites.
Magic underwear[
Joe, you know when you mention Mormon your eyes cross, you can't raise your arm, your writing slurs, and your tongue sticks to the inside of your mouth: all signs of political stroke.
We both agree that a far right loon cannot win.
You are wrong about a Bush, a Paul, or a Huntsman.
Uh, guy, I told you nominating the Mormon was a horrible idea, and guess what, it was.
Embarrassingly...Romney was a loser from the beginningHe didn't just lose a winnable election, he lost epicly.
He looks like a queer and child molester.Huntsman is a non-starter for me because he comes from the same whacky cult. The reason why he won't get the nomination is that the Evangelicals won't go along with it for a second time, he's not even pretending to be conservative like Romney did, and he's not willing to piss away millions of his own dollars to try to browbeat the GOP into supporting him like Romney did.
Bush would beat Clinton.Bush- also a non-starter. He could get the nomination, but he'd never win the election. Clinton vs. Bush, Clinton wins every time.
Paul is moving more towards the center everyday. By the time the debates roll around he will be a smidgen right of Romney. In the end, he will get accused of plagiarism by Perry and will see a quick exit.Rand Paul is a nut. Rand Paul is the candidate for people who listen to the Michael Savage show.
ANow, guys who might be viable- Scott Walker. Pence from Indiana. Christie might have been before he spectacularly exploded over Bridgegate. Definitely someone who used to be a governor and can make an honest claim to knowing how to run something.