Planned Parenthood caught trafficking in human body parts

[JoeB131]

Josef Mengele and Margaret Sanger would be so proud of PP.

Yawn, guy.

I'll take your concern about Fetuses more seriously when you actually start showing concern for kids that have been born beyond "Let them starve".

 

[gipper]

Josef Mengele and Margaret Sanger would be so proud of PP.

Yawn, guy.

I'll take your concern about Fetuses more seriously when you actually start showing concern for kids that have been born beyond "Let them starve".

Another idiotic post from an idiot...straight out of the PP handbook.

Do you ever tire of posting left wing cliches?

Nothing wrong with killing babies and selling their body parts...in the small minds of leftists.

 

[JoeB131]

Another idiotic post from an idiot...straight out of the PP handbook.

Do you ever tire of posting left wing cliches?

Nothing wrong with killing babies and selling their body parts...in the small minds of leftists.

Except no one is selling anything and fetuses aren't "babies".

It's only a baby if you want it. It's "That thing I need to take care of on Tuesday" if you don't.

 

[Jroc]

Josef Mengele and Margaret Sanger would be so proud of PP.

Yawn, guy.

I'll take your concern about Fetuses more seriously when you actually start showing concern for kids that have been born beyond "Let them starve".

there are no kids starving in this country boy. Why do we continually ship in poor people form other countries as you leftist push to slaughter our on own?

 

[JoeB131]

there are no kids starving in this country boy. Why do we continually ship in poor people form other countries as you leftist push to slaughter our on own?

Not that I really expect to have a conversation with you, Roid Rage, but here's the thing.

I would LOVE to reduce the number of abortions. But you do that by having more social programs, not less. France has universal health care, paid family leave, and even civil servants who help new parents with chores for the first few months. they have only 40% of the abortions we have, per capita, even though the government pays for abortions for the first 12 weeks.

But, um, yeah, there really are kids starving in the United States.

Child Hunger Poverty Fact Sheet Feeding America

Food Insecurity

• 15.8 million children lived in food-insecure households in 2013.
  [*]Twenty percent or more of the child population in 38 states and D.C. lived in food-insecure households in 2013, according to the most recent data available. The District of Columbia (31%) and Mississippi (29%) had the highest rates of children in households without consistent access to food.[ii]
  [*]In 2013, the top five states with the highest rate of food-insecure children under 18 were D.C., Mississippi, Arkansas, New Mexico, and Georgia.[iii]
  [*]In 2013, the top five states with the lowest rate of food-insecure children under 18 were North Dakota, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Massachusetts, and Virginia.[iv]
  

 

[Jroc]

there are no kids starving in this country boy. Why do we continually ship in poor people form other countries as you leftist push to slaughter our on own?

Not that I really expect to have a conversation with you, Roid Rage, but here's the thing.

I would LOVE to reduce the number of abortions. But you do that by having more social programs, not less. France has universal health care, paid family leave, and even civil servants who help new parents with chores for the first few months. they have only 40% of the abortions we have, per capita, even though the government pays for abortions for the first 12 weeks.

But, um, yeah, there really are kids starving in the United States.

Child Hunger Poverty Fact Sheet Feeding America

Food Insecurity

• 15.8 million children lived in food-insecure households in 2013.
  [*]Twenty percent or more of the child population in 38 states and D.C. lived in food-insecure households in 2013, according to the most recent data available. The District of Columbia (31%) and Mississippi (29%) had the highest rates of children in households without consistent access to food.[ii]
  [*]In 2013, the top five states with the highest rate of food-insecure children under 18 were D.C., Mississippi, Arkansas, New Mexico, and Georgia.[iii]
  [*]In 2013, the top five states with the lowest rate of food-insecure children under 18 were North Dakota, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Massachusetts, and Virginia.[iv]

Please.... With all the government program food stamps no kids are starving.Do you find it funny Washington D.C. is on the list while it is the riches area of the country?, as they are wasting tax payers money on their corny bullshit? but you want more of it. Kids dont starve here sorry fraud

 

[hadit]

Some people are more opposed to using animals for research than they are about using unborn humans.

There's no such thing as an "unborn human".

And, yes, animal research is cruel because it often subjects the animal to extended pain, with no real benefit. (what works on an animal won't necessarily work on a person.)

Just what IS growing in a pregnant woman, a zebra?

