Perspective: How Many Conservatives Would Kill You?

[ph3iron]

View attachment 141663

The left needs to pull it's collective head out of where they've inserted it.

*****SMILE*****

Love how our manly gun toters always have rugged guys somewhere.
I guess it makes them feel manly

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

violence, up to and including the taking of human life, is justified when a person or grup of person attempts to infringe upon the rightful liberty of another or seeks to deprive that person of life and property

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

And yet, strangely, you seem unconcerned by the nearly 40% of non-Muslims who "would kill any who disagree with their point of view." Of course, that characterization is a fabrication you pulled from a poll which asked a very different question than "Would you kill any who disagree with your point of view." Instead, the survey asked whether “targeting and killing civilians can be justified in order to further a political, social or religious cause.”

depends on how you define the term "civilian"

 

[Montrovant]

violence, up to and including the taking of human life, is justified when a person or grup of person attempts to infringe upon the rightful liberty of another or seeks to deprive that person of life and property

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

And yet, strangely, you seem unconcerned by the nearly 40% of non-Muslims who "would kill any who disagree with their point of view." Of course, that characterization is a fabrication you pulled from a poll which asked a very different question than "Would you kill any who disagree with your point of view." Instead, the survey asked whether “targeting and killing civilians can be justified in order to further a political, social or religious cause.”

depends on how you define the term "civilian"

Depends on number of different things, really. It's a pretty broad question. The article even goes into more depth on the answers, and shows that some people equated it to self-defense, or civilian casualties in war, or law enforcement.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Hey asshole, your usual personal attack is NOT A RESPONSE, it is the usual crap posted by poorly educated bigots who lack the knowledge to defend the bullshit they post.

Wow.....look how quickly I've forced you to default to vulgarity!


This post sure put a burr under your saddle, you donkey!
What is the reason you imbeciles....er, Liberals....always take the side of predators and perpetrators over innocent Americans????


But, in full disclosure, This is the first time I've seen a pustule postulate.

Asshole is used by me as an acronym:

Arrogant
Self Serving
Schadenfreude
HOLE (an object which defines something empty of principles, empathy and humility)

Which defines you to a T. The only vulgarity is your use of pustule to describe me, though such nastiness it expected from a cretin like you.

If that is an attempt at an apology it's feeble at best.

Don't do it again.

Now....the question that set you off...

What is the reason you imbeciles....er, Liberals....always take the side of predators and perpetrators over innocent Americans????

...perhaps I can answer it for you: you Democrats/Liberals hate America with such a passion that it bleeds over into a hatred of Americans, as well.

So....you imbeciles support and champion felons ans well as every other iteration of sociopath you can identify.



Hit the nail on your head???

It was not meant as an apology, I simply described why you are an asshole, and what makes an asshole.

Trolling flaming reported.

The Truth is a defense for what you consider calumny (do you even know the meaning of calumny?).

 

[miketx]

Wow.....look how quickly I've forced you to default to vulgarity!


This post sure put a burr under your saddle, you donkey!
What is the reason you imbeciles....er, Liberals....always take the side of predators and perpetrators over innocent Americans????


But, in full disclosure, This is the first time I've seen a pustule postulate.

Asshole is used by me as an acronym:

Arrogant
Self Serving
Schadenfreude
HOLE (an object which defines something empty of principles, empathy and humility)

Which defines you to a T. The only vulgarity is your use of pustule to describe me, though such nastiness it expected from a cretin like you.

If that is an attempt at an apology it's feeble at best.

Don't do it again.

Now....the question that set you off...

What is the reason you imbeciles....er, Liberals....always take the side of predators and perpetrators over innocent Americans????

...perhaps I can answer it for you: you Democrats/Liberals hate America with such a passion that it bleeds over into a hatred of Americans, as well.

So....you imbeciles support and champion felons ans well as every other iteration of sociopath you can identify.



Hit the nail on your head???

It was not meant as an apology, I simply described why you are an asshole, and what makes an asshole.

Trolling flaming reported.

The Truth is a defense for what you consider calumny (do you even know the meaning of calumny?).

