- Jan 19, 2010
- 70,319
- 65,805
- 3,605
Holyfuckingshit!
Your "interpretation" IS your "opinion."
You have a serious brain malfunction.
And by "hairsplitting," you mean correcting your bullshit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Holyfuckingshit!
Your "interpretation" IS your "opinion."
You have a serious brain malfunction.
And by "hairsplitting," you mean correcting your bullshit.
If you served then you would understand that you are required to respect the position / rank, not the man. You demonstrate you learned disloyalty and sedition is ok if you do not like the man or his leadership style ... or if he does not agree with you.President in name only....I know it's silly.What the heck is PINO? An acronym?
Thank you. Silly, but it fits. Trump is not a leader, unless one believes the first lemming jumping off the cliff into the sea is a leader.
During my career I worked for several chiefs, and I learned about leadership but not from them. Each in their own way blamed others for problems, and when faced with making a decision they uniformly asked "how will this effect me".
Real leaders listen to others and take the heat for a FU, and give credit to those when the change is successful. Which does not describe Trump, he is an empty suit.
The level of disrespect and sedition being shown the President is unacceptable / despicable.
You are truly fucking brain-dead.In other words, the court can declare him guilty even though he accepts the pardon.Wrong, moron. That isn't what the ruling says.As was quoted, a person has to ascend to a pardon. To use it to declare themselves free of the consequences of their crime. If they want to declare their innocence, they have to reject the pardon, which is a declaratory statement they committed a crime, but are being absolved of it's consequences.
It is admitted, that he may avail himself of it, at any time, by plea, before or after verdict or confession. But is insisted, that unless he pleads it, or in some way claims its benefit, thereby denoting his acceptance of the proffered grace, the court cannot notice it, nor allow it to prevent them from passing sentence.
Stick to carpentry, you stink at law. Or understanding english.No court can declare anyone guilty of a crime for which they've been pardoned.
I interpreted your post, cockroach. That isn't my opinion.
If you served then you know respect must be shown for the rank of the person. Did you not salute officers you did not know? Respect once came with the position but there are so many people that do not respect themselves enough to respect others.RESPECT is earned. I did serve, and experienced the good, the bad and the ugly. Some people do not lead, some know not how, some are naturals. Trump, being a clinical narcissist with megalomania is the worst of the ugly.
How much respect did you have for President Obama or President Clinton?
You are truly fucking brain-dead.In other words, the court can declare him guilty even though he accepts the pardon.Wrong, moron. That isn't what the ruling says.
It is admitted, that he may avail himself of it, at any time, by plea, before or after verdict or confession. But is insisted, that unless he pleads it, or in some way claims its benefit, thereby denoting his acceptance of the proffered grace, the court cannot notice it, nor allow it to prevent them from passing sentence.
Stick to carpentry, you stink at law. Or understanding english.No court can declare anyone guilty of a crime for which they've been pardoned.
I interpreted your post, cockroach. That isn't my opinion.
LOL you sure are stupid. What is it if not your opinion? An Aardvark?
Again, IF you served you would have known - or should have known - that the POSITION is always respected. just because you did not like your leader's leadership[ style did not give you the right to ignore his orders. THAT would / could have ended up with your courts martial.RESPECT is earned. I did serve, and experienced the good, the bad and the ugly. Some people do not lead, some know not how, some are naturals. Trump, being a clinical narcissist with megalomania is the worst of the ugly.
How much respect did you have for President Obama or President Clinton?
If you served then you know respect must be shown for the rank of the person. Did you not salute officers you did not know? Respect once came with the position but there are so many people that do not respect themselves enough to respect others.RESPECT is earned. I did serve, and experienced the good, the bad and the ugly. Some people do not lead, some know not how, some are naturals. Trump, being a clinical narcissist with megalomania is the worst of the ugly.
How much respect did you have for President Obama or President Clinton?
So you alone are the judge of each officer? You are the one that decides if respect is deserved? I think not. The title earned, the office of is what deserves respect and yet you give none to the president of the united states. All because your side lost. Now that is definitely not respectful."By your leave Sir"; "Aye-aye Sir"; "Aye, Sir, coming to one-four-zero, sir"
Yep. respect for the authority, I knew it well and most of the officers I worked for both deserved it and earned it.