 

[FA_Q2]

there are no kids starving in this country boy. Why do we continually ship in poor people form other countries as you leftist push to slaughter our on own?

Not that I really expect to have a conversation with you, Roid Rage, but here's the thing.

I would LOVE to reduce the number of abortions. But you do that by having more social programs, not less. France has universal health care, paid family leave, and even civil servants who help new parents with chores for the first few months. they have only 40% of the abortions we have, per capita, even though the government pays for abortions for the first 12 weeks.

But, um, yeah, there really are kids starving in the United States.

Child Hunger Poverty Fact Sheet Feeding America

Food Insecurity

• 15.8 million children lived in food-insecure households in 2013.
  [*]Twenty percent or more of the child population in 38 states and D.C. lived in food-insecure households in 2013, according to the most recent data available. The District of Columbia (31%) and Mississippi (29%) had the highest rates of children in households without consistent access to food.[ii]
  [*]In 2013, the top five states with the highest rate of food-insecure children under 18 were D.C., Mississippi, Arkansas, New Mexico, and Georgia.[iii]
  [*]In 2013, the top five states with the lowest rate of food-insecure children under 18 were North Dakota, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Massachusetts, and Virginia.[iv]

Please.... With all the government program food stamps no kids are starving.Do you find it funny Washington D.C. is on the list while it is the riches area of the country?, as they are wasting tax payers money on their corny bullshit? but you want more of it. Kids dont starve here sorry fraud

That is why the new term 'food insecurity' was invented. Food is available everywhere but to ensure the numbers reflect what they need them to (justification for the bureaucratic nightmare) food insecurity was created rather than hunger. Interestingly enough, those food insecure households have rather high rates of obesity.

Because, you know, racism or some such according to the resident idiot - joe. Couldn't be poor decision making.

 

[sakinago]

Congrats, guy, you managed to hit the all the high points of the Talk Radio Retard theme song...

Stop corporate welfare, which Obama does more than bush. Ever hear of stimulus, bailouts, solindra?

i think your whining about Solyndra would be great if you could spell the name of the company and knew the facts. Like the payments to that group of companies were 1) designed with the expectation some would fail, 2) Collectively actually realized a profit for the government as the companies that did work out paid back their grants with interest.

And there's another form of corporate welfare that comes in the form of regulation.

yeah, we should let the MARKET decide whether big corporations poison us or not.

The means test for social security I can see, but then it just becomes welfare essentially, especially when you pay a piss ton in your whole life with the expectation of getting some back in the end. But I could see that.

Yes, it essentially becomes welfare. If you live to be 72, you get everything you paid into back. But there's no good reason to pay rich people social security. They don't need it.

And there is a tonof ridiculous spending going on in the govt, half a mill on giving rabbits Swedish massages, couple mill euthanizing endangered turtles, swat team for the dept of education and any other govt program that does not need one.

Yes, all the other things that they misrepresent... I'm surprised you didn't include the mythical treadmills for shrimp that never happened.

And there needs to be a flat tax, get this stupid loophole filled code out if there. If your for profit, you pay up

no, we don't need yet another scheme to give tax cuts tot he rich. The rich need to pay their fair share.

Congrats, guy, you managed to hit the all the high points of the Talk Radio Retard theme song...

Stop corporate welfare, which Obama does more than bush. Ever hear of stimulus, bailouts, solindra?

i think your whining about Solyndra would be great if you could spell the name of the company and knew the facts. Like the payments to that group of companies were 1) designed with the expectation some would fail, 2) Collectively actually realized a profit for the government as the companies that did work out paid back their grants with interest.

And there's another form of corporate welfare that comes in the form of regulation.

yeah, we should let the MARKET decide whether big corporations poison us or not.

The means test for social security I can see, but then it just becomes welfare essentially, especially when you pay a piss ton in your whole life with the expectation of getting some back in the end. But I could see that.

Yes, it essentially becomes welfare. If you live to be 72, you get everything you paid into back. But there's no good reason to pay rich people social security. They don't need it.

And there is a tonof ridiculous spending going on in the govt, half a mill on giving rabbits Swedish massages, couple mill euthanizing endangered turtles, swat team for the dept of education and any other govt program that does not need one.

Yes, all the other things that they misrepresent... I'm surprised you didn't include the mythical treadmills for shrimp that never happened.