Yes sir. It's what liberals here do each day.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

violence, up to and including the taking of human life, is justified when a person or grup of person attempts to infringe upon the rightful liberty of another or seeks to deprive that person of life and property

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

And yet, strangely, you seem unconcerned by the nearly 40% of non-Muslims who "would kill any who disagree with their point of view." Of course, that characterization is a fabrication you pulled from a poll which asked a very different question than "Would you kill any who disagree with your point of view." Instead, the survey asked whether “targeting and killing civilians can be justified in order to further a political, social or religious cause.”

depends on how you define the term "civilian"

Depends on number of different things, really. It's a pretty broad question. The article even goes into more depth on the answers, and shows that some people equated it to self-defense, or civilian casualties in war, or law enforcement.

for example, if there was a law passed banning standard capacity magazines, then in my opinion, members of moms demand action or the brady campaign shouldnt be considered civilians, and would be legit targets, because the resulting crackdowns/arrests would be directly because of their actions...same with celebs who made that "demand a plan" commercial. Or conversely, if god forbid, all mosques were shut down and muslims required to register with the government, then people like Pamela Geller would be legit targetson their end, because their words and actions set the tone.
that is completely different than thinking its ok to kill someone because you disagree with them.

 

[miketx]

violence, up to and including the taking of human life, is justified when a person or grup of person attempts to infringe upon the rightful liberty of another or seeks to deprive that person of life and property

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

And yet, strangely, you seem unconcerned by the nearly 40% of non-Muslims who "would kill any who disagree with their point of view." Of course, that characterization is a fabrication you pulled from a poll which asked a very different question than "Would you kill any who disagree with your point of view." Instead, the survey asked whether “targeting and killing civilians can be justified in order to further a political, social or religious cause.”

depends on how you define the term "civilian"

Depends on number of different things, really. It's a pretty broad question. The article even goes into more depth on the answers, and shows that some people equated it to self-defense, or civilian casualties in war, or law enforcement.

for example, if there was a law passed banning standard capacity magazines, then in my opinion, members of moms demand action or the brady campaign shouldnt be considered civilians, and would be legit targets, because the resulting crackdowns/arrests would be directly because of their actions...same with celebs who made that "demand a plan" commercial. Or conversely, if god forbid, all mosques were shut down and muslims required to register with the government, then people like Pamela Geller would be legit targetson their end, because their words and actions set the tone.
that is completely different than thinking its ok to kill someone because you disagree with them.

Sounds like the definition of a liberal to me.

 

[PoliticalChic]

violence, up to and including the taking of human life, is justified when a person or grup of person attempts to infringe upon the rightful liberty of another or seeks to deprive that person of life and property

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

a fifth "would kill any who disagree with their point of view??"

lets look at empirical evidence.....



...a fifth are not killing anyone.

...billions disagree with their point of view.





are you a victim of propoganda...or?

20% is a fifth.

That will become clear to you after you get out of junior high.

cool story bro


where are all these 20%?

hrmmmmm???

boy and his wolf like imagination

3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals.Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What is the reason you imbeciles....er, Liberals....always take the side of predators and perpetrators over innocent Americans????

Hey asshole, your usual personal attack is NOT A RESPONSE, it is the usual crap posted by poorly educated bigots who lack the knowledge to defend the bullshit they post.

Wow.....look how quickly I've forced you to default to vulgarity!


This post sure put a burr under your saddle, you donkey!
What is the reason you imbeciles....er, Liberals....always take the side of predators and perpetrators over innocent Americans????


But, in full disclosure, This is the first time I've seen a pustule postulate.

Asshole is used by me as an acronym:

Arrogant
Self Serving
Schadenfreude
HOLE (an object which defines something empty of principles, empathy and humility)

Which defines you to a T. The only vulgarity is your use of pustule to describe me, though such nastiness it expected from a cretin like you.

If that is an attempt at an apology it's feeble at best.

Don't do it again.

Now....the question that set you off...

What is the reason you imbeciles....er, Liberals....always take the side of predators and perpetrators over innocent Americans????

...perhaps I can answer it for you: you Democrats/Liberals hate America with such a passion that it bleeds over into a hatred of Americans, as well.

So....you imbeciles support and champion felons ans well as every other iteration of sociopath you can identify.



Hit the nail on your head???

It was not meant as an apology, I simply described why you are an asshole, and what makes an asshole.

Actually, what is was was vulgarity in place of any ability to refute or dispute my posts.

Your regular modus operandi.

 

[PoliticalChic]

First, the number of members of the pertinent groups...then their view on homicide.

