By the way, the Boston Globe has since corrected its math: The test found that she might be somewhere between 1/64th and 1/1,024th (!) "Native American," the definition of which included Mexican, Colombian and Peruvian DNA as a "stand in." Yes, really. Science says that she may actually be less Native American than the average white American:
Bullshit.
Here's what the report actually says:
>> For Native American references, we used samples within the 1000 Genomes project of Native American ancestry; these samples come from Mexico, Peru and Colombia. (It is not possible to use Native American reference sequences from inside the United States, since Native American groups within the US have not chosen to participate in recent population genetics studies.) <<
--- that in no way means "she may actually be less Native American than the average white American". It means the opposite.
The report also says,
>> Because available samples do not provide complete coverage of all Native American groups, some segments with Native American ancestry may be missed. In addition, it is not possible to reliably associate smaller segments having Native American ancestry with any specific tribe or group. <<
Commissioned and paid for fake results , no doubt!
Also impossible since the report also says ---- right at the top, LITERALLY the first thing it says:
>> To analyze genetic data from an individual of European descent and determine if there is reliable
evidence of Native American and/or African ancestry. The identity of the sample donor, Elizabeth Warren, was not known to the analyst during the time the work was performed. <<
So what's it going to take for you Rump-pologists to break down and admit you and Rump were full of shit the whole time? Does Rump have to give you a cue before you obediently follow? Because this "damned if she does, damned if she doesn't" bullshit ain't selling for shit.