And there needs to be a flat tax, get this stupid loophole filled code out if there. If your for profit, you pay up

no, we don't need yet another scheme to give tax cuts tot he rich. The rich need to pay their fair share.

Haha coming from the party that invented talking points and fake arguments. I'm sorry but you are not capable of objectivity, so I'll try a different tact. What is your definition of rich, and what is your definition of "fair share" ? Fair share by the way most definitely a buzz word coming from the guy slinging accusations of talking points, and that one party hates the blacks and poor, and especially the poor blacks. And that picture you posted, I assume that's from the deflationary Great Depression? And if so I'll quote a guy who saw it coming 10 years earlier with the rise of progressive policies.

And the gods of the market tumbled, and their smooth tongue wizards withdrew, and the hearts of the meanest we're humbled, and began to believe it was true, that not all is gold that glitters, and 2 and 2 make 4, and the gods of the copybook headings, limped up to explain it once more, as it was in the beginning, so it will in the end, there are only 4 things certain, since social progress began, that the dog returns to his vomit, and the sower returns to her mire, and the burnt fools bandaged finger, goes wobbling back to the fire, and that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins, where all men are paid for existing, and no man must pay for his sins, as surely as water will wet us, and as surely as fire will burn, the gods of the copybook headings, with terror and slaughter return.

 

[BlueGin]

Hit the nail on the head.

They think that people do not deserve to be put through the trouble of actually managing the resources that they use. You, on the other hand, just have to deal.

It is asinine.

Another Clueless White Person heard from.

Hey, guy, it's kind of hard to "manage" your shopping when you don't have a car, and the only store that is selling groceries is run by immigrants who sell expired food at exorbitant prices. That's why those stores are always the first to get looted and burned when there's a riot like we see in LA or Ferguson.

The big chain stores don't put branches in these neighborhoods.

CVS did and they burned it down

 

[JoeB131]

Please.... With all the government program food stamps no kids are starving.Do you find it funny Washington D.C. is on the list while it is the riches area of the country?, as they are wasting tax payers money on their corny bullshit? but you want more of it. Kids dont starve here sorry fraud

No, I don't want to waste tax dollars. I'd be happy to take the Billions we are spending propping up Socialism in the Zionist Entity and spend it feeding poor kids in this country.

"All the government food stamps" (they stopped using stamps year ago) comes out to about $1.47 per person per meal.

 

[JoeB131]

Haha coming from the party that invented talking points and fake arguments. I'm sorry but you are not capable of objectivity, so I'll try a different tact. What is your definition of rich, and what is your definition of "fair share" ?

Rich- Anyone making over $250,000.

Fair Share- What they were paying before Reagan fucked up the Tax Code.

That was easy.

 

[Care4all]

That's not the point, and I said that's the current deficit. Still doesn't stop the point that the government is highly inefficient, and only growing it's inefficiency. You want to really help the people your talking about, then get on board with streamlining govt.

I could think of much better ways to "Streamline" government than taking food out of the mouths of poor children.

Let's start with defense. Withdraw all our troops out of every country in the world unless those countries want to pay us for them being there.

Then let's stop giving out Corporate Welfare and huge tax breaks to the rich. Obama rolled back Bush's tax giveaways to the Rich and the Deficit was cut in half.

We could also means-test social security and Medicare. If you have a pension and a 401K paying you a huge amount of money, you don't need social security.

Ahh some common ground, yes get those troops out, make the other NATO nations spend as much as they are required to for their own defense instead of relying on us. Also don't give billions of dollars to countries who openly hate us, or are just bad dictators and people. Stop propping them up.

Stop corporate welfare, which Obama does more than bush. Ever hear of stimulus, bailouts, solindra? And there's another form of corporate welfare that comes in the form of regulation. Where only the big dogs can afford to operate, like Dodd frank. Or laws that make citizens pay for things with out choice, ACA, the common core tests (which those companies are making billions), etc. And remember Obama added what like 67 new lobbyist. And deficit did not get cut in half if it went up more than all the previous presidents combined. We lost our shit when it went up to 6 trillion with bush.

The means test for social security I can see, but then it just becomes welfare essentially, especially when you pay a piss ton in your whole life with the expectation of getting some back in the end. But I could see that.

And there is a tonof ridiculous spending going on in the govt, half a mill on giving rabbits Swedish massages, couple mill euthanizing endangered turtles, swat team for the dept of education and any other govt program that does not need one.