1. "US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin JANUARY 3, 2017

• 36% of Americans now conservative, 25% liberal
• Liberal figure has inched up from 17% in 1990s
• Conservatives mainly steady, while moderates decline

US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin

2. Since about 130 million votes were cast in the last presidential election ... More votes were cast in 2016 than in 2012 — but that doesn’t mean turnout was great
....that would translate to about 46.8 million conservatives.



How would you react if a poll of conservatives found that over 9 million of 'em were perfectly fine with killing......slaughtering......any who didn't agree with conservative viewpoints????
Have you ever heard such killings voiced or approved by conservatives?





3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals. Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth




5. Now...how does this amount to the insanity of Democrats/Liberals?

"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




And Bill's wife wanted to increase this by 550%.


And they wonder why they lost the election.

Another dumb cut and paste by a cartoon character who doesn't even know the def of classical liberal.
Obviously no Latin in his white high school.
End of conversation.
Also doesn't realize that USA Muslims have better Ed and earn more than white high school rubes like our cartoon boy

3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals.Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth

 

[PoliticalChic]

First, the number of members of the pertinent groups...then their view on homicide.

1. "US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin JANUARY 3, 2017

• 36% of Americans now conservative, 25% liberal
• Liberal figure has inched up from 17% in 1990s
• Conservatives mainly steady, while moderates decline

US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin

2. Since about 130 million votes were cast in the last presidential election ... More votes were cast in 2016 than in 2012 — but that doesn’t mean turnout was great
....that would translate to about 46.8 million conservatives.



How would you react if a poll of conservatives found that over 9 million of 'em were perfectly fine with killing......slaughtering......any who didn't agree with conservative viewpoints????
Have you ever heard such killings voiced or approved by conservatives?





3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals. Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth




5. Now...how does this amount to the insanity of Democrats/Liberals?

"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




And Bill's wife wanted to increase this by 550%.


And they wonder why they lost the election.

From your link: "
Compared with general public, Muslims more likely to say targeting, killing civilians is never justifiable"

Also, when you follow the link in the article to a further explanation of some of the answers, you get this: "The new question finds that among the general public, Americans with a high school degree or less education are somewhat more likely than those with more education to say there are circumstances in which violence against civilians can be justified. In addition, Republicans and those who lean toward the GOP are more likely than Democrats to say such tactics are sometimes or often justifiable."
5. Terrorism and concerns about extremism

If you're trying to use the responses by Muslims in that poll to paint them as murderous, you're doing a terrible job. Ditto Democrats. If anything, the poll apparently shows that those who lean Republican are the most likely to be "peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em."

"Americans with a high school degree or less education are somewhat more likely than those with more education to say there are circumstances in which violence against civilians can be justified. In addition, Republicans and those who lean toward the GOP are more likely than Democrats to say such tactics are sometimes or often justifiable."


So good of you to have turned up just in time for a lesson.


1. More details are emerging about Humam al-Balawi, the man who blew up seven intelligence agents in Afghanistan. By education and professional status, the Jordanian doctor is typical of recent suicidal attackers. The man accused of trying to blow up a plane on Christmas Day is a Nigerian graduate of the University of London. In the Fort Hood shootings, a Palestinian-American psychiatrist in the U.S. Army has been charged.
Humam al-Balawi was said to be carrying information about Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden's number two, himself a surgeon who was born to a prominent Egyptian family.
Mohamed Atta of 9/11, who was an Egyptian urban planner who had been working in Germany - these are not the wretched of the earth. What essentially is the grievance that draws them to al-Qaida?
Groups Recruiting Well-Educated Terrorists : NPR

2. A recent study at Princeton University by Alan Krueger and Jitka Maleckova, called "Education, Poverty, Political Violence and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?" argues this point. One piece of the Krueger-Maleckova evidence involves 129 members of Hezbollah who died in action, mostly against Israel, from 1982 to 1994. Hezbollah is now designated by the U.S. as a terrorist organization. Biographical information from the Hezbollah newspaper al-Ahd indicates that the fighters who died were, on average, more educated and less impoverished than the Lebanese population of comparable age and regional origin….Moreover, the Palestinians' adherence to the view that the mass murder of civilians was not terrorism was independent of education and higher among those working than unemployed. Hence, support for terrorism was not reduced by increases in education and income….a study by Charles Russell and Bowman Miller (reprinted in the 1983 book Perspectives on Terrorism) considered 18 revolutionary groups, including the Japanese Red Army, Germany's Baader-Meinhof Gang, and Italy's Red Brigades. The authors found that "the vast majority of those individuals involved in terrorist activities as cadres or leaders is quite well-educated. In fact, approximately two-thirds of those identified terrorists are persons with some university training, [and] well over two-thirds of these individuals came from the middle or upper classes in their respective nations or areas." BW Online | June 10, 2002 | The Myth That Poverty Breeds Terrorism
http://www.krueger.princeton.edu/terrorism2.pdf

