Phony Scandals R' Us

Edgetho

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2012
15,821
7,076
390
How many laws did Susan Rice break? Any?

Did she lie to Congress? Last I checked, that's felony perjury.

How many others lied to Congress or gave false statements?

Know what the sad thing is?

All they had to do was the 'right' thing. Order some alerts, put some troops in isolation.

Easy, right? Takes no brains to order a few Military Units to the 'ready' position. It's not like they got a night job they gotta get to or anything.

But no. In the name of "POLITICS" they stand down. They do nothing on the off-chance that nobody gets killed (how'd that work out?) and that they can blame it on the exceedingly small and irrelevant protest against some stupid video.

For what? For political reasons.

This is just another reason to hate them, people.

Our People, our men that are in the Country doing a job on the ORDERS of their superiors, were left to die because democrats were afraid that if word of a dust-up got out, through Military channels, that it might cost them a few votes.

Maybe it would have. Who knows? :dunno:

And maybe, an F-18 doing Mach I at 1,000 feet might have scared the terrorists out of Benghazi and those men wouldn't have died.

We'll never know.

But what we do know?

the executive branch of this country is totally and complete corrupt and dishonest

CIA Officer Confirms White House Told No Protests Before Benghazi Terror Attack Prior To Susan Rice Blaming YouTube Video…

mtp_03rice_presgone_140223.video-260x195.jpg


Yes, still a phony scandal.

CIA ignored station chief in Libya when creating talking points on Benghazi - Washington Times

WASHINGTON —Before the Obama administration gave an inaccurate narrative on national television that the Benghazi attacks grew from an anti-American protest, the CIA’s station chief in Libya pointedly told his superiors in Washington that no such demonstration occurred, documents and interviews with current and former intelligence officials show.

The attack was “not an escalation of protests,” the station chief wrote to then-Deputy CIA Director Michael J. Morell in an email dated Sept. 15, 2012 — a full day before the White House sent Susan E. Rice to several Sunday talk shows to disseminate talking points claiming that the Benghazi attack began as a protest over an anti-Islam video.

That the talking points used by Mrs. Rice, who was then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, were written by a CIA that ignored the assessment by its own station chief inside Libya, has emerged as one of the major bones of contention in the more than two years of political fireworks and congressional investigations into the Benghazi attack.

What has never been made public is whether Mr. Morell and others at the CIA explicitly shared the station chief’s assessment with the White House or State Department.

Two former intelligence officials have told The Washington Times that this question likely will be answered at a Wednesday hearing of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence during which Mr. Morell is scheduled to give his public testimony.
 
There was no help in range, and we don't know what triggered the attack, but ALL THE PROTESTS ATTACKS EARLIER THAT SAME DAY WERE DUE TO THE ISLAMIST RUSH LIMBAUGH OF THE ME CALLING FOR PROTEST OF THAT IDIOTIC RW VIDEO...
 
There was no help in range, and we don't know what triggered the attack, but ALL THE PROTESTS ATTACKS EARLIER THAT SAME DAY WERE DUE TO THE ISLAMIST RUSH LIMBAUGH OF THE ME CALLING FOR PROTEST OF THAT IDIOTIC RW VIDEO...

franco for crying out loud the Defense Secretary, you know ol' Leon testified that they knew right away it was a terrorist attack and not a violent protest.

Testified under oath. Stop trying to defend the lies.
 
Splitting hairs is a heck of a basis for a scandal. Obviously it was an act of terror or a terrorist attack, but we don't know the motive. But a terrorist attack by most definition means it was ordered by an international terrorist organisation. So as Hillary said- all spun into a lie of course, "what difference does all your bs make?"- her point was to make it impossible for it to happen again. No money forth coming from Pubs of course...
 
Under oath, he said that's what he said DURING THE ATTACK! Guess what, they learned a few things since. Sorry about your brainwashed bs talking point. When did you become a Pub drone. 1986, with Raygun and Rush? Sure is easier than thinking...
 
Do WHAT, dingbat? You are horribly misinformed.

Lie, cheat, steal, sell guns to gangs, let ambassadors die..

Let's face it, you hold party members above the law - simple as that.

Yup.

Then they vote rapists into the White House and try to tell US that we're the misogynists.

Full Dateline NBC: Juanita Broaddrick on Bill Clinton raping her

https://www.mrctv.org/videos/full-dateline-nbc-juanita-broaddrick-bill-clinton-raping-her

They'd be funny if they weren't so disgusting
 
Last edited:
Do WHAT, dingbat? You are horribly misinformed.

Lie, cheat, steal, sell guns to gangs, let ambassadors die..

Let's face it, you hold party members above the law - simple as that.

Yup.

Then they vote rapists into the White House and try to tell US that we're the misogynists.

Full Dateline NBC: Juanita Broaddrick on Bill Clinton raping her

https://www.mrctv.org/videos/full-dateline-nbc-juanita-broaddrick-bill-clinton-raping-her

They'd be funny if they weren't so disgusting

You just don't seem like a black flash, but I'm no expert.
 
Splitting hairs is a heck of a basis for a scandal. Obviously it was an act of terror or a terrorist attack, but we don't know the motive. But a terrorist attack by most definition means it was ordered by an international terrorist organisation. So as Hillary said- all spun into a lie of course, "what difference does all your bs make?"- her point was to make it impossible for it to happen again. No money forth coming from Pubs of course...

Why not?
 
Edgetho, no one was told to "stand down."

That was simply not true and has been thoroughly debunked.

According to testimony, Rear Adm. Brian L. Losey, the Africa commander, told Gibson to remain in Tripoli to defend Americans there. In addition, six U.S. security personnel were already en route to Benghazi on a chartered Libyan aircraft to evacuate Americans. The plane with the evacuees on a return flight to Tripoli would have crossed paths with Gibson and three others if they had left for Benghazi.

In committee interviews, Rep. Martha Roby, R-Ala., asked Gibson whether he agreed that his team was ordered to stand down.

"I was not ordered to stand down," Gibson testified. "I was ordered to remain in place. 'Stand down' implies that we cease all operations, cease all activities. We continued to support the team that was in Tripoli."

The committee in its February report said "there was no 'stand down' order issued to U.S. military personnel in Tripoli who sought to join the fight in Benghazi." A separate, bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee in January said allegations that the military or intelligence community prevented "the mounting of any military relief effort during the attacks" were unsubstantiated.

Dempsey, in testimony to the Senate last June, said, "They weren't told to stand down. A 'stand down' means don't do anything. They were told that the mission they were asked to perform was not in Benghazi, but was at Tripoli airport."

House GOP pursues Benghazi 'stand down' probe | Politics | The Seattle Times
 
Perhaps we don't know for a reason. Perhaps it is because the President and his minions insist on calling it a "phony" scandal and squash any serious inquiry. Hmmmmmm?
 
Ahh yes, the Benghazi-Truthers strikes another blow for impeachment.


Say, how's that impeachment going anyway?
 

Forum List

Back
Top