And there needs to be a flat tax, get this stupid loophole filled code out if there. If your for profit, you pay up

Boy oh boy are YOU way off base with your propaganda.....Sheesh!!!! Just downright lies or misinformation from lying right wing media that YOU CHOSE to believe without verifying your sources....

President Obama did cut the deficit in half.....actually...more than half from Bush's last fiscal year of responsibility.... and saying Bush was less of a corporate shill than Obama is ANOTHER mistake.with no actual facts to support such foolish talk.....etc etc etc etc etc.....be careful, double check what you think you know before spouting lies and right wing propaganda, then on real issues you could have more clout or respect...when debating imo.

 

[sakinago]

Haha coming from the party that invented talking points and fake arguments. I'm sorry but you are not capable of objectivity, so I'll try a different tact. What is your definition of rich, and what is your definition of "fair share" ?

Rich- Anyone making over $250,000.

Fair Share- What they were paying before Reagan fucked up the Tax Code.

That was easy.

Our tax code has been f'd up since way before Reagan, actually right around the time of WWI I believe. But, anyway I assume you believe they should be taxed just shy of 50% for personal, and like 57 % corporate?

 

[Vigilante]

Back on topic....

 

[sakinago]

That's not the point, and I said that's the current deficit. Still doesn't stop the point that the government is highly inefficient, and only growing it's inefficiency. You want to really help the people your talking about, then get on board with streamlining govt.

I could think of much better ways to "Streamline" government than taking food out of the mouths of poor children.

Let's start with defense. Withdraw all our troops out of every country in the world unless those countries want to pay us for them being there.

Then let's stop giving out Corporate Welfare and huge tax breaks to the rich. Obama rolled back Bush's tax giveaways to the Rich and the Deficit was cut in half.

We could also means-test social security and Medicare. If you have a pension and a 401K paying you a huge amount of money, you don't need social security.

Ahh some common ground, yes get those troops out, make the other NATO nations spend as much as they are required to for their own defense instead of relying on us. Also don't give billions of dollars to countries who openly hate us, or are just bad dictators and people. Stop propping them up.

Stop corporate welfare, which Obama does more than bush. Ever hear of stimulus, bailouts, solindra? And there's another form of corporate welfare that comes in the form of regulation. Where only the big dogs can afford to operate, like Dodd frank. Or laws that make citizens pay for things with out choice, ACA, the common core tests (which those companies are making billions), etc. And remember Obama added what like 67 new lobbyist. And deficit did not get cut in half if it went up more than all the previous presidents combined. We lost our shit when it went up to 6 trillion with bush.

The means test for social security I can see, but then it just becomes welfare essentially, especially when you pay a piss ton in your whole life with the expectation of getting some back in the end. But I could see that.

And there is a tonof ridiculous spending going on in the govt, half a mill on giving rabbits Swedish massages, couple mill euthanizing endangered turtles, swat team for the dept of education and any other govt program that does not need one.

And there needs to be a flat tax, get this stupid loophole filled code out if there. If your for profit, you pay up

Boy oh boy are YOU way off base with your propaganda.....Sheesh!!!! Just downright lies or misinformation from lying right wing media that YOU CHOSE to believe without verifying your sources....

President Obama did cut the deficit in half.....actually...more than half from Bush's last fiscal year of responsibility.... and saying Bush was less of a corporate shill than Obama is ANOTHER mistake.with no actual facts to support such foolish talk.....etc etc etc etc etc.....be careful, double check what you think you know before spouting lies and right wing propaganda, then on real issues you could have more clout or respect...when debating imo.

Ok I'll be more specific with my words, since any wrong word you can find, you will jump all over, ignoring my main point. Main point being DEBT is still skyrocketing despite record highs in tax revenue. So do we still think govt has a revenue problem? How can that be possible since we have highs in revenue? No they have a spending problem. You can try to blame it wartime spending, but is that really the case when homeland security alone has purchased enough ammo to fund the Iraq war at it's height for decades? And I believe AT LEAST 90% of those over are paying around 43% in tax. I don't consider those 250,000 the big guy at all, they are the small business owner/where most Americans find their employment. And what's happening to the labor force??? Can't ignore that stat, even if your in charge. The rich keep getting richer , just like in the early days of the industrial era, where you can only get richer like that through the help of power. Which was my earlier point that regulation is another form of corporate welfare, where the smart lobbyist from big bis push for it, not against. Giving the growing little guy not enough resources, like teams of lawyers, time, "proper equipment", or manpower for the useless menial jobs. Ever try to do a state contract in anything, they're fubar. My dad owns a construction company, and my bro owns a paving company, and I could give y'all so many stupid regulations there are that make contracts cost 3 times more than they should.