3. …men who belonged to violent Islamist groups active over the past few decades (some in jail, some not). Had those groups reflected the working-age populations of their countries, engineers would have made up about 3.5 percent of the membership. Instead, nearly 20 percent of the militants had engineering degrees. When Gambetta and Hertog looked at only the militants whose education was known for certain to have gone beyond high school, close to half (44 percent) had trained in engineering.
Today's Highly Educated Terrorists | The National Interest Blog

Today's Highly Educated Terrorists

4. Pol Pot, was the leader of the Cambodian communist movement known as the Khmer Rouge[3] and was Prime Minister of Democratic Kampuchea from 1976–1979. Pol Pot's leadership, in which he attempted to "cleanse" the country, resulted in the deaths of an estimated 1.7–2.5 million people…. he qualified for a scholarship that allowed for technical study in France. He studied radio electronics at the EFR in Paris from 1949 to 1953 Pol Pot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

5. Khmer Rouge leader Khieu Samphan, who had studied in Paris, wrote in his doctoral dissertation that the Cambodian economy and social structure would be renewed by tapping “the dormant energy of the peasant mass” against the cities. “Kissinger, “The White House Years,” p. 518.

6. Ernesto "Che" Guevara "the man was a mass killer. Hundreds were reportedly executed on his watch" Why Do people love a mass murder like Che? // Current

Ernesto Guevara de la Serna (1928-1967) was an Argentine physician... Learn About the Life of Che Guevara


As a young boy growing up, he had a passion for education, literature and philosophy. Mao Zedong
"he worked as a doctor. Che Guevara : Biography

7. Lenin was born Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, April 22, 1870….In 1891 he passed the law examinations at the University of St. Petersburg as an external student, scoring first in his class. He practiced law briefly in Samara before devoting himself to the revolutionary movement. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin), 1870-1924

8. Bashar al-Assad is the President of the Syrian Arab Republic, Regional Secretary of the Ba'ath Party, and the son of former President Hafez al-Assad. Al-Assad is a controversial figure both in Syria and Internationally… for his disregard for human rights, economic lapses, sponsorship of terrorism, and corruption. Bashar studied ophthalmology at Damascus University 1988 and arrived in London in 1992 to continue his studies. Bashar al-Assad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



9. Mao was a rebellious teen-ager. His father wanted him to be a farmer; Mao wanted more education beyond the village grammar school. Mao left home at age 13 to attend an advanced school in a nearby district and in 1911 arrived in Changsha, the provincial capital, to attend secondary school…. He tried law enforcement, business and history before settling on education, graduating from a teachers' training school in 1918. He departed for Beijing to attend the university. CNN In-Depth Specials - Visions of China - Profiles: Mao Tse-tung



10.Al Qaeda leader Ayman al Zawahiri received his master's degree in surgery from Cairo University.... Ayman al Zawahiri


11. Nidal Hasan, Abdulmutallab and Humam al-Balawi are jihadists who were educated and came from privileged middle- and upper-class backgrounds. Hasan was an American-trained U. S. Army doctor, Abdulmutallab was a London engineering student and the son of a wealthy Nigerian banker, and double-agent Dr. Humam al-Balawi was a member of the Jordanian professional class. The Educated Muslim Terrorist


12. "One piece of the Krueger-Maleckova evidence involves 129 members of Hezbollah who died in action, mostly against Israel, from 1982 to 1994. Hezbollah is now designated by the U.S. as a terrorist organization. Biographical information from the Hezbollah newspaper al-Ahd indicates that the fighters who died were, on average, more educated and less impoverished than the Lebanese population of comparable age and regional origin." The Myth That Poverty Breeds Terrorism

and......" a study by Charles Russell and Bowman Miller (reprinted in the 1983 book Perspectives on Terrorism) considered 18 revolutionary groups, including the Japanese Red Army, Germany's Baader-Meinhof Gang, and Italy's Red Brigades. The authors found that "the vast majority of those individuals involved in terrorist activities as cadres or leaders is quite well-educated. In fact, approximately two-thirds of those identified terrorists are persons with some university training, [and] well over two-thirds of these individuals came from the middle or upper classes in their respective nations or areas."Ibid.


