ConHog
Rookie
- Jun 4, 2010
- 14,538
- 951
- 0
- Banned
- #201
Not even close to the same thing. The pharmacist is not refusing to serve the customers and will sell them anything else that he CARRIES in his store--he just doesn't want to carry that one product. Maybe there are other drugs that he doesn't carry because he doesn't make any money on them. Should he also be forced to carry them?
It is the same thing: discrimination.
The only reason I support making pharms carrying plan b is because it is an emergency medication. Self righteous pharms should not be a hurdle to citizens in need of immediate medication.
You obviously weren't around in the 60's if you think this is discrimination! Jeez!!!
There are one or two private, one-store pharmacies in my area that have been here since my family would vacation here when I was a child. There are also several of the Rite-Aid, Walgreen, CVS type which have sprung up. And I'm in a small resort town. If the one store pharmacist doesn't want to carry something in his store, I can't imagine trying to force him to do so. To pretend that there are no other options is disingenuous. And for what purpose?
That's what I'm saying. I can't imagine that in 2010 ANYONE lives more than an hour from a Wal Mart, or it's equivalent, you KNOW these people are going to carry this product. Why force Tom the local guy to do so ?
Same thing as the gays wanting in a group which explicitly doesn't want them. It has nothing to do with anything other than forcing their views on other people PERIOD