 

[skookerasbil]

That's not the point, and I said that's the current deficit. Still doesn't stop the point that the government is highly inefficient, and only growing it's inefficiency. You want to really help the people your talking about, then get on board with streamlining govt.

I could think of much better ways to "Streamline" government than taking food out of the mouths of poor children.

Let's start with defense. Withdraw all our troops out of every country in the world unless those countries want to pay us for them being there.

Then let's stop giving out Corporate Welfare and huge tax breaks to the rich. Obama rolled back Bush's tax giveaways to the Rich and the Deficit was cut in half.

We could also means-test social security and Medicare. If you have a pension and a 401K paying you a huge amount of money, you don't need social security.

Ahh some common ground, yes get those troops out, make the other NATO nations spend as much as they are required to for their own defense instead of relying on us. Also don't give billions of dollars to countries who openly hate us, or are just bad dictators and people. Stop propping them up.

Stop corporate welfare, which Obama does more than bush. Ever hear of stimulus, bailouts, solindra? And there's another form of corporate welfare that comes in the form of regulation. Where only the big dogs can afford to operate, like Dodd frank. Or laws that make citizens pay for things with out choice, ACA, the common core tests (which those companies are making billions), etc. And remember Obama added what like 67 new lobbyist. And deficit did not get cut in half if it went up more than all the previous presidents combined. We lost our shit when it went up to 6 trillion with bush.

The means test for social security I can see, but then it just becomes welfare essentially, especially when you pay a piss ton in your whole life with the expectation of getting some back in the end. But I could see that.

And there is a tonof ridiculous spending going on in the govt, half a mill on giving rabbits Swedish massages, couple mill euthanizing endangered turtles, swat team for the dept of education and any other govt program that does not need one.

And there needs to be a flat tax, get this stupid loophole filled code out if there. If your for profit, you pay up

....

President Obama did cut the deficit in half.....actually...more than half from Bush's last fiscal year of responsibility.... .

lol.....to progressives, shining shit is a virtue!!!

This analogy is like saying, "Well.........now that 3 out of 4 goiters have been removed from her face, she';s gorgeous!!!"

 

[skookerasbil]

Its pretty simple........those who support this PP stuff are human POS's. Fucking ghouls!! Please remember to give me a buzz so I can be there at your deathbed as you check out.........so I can give you the big smile and thumbs up!!

 

[aris2chat]

Its pretty simple........those who support this PP stuff are human POS's. Fucking ghouls!! Please remember to give me a buzz so I can be there at your deathbed as you check out.........so I can give you the big smile and thumbs up!!

You might not like it but PP did not commit a crime. It is not illegal to use tissue for research. They can charge a price for the expenses and did not 'profit' from the transfer of tissue.

Get rid of PP and every doctor and OB/GYN will have to take on the performance of education and abortions. It is a woman's right to choose under the law. Women are not slaves. I'd rather see personal doctors required to carry out abortions than a handful of distant clinics, I also think they should be covered in full by 'all' medical insurance.........and all tissue should be turned over to labs.

 

[skookerasbil]

Its pretty simple........those who support this PP stuff are human POS's. Fucking ghouls!! Please remember to give me a buzz so I can be there at your deathbed as you check out.........so I can give you the big smile and thumbs up!!

You might not like it but PP did not commit a crime. It is not illegal to use tissue for research. They can charge a price for the expenses and did not 'profit' from the transfer of tissue.

Get rid of PP and every doctor and OB/GYN will have to take on the performance of education and abortions. It is a woman's right to choose under the law. Women are not slaves. I'd rather see personal doctors required to carry out abortions than a handful of distant clinics, I also think they should be covered in full by 'all' medical insurance.........and all tissue should be turned over to labs.

Of course..........all feminist bulldogs possess morality levels of a small soap dish. The level of selfish is astounding.

PP? Fine.....but not with taxpayer dollars to fund these morticians.


Lastly and most importantly..........keep the legs closed if you're a pseudo-human!!!