It's my understanding of what you posted, cockroach.You are truly fucking brain-dead.In other words, the court can declare him guilty even though he accepts the pardon.Wrong, moron. That isn't what the ruling says.
It is admitted, that he may avail himself of it, at any time, by plea, before or after verdict or confession. But is insisted, that unless he pleads it, or in some way claims its benefit, thereby denoting his acceptance of the proffered grace, the court cannot notice it, nor allow it to prevent them from passing sentence.
Stick to carpentry, you stink at law. Or understanding english.No court can declare anyone guilty of a crime for which they've been pardoned.
I interpreted your post, cockroach. That isn't my opinion.
LOL you sure are stupid. What is it if not your opinion? An Aardvark?
Every snowflake thread is bullshit. What else do they have aside from bullshit?Arpaio is Hispanic. he was a victim of a far left judge. Obama pardoned dozens of murderers and terrorists. There is no comparison. This thread is bullshit.
Spits the rightard who started a bullshit thread about a photo of the KKK marching at the 1924 DNC which wasn't actually from the 1924 DNC.Every snowflake thread is bullshit. What else do they have aside from bullshit?Arpaio is Hispanic. he was a victim of a far left judge. Obama pardoned dozens of murderers and terrorists. There is no comparison. This thread is bullshit.
Keep flogging your dead horse, cockroach.Spits the rightard who started a bullshit thread about a photo of the KKK marching at the 1924 DNC which wasn't actually from the 1924 DNC.Every snowflake thread is bullshit. What else do they have aside from bullshit?Arpaio is Hispanic. he was a victim of a far left judge. Obama pardoned dozens of murderers and terrorists. There is no comparison. This thread is bullshit.
![]()
Pointing out how you do what you accuse others of doing is beating a dead horse?Keep flogging your dead horse, cockroach.Spits the rightard who started a bullshit thread about a photo of the KKK marching at the 1924 DNC which wasn't actually from the 1924 DNC.Every snowflake thread is bullshit. What else do they have aside from bullshit?Arpaio is Hispanic. he was a victim of a far left judge. Obama pardoned dozens of murderers and terrorists. There is no comparison. This thread is bullshit.
![]()
what did you expect a president to do in the wake of a hurricane exactly? please explain.can't make up this much stupid I swear.As a #4 hurricane bears down on Texas, Trump tweets this.
If they are pulled over for a violation, they have to produce a license. Your belief that the cops were pulling over people at random is totally unsubstantiated at this point.I believe Arpaio had a reason to stop them in every case. When they couldn't speak English and couldn't produce a license, their immigration status was checked.It's idiotic to accuse him of "targeting" Hispanics. Who else would he be suspected of being an illegal alien in AZ?Yes he did. He targeted Hispanics. There are many Hispanics in this country that are American citizens. The only thing that is made up is what you say.
You are not allowed to target Hispanics and see their papers just because you want to see them. There has to be a reason for stopping them. Their 4th amendment rights were violated..
They don't have to produce a license. Unless they are committing a crime, he has no right to ask. That is a violation of the 4th Amendment as conservative Justin Amash pointed out.
Nothing was made up. You cannot ask someone for their papers based of their ethnicity. Their constitutional rights were violated. Even conservatives like Justin Amash agree.
That's what was made up. He didn't ask them for their papers based on their ethnicity. The judge made that up. Illegals have no constitutional rights and no American Citizens rights were violated. that was fabricated by a corrupt judge.
Yes he did. He targeted Hispanics. There are many Hispanics in this country that are American citizens. The only thing that is made up is what you say.
No dumbass, he did not. That was made up entirely by his accusors. There is absolutely zero evidence he did anything like that at all.
There is plenty of evidence. You Nazis just don't want to see it. Arpaio even bragged about it and said he was above the law.
You just continue to make shit up. Doesn't matter really. The majority of Americans know the truth and you left wing nutters are a vast minority.