13. Fidel Castro was a talented student, and decided to pursue a career in law, entering the University of Havana Law School in 1945. After graduating law school, he opened a law office that primarily catered for poor Cubans, although it proved a financial failure.

Fidel Castro Biography - life, family, parents, story, history, school, mother, young, son, old, information, born


Highly educated Leftists, smart guys all....




Is it possible that you are soooooo ignorant as to not recognize the Q'ran as a manual of warfare?????


Are you that dumb????

Do you really think people read your cut and paste drivel?
Way too much time sucking off you socialist eelfare

A moron posts several replies in the thread....then writes

"Do you really think people read your cut and paste drivel?"


Priceless.

 

[PoliticalChic]

violence, up to and including the taking of human life, is justified when a person or grup of person attempts to infringe upon the rightful liberty of another or seeks to deprive that person of life and property

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

And yet, strangely, you seem unconcerned by the nearly 40% of non-Muslims who "would kill any who disagree with their point of view." Of course, that characterization is a fabrication you pulled from a poll which asked a very different question than "Would you kill any who disagree with your point of view." Instead, the survey asked whether “targeting and killing civilians can be justified in order to further a political, social or religious cause.”

You need another spanking?

Well....OK, after all, a conservative is never so tall as when she stoops to educate a Liberal.


You were asked this:

How would you react if a poll of conservatives found that over 9 million of 'em were perfectly fine with killing......slaughtering......any who didn't agree with conservative viewpoints????
Have you ever heard such killings voiced or approved by conservatives?

It requires reflection....so, of course, it was beyond you.


But...for those who would be incensed if it were the case that 20% or conservatives favored slaughter of their opponents, I proved this from a recent poll of Muslim Americans:

3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals.Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.


Get it now, you dunce?

 

[G.T.]

violence, up to and including the taking of human life, is justified when a person or grup of person attempts to infringe upon the rightful liberty of another or seeks to deprive that person of life and property

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

a fifth "would kill any who disagree with their point of view??"

lets look at empirical evidence.....



...a fifth are not killing anyone.

...billions disagree with their point of view.





are you a victim of propoganda...or?

20% is a fifth.

That will become clear to you after you get out of junior high.

cool story bro


where are all these 20%?

hrmmmmm???

boy and his wolf like imagination

3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals.Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

1. is it hard for them to find people that disagree with them?

2. than why arent 20% (or anywhere fuggin close) of american muslims in prison yet for murder.


they waiting for the 3rd full moon after the 5th solstice from their 83rd birthday...or? might you me a lil skeered of propoganda??

 

[Nosmo King]

Street thugs, robbers, meth heads, muggers, rapists, drug dealers, petty thieves, ineligible firearms possessors, prostitutes, crack heads.....all believers in liberal or progressive values.

Is it truth, or just a security blanket? Why would you imagine that the folks you identified have any political aspirations or motivations at all?

I think you just want to wrap yourself up in some self-assured fallacy and ascribe politics to criminals. What a slimy way to think, but, then again, Conservatism does not promote much original thought.

 

[Borillar]

First, the number of members of the pertinent groups...then their view on homicide.

1. "US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin JANUARY 3, 2017

• 36% of Americans now conservative, 25% liberal
• Liberal figure has inched up from 17% in 1990s
• Conservatives mainly steady, while moderates decline

US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin

2. Since about 130 million votes were cast in the last presidential election ... More votes were cast in 2016 than in 2012 — but that doesn’t mean turnout was great
....that would translate to about 46.8 million conservatives.



How would you react if a poll of conservatives found that over 9 million of 'em were perfectly fine with killing......slaughtering......any who didn't agree with conservative viewpoints????
Have you ever heard such killings voiced or approved by conservatives?





3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals. Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth




5. Now...how does this amount to the insanity of Democrats/Liberals?

"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




And Bill's wife wanted to increase this by 550%.


And they wonder why they lost the election.

From your link: "
Compared with general public, Muslims more likely to say targeting, killing civilians is never justifiable"

Also, when you follow the link in the article to a further explanation of some of the answers, you get this: "The new question finds that among the general public, Americans with a high school degree or less education are somewhat more likely than those with more education to say there are circumstances in which violence against civilians can be justified. In addition, Republicans and those who lean toward the GOP are more likely than Democrats to say such tactics are sometimes or often justifiable."
5. Terrorism and concerns about extremism

If you're trying to use the responses by Muslims in that poll to paint them as murderous, you're doing a terrible job. Ditto Democrats. If anything, the poll apparently shows that those who lean Republican are the most likely to be "peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em."

View attachment 141667

How many of those in the general public who say violence is justified are progressive liberals?

It would seem that progressives in the general public have no problem threatening or even utilizing violence to justify their ends.

I believe that also is a point here.

*****SMILE*****

That's fine, and I'm not going to argue that riots more often involve conservative-leaning folks than liberals or progressives. I was merely pointing out that PC's contention that Muslims are particularly murderous is not born out by the poll she used as evidence.

Indeed. Judging by the poll she provided, we have less to fear from Muslims than we do conservative nutjobs.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Doesn't pertain.

The issue presented in the OP is of a particular religion residing in this country, a fifth of whom would kill any who disagree with their point of view.


And these folks are deemed excellent candidates for our society by Democrats/Liberals.

a fifth "would kill any who disagree with their point of view??"

lets look at empirical evidence.....



...a fifth are not killing anyone.

...billions disagree with their point of view.





are you a victim of propoganda...or?

20% is a fifth.

That will become clear to you after you get out of junior high.

cool story bro


where are all these 20%?

hrmmmmm???

boy and his wolf like imagination

3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals.Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

1. is it hard for them to find people that disagree with them?

2. than why arent 20% (or anywhere fuggin close) of american muslims in prison yet for murder.


they waiting for the 3rd full moon after the 5th solstice from their 83rd birthday...or? might you me a lil skeered of propoganda??

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth



If we were to put a lens in each of your ears, we'd have a telescope.

If you'd like me to post all 93 Islamist plots that have taken place during Hussein's 8 failed years.....just say so.

 

[PoliticalChic]

First, the number of members of the pertinent groups...then their view on homicide.

1. "US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin JANUARY 3, 2017

• 36% of Americans now conservative, 25% liberal
• Liberal figure has inched up from 17% in 1990s
• Conservatives mainly steady, while moderates decline

US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin

2. Since about 130 million votes were cast in the last presidential election ... More votes were cast in 2016 than in 2012 — but that doesn’t mean turnout was great
....that would translate to about 46.8 million conservatives.



How would you react if a poll of conservatives found that over 9 million of 'em were perfectly fine with killing......slaughtering......any who didn't agree with conservative viewpoints????
Have you ever heard such killings voiced or approved by conservatives?





3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals. Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth




5. Now...how does this amount to the insanity of Democrats/Liberals?

"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




And Bill's wife wanted to increase this by 550%.


And they wonder why they lost the election.

From your link: "
Compared with general public, Muslims more likely to say targeting, killing civilians is never justifiable"

Also, when you follow the link in the article to a further explanation of some of the answers, you get this: "The new question finds that among the general public, Americans with a high school degree or less education are somewhat more likely than those with more education to say there are circumstances in which violence against civilians can be justified. In addition, Republicans and those who lean toward the GOP are more likely than Democrats to say such tactics are sometimes or often justifiable."
5. Terrorism and concerns about extremism

If you're trying to use the responses by Muslims in that poll to paint them as murderous, you're doing a terrible job. Ditto Democrats. If anything, the poll apparently shows that those who lean Republican are the most likely to be "peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em."

View attachment 141667

How many of those in the general public who say violence is justified are progressive liberals?

It would seem that progressives in the general public have no problem threatening or even utilizing violence to justify their ends.

I believe that also is a point here.

*****SMILE*****

That's fine, and I'm not going to argue that riots more often involve conservative-leaning folks than liberals or progressives. I was merely pointing out that PC's contention that Muslims are particularly murderous is not born out by the poll she used as evidence.

Indeed. Judging by the poll she provided, we have less to fear from Muslims than we do conservative nutjobs.

93 Islamists plots against America....how many by conservatives,you dunce?

 

[G.T.]

a fifth "would kill any who disagree with their point of view??"

lets look at empirical evidence.....



...a fifth are not killing anyone.

...billions disagree with their point of view.





are you a victim of propoganda...or?

20% is a fifth.

That will become clear to you after you get out of junior high.

cool story bro


where are all these 20%?

hrmmmmm???

boy and his wolf like imagination

3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals.Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

1. is it hard for them to find people that disagree with them?

2. than why arent 20% (or anywhere fuggin close) of american muslims in prison yet for murder.


they waiting for the 3rd full moon after the 5th solstice from their 83rd birthday...or? might you me a lil skeered of propoganda??

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth



If we were to put a lens in each of your ears, we'd have a telescope.

If you'd like me to post all 93 Islamist plots that have taken place during Hussein's 8 failed years.....just say so.

anectodal bullshit is not equal to or greater than 20% of muslim americans

cool story though, ill be scared as soon as the sky starts falling

 

[Borillar]

First, the number of members of the pertinent groups...then their view on homicide.

1. "US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin JANUARY 3, 2017

• 36% of Americans now conservative, 25% liberal
• Liberal figure has inched up from 17% in 1990s
• Conservatives mainly steady, while moderates decline

US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin

2. Since about 130 million votes were cast in the last presidential election ... More votes were cast in 2016 than in 2012 — but that doesn’t mean turnout was great
....that would translate to about 46.8 million conservatives.



How would you react if a poll of conservatives found that over 9 million of 'em were perfectly fine with killing......slaughtering......any who didn't agree with conservative viewpoints????
Have you ever heard such killings voiced or approved by conservatives?





3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals. Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth




5. Now...how does this amount to the insanity of Democrats/Liberals?

"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




And Bill's wife wanted to increase this by 550%.


And they wonder why they lost the election.

From your link: "
Compared with general public, Muslims more likely to say targeting, killing civilians is never justifiable"

Also, when you follow the link in the article to a further explanation of some of the answers, you get this: "The new question finds that among the general public, Americans with a high school degree or less education are somewhat more likely than those with more education to say there are circumstances in which violence against civilians can be justified. In addition, Republicans and those who lean toward the GOP are more likely than Democrats to say such tactics are sometimes or often justifiable."
5. Terrorism and concerns about extremism

If you're trying to use the responses by Muslims in that poll to paint them as murderous, you're doing a terrible job. Ditto Democrats. If anything, the poll apparently shows that those who lean Republican are the most likely to be "peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em."

View attachment 141667

How many of those in the general public who say violence is justified are progressive liberals?

It would seem that progressives in the general public have no problem threatening or even utilizing violence to justify their ends.

I believe that also is a point here.

*****SMILE*****

That's fine, and I'm not going to argue that riots more often involve conservative-leaning folks than liberals or progressives. I was merely pointing out that PC's contention that Muslims are particularly murderous is not born out by the poll she used as evidence.

Indeed. Judging by the poll she provided, we have less to fear from Muslims than we do conservative nutjobs.

93 Islamists plots against America....how many by conservatives,you dunce?

Depends on how many they can fit in the congressional schedule.

 

[Wry Catcher]

a fifth "would kill any who disagree with their point of view??"

lets look at empirical evidence.....



...a fifth are not killing anyone.

...billions disagree with their point of view.





are you a victim of propoganda...or?

20% is a fifth.

That will become clear to you after you get out of junior high.

cool story bro


where are all these 20%?

hrmmmmm???

boy and his wolf like imagination

3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals.Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream

Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.

1. is it hard for them to find people that disagree with them?

2. than why arent 20% (or anywhere fuggin close) of american muslims in prison yet for murder.


they waiting for the 3rd full moon after the 5th solstice from their 83rd birthday...or? might you me a lil skeered of propoganda??

4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”

When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.

Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth



If we were to put a lens in each of your ears, we'd have a telescope.

If you'd like me to post all 93 Islamist plots that have taken place during Hussein's 8 failed years.....just say so.

"so"

And explain how many of these "plots" were successful and carried out by:

• Native born Americans
• Adults brought to the US as children
• Plots carried out with guns
• Plots by single actors
• Plots by liberals or progressive
• Plots by religious zealots, aka conservatives